IELTS Speaking Part 2

A Person You Know Who Encourages People to Look After the Natural World

Most recently asked in May–Aug 2026

The cue card

Describe a person you know about who encourages people to look after the natural world (e.g. plants, animals, insects and so on)

You should say:

  • What you know about this person
  • How this person encourages people to look after the natural world
  • How long this person has been doing this

Sample answers: Band 6.5, 7.0 & 7.5

Three versions of the same answer, each written to sit genuinely at that band — compare them to see exactly what separates the scores.

Band 6.5

The answer describes Thảo's beach clean-ups in short, plain sentences with a simple contrast ('but now the beach is often covered in plastic rubbish') and a directly stated closing observation.

The person I want to talk about is Thảo, a colleague of mine at the design studio where I work in Da Nang. She is a few years older than me, and she is very passionate about the ocean and about keeping our beaches clean.

What I know about her is that she grew up near My Khe Beach, and she says she used to swim there every summer as a child, but now the beach is often covered in plastic rubbish. That's why she decided to do something about it.

She encourages people mostly by organising a beach clean-up once a month. She posts about it on Zalo and invites anyone from the office who wants to join, and usually about ten or fifteen of us go along on a Sunday morning. She also brings extra gloves and bags for people who forget theirs, and she always takes photos to post afterwards, which encourages even more people to come next time.

She has been doing this for about three years now, since she came back from a trip where she saw how dirty some beaches had become. I think she is a really good example of someone who doesn't just complain about a problem but actually does something small and regular about it, and that inspires the rest of us at the office too.

225 words · about 2 minutes

Why this band

  • LRThe person I want to talk about is Thảo, a colleague of mine at the design studioThe opening uses the most standard, formulaic Part 2 framing available — 'The person I want to talk about is' — followed by plain factual details ('a colleague of mine at the design studio') with no attempt at a more creative or varied way in. That directness and predictability is exactly what the Band 6.5 lexical target calls for: 'everyday, high-frequency words' with 'at most one slightly less-common word,' avoiding the more inventive opening a 7.5 answer might use. The plainness here isn't a weakness at this level — it communicates the required information clearly and gets the answer moving without any wasted effort on style.
  • GRAshe used to swim there every summer as a child, but now the beach is often covered in plastic rubbishThe sentence uses the most basic contrastive connector available, 'but,' to join a past-habit clause ('used to swim') with a present-state clause ('is often covered'), accurate and clear but the simplest possible way to express this kind of before-and-after contrast. A 7.5 answer covering the same idea might use a more compressed or figurative structure, but the Band 6.5 grammar target explicitly asks for exactly this — 'mostly simple sentences plus a few basic complex ones' — so the plain 'but' contrast hits the target rather than falling short of it. The contrast itself is also doing real work, since it's the reason given for why Thảo decided to act.
  • FCwho doesn't just complain about a problem but actually does something small and regular about itThe relative clause states its point directly — action over complaint — using everyday vocabulary and a straightforward 'not just X but Y' pattern, without building toward a more layered or figurative reflection the way a higher-band answer might. That plain, clearly stated evaluation is appropriate for Band 6.5, where the fluency target asks only that the answer stay on topic with 'one clear reason or example,' not the fuller evaluative development expected at 7.5. The observation is still a genuine piece of reasoning rather than pure description, which is what keeps the answer functioning well within its target band.
Band 7.0

The answer develops the reasons for Trang's activism with a comfortable relative clause and the natural collocation 'rubbed off on,' sounding fluent and coherent without especially unusual vocabulary.

The person I'd like to talk about is Trang, a colleague of mine at the company where I work in Da Nang. She's a bit older than me, and she cares a lot about the ocean, particularly about keeping the local beaches clean.

What I know about her is that she grew up close to My Khe Beach and used to swim there constantly as a child, but over the years she noticed it becoming more and more covered in rubbish, especially plastic, which is apparently what pushed her to actually do something about it rather than just complain.

The way she encourages people is mainly by organising a beach clean-up once a month. She posts about it in our office chat group and invites anyone who's free to join her, and usually somewhere between ten and fifteen of us turn up on a Sunday morning. She always brings a few spare bags and gloves for anyone who forgets theirs, and she takes photos afterwards to share online, which seems to genuinely encourage more people to show up the following month.

She's been doing this for roughly three years now, ever since a trip where she saw firsthand how badly littered some other beaches had become compared to what she remembered. I think what makes her a good example is that she doesn't just talk about the problem in a general way — she does something small but consistent about it, month after month, and that steady effort has honestly rubbed off on quite a few of us at the office who probably wouldn't have bothered otherwise.

267 words · about 2 minutes

Why this band

  • GRAwhich is apparently what pushed her to actually do something about it rather than just complainThe "which" clause refers back to the whole preceding idea (noticing the beach get dirtier) and explains its consequence, while the hedge "apparently" signals this is inferred rather than confirmed fact -- a natural, accurate way of speculating about someone else's motivation without overclaiming, consistent with Band 7.0's comfortable-but-not-showy grammar range. The "rather than just complain" contrast also adds a small evaluative edge to an otherwise descriptive clause.
  • LRShe always brings a few spare bags and gloves for anyone who forgets theirs"Spare bags and gloves" uses the everyday adjective "spare" precisely, meaning extra and kept in reserve, rather than a vaguer phrase like "some more bags," giving a small, concrete detail about Trang's preparedness. This is natural, unforced vocabulary that stays common enough for Band 7.0 while still being more specific than the plainest possible wording.
  • FCever since a trip where she saw firsthand how badly littered some other beaches had become compared to what she rememberedThe comparative structure ("how badly... compared to what she remembered") packs a before-and-after contrast into a single relative clause, giving a specific origin story for Trang's motivation rather than a vague "she cares about the environment" -- this kind of reason-with-concrete-detail development in one flowing sentence is what the Band 7.0 fluency and coherence target means by developing an answer "with a reason and one short concrete example."
  • LRthat steady effort has honestly rubbed off on quite a few of us at the office who probably wouldn't have bothered otherwise"Rubbed off on" is an idiomatic collocation for influence spreading informally from one person to others, more vivid than a plain equivalent like "influenced," and the added relative clause ("who probably wouldn't have bothered otherwise") specifies the counterfactual impact. This single well-chosen collocation plus natural spoken hedges ("honestly," "probably") is the Band 7.0 ceiling on lexical ambition, one notch below the denser figurative language in the Band 7.5 version of this same topic.
Band 7.5

The answer uses the vivid behavioural detail 'stopping in complete silence and pointing' and the economical, implication-carrying line 'thirty years of teaching gives you a very long list,' closing on a genuinely reflective personal change.

The person I'd describe is Mrs Lan, a retired biology teacher who has spent the last eight years trying to make Da Nang care about a monkey. Specifically the red-shanked douc langur, which lives on the Sơn Trà Peninsula just north of the city — a beautiful animal with orange legs and a grey body that most residents had never heard of until she started shouting about it.

I know about her because a friend took me on one of her walks. Every Saturday morning she leads a small group up the peninsula road, mostly families with children, and she has this way of stopping in complete silence and pointing — and suddenly there are five langurs eating leaves ten metres above you. She never lectures. She lets people see the animal and then tells them, quite calmly, that the road they're standing on and the resorts down the hill are the reason there are fewer every year.

What she does beyond the walks is a mixture of stubborn and clever. She runs a Facebook group where people post sightings, which has quietly become the best record of the langur population anyone has. She goes into primary schools with photos and a stuffed toy. When a new hotel was proposed on the peninsula, she organised a petition of former students — hundreds of them, because thirty years of teaching gives you a very long list — and the plan was changed.

She's been doing this since she retired, and honestly I think the retirement is why it works: she has no career to protect and no funding to lose, so she says exactly what she thinks to whoever needs to hear it. I follow her group now and notice the trees on my commute in a way I never did. That's her effect, multiplied by a few thousand people.

309 words · about 2 minutes

Why this band

  • FCshe has this way of stopping in complete silence and pointingRather than a general claim like "she's good at showing people wildlife," the speaker describes a specific, repeatable gesture ("stopping in complete silence and pointing") that lets the listener visualize the exact moment, and the sentence is deliberately left unresolved -- what she's pointing at -- until the next clause reveals the langurs. This concrete, scene-building technique is a more sophisticated fluency move than simple description, delivering the reflective effect the Band 7.5 fluency and coherence target wants indirectly through narrative craft rather than stated commentary.
  • GRAthirty years of teaching gives you a very long listThe sentence uses an abstract noun phrase ("thirty years of teaching") as the grammatical subject of a present-tense generalization ("gives you"), compressing an implied cause-and-effect argument -- many former students means a long petition list -- into a single clause with no explicit connector like "because." This kind of economical, understated construction, trusting the listener to infer the logic, is a hallmark of the confident, varied control the Band 7.5 grammar target rewards over more explicit, fully-spelled-out reasoning.
  • LRI follow her group now and notice the trees on my commute in a way I never did.The comparative clause "in a way I never did" precisely marks personal change over time, and pairing the concrete verb "notice the trees" with the mundane detail "on my commute" grounds an abstract idea (raised awareness) in a specific daily habit rather than a vague claim like "she made me care more." This is the single reflective/evaluative point with genuinely personal stakes that the Band 7.5 fluency and coherence target asks for, closing the whole story on the speaker's own transformation rather than just praising Mrs Lan.

How this card was asked, by exam period

  • Describe a person you know about who encourages people to look after the natural world (e.g. plants, animals, insects and so on)May–Aug 2026

Part 3 follow-up questions

These are the discussion questions examiners asked after this cue card. Sample answers are shown where available.

  1. 1. How can parents help children to learn about nature?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Closes with a short, direct sentence stating what doesn't work, without a further contrasting final line.

    Mostly by putting children in front of nature and then stepping back. My grandmother taught me the name of every plant in her yard in Hue, not by telling me, but by making me water each one myself — you learn what a jasmine needs when it dies on you. Parents can grow something on a balcony, keep a pet, walk instead of drive to the park, and allow some dirt and boredom, because that's when a child starts looking at ants. Answering questions honestly helps, and so does admitting you don't know and finding out together. What doesn't work is treating nature like a lesson.

    Why this band

    • FCMostly by putting children in front of nature and then stepping back.This opening fronted phrase states the method plainly. The 7.0 version softens it with the trailing hedge 'I'd say', while 7.5 keeps the same confident structure without a hedge, showing a range of ways to open with a fronted adverbial.
    • LRstepping backThis is a workable but fairly ordinary phrasal verb for non-intervention. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace it with the more idiomatic 'getting out of the way', a livelier, more natural collocation for the same parenting approach.
    • GRAWhat doesn't work is treating nature like a lesson.This closing sentence uses the verb 'treating... like', a functional but slightly heavier construction. The 7.0/7.5 versions compress this to the noun phrase 'nature as a lesson', a more economical way of expressing the same contrast.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the hedge 'I'd say' after the opening claim and the adverb 'crucially' to mark the key point about tolerating boredom.

    Mostly by putting children in front of it and then getting out of the way, I'd say. My grandmother taught me the name of every plant in her yard in Hue not by telling me, but by making me responsible for watering each one — you learn what a jasmine needs when it dies on you. Parents can grow something on a balcony, keep a pet, walk instead of drive to the park, and, crucially, tolerate dirt and boredom, because that's usually when a child starts looking properly at ants. Answering questions honestly helps, and so does admitting you don't know and finding out together. What doesn't work is treating nature as a lesson.

    Why this band

    • FCI'd sayThis trailing hedge softens the opening claim, a more natural spoken device than the unhedged 6.5 opener. The 7.5 version drops the hedge entirely, stating the same method with direct confidence.
    • LRgetting out of the wayThis idiomatic phrasal verb is more vivid and natural than the plain 6.5 phrase 'stepping back'. It's reused identically at 7.5, confirming it fits the higher bands.
    • GRAand, crucially, tolerate dirt and boredomThe adverb 'crucially' is inserted as a parenthetical between commas, a more flexible structural device than the plain coordinated list at 6.5 ('grow something... keep a pet... walk... and allow some dirt and boredom'), which has no such emphasis marker.
    Band 7.5

    Adds a short final two-sentence close that separates 'nature as a lesson' from the positive contrast about learning nature 'as a place'.

    Mostly by putting children in front of it and then getting out of the way. My grandmother taught me the name of every plant in her yard in Hue not by telling me, but by making me responsible for watering each one — you learn what a jasmine needs when it dies on you. Parents can grow something on a balcony, keep a pet, walk instead of drive to the park, and, crucially, tolerate dirt and boredom, because that's when a child starts looking at ants. Answering questions honestly helps, and so does admitting you don't know and finding out together. What doesn't work is nature as a lesson. Children learn it as a place, not a subject.

    Why this band

    • FCWhat doesn't work is nature as a lesson. Children learn it as a place, not a subject.This closing pair of short sentences adds a positive contrast after the negative claim, a structural move beyond both 6.5's single closing sentence and 7.0's similar single sentence, giving the answer a more deliberate, aphoristic finish.
    • LRas a place, not a subjectThis compact final contrast between 'place' and 'subject' is a vivid, economical piece of phrasing unique to this band, capturing the whole argument in five words.
    • GRAWhat doesn't work is nature as a lesson.This compressed noun phrase ('nature as a lesson') stands as the complement of 'is' without any linking verb like 'treating' or 'as', the leanest of the three versions of this sentence and identical in structure to 7.0's slightly less trimmed version.
  2. 2. Do you agree or disagree that children should spend more time learning about nature at school?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Introduces the concession with the plain phrase 'as long as' and closes with a full, unhedged final judgement.

    I agree, as long as 'learning about' means actually going outside. In six years of secondary school I had one field trip, to a botanical garden where we weren't allowed to touch anything, and I learnt more from a single afternoon with my grandmother's plants. Nature in textbooks is just another exam subject. But time spent outdoors — a school garden, a stream survey, a week of camping — builds the kind of attachment that turns into care as adults, and it's good for attention and health too. The argument against is timetable pressure, and I understand that. But a generation that can name fifty brands and no trees is a strange result for an education system.

    Why this band

    • FCI agree, as long as 'learning about' means actually going outside.The conditional 'as long as' states the qualification plainly, with 'actually' added for emphasis. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'as long as... actually' with the slightly more formal single word 'provided', a more economical way to introduce the same condition.
    • LRa strange result for an education systemThis is a workable but slightly clunky closing noun phrase. The 7.0/7.5 versions trim this to 'a strange outcome for an education', which reads more naturally as a spoken final judgement.
    • GRAThe argument against is timetable pressure, and I understand that.This sentence and the one before it are both simple, coordinated with 'and'. The 7.0/7.5 versions add the adverb 'Still' at the start of the next sentence, a more controlled way of signalling a return to the main argument after a concession.
    Band 7.0

    Uses 'provided' for the condition and adds 'Still' before the closing judgement to mark the return from the concession.

    I agree, provided 'learning about' means going outside. In six years of secondary school I had one field trip, to a botanical garden where we weren't allowed to touch anything, and I honestly learnt more from a single afternoon with my grandmother's plants. Nature in textbooks is just another exam. But time spent outdoors — a school garden, a stream survey, a week of camping — builds the kind of attachment that turns into care as adults, and it's good for attention and health besides. The argument against is timetable pressure, and I do understand that. Still, a generation that can name fifty brands and no trees seems like a strange outcome for an education.

    Why this band

    • FCStill,This connector signals a clear return to the main line of argument after the concession about timetable pressure, a more controlled cohesive device than the plain 'But' used earlier in the 6.5 version for a similar shift.
    • LRprovidedThis single, slightly formal word replaces the fuller 6.5 phrase 'as long as... actually means', a more economical and natural way of introducing a condition in spoken academic English.
    • GRAa generation that can name fifty brands and no trees seems like a strange outcome for an educationThe hedge 'seems like' softens the final judgement slightly, a more measured grammatical choice than the flatter, unhedged 'is a strange result' used at 6.5.
    Band 7.5

    Drops the hedge 'seems like' used at 7.0, stating the final judgement with direct, unhedged confidence.

    I agree, provided 'learning about' means going outside. In six years of secondary school I had one field trip, to a botanical garden where we weren't allowed to touch anything, and I learnt more from a single afternoon with my grandmother's plants. Nature in textbooks is just another exam. But time spent outdoors — a school garden, a stream survey, a week of camping — builds the kind of attachment that turns into care as adults, and it's good for attention and health besides. The argument against is timetable pressure, and I understand that. Still, a generation that can name fifty brands and no trees is a strange outcome for an education.

    Why this band

    • FCStill, a generation that can name fifty brands and no trees is a strange outcome for an education.This closing sentence states the judgement directly, without the hedge 'seems like' used at 7.0, giving the final line more rhetorical weight while keeping the same content as both lower bands.
    • LRattachment that turns into care as adultsThis phrase captures a developmental process precisely and is shared with 7.0, but lands with more force here since the surrounding sentences are slightly leaner and less hedged than at 7.0.
    • GRAI agree, provided 'learning about' means going outside.This concise conditional opening, without any additional hedge word, is the leanest of the three versions and matches the confident, economical tone maintained throughout the rest of this band's answer.
  3. 3. Is it easy for children living in cities to enjoy the natural world?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Uses a plain coordinating 'but' to open the answer, giving each half of the contrast its own weight without a hedge.

    Easier than it looks, but harder than it should be. The children in my apartment tower have watched hundreds of animal videos and never climbed a tree, and that's fairly normal — the nature is there, in parks and along the river, but the habit of going to it isn't. Cities often have decent green spaces; the real problems are time, traffic and parents who think outside is dangerous. Da Nang is lucky, with a beach and a mountain inside the city, and plenty of kids still ignore both. So enjoyment is possible for a city child, but it usually needs an adult who makes it happen.

    Why this band

    • FCEasier than it looks, but harder than it should be.This opening balances two comparative phrases with the plain coordinator 'but'. The 7.0 version adds the trailing hedge 'I'd say' to the same balanced structure, while 7.5 keeps it unhedged, showing the range of confidence levels this sentence can carry.
    • LRparents who think outside is dangerousThis is a workable but slightly informal way of describing overprotective attitudes. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'think' with the more precise, formal verb 'consider', a small but real lexical upgrade.
    • GRASo enjoyment is possible for a city child, but it usually needs an adult who makes it happen.This final sentence ends after one main clause. The 7.0/7.5 versions extend the same sentence with a further coordinated clause about adults having 'stopped doing that themselves', adding a second, more reflective layer to the conclusion.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the trailing hedge 'I'd say' to the opening balance and extends the closing sentence with a further reflective clause.

    Easier than it looks and harder than it should be, I'd say. The children in my apartment tower have watched hundreds of animal videos and never climbed a tree, and that's fairly typical — the nature is there, in parks and along the river, but the habit of going to it isn't. Cities often have decent green spaces; the problems are time, traffic and parents who consider outside dangerous. Da Nang is lucky with a beach and a mountain inside the city limits, and plenty of kids still ignore both. So enjoyment is possible for a city child, but it usually requires an adult who makes it happen, and plenty of adults have stopped doing that themselves.

    Why this band

    • FCI'd sayThis trailing hedge softens the opening claim, giving it a more natural spoken rhythm than the unhedged 6.5 opener. The 7.5 version removes the hedge, presenting the same balanced claim with slightly more direct confidence.
    • LRconsider outside dangerousThis precise verb-plus-adjective pair is a clear upgrade from the vaguer 6.5 phrase 'think outside is dangerous', using 'consider' in its more formal sense of holding a settled view.
    • GRAand plenty of adults have stopped doing that themselvesThis final clause extends the closing sentence beyond the 6.5 version, adding a reflective observation about adults themselves rather than stopping at the claim about children needing help.
    Band 7.5

    Drops the hedge 'I'd say' used at 7.0 and changes 'plenty of' to 'many' in the final clause for a slightly more formal register.

    Easier than it looks and harder than it should be. The children in my apartment tower have watched hundreds of animal videos and never climbed a tree, and that's fairly typical — the nature is there, in parks and along the river, but the habit of going to it isn't. Cities often have decent green spaces; the problems are time, traffic and parents who consider outside dangerous. Da Nang is lucky with a beach and a mountain in the city limits, and plenty of kids still ignore both. So enjoyment is possible for a city child, but it usually requires an adult who makes it happen, and many adults have stopped doing that themselves.

    Why this band

    • FCEasier than it looks and harder than it should be.This opening states the balanced claim directly, without the trailing hedge 'I'd say' used at 7.0, giving the sentence a slightly more confident, aphoristic rhythm.
    • LRmany adults have stopped doing that themselvesThe quantifier 'many' is marginally more formal and measured than 7.0's more casual 'plenty of adults', a small but deliberate register choice in the closing sentence.
    • GRAbut it usually requires an adult who makes it happen, and many adults have stopped doing that themselvesThis sentence keeps the same two-clause extended structure introduced at 7.0, showing that this particular grammatical development (adding a reflective coordinated clause) is already appropriate from 7.0 and simply gets a lexical refinement at 7.5.
  4. 4. What things can people do to help to protect nature?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Uses the plain adjective 'annoying' to describe the tone to avoid when talking about the issue.

    Small consistent things, and one or two big ones. I counted my week's plastic coffee cups once — eleven — and have carried a flask ever since; that kind of daily change adds up across a whole city. Eating less meat, wasting less food, walking or riding where possible, not buying things that will be rubbish in a month. The bigger levers are voting and money: supporting politicians and businesses that take it seriously, and refusing the ones that don't. Joining something local, like a beach cleanup or a conservation group, matters more than people expect, because it keeps the issue visible. And talking about it, without being annoying, changes more minds than any campaign.

    Why this band

    • FCAnd talking about it, without being annoying, changes more minds than any campaign.The parenthetical 'without being annoying' is plain and direct. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'annoying' with the more vivid, idiomatic adjective 'unbearable', a stronger and more natural word for describing off-putting persistence.
    • LRwalking or riding where possibleThis is a workable but slightly vague qualifier. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'where possible' with 'where it's practical', a more precise and natural collocation for describing realistic, situational choices.
    • GRASmall consistent things, and one or two big ones.This opening fragment uses a comma before 'and', which is grammatically fine but slightly loose. The 7.5 version removes the comma, joining the two phrases more tightly, a subtle but real punctuation refinement.
    Band 7.0

    Upgrades 'annoying' to the more vivid 'unbearable' and 'where possible' to 'where it's practical'.

    Small consistent things, and one or two large ones. I counted my week's plastic coffee cups once — eleven — and have carried a flask ever since; that kind of daily change adds up across a city. Eating less meat, wasting less food, walking or riding where it's practical, not buying things that will be rubbish within a month. The larger levers are voting and money: supporting politicians and businesses that take it seriously, and refusing those that don't. Joining something local, like a beach cleanup or a conservation group, matters more than people expect, because it keeps the issue visible. And talking about it, without being unbearable, changes more minds than any campaign.

    Why this band

    • FCwithout being unbearableThis idiomatic adjective is a livelier, more natural upgrade from the plain 6.5 word 'annoying'. It's reused identically at 7.5, confirming it already suits the higher bands.
    • LRwhere it's practicalThis precise collocation is a clear upgrade from the vaguer 6.5 phrase 'where possible', more accurately capturing the idea of realistic, situational transport choices.
    • GRASmall consistent things, and one or two large ones.This retains the comma before 'and' from the 6.5 version, showing this particular punctuation choice persists at 7.0 before being tightened slightly at 7.5, which removes the comma for a marginally more compact opening.
    Band 7.5

    Removes the comma in the opening fragment used at 6.5 and 7.0, joining the two phrases into one tighter unit.

    Small consistent things and one or two large ones. I counted my week's plastic coffee cups once — eleven — and have carried a flask ever since; that kind of daily change adds up across a city. Eating less meat, wasting less food, walking or riding where it's practical, not buying things that will be rubbish in a month. The larger levers are voting and money: supporting politicians and businesses that take it seriously, and refusing those that don't. Joining something local, like a beach cleanup or a conservation group, matters more than people expect, because it keeps the issue visible. And talking about it, without being unbearable, changes more minds than any campaign.

    Why this band

    • FCSmall consistent things and one or two large ones.This opening fragment removes the comma before 'and' that both 6.5 and 7.0 use, joining the phrase into one tighter, more compact unit, a small but deliberate punctuation refinement typical of higher-band control.
    • LRadds up across a cityThis economical phrase captures the idea of cumulative small actions precisely, identical to 7.0's wording, showing that once a phrase is already well-chosen it can remain unchanged while other parts of the answer are refined.
    • GRAwithout being unbearable, changes more minds than any campaignThis clause keeps the same structure as 7.0, confirming that the sentence-level grammar here was already optimal at 7.0, with 7.5's development concentrated instead on the tighter opening fragment.
  5. 5. Do you think there is a need for new laws to protect nature?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Ends without the closing aphorism about enforcement versus new laws that the higher bands add.

    Some new ones in certain areas, but mostly we need to enforce the laws that already exist. The resort plan on Sơn Trà Peninsula was stopped by public pressure, not by any law, which shows the legal protection was too weak to rely on. Vietnam has environmental laws on paper that would be enough if they were applied properly, and often they aren't. Where genuinely new laws are needed is in areas the old ones never thought of — plastic, carbon, protecting specific species rather than 'nature' in general. I'd also add laws that make the polluter pay, since most damage currently costs nothing for the person causing it.

    Why this band

    • FCVietnam has environmental laws on paper that would be enough if they were applied properly, and often they aren't.The comparative claim uses the plain adjective 'enough'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the more precise, formal adjective 'adequate', a small but real upgrade suited to a discussion of legal standards.
    • LRcosts nothing for the person causing itThis is a workable but slightly awkward preposition choice. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'for' with 'to', which is the more natural and standard collocation with 'costs nothing'.
    • GRAWhere genuinely new laws are needed is in areas the old ones never thought of — plastic, carbon, protecting specific species rather than 'nature' in general.This sentence uses the verb phrase 'protecting specific species' inside the dash-led list. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the noun phrase 'the protection of specific species' (at 7.5) or keep the gerund (at 7.0), showing slightly different but both viable grammatical choices around the same list.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the hedge 'I'd say' to the opening claim and closes with the extra aphoristic sentence about enforcement beating new laws.

    New ones in some areas, I'd say, but mostly it's about enforcing the laws that already exist. The resort plan on Sơn Trà Peninsula was stopped by public pressure, not by any law, which tells you the legal protection was too weak to rely on. Vietnam has environmental laws on paper that would be adequate if applied consistently, and they often aren't. Where genuinely new laws are needed is in areas the old ones never imagined — plastic, carbon, protecting specific species rather than general 'nature'. I'd also add laws that make the polluter pay, since most damage currently costs nothing to whoever caused it. But a well-enforced old law beats a beautiful new one nobody applies.

    Why this band

    • FCI'd say,This hedge softens the opening claim about the balance between new and enforced laws, a more natural spoken device than the flat 6.5 opener. The 7.5 version drops the hedge for a leaner, more direct opening statement.
    • LRadequateThis precise, formal adjective is a clear upgrade from the plain 6.5 word 'enough', fitting the more analytical register appropriate to a discussion of legal standards.
    • GRABut a well-enforced old law beats a beautiful new one nobody applies.This additional closing sentence, absent from the 6.5 version, adds a final aphoristic generalisation that sums up the whole answer, a structural move the 6.5 version doesn't make.
    Band 7.5

    Drops the hedge used at 7.0 and adds the relative pronoun 'that' before 'nobody applies' in the closing aphorism.

    New ones in some areas, but mostly enforcement of the ones that exist. The resort plan on Sơn Trà Peninsula was stopped by public pressure, not by any law, which tells you the legal protection was too weak to rely on. Vietnam has environmental laws on paper that would be adequate if they were applied consistently, and they often aren't. Where genuinely new laws are needed is in areas the old ones never imagined — plastic, carbon, the protection of specific species rather than general 'nature'. I'd also add laws that make the polluter pay, since most damage currently costs nothing to the person causing it. But a well-enforced old law beats a beautiful new one that nobody applies.

    Why this band

    • FCNew ones in some areas, but mostly enforcement of the ones that exist.This opening fragment states the balance directly and economically, without the hedge 'I'd say' used at 7.0, and compresses the verb phrase into a noun phrase ('enforcement of the ones that exist') rather than 6.5's fuller clause.
    • LRthe protection of specific speciesThis noun phrase is a slightly more formal, nominalised alternative to 7.0's gerund phrase 'protecting specific species', matching the more analytical register of the rest of this band's answer.
    • GRABut a well-enforced old law beats a beautiful new one that nobody applies.The relative pronoun 'that' is included here before 'nobody applies', creating a more complete and formally correct relative clause than 7.0's reduced version 'a beautiful new one nobody applies', which omits the pronoun.
  6. 6. Are punishments or rewards more effective in encouraging people to protect nature?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Describes enforcement problems with the plain phrase 'difficult to keep up' rather than a single precise adjective.

    For most people, rewards, or at least removing the cost of doing the right thing. Da Nang has fines for littering on the beach that almost nobody has ever paid, while the small deposit on glass drink bottles means they get returned every single time. Punishment needs someone watching, and that's expensive and difficult to keep up. Rewards, even tiny ones, work quietly and all the time. That said, for serious offenders — factories dumping waste, illegal logging — rewards don't matter and only real penalties work. So I'd say rewards for the everyday behaviour of millions and punishment for the deliberate behaviour of a few.

    Why this band

    • FCPunishment needs someone watching, and that's expensive and difficult to keep up.The consequence is described with the fuller phrase 'difficult to keep up'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the single, more precise adjective 'patchy', a more economical and vivid way of describing inconsistent enforcement.
    • LRrewards don't matter and only real penalties workThis is a workable but slightly informal pairing. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'don't matter' and 'work' with the more formal, precise pair 'are irrelevant' and 'matter', a small but real register upgrade.
    • GRASo I'd say rewards for the everyday behaviour of millions and punishment for the deliberate behaviour of a few.This closing sentence ends after stating the balanced rule. The 7.0/7.5 versions extend the same sentence with a further coordinated clause about most countries getting 'that mix backwards', adding an evaluative final twist.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the adjective 'patchy' and extends the closing sentence with the evaluative twist about countries getting the mix backwards.

    For most people, rewards — or at least removing the cost of doing the right thing. Da Nang has fines for littering on the beach that almost nobody has ever paid, while the small deposit on glass drink bottles means they get returned every single time. Punishment needs someone watching, and that's expensive and patchy. Rewards, even tiny ones, work quietly and constantly. That said, for serious offenders — factories dumping waste, illegal logging — rewards are irrelevant and only real penalties matter. So I'd say rewards for the everyday behaviour of millions and punishment for the deliberate behaviour of a few, and most countries, honestly, get that mix backwards.

    Why this band

    • FChonestly,This hedge is inserted mid-sentence in the closing evaluative twist, softening a fairly blunt criticism in a natural spoken way. The 7.5 version removes this hedge, stating the same criticism with slightly more direct confidence.
    • LRpatchyThis single, precise adjective is a clear economical upgrade from the fuller 6.5 phrase 'difficult to keep up', capturing the same idea of inconsistent enforcement in one word.
    • GRAand most countries, honestly, get that mix backwardsThis final coordinated clause, absent from the 6.5 version, extends the closing sentence with an evaluative twist, a structural move the 6.5 version doesn't make, stopping instead at the balanced rule alone.
    Band 7.5

    Drops the hedge 'honestly' used at 7.0 and slightly trims the opening phrase 'doing the right thing' to 'doing right'.

    For most people, rewards — or at least removing the cost of doing right. Da Nang has fines for littering on the beach that almost nobody has ever paid, while the small deposit on glass drink bottles means they get returned every single time. Punishment needs someone watching, and that's expensive and patchy. Rewards, even tiny ones, work quietly and constantly. That said, for serious offenders — factories dumping waste, illegal logging — rewards are irrelevant and only real penalties matter. So I'd say rewards for the everyday behaviour of millions and punishment for the deliberate behaviour of a few, and most countries get that mix backwards.

    Why this band

    • FCor at least removing the cost of doing rightThis trims 7.0's fuller phrase 'doing the right thing' down to the more compact 'doing right', a small but deliberate economy in phrasing typical of the leaner, more confident register at this band.
    • LRget that mix backwardsThis idiomatic closing phrase is identical to 7.0's, but lands with slightly more direct force here since it isn't softened by the hedge 'honestly' that precedes it at 7.0.
    • GRAand most countries get that mix backwardsThis final clause states the criticism directly, without the mid-sentence hedge 'honestly' used at 7.0, giving the closing evaluative twist more unhedged authority while keeping the same content as the 7.0 version.
  7. 7. Which is more effective when someone is campaigning to protect the natural world: raising people's awareness or leading by example, such as by avoiding flying?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Uses the plain contrastive 'But' before introducing the Mrs Lan example, rather than a more formal subordinator.

    Leading by example, but only if it invites people rather than blaming them. A colleague of mine announced she'd stopped flying, and the main result in the office was that everyone got defensive about their holidays. But Mrs Lan's langur walks change people exactly because she asks nothing of them — she shows them something worth protecting and lets them draw their own conclusion. Awareness alone is cheap; people are aware of everything now and act on very little of it. Example that looks like sacrifice makes people feel judged. Example that looks like a better life — cycling because it's nice, eating locally because it tastes good — is the kind that actually spreads.

    Why this band

    • FCBut Mrs Lan's langur walks change people exactly because she asks nothing of themThe contrast between the colleague's example and Mrs Lan's is introduced with the plain 'But'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the more formal subordinating connector 'Whereas', which signals the contrast within a more tightly integrated sentence structure.
    • LRis the kind that actually spreadsThis is a workable, functional closing phrase. The 7.5 version drops 'actually', tightening the phrase to 'is the kind that spreads', a small but deliberate economy that reads as slightly more confident and less emphatic.
    • GRAlets them draw their own conclusionThis uses the possessive 'their own' before 'conclusion'. The 7.0/7.5 versions drop 'own', using the simpler 'lets them draw the conclusion', a marginally more compact relative-clause-free construction with the same meaning.
    Band 7.0

    Uses 'Whereas' to open the contrast with Mrs Lan and adds the hedge 'honestly' to intensify a claim about judgement.

    Leading by example, I'd say, but only if it invites rather than accuses. A colleague of mine announced she'd stopped flying, and the main effect in the office was that everyone got defensive about their holidays. Whereas Mrs Lan's langur walks change people precisely because she asks nothing of them — she shows them something worth protecting and lets them draw the conclusion themselves. Awareness alone is cheap; people are aware of everything now and act on very little. Example that looks like sacrifice makes people feel judged, honestly. Example that looks like a better life — cycling because it's pleasant, eating locally because it's delicious — is the kind that actually spreads.

    Why this band

    • FCWhereas Mrs Lan's langur walks change people precisely because she asks nothing of themThe subordinator 'Whereas' signals the contrast more formally and within a single connected idea, compared with the plain 'But... exactly because' structure used at 6.5.
    • LRact on very littleThis phrase is close to the plain 6.5 wording 'act on very little of it' but trims the trailing 'of it', a small economy the 7.5 version develops further by dropping 'very' as well, leaving the leanest 'act on little'.
    • GRAExample that looks like sacrifice makes people feel judged, honestly.The hedge 'honestly' is placed at the very end of the sentence rather than the front, a more flexible and conversational position than a sentence-initial hedge would allow, distinct from the unhedged version of the same sentence at 6.5 and 7.5.
    Band 7.5

    Trims 'act on very little' to the leanest 'act on little' and adds a final short aphoristic sentence about tone versus method.

    Leading by example, but only if it invites rather than accuses. A colleague of mine announced she'd stopped flying, and the main effect in the office was that everyone got defensive about their holidays. Whereas Mrs Lan's langur walks change people precisely because she asks nothing of them — she shows them something worth protecting and lets them draw the conclusion. Awareness alone is cheap; people are aware of everything now and act on little. Example that looks like sacrifice makes people feel judged. Example that looks like a better life — cycling because it's pleasant, eating locally because it's delicious — is the kind that spreads. The tone matters more than the method.

    Why this band

    • FCThe tone matters more than the method.This additional closing aphorism, absent from both 6.5 and 7.0, distils the whole answer into one final generalising sentence, a structural device unique to this band.
    • LRact on littleThis is the leanest of the three versions of this phrase, dropping both 'of it' (present at 6.5) and 'very' (present at 7.0), showing the most economical, confident phrasing of the idea.
    • GRAlets them draw the conclusionThis matches 7.0's already-compact structure exactly, showing that this particular relative-clause economy was already achieved at 7.0, with 7.5's further development concentrated instead in the new closing aphorism.
  8. 8. How important is it for environmental campaigners to be well informed about science?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Ends after the point about admitting mistakes, without the closing sentence connecting back to Mrs Lan that the higher bands add.

    Very important, because being wrong can cost a campaign its credibility for years. A well-meaning group in Da Nang planted hundreds of trees along the coast that weren't suited to salt wind, and when they died within a season, the group's next three projects were laughed at. Campaigners also face opponents with lawyers and scientists, and passion doesn't survive against a data table. Being informed means knowing what actually helps — some popular actions, like certain recycling schemes, do almost nothing. It doesn't mean every campaigner needs a degree; it means checking facts, and being willing to say 'I was wrong'.

    Why this band

    • FCsome popular actions, like certain recycling schemes, do almost nothingThis uses the general noun 'actions'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace it with the more precise, slightly ironic noun 'gestures', which better captures the idea of well-meaning but ineffective behaviours.
    • LRpassion doesn't survive against a data tableThis includes the extra preposition 'against'. The 7.0/7.5 versions drop it, using the tighter, more idiomatic 'passion doesn't survive a data table', treating the verb as transitive for a punchier effect.
    • GRAIt doesn't mean every campaigner needs a degree; it means checking facts, and being willing to say 'I was wrong'.This sentence includes the object 'facts' after 'checking'. The 7.0/7.5 versions drop the object, leaving the bare verb 'checking', a more economical and idiomatic use of the verb alone as a complete idea.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the hedge 'frankly' to intensify the claim about passion and data, and appends the closing sentence linking back to Mrs Lan.

    Very important, because being wrong costs a campaign its credibility for years. A well-meaning group in Da Nang planted hundreds of trees along the coast that weren't suited to salt wind, and when they died within a season, the group's next three projects were laughed at. Campaigners also face opponents with lawyers and scientists, and passion, frankly, doesn't survive a data table. Being informed means knowing what actually helps — some popular gestures, like certain recycling schemes, do almost nothing. It doesn't mean every campaigner needs a degree; it means checking, and being willing to say 'I was wrong'. Mrs Lan's authority comes from thirty years of biology, and people can tell.

    Why this band

    • FCfrankly,This hedge is inserted mid-sentence to intensify a fairly blunt claim about data beating passion, a more natural spoken device than the unhedged version of the same claim at 6.5.
    • LRgesturesThis more precise, slightly ironic noun is a clear upgrade from the general 6.5 word 'actions', better capturing the idea of well-meaning but largely symbolic behaviours.
    • GRAMrs Lan's authority comes from thirty years of biology, and people can tell.This additional closing sentence, absent from the 6.5 version, ties the whole answer back to the specific example named in the question's context, a structural move the 6.5 version doesn't make.
    Band 7.5

    Removes the hedge 'frankly' used at 7.0, stating the claim about passion and data with direct, unhedged confidence.

    Very important, because being wrong costs a campaign its credibility for years. A well-meaning group in Da Nang planted hundreds of trees along the coast that weren't suited to salt wind, and when they died within a season, the group's next three projects were laughed at. Campaigners also face opponents with lawyers and scientists, and passion doesn't survive a data table. Being informed means knowing what actually helps — some popular gestures, like certain recycling schemes, do almost nothing. It doesn't mean every campaigner needs a degree; it means checking, and being willing to say 'I was wrong'. Mrs Lan's authority comes from thirty years of biology, and people can tell.

    Why this band

    • FCpassion doesn't survive a data tableThis states the claim directly, without the mid-sentence hedge 'frankly' used at 7.0, giving the observation slightly more unhedged force while keeping the same tight, idiomatic phrasing.
    • LRMrs Lan's authority comes from thirty years of biologyThis phrase is identical to 7.0's, showing that once the closing sentence linking back to the example was well-formed at 7.0, it required no further lexical change at 7.5 — the refinement here is entirely in removing the earlier hedge.
    • GRAit means checking, and being willing to say 'I was wrong'This matches 7.0's already-economical structure exactly, confirming the bare-verb idiom 'checking' (without an object) was already appropriate from 7.0 upward.
  9. 9. Do you think environmental campaigns to protect the natural world can ever really succeed?

    May–Aug 2026
    Compare Band 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5 for this question
    Band 6.5

    Closes with the plain phrase 'and that is the point' without a further closing sentence about expecting final victory.

    They can, if you count success in the right way. The langur population on Sơn Trà has stopped falling and may be growing, which is a real win for a few hundred determined people over eight years. Some global campaigns have worked completely — the ozone layer is recovering because a treaty banned the right chemicals. What campaigns rarely achieve is the total, permanent win they promise, because the pressures that damage nature, mainly money and population, don't go away; they have to be held back all the time. So I'd say campaigns succeed the way maintenance succeeds: nothing dramatic happens, and that is the point.

    Why this band

    • FCwhich is a real win for a few hundred determined people over eight yearsThis uses the plain adjective pair 'real win' and 'determined people'. The 7.0/7.5 versions upgrade these to the more precise, formal 'genuine victory' and 'stubborn people', both slightly stronger, more vivid word choices.
    • LRthey have to be held back all the timeThis is a workable but slightly loose closing phrase. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'all the time' with the more precise adverb 'continuously', a tighter, more formal way of expressing the same ongoing effort.
    • GRASo I'd say campaigns succeed the way maintenance succeeds: nothing dramatic happens, and that is the point.This sentence ends the answer without a further generalising clause. The 7.0/7.5 versions add an entire extra sentence afterwards about expecting a final victory being 'the surest way to give up', extending the argument one step further.
    Band 7.0

    Adds the hedge 'honestly' and the intensifier 'really', and appends a whole extra closing sentence about expecting final victory.

    They can, if you count success the right way. The langur population on Sơn Trà has stopped falling and may be growing, which is a genuine victory for a few hundred stubborn people over eight years. Some global campaigns have worked completely — the ozone layer is recovering because a treaty banned the right chemicals. What campaigns rarely achieve, honestly, is the total, permanent win they promise, because the pressures that damage nature, mainly money and population, don't go away; they have to be held back continuously. So I'd say campaigns succeed the way maintenance succeeds: nothing dramatic happens, and that's the point. Expecting a final victory is really the surest way to give up.

    Why this band

    • FChonestly,This hedge is inserted mid-sentence before the key claim about what campaigns rarely achieve, softening it in a natural spoken way that the flatter, unhedged 6.5 version lacks. The 7.5 version drops this hedge for a more direct statement.
    • LRstubborn peopleThis vivid, slightly affectionate adjective is a clear upgrade from the plain 6.5 phrase 'determined people', capturing a touch of personality that 'determined' alone doesn't convey.
    • GRAExpecting a final victory is really the surest way to give up.This additional closing sentence, absent from the 6.5 version, extends the argument with a final paradoxical generalisation, a structural move the 6.5 version doesn't make.
    Band 7.5

    Removes the intensifier 'really' used at 7.0's closing sentence, stating the final paradox with slightly more restraint.

    They can, if you count success the right way. The langur population on Sơn Trà has stopped falling and may be growing, which is a genuine victory for a few hundred stubborn people over eight years. Some global campaigns have worked completely — the ozone layer is recovering because a treaty banned the right chemicals. What campaigns rarely achieve is the total, permanent win they promise, because the pressures that damage nature, mainly money and population, don't go away; they have to be held back continuously. So I'd say campaigns succeed the way maintenance succeeds: nothing dramatic happens, and that's the point. Expecting a final victory is the surest way to give up.

    Why this band

    • FCExpecting a final victory is the surest way to give up.This closing sentence states the paradox directly, without the intensifier 'really' used at 7.0, giving the final aphorism a slightly more understated, confident register.
    • LRcontinuouslyThis precise adverb is identical to 7.0's already well-chosen word, showing that the lexical upgrade from the vaguer 6.5 phrase 'all the time' was already complete at 7.0.
    • GRAWhat campaigns rarely achieve is the total, permanent win they promiseThis states the claim directly, without the mid-sentence hedge 'honestly' used at 7.0, giving the sentence slightly more unhedged authority while keeping the same content as both other bands.

Frequently asked questions

How long should my answer to this Part 2 cue card be?
Speak for 1 to 2 minutes. The examiner will stop you at 2 minutes, so aim for roughly 220-300 words that cover every bullet on the card and end with how you feel about it.
What Part 3 questions follow this cue card?
After "A Person You Know Who Encourages People to Look After the Natural World", examiners have asked 9 follow-up discussion questions, listed above. They move from your personal story to general opinions on the same theme.
Is this cue card still being used?
It was most recently reported by test-takers in May–Aug 2026. Cue cards rotate every four months, and many topics return in later seasons with slightly different wording.