IELTS Speaking Part 1

Art

Hobbies & Free Time

Most recently asked in May–Aug 2026

Questions in this topic

Grouped by the exam period they were reported in, newest first. Examiners usually pick three or four of these.

  1. Would you like to learn more about art in the future?May–Aug 2026
  2. Do you like looking at drawings or paintings?May–Aug 2026
  3. Did you learn to draw or paint when you were younger?May–Aug 2026
  4. Have you ever visited an art gallery?May–Aug 2026

Sample answers: Band 6.5, 7.0 & 7.5

Three versions of each answer, each written to sit genuinely at that band — compare them to see exactly what separates the scores, then swap in your own details.

Band 6.5

The answer stays with plain vocabulary like 'I liked how peaceful they looked' and short factual sentences, giving clear but unembellished responses typical of Band 6.5.

Would you like to learn more about art in the future?
Yes, I would like to learn more about painting someday. I've seen an online course about watercolor painting, and I think it would be a nice hobby to try when I have more free time.

Why this band

  • FCI think it would be a nice hobby to try when I have more free time.The answer closes with a short, generic wish rather than expanding on what specifically appeals about watercolor painting or the online course mentioned just before it. That flat, minimally developed closing line is typical of how 6.5 answers wrap up — logically complete, but without the extra reflective clause a 7.0 speaker might add, such as explaining why watercolor specifically interests them. It does still connect the idea of free time back to a plausible, realistic reason for not having started already.
Do you like looking at drawings or paintings?
Yes, I really enjoy looking at paintings. Last weekend, I visited a small art shop near Han Market and saw some simple ink drawings of old houses. I liked how peaceful they looked.

Why this band

  • LRI liked how peaceful they looked.'Peaceful' is a common, easily accessible adjective chosen to sum up a reaction to the ink drawings, with no attempt at a more specific or painterly word like 'tranquil' or 'understated'. This plain, safe word choice with zero elaboration afterward is textbook Band 6.5 lexical resource — clear and appropriate, but showing no range beyond the first adjective that comes to mind. It does connect logically back to the simple ink drawings of old houses described just before it.
Did you learn to draw or paint when you were younger?
Yes, I started drawing when I was about seven. My older cousin taught me how to draw simple cartoons at home, and I practiced almost every day after school because I enjoyed it so much.

Why this band

  • GRAMy older cousin taught me how to draw simple cartoons at home, and I practiced almost every day after school because I enjoyed it so much.Two ideas are joined with the coordinating conjunction 'and', and a reason is tacked on with 'because' — a step up from a single bare sentence, but still built from the most basic connectors available rather than a subordinate structure like a relative clause describing the cousin. That small increase in sentence length without an increase in structural variety is exactly the modest range expected at 6.5. It nonetheless reports the whole learning story — who taught, what was learned, how often practised, and why — in one manageable sentence.
Have you ever visited an art gallery?
Yes, I visited an art gallery in Hoi An during a weekend trip with my friend Vy. We saw many paintings of the old town, and I really liked the bright yellow colors used in most of them.

Why this band

  • FCI really liked the bright yellow colors used in most of them.This sentence adds a single plain reaction to the paintings without any further explanation of why the colours stood out or what feeling they created. A Band 7.0 answer describing the same gallery visit would likely explain the reaction with a reason or comparison. At Band 6.5, this kind of short, direct closing comment is typical - it completes the answer but doesn't extend it.
Band 7.0

The wording is natural and fluent, with a comfortable relative clause ('an online course about watercolour painting recently, and it looks like a nice hobby') and a light collocation ('pick up... a hobby'), sitting between the plainness of 6.5 and the richer detail of 7.5.

Would you like to learn more about art in the future?
Yes, I'd like to learn more about painting at some point. I came across an online course about watercolour painting recently, and it looks like a nice hobby to pick up once I have a bit more free time.

Why this band

  • LRit looks like a nice hobby to pick up once I have a bit more free time"Pick up a hobby" is a natural everyday collocation that a Band 6.5 speaker might replace with a flatter verb like "start" or "try," but here it's used comfortably and correctly without being showy -- exactly the "a few flexible or topic-specific" vocabulary items the 7.0 descriptor asks for, short of the idiomatic reach expected at 7.5. The phrase also fits naturally into a longer conditional idea ("once I have a bit more free time"), showing the vocabulary choice isn't isolated but part of a fluent, connected thought about future plans.
Do you like looking at drawings or paintings?
Yes, I really enjoy it. Last weekend I stopped by a small art shop near the market and saw some simple ink drawings of old houses, which I thought looked really peaceful and well done.

Why this band

  • FCwhich I thought looked really peaceful and well doneAdding a brief personal evaluation ("I thought looked really peaceful and well done") after the factual description of the ink drawings develops the answer a little further than a plain fact, which is what separates 7.0 from a 6.5 response that would likely stop at describing what was seen. The two adjectives chosen, "peaceful" and "well done," also cover both an emotional reaction and a judgment of skill, giving a slightly fuller opinion than a single word would. It stays modest and conversational rather than reaching for a more elaborate or figurative response.
Did you learn to draw or paint when you were younger?
Yes, I started drawing when I was around seven. My cousin used to draw cartoons at home, and I picked it up by copying him, practising almost every day after school because I genuinely enjoyed it.

Why this band

  • GRAMy cousin used to draw cartoons at home, and I picked it up by copying him, practising almost every day after school because I genuinely enjoyed it.Clauses are chained together naturally with "and" and "because," plus a participial phrase ("practising almost every day") added without its own subject, producing a comfortable complex sentence that stays generally accurate throughout -- the 7.0 target rather than the wider grammatical range expected at 7.5. The sequence also mirrors how the process actually happened (seeing the cousin draw, copying him, then practising), so the grammar tracks a real causal chain rather than listing disconnected facts. A Band 6.5 answer would likely break this into two or three shorter, separate sentences.
Have you ever visited an art gallery?
Yes, I visited one in Hoi An during a weekend trip with a friend. There were lots of paintings of the old town, and I particularly liked the bright yellow tones that most of the artists seemed to use.

Why this band

  • GRAthe bright yellow tones that most of the artists seemed to useThe relative clause 'that most of the artists seemed to use' is attached naturally to the noun phrase, adding detail without breaking the flow of the sentence. A Band 6.5 answer would more likely state this as two separate simple sentences, such as 'The tones were bright yellow. Most artists used them.' The comfortable embedding of this clause while describing the gallery in Hoi An reflects the generally accurate complex-sentence use expected at Band 7.0.
Band 7.5

The answer includes precise vocabulary ('shading and character design') and a reflective closing comment ('it really made me think about daily waste'), showing the evaluative, topic-specific development of Band 7.5.

Would you like to learn more about art in the future?
Yes, I'd really like to learn more about art-especially modern illustration and digital techniques. For instance, I've been eyeing a weekend workshop at a small Da Nang gallery where local artists teach shading and character design. I think it would be a fun way to refresh my creativity outside my usual UI work.

Why this band

  • LRlocal artists teach shading and character design'Shading' and 'character design' are precise, topic-specific technical terms from illustration, used naturally rather than a vaguer phrase like 'drawing skills' or 'art techniques'. Reaching for this level of specific, field-appropriate vocabulary, instead of staying at the general level a 7.0 answer would use, is exactly the wider lexical range Band 7.5 targets. It also makes the workshop sound concrete and genuinely researched rather than a vague aspiration, reinforcing the answer's claim that the speaker has specifically been 'eyeing' this particular class.
Do you like looking at drawings or paintings?
Yes, I do enjoy looking at drawings and paintings, especially when I get time to visit small galleries around Da Nang. A few weeks ago, I stopped by a pop-up art show near the Dragon Bridge and was really drawn to a series of watercolour pieces showing local street scenes. The colours and details made the city feel both familiar and somehow fresh to me.

Why this band

  • FCThe colours and details made the city feel both familiar and somehow fresh to me.Rather than simply describing what was in the paintings, this sentence offers a reflective, slightly paradoxical observation - that a familiar city could feel fresh - which requires genuine interpretation rather than plain reporting. A Band 7.0 answer would be more likely to stop at a factual description of the watercolour scenes. This kind of nuanced, evaluative closing thought about the pop-up art show is characteristic of the fluency and coherence expected at Band 7.5.
Did you learn to draw or paint when you were younger?
Yes, I actually learned to draw quite early. My mom enrolled me in an after-school art class at a small community center in Hue when I was about nine. I still remember the first time I tried using watercolors - I was so focused on painting a lotus pond that I barely noticed everyone else packing up to go home.

Why this band

  • GRAI still remember the first time I tried using watercolors - I was so focused on painting a lotus pond that I barely noticed everyone else packing up to go home.The sentence combines a time-marking opening ('the first time I tried...') with a 'so...that' result structure describing the intensity of the speaker's focus, layering two different complex forms into one continuous memory rather than presenting them as separate simple sentences. Handling this combination of structures accurately across a long sentence is the varied complex grammar Band 7.5 targets, well beyond the shorter, single-structure sentences a 7.0 answer would use to recount the same early art class memory. The 'so...that' clause also does real descriptive work, conveying just how absorbed the child was in painting rather than simply stating that she enjoyed it.
Have you ever visited an art gallery?
Yes, I have. Last year, I visited a small contemporary art gallery on Nguyen Chi Thanh street with my colleague Thao. We dropped by after work, and I remember being struck by this huge mixed media piece featuring recycled plastic bottles-it really made me think about daily waste. The space was quiet and bright, and we spent about an hour just wandering and chatting about the artists.

Why this band

  • FCit really made me think about daily wasteThis closing observation draws a broader personal reflection (about daily waste) out of a specific visual experience (the recycled-plastic artwork), rather than simply describing what the artwork looked like or how the visit went. Extending a description into a genuine takeaway like this is the reflective, evaluative development Band 7.5 fluency and coherence rewards, where a 7.0 answer would more likely stop after describing the piece itself without connecting it to a broader idea about consumption or waste.

Frequently asked questions

How long should a Part 1 answer about art be?
Two to four sentences. Give a direct answer, add a reason or a detail, and stop. Part 1 is scored on natural interaction, not on how much you say — the examiner will move on after about 20-30 seconds anyway.
What questions does the examiner ask about art?
Test-takers have reported 4 different questions on this topic, listed above. In the test you will usually get three or four of them, starting with a simple factual one and moving to preferences or opinions.
Is this Part 1 topic still being asked?
It was most recently reported in May–Aug 2026. Part 1 topics change partially every four months, and familiar subjects like this one tend to come back in later exam periods.
IELTS Speaking Part 1: Art — Questions & Sample Answers | Ieltsa