IELTS Speaking Part 2

An Occasion When You Lost Something in a Public Place

最近一次出现于 2026年5–8月

题卡

Describe an occasion when you lost something in a public place

You should say:

  • what you lost
  • when and where you lost this thing
  • what you did to try and find it
  • and explain how you felt about losing this thing in a public place

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

Simple, concrete statements such as 'My money was all still inside' and a single especially-clause to add detail keep the language plain and accurate, characteristic of Band 6.5.像'My money was all still inside'(我的钱还都在里面)这样简单具体的句子,加上一个用来补充细节的especially从句,让语言保持朴素而准确,这是6.5分的典型特征。

The thing I lost was my wallet, and I lost it at My Khe Beach in Da Nang on a Sunday morning about a year ago.

I go running along the beach most weekends, and that day I put my wallet and phone in a small bag on a beach chair while I went for a swim afterwards. When I came back about twenty minutes later, my bag was still there, but when I checked inside, my wallet was gone. I looked around the chair and under the towel, but there was nothing.

What I did was ask the lifeguard on duty, a young man named Huy, if anyone had handed anything in. He checked a small box he kept in his hut, and luckily, my wallet was there. Someone had found it near the chairs and given it to him, but they didn't wait to tell me who they were. My money was all still inside, and only my hands were shaking, not my luck, I joked to myself.

I felt really careless about losing it in such a public place, especially somewhere so crowded on a weekend. But afterwards I felt grateful, because it reminded me that most people are honest. Now I always keep my wallet in a zipped pocket, never in an open bag.

查看中文翻译

我丢的东西是我的钱包,大约一年前的一个周日早上,我在岘港的美溪海滩弄丢的。

我大多数周末都会沿着海滩跑步,那天跑完步后我把钱包和手机放进沙滩椅上的一个小包里,然后去游泳。大约二十分钟后我回来,包还在原地,但打开一看,钱包不见了。我在椅子周围和毛巾底下都找了,什么也没有。

我做的是去问当班的一位救生员,一个叫Huy的年轻人,看看有没有人捡到东西交上来。他检查了他小屋里放的一个小盒子,幸运的是,我的钱包就在里面。有人在椅子附近捡到了它交给他,但没有留下姓名等着告诉我是谁。钱包里的钱一分没少,我跟自己开玩笑说,发抖的只是我的手,不是我的运气。

在这么一个公共场所把钱包弄丢,我当时觉得特别粗心,尤其是在周末那么拥挤的地方。但事后我心里挺感激的,因为这提醒了我,大多数人其实都是诚实的。从那以后,我总是把钱包放进拉链口袋里,再也不放在敞口的包里了。

218 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LR“My money was all still inside” — This short statement uses only common, concrete words ("money," "still," "inside") to deliver the key positive outcome of the story without any embellishment or more descriptive phrasing (like "untouched" or "intact"). It's placed right before the speaker's own joke about the situation, so the plainness of the factual statement sets up a clear contrast with the lighter aside that follows. This kind of direct, unadorned reporting of good news is typical of the everyday vocabulary ceiling the Band 6.5 descriptor describes.这句简短的陈述只用了常见、具体的词("money"、"still"、"inside")来传达这个故事的关键正面结果，没有任何修饰或更具描写性的措辞(比如"untouched"或"intact")。它紧接在说话人自己对这个情况开的玩笑之前，所以这句平实的事实陈述与后面轻松的插话形成了清晰的对比。这种直白、不加修饰地报告好消息的方式，正是Band 6.5描述语所刻画的日常词汇上限的典型表现。
  • FC“I looked around the chair and under the towel, but there was nothing.” — The sentence reports the outcome of the search in the most economical way possible — two concrete locations checked, then a flat "but there was nothing" — without dramatising the disappointment or building suspense. This directness keeps the narrative moving efficiently toward the next event (asking the lifeguard), the straightforward, one-idea-at-a-time storytelling the Band 6.5 fluency descriptor rewards. A higher-band retelling might instead let the failed search carry more emotional weight through a reflective aside rather than stating it this plainly.这句话用尽可能简洁的方式汇报了搜寻的结果——检查了两个具体地点，然后一句平淡的"but there was nothing"——没有把失望戏剧化，也没有制造悬念。这种直接性让叙述高效地推进到下一个事件(询问救生员)，这正是Band 6.5流利度描述语所奖励的那种直白、一次一个要点的讲故事方式。更高分段的复述可能会改为通过一段反思性的插话，让搜寻失败承载更多情感分量，而不是这样平铺直叙地陈述。
  • GRA“I felt really careless about losing it in such a public place, especially somewhere so crowded on a weekend.” — The main clause states the feeling plainly, and the "especially" phrase then adds one extra layer of specificity about the setting, a simple but genuinely useful way to build a sentence beyond a single flat statement. It's accurate and the added detail ("so crowded on a weekend") does real work in explaining why the speaker felt careless, rather than being pure padding. This single-layer elaboration — one main idea plus one supporting phrase — is representative of the basic-but-functional complex grammar the descriptor associates with Band 6.5.主句平实地陈述了这种感觉，随后的"especially"短语又为场景增添了一层具体性，这是一种简单但确实有用的方式，让句子超越了单一平淡的陈述。这句话是准确的，添加的细节("so crowded on a weekend")真正起到了解释说话人为何感到粗心大意的作用，而不是纯粹的填充。这种单层的展开——一个主要想法加一个支撑短语——代表了描述语与Band 6.5相关联的那种基础但实用的复杂语法。
7.0 分

The comparison structure 'rather than just keeping it' and the developed reasoning in 'mostly annoyed with myself at first, because it wasn't even an expensive jacket' show a comfortable range of complex sentences and natural spoken development, typical of Band 7.0.比较结构'rather than just keeping it'(而不是干脆自己留下)以及在'mostly annoyed with myself at first, because it wasn't even an expensive jacket'(一开始主要是对自己生气,因为那也不是什么贵的外套)中展开的说理,都展现出从容的复合句运用范围以及自然的口语化思路展开,这是7.0分的典型特征。

The thing I lost was my jacket, and I left it behind at a cinema in Da Nang about eight months ago, after watching a late film with some friends.

It happened on a Friday night. We'd gone to see a film that finished quite late, and because it was a bit cold in the cinema, I'd taken my jacket off partway through and put it over the back of the seat. I completely forgot about it once the film ended, since we were all talking and rushing to catch a taxi home.

I only realised it was missing the next morning, when I was getting ready to go out and couldn't find it anywhere. What I did first was call the cinema directly, though it took a while to actually get through to someone who could check the lost property properly. They told me to come in person, so I went back that afternoon with the exact seat number, which I luckily remembered because we'd booked online.

Thankfully, a cleaner had found it the night before and handed it in to the front desk, so I got it back within a few minutes of arriving, still folded neatly over a chair in the staff office.

How I felt about losing it was mostly annoyed with myself at first, because it wasn't even an expensive jacket, just one I'd had for years and liked a lot. I felt genuinely relieved once I got it back, though, and honestly a bit surprised that a stranger had bothered to hand it in rather than just keeping it. Since then, I've made a habit of double-checking my seat before leaving any cinema or bus, because I clearly can't be trusted not to forget things when I'm distracted.

查看中文翻译

我弄丢的东西是我的外套,大约八个月前把它落在了岘港的一家电影院里,当时是和几个朋友看了一场晚场电影之后的事。

那是一个周五晚上。我们去看的那场电影结束得比较晚,因为影院里有点冷,看到一半我就把外套脱了搭在座椅靠背上。电影一结束我就完全把它忘了,因为大家都在聊天,急着打车回家。

我是第二天早上准备出门的时候才发现外套不见了,怎么找都找不到。我做的第一件事就是直接打电话给电影院,不过花了不少时间才联系上能帮忙查失物招领的人。他们让我亲自过去一趟,于是我下午带着当时具体的座位号回去了,幸运的是我还记得,因为我们是网上订的票。

还好前一天晚上有位清洁阿姨捡到了外套,交到了前台,所以我一到就在几分钟内拿回了外套,它整整齐齐地叠放在员工办公室的一把椅子上。

丢外套的时候,我一开始的感觉主要是对自己生气,因为那也不是什么贵的外套,只是穿了好几年、自己很喜欢的一件。不过真的拿回来之后我确实松了一口气,而且说实话还挺意外的,居然有陌生人愿意把它交上去,而不是干脆自己留下。从那以后,我养成了一个习惯,不管是离开电影院还是公交车,都会再检查一下座位,因为很明显,只要一分心,我就没办法保证自己不会忘东西。

294 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LR“still folded neatly over a chair in the staff office” — "Folded neatly" is a natural, flexible collocation that adds a small but vivid visual detail to the resolution of the story, going a step beyond a plain equivalent like "it was there" that a Band 6.5 retelling would likely settle for. Placing this detail at the very end of the sentence, after the main action (getting the jacket back) has already been reported, also shows some control over information ordering for effect, consistent with the "mostly common words plus a few flexible... ones" the Band 7.0 lexical descriptor describes."Folded neatly"是一个自然、灵活的搭配,为故事的结局增添了一个细小却生动的视觉细节,比Band 6.5复述中可能满足于的平淡说法"it was there"更进了一步。把这个细节放在句子的最末尾,即主要动作(拿回外套)已经交代完之后,也显示出说话者在信息排列上为了达到某种效果所做的一些掌控,这与Band 7.0词汇描述中所说的"大多是常见词汇,加上少量灵活……的词汇"相符。
  • FC“How I felt about losing it was mostly annoyed with myself at first, because it wasn't even an expensive jacket, just one I'd had for years and liked a lot.” — Rather than stopping at "I felt annoyed," the speaker immediately explains why the annoyance made sense given the jacket's actual value (sentimental rather than financial), developing the emotional reaction into a small piece of reasoning rather than leaving it as an isolated adjective. The qualifier "at first" also sets up the later shift to relief, showing the speaker tracking her own emotional arc across the story. This fuller, reason-supported development of feeling is the "reason and one short concrete example" elaboration the Band 7.0 fluency descriptor asks for, beyond the flatter feeling-statements typical of Band 6.5.说话者没有止步于"I felt annoyed",而是立刻解释了这种烦躁为何合理——考虑到外套的真正价值在于情感意义而非金钱价值,把情绪反应发展成了一小段推理,而不是让它作为一个孤立的形容词悬在那里。限定语"at first"还为后面转向如释重负的心情做了铺垫,显示说话者在整个故事中一直在追踪自己情绪的起伏轨迹。这种更充分、有理由支撑的情感展开,正是Band 7.0流利度描述所要求的"一个理由加一个简短具体例子"式的阐述,超越了Band 6.5典型的平淡情绪陈述。
  • GRA“a bit surprised that a stranger had bothered to hand it in rather than just keeping it” — The "rather than" comparison sits inside an already complex sentence (a "that"-clause reporting the surprise, itself containing the comparison), requiring the speaker to hold multiple grammatical layers together while keeping the meaning — a stranger chose honesty over self-interest — perfectly clear. This comfortable handling of a comparison embedded within a subordinate clause, without losing accuracy, is representative of the "comfortable mix of simple and complex sentences, generally accurate" the Band 7.0 descriptor describes, one notch below the even more tightly compressed structures seen at Band 7.5 elsewhere in this batch."rather than"这一比较结构嵌套在一个本已复杂的句子内部(一个报道惊讶之情的"that"从句,这个从句本身又包含了该比较结构),这要求说话者在保持含义——一个陌生人选择了诚实而非自身利益——完全清晰的同时,把多层语法结构同时驾驭住。这种把比较结构嵌入从属从句、却不失准确性的从容处理,代表了Band 7.0描述中"简单句与复杂句的自如混用,总体准确"的水平,比本批次其他地方所见Band 7.5那种压缩得更为紧密的结构低了一档。
7.5 分

The metonymic phrase 'watched the bus pull away with my six months on board' compresses the loss vividly, and the short callback 'I finished the boat one' closes the story with the kind of narrative economy expected at Band 7.5.转喻式的表达'watched the bus pull away with my six months on board'(眼睁睁看着那辆车开走,车上载着我六个月的心血)生动地把这次损失浓缩了进去,而简短的呼应句'I finished the boat one'(我后来把那幅船的画完成了)则以7.5分所期待的那种叙事上的精炼收束了整个故事。

The thing I lost was my sketchbook — a small black book, half full, with about six months of drawings and every idea I'd had for a client project — and I lost it on a city bus in Hanoi last spring.

When and where: I was in Hanoi for two days of meetings, staying with a friend across the city, and on the second evening I took a bus back from the client's office with the sketchbook on my lap, drawing the view. My phone rang, I stood up to get off at the stop, and I left the book on the seat. I realised on the pavement, turned round, and watched the bus pull away with my six months on board.

What I did was, first, run after it. Then I phoned the bus company and was told, kindly, that most things left on buses are never seen again. My friend and I went to the depot at six the next morning and searched a box of umbrellas. Nothing. I flew home to Da Nang that afternoon.

Three days later a parcel arrived at the studio. Inside was the book, and inside the book, on the first blank page, was a note from a woman who'd found it on the seat, read enough to see it belonged to a designer in Da Nang — my studio's name was on a drawing — and had posted it at her own cost. No name, no address, one line: 'Finish the boat one.'

How I felt about losing it in public was a specific kind of shame at having handed something private to a city of strangers. What I felt afterwards was almost the opposite. A stranger had looked at my private pages and decided they were worth sending home. I finished the boat one. I've never lost the book again, because it now lives in a bag I never take off.

查看中文翻译

我弄丢的东西是我的速写本——一本黑色小本子,已经用了大半,里面记录着大约六个月的画作,还有我为一个客户项目构思的所有想法——去年春天,我把它落在了河内的一辆公交车上。

什么时候、在什么地方:我当时在河内待两天开会,借住在城市另一头一位朋友家里,第二天晚上,我从客户办公室搭公交车回去,速写本就摆在膝盖上,我一边坐车一边画着窗外的景色。这时手机响了,我站起来准备到站下车,结果把本子落在了座位上。等我站到人行道上才意识到这件事,我转过身,却只能眼睁睁看着公交车载着我六个月的心血开走了。

我做的第一件事是追着车跑。然后我打电话给公交公司,对方很客气地告诉我,大多数落在公交车上的东西都再也找不回来了。我和朋友第二天早上六点去了车站,在一箱雨伞里翻找。什么都没有。那天下午我就飞回了岘港。

三天后,工作室收到了一个包裹。里面是那本速写本,而在本子的第一页空白页上,有一张字条,是一位在座位上发现本子的女士留下的——她翻看了一下,看出这本子属于一位岘港的设计师(我工作室的名字出现在一幅画里),便自费把它寄了回来。没有署名,没有地址,只有一句话:'把那幅船的画完成吧。'

弄丢它、把私人的东西交到一座满是陌生人的城市手中的那种感觉,是一种很特别的羞愧。而之后我的感受几乎完全相反。一个素不相识的人翻看了我私人的画页,却认为它们值得被寄回家。我把那幅船的画完成了。此后我再也没弄丢过那本速写本,因为它现在一直放在一个我从不离身的包里。

321 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LR“a specific kind of shame at having handed something private to a city of strangers” — Rather than naming a single emotion word like "embarrassed," the speaker constructs a precise, layered noun phrase — "a specific kind of shame" — and then extends it figuratively with "a city of strangers," treating the whole city as a single collective witness to the loss. This kind of precise emotional calibration, built through figurative language rather than a stock adjective, is exactly the "several precise or less-common words and collocations" combined with "one figurative... touch" the Band 7.5 descriptor calls for, going well beyond the plain "I felt embarrassed" a Band 6.5 or 7.0 answer would likely produce for the same moment.说话者没有用"embarrassed"这样单一的情绪词,而是构建了一个精确、层次丰富的名词短语——"a specific kind of shame"——然后用"a city of strangers"作比喻加以延伸,把整座城市当作这次失落的一个集体见证者。这种通过比喻语言而非套话式形容词实现的精确情感校准,正是Band 7.5描述所要求的"若干精确或不常见的词汇与搭配"叠加"一处比喻……点缀",远远超出了Band 6.5或7.0在同一情境下很可能给出的平淡说法"I felt embarrassed"。
  • FC“I finished the boat one.” — This four-word sentence deliberately trusts the listener to remember the earlier reference to "the boat one" (from the stranger's note), closing the story with understated economy rather than restating the context in full. This kind of confident narrative compression — allowing a callback to do emotional work without spelling it out — is a genuinely reflective and evaluative closing choice, demonstrating the "good rhythm" and restraint the Band 7.5 fluency descriptor associates with a strong, specific spoken answer, in clear contrast to the more explicit, fully-spelled-out closings typical of Band 6.5 responses elsewhere in this batch.这句只有四个词的话,刻意相信听者还记得之前提到过的"the boat one"(来自那位陌生人留下的字条),以一种含蓄克制的方式收尾,而不是把背景完整重述一遍。这种自信的叙事压缩——让一次呼应前文的提法去完成情感层面的工作,而不必挑明——是一个真正具有反思性和评价性的结尾选择,体现出Band 7.5流利度描述中与有力、具体的口语答案相关联的"良好节奏"与克制感,与本批次其他地方Band 6.5答案中更直白、完整交代的结尾形成鲜明对比。
  • GRA“I realised on the pavement, turned round, and watched the bus pull away with my six months on board.” — The metonymic phrase 'my six months on board' stands in for the sketchbook's contents, showing flexible, figurative grammar within a parallel verb sequence.转喻式的短语'my six months on board'(我六个月的心血都在那上面)代指了速写本里的内容,在一组并列动词结构中展现出灵活、富有比喻色彩的语法运用。

各考试时段出题记录

  • Describe an occasion when you lost something in a public place2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

  1. 1. Why do some people lose things more often than other people?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Spells the claim out fully with 'I think it is mostly about' rather than a compact fragment.用'I think it is mostly about'完整地表达出这个观点,而不是压缩成简洁的片段。

    I think it is mostly about attention and habits. My friend Đức has lost four phones since I have known him, but my sister has not lost anything since about 2010 - the difference is not about intelligence, but that she has a fixed place for everything, while he just believes he will remember. People who lose things often are usually thinking about something else, like a phone call, at the moment they put something down. Some carry too many things, so nothing really has its own place. Being tired or stressed makes it worse too. I think habit is stronger than memory.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为这主要跟注意力和习惯有关。我认识的朋友阿德自从我认识他以来已经丢了四部手机,但我姐姐从2010年左右起就没丢过任何东西——这个差别不在于聪明与否,而在于她给每样东西都固定了一个位置,而他只是单纯相信自己会记得。经常丢东西的人,在放下某样东西的那一刻,往往在想别的事情,比如一通电话。有些人随身带的东西太多,所以其实没有一样东西真正有固定的位置。疲惫或压力大也会让情况更糟。我认为习惯比记忆更靠得住。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think it is mostly about attention and habits.” — This full sentence states the claim plainly with 'I think... mostly about'; 7.0 compresses this into the fragment 'Attention and systems, mostly, I'd say.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the leanest 'Attention and systems, mostly.'这个完整句子用'I think... mostly about'平实地陈述观点;7.0分把它压缩成片段'Attention and systems, mostly, I'd say.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,变成最精简的'Attention and systems, mostly.'
    • LR“not about intelligence” — 'not about intelligence' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both keep this word but embed it in the tighter parallel structure 'a fixed place for everything... a fixed belief that he'll remember', a more rhetorically balanced phrase.'not about intelligence'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都保留了这个词,但把它嵌入更紧凑的并列结构'a fixed place for everything... a fixed belief that he'll remember'中,修辞上更加平衡。
    • GRA“People who lose things often are usually thinking about something else, like a phone call, at the moment they put something down.” — This sentence gives one example inside a 'like' phrase; 7.0 and 7.5 both restructure this with a dash-linked pair of examples, 'the next meeting, the phone call', for a punchier, more parallel rhythm.这句话用'like'短语给出了一个例子;7.0分和7.5分都用破折号连接的一对例子'the next meeting, the phone call'重新组织,节奏更有力、更对称。
    7.0 分

    Compresses the opener to a fragment with a mid-placed hedge, tighter than 6.5's full sentence.把开头压缩成一个片段,让步语放在句中,比6.5分的完整句更紧凑。

    Attention and systems, mostly, I'd say. Đức has lost four phones in the time I've known him, and my sister hasn't lost anything since about 2010; the difference isn't intelligence but that she has a fixed place for everything and he has a fixed belief that he'll remember. People who lose things often are usually thinking about something else - the next meeting, the phone call - at the moment they put a thing down. Some carry too much, so nothing ever has a home. Stress and tiredness make it worse, and some people simply don't mind losing things, which makes them careless in a way a more anxious person never is. Habit beats memory every time.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,主要是注意力和系统的问题。自从我认识阿德以来,他已经丢了四部手机,而我姐姐从2010年左右起就没丢过任何东西;差别不在于聪明与否,而在于她给每样东西都有固定的位置,而他只是坚信自己会记得。经常丢东西的人,在放下某样东西的那一刻,往往在想别的事情——下一场会议、那通电话。有些人带的东西太多,所以从来没有一样东西真正有个“家”。压力和疲惫会让情况更糟,而且有些人根本不在乎丢东西,这让他们变得粗心大意,而一个更容易焦虑的人永远不会这样。习惯每次都能战胜记忆。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Attention and systems, mostly, I'd say.” — This fragment-based opener with a mid-placed hedge is far more compact than 6.5's full sentence; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the leanest possible version, 'Attention and systems, mostly.'这种以片段为基础、让步语放在句中的开头比6.5分的完整句紧凑得多;7.5分完全去掉让步语,变成最精简的版本'Attention and systems, mostly.'
    • LR“a more anxious person never is” — This precise comparative phrase is more evaluative than a plain statement; 7.5 varies this slightly to 'a person who dreads it never is', a marginally more vivid, emotionally specific phrase.这个精确的比较表达比一个平铺直叙的陈述更具评价意味;7.5分把它稍作变化,改成'a person who dreads it never is',这个表达略微更生动、情感上也更具体。
    • GRA“Some carry too much, so nothing ever has a home.” — This is the one moderately complex touch expected at 7.0, using the metaphor 'a home' for where objects belong; 7.5 keeps a nearly identical sentence, trimming 'ever', and adds a further personal example about the sketchbook.这是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的处理,用'a home'这个比喻来指代物品该待的地方;7.5分保留了几乎相同的句子,去掉了'ever',并补充了一个关于素描本的个人例子。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps, the leanest and most confident opener of the three.去掉了7.0分保留的让步语'I'd say',成为三者中最精简、最自信的开头。

    Attention and systems, mostly. Đức has lost four phones in the time I've known him, and my sister hasn't lost anything since about 2010; the difference isn't intelligence but that she has a fixed place for everything and he has a fixed belief that he'll remember. People who lose things often are usually thinking about something else - the phone call, the next meeting - at the moment they put a thing down. Some carry too much, so nothing has a home. Stress and tiredness make it worse; I lost a sketchbook once at the end of a two-day trip. And some people simply don't mind losing things, which makes them careless in a way that a person who dreads it never is. Habit beats memory every time.

    查看中文翻译

    主要是注意力和系统的问题。自从我认识阿德以来,他已经丢了四部手机,而我姐姐从2010年左右起就没丢过任何东西;差别不在于聪明与否,而在于她给每样东西都有固定的位置,而他只是坚信自己会记得。经常丢东西的人,在放下某样东西的那一刻,往往在想别的事情——那通电话、下一场会议。有些人带的东西太多,所以没有一样东西真正有个“家”。压力和疲惫会让情况更糟;我有一次在一趟两天的旅行快结束时弄丢了一本素描本。而且有些人根本不在乎丢东西,这让他们以一种害怕丢东西的人永远不会有的方式变得粗心大意。习惯每次都能战胜记忆。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Attention and systems, mostly.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps at the end of the same fragment makes this the leanest and most confident of the three openers.去掉7.0分保留在同一片段末尾的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精简、最自信的一个。
    • LR“a person who dreads it never is” — This is a marginally more vivid, emotionally specific phrase than 7.0's 'a more anxious person never is', showing a slightly sharper, more original choice of words for the same comparison.这个表达比7.0分的'a more anxious person never is'略微更生动、情感上更具体,展现出在同一个比较上略微更犀利、更独特的用词选择。
    • GRA“Stress and tiredness make it worse; I lost a sketchbook once at the end of a two-day trip.” — Adding this personal, concrete example via a semicolon, absent from both 6.5 and 7.0, grounds the abstract claim in specific experience, showing the wider range of connected, illustrative detail expected at 7.5.用分号加入这个个人的、具体的例子,这在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,把抽象的论点落实到具体经历上,展现出7.5分应有的更丰富的关联性说明细节。

  2. 2. What kinds of things do people often lose in public places?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    States the claim in full with 'I think... probably the most common things' rather than a leaner fragment.用'I think... probably the most common things'完整地陈述观点,而不是用更精简的片段。

    I think umbrellas, phones, and keys are probably the most common things people lose. The lost-property box at a bus station I visited was a good example - it had many umbrellas, phone chargers, one shoe, a bag of vegetables, and several sets of keys, but no sketchbook, unfortunately. Umbrellas are lost the most because people carry them when it rains and forget them once it stops. Phones and wallets are lost constantly, and they hurt the most to lose. In cafes, people often forget laptops and chargers. Basically, people lose whatever they were holding when something more urgent happened.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为雨伞、手机和钥匙大概是人们最常丢的东西。我去过的一个汽车站的失物招领箱就是个很好的例子——里面有很多把雨伞、手机充电器、一只鞋子、一袋蔬菜,还有好几串钥匙,但很可惜没有素描本。雨伞是丢得最多的,因为人们下雨的时候带着它,雨一停就忘了。手机和钱包总是被丢,而且丢了最让人心疼。在咖啡馆,人们经常忘拿笔记本电脑和充电器。基本上,人们会丢掉手里正拿着的、而在那一刻发生了更紧急的事情时被搁下的东西。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think umbrellas, phones, and keys are probably the most common things people lose.” — This full sentence states the claim with 'I think... probably'; 7.0 compresses this into the fragment 'Umbrellas, phones and keys, I'd say, are probably the classic ones.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely, opening straight with the concrete example itself.这个完整句子用'I think... probably'陈述观点;7.0分把它压缩成片段'Umbrellas, phones and keys, I'd say, are probably the classic ones.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,直接以具体的例子开头。
    • LR“was a good example” — 'was a good example' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both replace this with the more idiomatic 'was a fair example' / 'was a fair survey', a slightly more precise, evaluative noun choice.'was a good example'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都换成更地道的'was a fair example'/'was a fair survey',这个名词选择略微更精确、更具评价意味。
    • GRA“The lost-property box at a bus station I visited was a good example - it had many umbrellas, phone chargers, one shoe, a bag of vegetables, and several sets of keys, but no sketchbook, unfortunately.” — This sentence uses 'it had... but' to link the list to the twist; 7.0 and 7.5 both drop 'it had' and let the list run directly after the dash, a tighter, more efficient structure.这句话用'it had... but'把列表和转折连接起来;7.0分和7.5分都去掉了'it had',让列表直接跟在破折号后面,结构更紧凑、更高效。
    7.0 分

    Uses a fragment with a mid-placed hedge and drops straight into the list without 'it had'.使用了让步语放在句中的片段,并直接进入列表,没有使用'it had'。

    Umbrellas, phones and keys, I'd say, are probably the classic ones. The lost-property box at a Hanoi bus depot was a fair example - umbrellas by the dozen, phone chargers, a single shoe, a bag of vegetables, several sets of keys, and, unfortunately, no sketchbook. Umbrellas top every list because people carry them when it rains and forget them the moment it stops. Phones, wallets and keys are lost constantly, and they hurt the most. Glasses, hats and headphones follow; in cafés it's laptops and chargers, and at airports it's documents and, astonishingly, luggage. What people lose is basically whatever they were holding when something more urgent happened.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,雨伞、手机和钥匙大概是最典型的。河内一个汽车站的失物招领箱就是个很公道的例子——雨伞一打一打的,手机充电器,一只落单的鞋子,一袋蔬菜,好几串钥匙,而很可惜,没有素描本。雨伞总是排在每份清单的榜首,因为人们下雨的时候带着它,雨一停就立刻忘了。手机、钱包和钥匙总是被丢,而且丢了最让人心疼。眼镜、帽子和耳机紧随其后;在咖啡馆是笔记本电脑和充电器,而在机场则是证件,还有令人吃惊的——行李。人们丢的基本上就是他们手里正拿着的、而在那一刻发生了更紧急的事情时被搁下的东西。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Umbrellas, phones and keys, I'd say, are probably the classic ones.” — This fragment with a mid-placed hedge is more compact than 6.5's full sentence; 7.5 removes the opening claim sentence entirely, moving straight to the concrete example as the answer's opening line.这个让步语放在句中的片段比6.5分的完整句更紧凑;7.5分完全去掉了开头的陈述句,直接以具体例子作为答案的开头。
    • LR“was a fair example” — 'fair' is a slightly more precise, idiomatic evaluative word than 6.5's plain 'good'; 7.5 extends this into 'was a fair survey', an even more original noun choice for the same idea.'fair'比6.5分平淡的'good'略微更精确、更地道,也更具评价意味;7.5分把它进一步发展成'was a fair survey',是对同一个意思更独特的名词选择。
    • GRA“Glasses, hats and headphones follow; in cafés it's laptops and chargers, and at airports it's documents and, astonishingly, luggage.” — This semicolon-linked list covering three locations is the one moderately complex structure expected at 7.0; 7.5 extends the same list with a fourth location, 'on beaches it's sunglasses', for an even fuller, more layered structure.这个用分号连接、涵盖三个地点的列表是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结构;7.5分在同一份列表中又加上第四个地点'on beaches it's sunglasses',结构更充实、更有层次。
    7.5 分

    Opens directly with the concrete example and a colon, no claim sentence or hedge beforehand.直接以具体例子和冒号开头,前面没有陈述句或让步语。

    The box at the Hanoi bus depot was a fair survey: umbrellas by the dozen, phone chargers, a single shoe, a bag of vegetables, several sets of keys, and no sketchbook. Umbrellas top every list because people carry them when it rains and forget them when it stops. Phones, wallets and keys are lost constantly, and hurt most. Glasses, hats, water bottles and headphones follow, along with anything small enough to sit on a seat. In cafés it's laptops and chargers; on beaches it's sunglasses; at airports it's documents and, astonishingly, luggage. What people lose is whatever they were holding when something more urgent happened. The bus depot's box was a museum of interrupted moments.

    查看中文翻译

    河内那个汽车站的失物招领箱就是一份相当公道的调查:雨伞一打一打的,手机充电器,一只落单的鞋子,一袋蔬菜,好几串钥匙,没有素描本。雨伞总是排在每份清单的榜首,因为人们下雨的时候带着它,雨一停就忘了。手机、钱包和钥匙总是被丢,而且丢了最让人心疼。眼镜、帽子、水瓶和耳机紧随其后,还有任何小到能放在座位上的东西。在咖啡馆是笔记本电脑和充电器;在海滩是太阳镜;在机场是证件,还有令人吃惊的——行李。人们丢的就是他们手里正拿着的、而在那一刻发生了更紧急的事情时被搁下的东西。那个汽车站的失物箱,就像一座陈列着被打断瞬间的博物馆。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The box at the Hanoi bus depot was a fair survey:” — Opening directly with the concrete example and a colon, with no claim sentence or hedge beforehand, is more confident and economical than 6.5 and 7.0's claim-first openers.直接以具体例子和冒号开头,前面没有陈述句或让步语,这比6.5分和7.0分那种先陈述观点的开头更自信、更精简。
    • LR“was a museum of interrupted moments” — This closing metaphor is a genuinely original, idiomatic image absent from both 6.5 and 7.0, giving the answer a memorable, reflective final line well beyond a literal description.这个结尾的比喻是一个真正独特、地道的意象,在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,给答案增添了一句令人难忘、富有反思意味的收尾,远超字面描述。
    • GRA“The bus depot's box was a museum of interrupted moments.” — This short final sentence, functioning as a metaphorical summary of everything listed before it, is a more flexible, essay-like closing device than the plainer final sentences in 6.5 and 7.0.这句简短的结尾句,作为对前面所列一切内容的比喻性总结,是一种比6.5分和7.0分较平淡的结尾句更灵活、更具书面论说文风格的收尾方式。

  3. 3. What motivates archaeologists to search for objects from the distant past?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    States the claim in full, 'I think it is curiosity about', rather than a compact fragment.用'I think it is curiosity about'完整地陈述观点,而不是用简洁的片段。

    I think it is curiosity about people who left no other message. An archaeologist I met near the Mỹ Sơn ruins told me that a broken cooking pot can answer questions that no written record can, like what people ate or how a family lived a thousand years ago. Archaeologists search because most of human history was never written down, so objects are often the only proof we have. Some are driven by one specific mystery, like where a city disappeared to. National pride also pays for a lot of this work, since a country's past is part of its identity.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为这是出于对那些没有留下其他讯息的人的好奇心。我在美山遗址附近认识的一位考古学家告诉我,一个破损的锅可以回答书面记录无法回答的问题,比如人们吃什么、一个家庭一千年前是怎么生活的。考古学家进行发掘,是因为人类历史大部分从未被记录下来,所以实物往往是我们拥有的唯一证据。有些人是被某个具体的谜团驱动的,比如一座城市消失去了哪里。民族自豪感也为这类工作提供了不少资金,因为一个国家的过去是其身份认同的一部分。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think it is curiosity about people who left no other message.” — This full sentence states the claim with 'I think it is'; 7.0 compresses this into the fragment 'Curiosity about people who left no other message, I'd say.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the bare noun phrase 'Curiosity about people who left no other message.'这个完整句子用'I think it is'陈述观点;7.0分把它压缩成片段'Curiosity about people who left no other message, I'd say.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,变成纯粹的名词短语'Curiosity about people who left no other message.'
    • LR“no other message” — 'no other message' is used here as plain description; 7.0 and 7.5 both keep the exact same phrase, showing this specific image was already strong at 6.5, with the real differences appearing elsewhere in sentence structure and added detail.'no other message'在这里是平实的描述;7.0分和7.5分都保留了完全相同的表达,说明这个具体的意象在6.5分时就已经很出色了,真正的差异体现在其他地方的句子结构和补充细节上。
    • GRA“Archaeologists search because most of human history was never written down, so objects are often the only proof we have.” — This sentence links cause and effect with 'so'; 7.0 and 7.5 both replace 'so' with 'and', restructuring the final clause as 'objects are the only witnesses left/the only witnesses', a slightly more literary, less mechanical connection.这句话用'so'连接因果;7.0分和7.5分都把'so'换成'and',把最后一个分句重新组织成'objects are the only witnesses left/the only witnesses',连接方式更文学化、更不机械。
    7.0 分

    Trims the opener to a fragment with a trailing hedge, more compact than 6.5's full sentence.把开头精简成片段,让步语放在句末,比6.5分的完整句更紧凑。

    Curiosity about people who left no other message, I'd say. An archaeologist at the Mỹ Sơn ruins near Da Nang told me that a broken cooking pot can answer questions no written record does - what people ate, who traded with whom, how a family lived on an ordinary day a thousand years ago. Archaeologists search because most of human history was never written down, and objects are the only witnesses left. Some are driven by a specific mystery - where a city went, why a civilisation ended. National pride funds a good deal of it too, since a country's past is part of its identity. And there's simply the human wish to know where we came from.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,是出于对那些没有留下其他讯息的人的好奇心。岘港附近美山遗址的一位考古学家告诉我,一个破损的锅可以回答书面记录无法回答的问题——人们吃什么、谁和谁做交易、一个家庭一千年前普通的一天是怎么过的。考古学家进行发掘,是因为人类历史大部分从未被记录下来,而实物是仅存的见证者。有些人是被某个具体的谜团驱动的——一座城市去了哪里、一个文明为何终结。民族自豪感也为这类工作提供了不少资金,因为一个国家的过去是其身份认同的一部分。而且,人类单纯就是想知道我们来自何方。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Curiosity about people who left no other message, I'd say.” — This fragment with a trailing hedge is more compact than 6.5's full sentence; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely, opening with the bare noun phrase 'Curiosity about people who left no other message.'这个让步语放在末尾的片段比6.5分的完整句更紧凑;7.5分完全去掉让步语,直接以纯粹的名词短语'Curiosity about people who left no other message.'开头。
    • LR“objects are the only witnesses left” — 'witnesses' is a precise, slightly personifying metaphor; 7.5 keeps the same word but trims 'left' for the even sharper 'objects are the only witnesses', a more compact final form.'witnesses'是一个精确、略带拟人色彩的比喻;7.5分保留了同一个词,但去掉了'left',变成更犀利的'objects are the only witnesses',形式更紧凑。
    • GRA“Some are driven by a specific mystery - where a city went, why a civilisation ended.” — This dash-linked list of two mysteries is the one moderately complex structure expected at 7.0; 7.5 keeps this exact sentence and adds a further parallel sentence, 'Some by the thrill of being the first hand on a thing in centuries.', extending the range of motives listed.这个用破折号连接、列出两个谜团的列表是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结构;7.5分保留了完全相同的句子,并加上另一句并列句'Some by the thrill of being the first hand on a thing in centuries.',拓展了所列动机的范围。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps, opening with the bare noun phrase.去掉了7.0分保留的让步语'I'd say',以纯粹的名词短语开头。

    Curiosity about people who left no other message. An archaeologist at the Mỹ Sơn ruins near Da Nang told me that a broken cooking pot can answer questions no written record does: what people ate, who traded with whom, how a family lived on an ordinary day a thousand years ago. Archaeologists search because most of human history was never written down, and objects are the only witnesses. Some are driven by a specific mystery - where a city went, why a civilisation ended. Some by the thrill of being the first hand on a thing in centuries. National pride funds a good deal of it, since a country's past is part of its identity. And there's the simple human wish to know where we came from, which never runs out.

    查看中文翻译

    是出于对那些没有留下其他讯息的人的好奇心。岘港附近美山遗址的一位考古学家告诉我,一个破损的锅可以回答书面记录无法回答的问题:人们吃什么、谁和谁做交易、一个家庭一千年前普通的一天是怎么过的。考古学家进行发掘,是因为人类历史大部分从未被记录下来,而实物是仅存的见证者。有些人是被某个具体的谜团驱动的——一座城市去了哪里、一个文明为何终结。有些人则是被那种几个世纪以来第一双触碰某件物品的手所带来的兴奋感所驱动。民族自豪感也为这类工作提供了不少资金,因为一个国家的过去是其身份认同的一部分。而且,还有一种单纯的人类渴望——想知道我们来自何方,这种渴望永远不会枯竭。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Curiosity about people who left no other message.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps at the end of the same fragment makes this the leanest and most direct of the three openers.去掉7.0分保留在同一片段末尾的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精简、最直接的一个。
    • LR“the simple human wish to know where we came from, which never runs out” — The added relative clause 'which never runs out' is a more original, reflective closing touch absent from 7.0's plainer final sentence, giving the whole answer a more resonant final image.增加的定语从句'which never runs out'是一种更独特、更具反思意味的收尾处理,7.0分较平淡的结尾句中没有这一点,使整个答案的结尾意象更有余韵。
    • GRA“Some by the thrill of being the first hand on a thing in centuries.” — This extra sentence fragment, added as a third parallel motive after the two given in 7.0, shows the fuller, more layered listing structure typical of 7.5.这个额外的句子片段,作为在7.0分给出的两个动机之后添加的第三个并列动机,展现出7.5分典型的更充实、更有层次的列举结构。

  4. 4. Why do people sometimes make a lot of effort to find something they have lost?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Spells the reason out with 'I think it is because' rather than leading directly with the reason.用'I think it is because'把原因讲清楚,而不是直接以原因开头。

    I think it is because the value is not really about the price. I once travelled across Hanoi at six in the morning for a sketchbook that only cost a few dollars but held six months of my ideas, and to me the effort made complete sense, even though the bus company probably thought I was crazy. People search hard for things that cannot be replaced, like photos or a grandmother's ring, or things that took a lot of time and work to make. Some people also just refuse to accept a loss that feels unfair, and effort can feel like a way to undo an accident.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为这是因为价值其实并不在于价格。我曾经在早上六点跨越整个河内,就为了一本只值几美元的素描本,但那本子里装着我半年来的想法,对我来说,这份付出完全说得通,尽管那家公交公司大概觉得我疯了。人们会拼命寻找那些无法替代的东西,比如照片或者祖母的戒指,或者那些花了大量时间和心血才做出来的东西。有些人也只是不肯接受一种让人觉得不公平的损失,而付出努力有时候感觉就像是在弥补一场意外。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think it is because the value is not really about the price.” — This full sentence spells the reason out with 'I think it is because'; 7.0 restructures this to lead with the reason, 'Because the value isn't the price, I'd say.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the bare causal clause 'Because the value isn't the price.'这个完整句子用'I think it is because'把原因讲清楚;7.0分重新组织,以原因开头,'Because the value isn't the price, I'd say.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,变成纯粹的因果分句'Because the value isn't the price.'
    • LR“made complete sense” — 'made complete sense' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both extend this into the sharper contrast 'made perfect sense to me and none at all/none to the bus company', a more idiomatic, balanced structure.'made complete sense'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都把它扩展成更犀利的对比'made perfect sense to me and none at all/none to the bus company',结构更地道、更平衡。
    • GRA“People search hard for things that cannot be replaced, like photos or a grandmother's ring, or things that took a lot of time and work to make.” — This sentence uses 'like... or' loosely; 7.0 and 7.5 both restructure the same list with a dash and three specific items, for a tighter, more vivid parallel structure.这句话较松散地使用了'like... or';7.0分和7.5分都用破折号和三个具体项目重新组织了这份列表,结构更紧凑、更生动、更对称。
    7.0 分

    Leads with the causal clause, placing the hedge 'I'd say' at the end, more sophisticated than 6.5's plain opener.以因果分句开头,把让步语'I'd say'放在句末,比6.5分平淡的开头更老练。

    Because the value isn't the price, I'd say. I went across Hanoi at six in the morning for a sketchbook that cost a few dollars and held six months of my thinking, and the effort made perfect sense to me and none at all to the bus company. People search hard for things that can't be replaced - photographs, a grandmother's ring, a child's only toy - or that represent real time and work. Practical necessity drives some searches too: keys, passports, medicine. There's also the refusal to accept a loss that feels unfair, and the hope that effort alone can somehow reverse an accident.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,是因为价值不在于价格。我曾在早上六点跨越整个河内,就为了一本只值几美元的素描本,但那本子里装着我半年来的思考,这份付出对我来说完全说得通,而对那家公交公司来说则完全说不通。人们会拼命寻找那些无法替代的东西——照片、祖母的戒指、孩子唯一的玩具——或者那些代表着真正时间和心血的东西。有时候实际的需要也会驱使人们去寻找:钥匙、护照、药物。还有一种因素是不肯接受一种让人觉得不公平的损失,以及一种希望——希望仅凭努力就能以某种方式扭转一场意外。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Because the value isn't the price, I'd say.” — Leading with the reason and placing the hedge 'I'd say' at the end is more sophisticated than 6.5's plain 'I think it is because'; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely, stating the same reason with full confidence.以原因开头,把让步语'I'd say'放在句末,比6.5分平淡的'I think it is because'更老练;7.5分完全去掉让步语,以十足的自信陈述同样的原因。
    • LR“made perfect sense to me and none at all to the bus company” — This balanced contrastive phrase is more vivid than 6.5's plain 'made complete sense'; 7.5 keeps a nearly identical phrase, trimming only 'at all', showing 7.0 had already found the right structure here.这个平衡的对比表达比6.5分平淡的'made complete sense'更生动;7.5分保留了几乎相同的表达,只去掉了'at all',说明7.0分在这里已经找到了合适的结构。
    • GRA“People search hard for things that can't be replaced - photographs, a grandmother's ring, a child's only toy - or that represent real time and work.” — This dash-bracketed list of three specific items is the one moderately complex structure expected at 7.0; 7.5 keeps a nearly identical structure but extends the final item to 'a child's toy that is the only toy', a slightly more emotionally precise phrase.这个用破折号括起来、列出三个具体项目的列表是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结构;7.5分保留了几乎相同的结构,但把最后一项扩展为'a child's toy that is the only toy',情感表达略微更精确。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps, for the leanest, most assertive causal opener.去掉了7.0分保留的让步语'I'd say',使因果开头最为精炼、最为坚定。

    Because the value isn't the price. I went across Hanoi at six in the morning for a sketchbook that cost a few dollars and held six months of my thinking, and the effort made perfect sense to me and none to the bus company. People search hard for things that can't be replaced - photographs, a grandmother's ring, a child's toy that is the only toy - or that represent time and work. Practical necessity drives some searches: keys, passports, medicine. There's also the refusal to accept a loss that feels unfair, and the hope that effort can reverse an accident. And for some things, the search is really a way of honouring what was lost, even when the searcher already knows it's gone.

    查看中文翻译

    是因为价值不在于价格。我曾在早上六点跨越整个河内,就为了一本只值几美元的素描本,但那本子里装着我半年来的思考,这份付出对我来说完全说得通,而对那家公交公司来说完全说不通。人们会拼命寻找那些无法替代的东西——照片、祖母的戒指、一个孩子唯一的那个玩具——或者那些代表着时间和心血的东西。有时候实际的需要也会驱使人们去寻找:钥匙、护照、药物。还有一种因素是不肯接受一种让人觉得不公平的损失,以及一种希望——希望努力能够扭转一场意外。而对于有些东西来说,寻找其实是一种致敬失去之物的方式,哪怕寻找的人早已知道它已经不在了。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Because the value isn't the price.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps at the end of the same clause makes this the leanest and most assertive of the three openers.去掉7.0分保留在同一分句末尾的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精炼、最坚定的一个。
    • LR“the search is really a way of honouring what was lost” — This closing reflective metaphor, absent from 6.5 and 7.0, reframes the whole answer around the idea of 'honouring', a more abstract and emotionally precise final point than the practical reasons listed earlier.这个结尾的反思性比喻在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,它围绕“致敬”这一概念重新构建了整个答案,是一个比前面所列实际原因更抽象、情感上更精确的收尾观点。
    • GRA“And for some things, the search is really a way of honouring what was lost, even when the searcher already knows it's gone.” — This extra final sentence, built around a concessive 'even when' clause, extends the answer with one more connected, reflective idea beyond what 6.5 or 7.0 include, showing the fuller range expected at 7.5.这句额外的结尾句围绕一个让步性的'even when'从句构建,在6.5分或7.0分所包含内容之外又延伸出一个相关的、富有反思意味的想法,展现出7.5分应有的更充实的范围。

  5. 5. How useful is it to offer a reward for finding a lost object?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Spells the balanced claim out fully with 'I think... but it can also feel'.用'I think... but it can also feel'完整地表达出这个平衡的观点。

    I think a reward can help in some cases, but it can also feel a little insulting in others. For example, the woman who found and posted my sketchbook did it herself, with no reward offered, and I do not think a reward would have changed anything for her. But a neighbour who offered money for a lost dog was brought three dogs that were not even his. Rewards can help when nobody obviously owns the object, because they give the finder a reason to make an effort. But they can also attract dishonest people, especially for valuable items.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为悬赏在某些情况下会有帮助,但在另一些情况下也可能让人觉得有点被冒犯。比如,那个找到并寄回我素描本的女士完全是自发的,并没有任何悬赏,我认为悬赏对她来说根本不会有什么影响。但一位邻居为了找回丢失的狗悬赏,结果被人送来了三只根本不是他家的狗。当一件物品明显没有主人认领时,悬赏是有帮助的,因为它给了拾到者一个愿意花心思去做的理由。但悬赏也可能招来不诚实的人,尤其是对贵重物品而言。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think a reward can help in some cases, but it can also feel a little insulting in others.” — This full sentence spells the balanced claim out with 'I think... but'; 7.0 and 7.5 both compress this into the fragment 'Useful in some cases, and slightly insulting in others.', dropping the verb for a more compact opener.这个完整句子用'I think... but'表达出平衡的观点;7.0分和7.5分都把它压缩成片段'Useful in some cases, and slightly insulting in others.',省略动词使开头更紧凑。
    • LR“feel a little insulting” — 'feel a little insulting' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both tighten this to simply 'slightly insulting', a more economical evaluative phrase.'feel a little insulting'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都收紧为简单的'slightly insulting',这个评价性表达更精简。
    • GRA“Rewards can help when nobody obviously owns the object, because they give the finder a reason to make an effort.” — This 'because' sentence states the effect plainly; 7.0 and 7.5 both extend the same idea with a vivid dash-linked metaphor, 'they turn a shrug into a phone call', adding a livelier, more concrete image.这个'because'句平铺直叙地陈述了效果;7.0分和7.5分都用一个用破折号连接的生动比喻'they turn a shrug into a phone call'来扩展同一个意思,增添了一个更生动、更具体的意象。
    7.0 分

    Compresses the opener to a fragment with a mid-placed hedge, tighter than 6.5's full sentence.把开头压缩成一个片段,让步语放在句中,比6.5分的完整句更紧凑。

    Useful in some cases, I'd say, and slightly insulting in others. The woman who posted my sketchbook did it at her own expense with no reward on offer, and I doubt a reward would have changed much about her at all; a neighbour who offered money for a lost dog, on the other hand, was brought three dogs that weren't even his. Rewards help when the object has no obvious owner and the finder needs a reason to bother - they turn a shrug into a phone call. They can also attract fraud, and for valuable items they can encourage people to hold things for ransom instead of simply returning them.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,悬赏在某些情况下有用,但在另一些情况下会让人觉得有点被冒犯。那位寄回我素描本的女士是自掏腰包做的,没有任何悬赏,我怀疑悬赏根本不会对她有什么影响;而另一方面,一位为丢失的狗悬赏的邻居,却被人送来了三只根本不是他家的狗。当一件物品明显没有主人,而拾到者需要一个不嫌麻烦的理由时,悬赏是有帮助的——它能把一个无所谓的耸肩变成一通电话。但悬赏也可能招来欺诈,而对贵重物品来说,悬赏还可能诱使人们扣着东西勒索,而不是干脆归还。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Useful in some cases, I'd say, and slightly insulting in others.” — This fragment with a mid-placed hedge is more compact than 6.5's full sentence; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the leaner 'Useful in some cases and slightly insulting in others.'这个让步语放在句中的片段比6.5分的完整句更紧凑;7.5分完全去掉让步语,变成更精简的'Useful in some cases and slightly insulting in others.'
    • LR“they turn a shrug into a phone call” — This vivid metaphor for motivating a finder is far more idiomatic than a plain description; 7.5 keeps the exact same phrase, showing 7.0 had already reached this level of vividness here.这个用来形容激励拾到者的生动比喻,比平铺直叙的描述地道得多;7.5分完全保留了这个表达,说明7.0分在这里已经达到了这种生动程度。
    • GRA“for valuable items they can encourage people to hold things for ransom instead of simply returning them” — This is the one moderately complex closing clause expected at 7.0; 7.5 trims 'instead of simply returning them' for a punchier ending and instead adds a further closing sentence about a clear name and contact detail, extending the answer's range.这是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结尾分句;7.5分去掉了'instead of simply returning them'以获得更有力的结尾,并转而补充了一句关于清楚留下姓名和联系方式的结尾句,拓展了答案的范围。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence, the leanest and most direct opener.去掉了7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',成为最精简、最直接的开头。

    Useful in some cases and slightly insulting in others. The woman who posted my sketchbook did it at her own expense with no reward on offer, and I suspect a reward would have changed nothing about her; a neighbour who offered money for a lost dog was brought three dogs that weren't his. Rewards help when the object has no obvious owner and the finder needs a reason to make an effort - they turn a shrug into a phone call. They can also attract fraud, and for valuable items they can encourage people to hold things for ransom. For most everyday losses, a clear name and contact inside the object does more than any reward, because most finders are honest and simply need to know where to send it.

    查看中文翻译

    悬赏在某些情况下有用,在另一些情况下则会让人觉得有点被冒犯。那位寄回我素描本的女士是自掏腰包做的,没有任何悬赏,我怀疑悬赏根本不会对她有什么影响;而一位为丢失的狗悬赏的邻居,却被人送来了三只不是他家的狗。当一件物品明显没有主人,而拾到者需要一个愿意花心思的理由时,悬赏是有帮助的——它能把一个无所谓的耸肩变成一通电话。但悬赏也可能招来欺诈,而对贵重物品来说,悬赏还可能诱使人们扣着东西勒索。对于大多数日常的遗失物来说,在物品里清楚地写上姓名和联系方式,比任何悬赏都更管用,因为大多数拾到者都是诚实的,他们只是需要知道该把东西送到哪里。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Useful in some cases and slightly insulting in others.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence makes this the leanest and most direct of the three openers.去掉7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精简、最直接的一个。
    • LR“a clear name and contact inside the object does more than any reward” — This closing practical insight, absent from 6.5 and 7.0, adds a further concrete, original point about honest finders, broadening the argument beyond the simple reward-versus-insult contrast.这个结尾的实用见解在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,它补充了一个关于诚实拾到者的具体、独特的观点,把论证拓展到了单纯的“悬赏对比冒犯”这一简单对比之外。
    • GRA“For most everyday losses, a clear name and contact inside the object does more than any reward, because most finders are honest and simply need to know where to send it.” — This extra closing sentence, built from a full 'because' clause, extends the answer with one more connected, practical idea beyond what 6.5 or 7.0 include, showing the fuller range expected at 7.5.这句额外的结尾句由一个完整的'because'从句构成,在6.5分或7.0分所包含内容之外又延伸出一个相关的、实用性的想法,展现出7.5分应有的更充实的范围。

  6. 6. What are some different ways people can try to find something they have lost?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Uses the plain phrase 'My own way of doing it' rather than a more precise single noun.使用了平实的短语'My own way of doing it',而不是一个更精确的单一名词。

    My own way of doing it was fairly complete - I ran after the bus, phoned the bus company, visited the lost-property office, posted in a Hanoi lost-and-found group online, and finally just waited, which was actually the method that worked. Retracing your steps is the classic method, and it works more often than people think. Asking staff at the place where you lost it, like a cafe or station, often helps too, since most places keep a lost-property box. Posting in online local groups has also reunited a lot of people with their things. For phones, tracking apps can help as well.

    查看中文翻译

    我自己的做法算是相当全面了——我追着公交车跑、给公交公司打电话、去失物招领处、在河内的一个失物招领网络群组里发帖,最后就是干等着,而这居然就是真正奏效的方法。原路寻找是最经典的方法,而且它成功的概率比人们想的要高。向丢失物品地点的工作人员询问,比如咖啡馆或车站,也常常有帮助,因为大多数地方都有一个失物招领箱。在网上的本地群组里发帖也让很多人找回了自己的东西。对于手机来说,追踪软件也能有帮助。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“My own way of doing it was fairly complete -” — 'My own way of doing it' is plain, everyday phrasing; 7.0 and 7.5 both tighten this to the more precise noun 'sequence', a single word doing the same descriptive job more economically.'My own way of doing it'是平实的日常说法;7.0分和7.5分都收紧为更精确的名词'sequence',用一个词就更经济地完成了同样的描述任务。
    • LR“was actually the method that worked” — 'was actually the method that worked' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both tighten this to 'turned out to be the method that worked', a slightly more natural, idiomatic verb phrase.'was actually the method that worked'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都收紧为'turned out to be the method that worked',这个动词短语略微更自然、更地道。
    • GRA“Retracing your steps is the classic method, and it works more often than people think.” — This full sentence links two ideas with 'and'; 7.5 restructures the whole answer's later sentences into a series of short fragments, a noticeably more compact, list-like structure than 6.5's complete sentences.这个完整句子用'and'连接了两个意思;7.5分把答案后半部分的句子重新组织成一连串简短的片段,比6.5分完整的句子结构明显更紧凑、更像列表。
    7.0 分

    Uses the more precise noun 'sequence' plus a mid-placed hedge, tighter than 6.5's plainer opener.使用了更精确的名词'sequence'加上句中的让步语,比6.5分较平淡的开头更紧凑。

    My own sequence was fairly complete, I'd say - run after the bus, phone the company, visit the depot, post in a Hanoi lost-and-found group online, and finally give up and wait, which turned out to be the method that worked. Retracing your steps is the classic approach, and it succeeds more often than people expect. Asking the staff wherever the loss happened, whether it's a café, a station or a shop, helps too, since most places keep some kind of box. Lost-property offices exist for exactly this reason. Online groups for the local area have reunited a surprising number of people with their things, and for phones, tracking apps can help as well.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,我自己的这套流程算是相当完整——追着公交车跑,给公司打电话,去车站,在河内的一个失物招领网络群组里发帖,最后放弃并等待,而这竟然就是真正奏效的方法。原路寻找是最经典的做法,而且它成功的概率比人们想的要高。向丢失地点的工作人员询问,不管是咖啡馆、车站还是商店,也有帮助,因为大多数地方都会准备某种失物箱。失物招领处正是为此而存在的。当地的网络群组已经让相当多的人找回了自己的东西,而对于手机来说,追踪软件也能有帮助。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“My own sequence was fairly complete, I'd say -” — Using the more precise word 'sequence' plus a mid-placed hedge is tighter than 6.5's plainer 'My own way of doing it was fairly complete -'; 7.5 removes the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, relying on the bare claim to open the answer.使用更精确的词'sequence'加上句中的让步语,比6.5分较平淡的'My own way of doing it was fairly complete -'更紧凑;7.5分完全去掉让步语'I'd say',只靠陈述本身来开启答案。
    • LR“turned out to be the method that worked” — This is a more natural, idiomatic verb phrase than 6.5's plain 'was actually the method that worked'; 7.5 keeps this exact phrase, showing 7.0 had already found the right wording here.这是一个比6.5分平淡的'was actually the method that worked'更自然、更地道的动词短语;7.5分保留了完全相同的表达,说明7.0分在这里已经找到了合适的措辞。
    • GRA“Asking the staff wherever the loss happened, whether it's a café, a station or a shop, helps too, since most places keep some kind of box.” — This is a full, grammatically complete sentence with an embedded 'whether' clause, the one moderately complex structure expected at 7.0; 7.5 restructures the same idea into a fragment, a more compact, list-like alternative.这是一个完整的、语法完整的句子,内嵌了一个'whether'从句,是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结构;7.5分把同样的意思重新组织成一个片段,是一种更紧凑、更像列表的替代方式。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' and uses a colon instead of a dash, the leanest, most confident opener.去掉了让步语'I'd say',并用冒号代替破折号,是最精简、最自信的开头。

    My own sequence was fairly complete: run after the bus, phone the company, visit the depot, post in a Hanoi lost-and-found group online, and finally give up and wait, which turned out to be the method that worked. Retracing steps is the classic, and it succeeds more often than people expect. Asking the staff wherever the loss happened - a café, a station, a shop - since most places keep a box. Lost-property offices, which exist for exactly this. Online groups for the area, which have reunited a surprising number of people with their things. For phones and some devices, tracking apps. And putting the word out through friends, since cities are smaller than they look. The main thing is speed; a found object is easiest to return on the day it's found.

    查看中文翻译

    我自己的这套流程算是相当完整:追着公交车跑,给公司打电话,去车站,在河内的一个失物招领网络群组里发帖,最后放弃并等待,而这竟然就是真正奏效的方法。原路寻找是最经典的做法,而且它成功的概率比人们想的要高。向丢失地点的工作人员询问——咖啡馆、车站、商店——因为大多数地方都会准备一个失物箱。失物招领处,正是为此而存在的。当地的网络群组,已经让相当多的人找回了自己的东西。对于手机和某些设备来说,追踪软件。还有通过朋友传话,因为城市其实比看起来要小。最重要的是速度;一件失物在被找到的当天最容易归还。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“My own sequence was fairly complete:” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps, and using a colon instead of a dash, gives this opener a leaner, more confident, essay-like start.去掉7.0分保留的让步语'I'd say',并用冒号代替破折号,使这个开头更精简、更自信,更具书面论说文风格。
    • LR“The main thing is speed; a found object is easiest to return on the day it's found.” — This closing practical insight, absent from 6.5 and 7.0, adds a further precise, memorable final point using the semicolon-linked structure to state cause and effect concisely.这个结尾的实用见解在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,它用分号连接的结构简洁地陈述了因果关系,补充了一个更精确、更令人印象深刻的收尾观点。
    • GRA“Lost-property offices, which exist for exactly this. Online groups for the area, which have reunited a surprising number of people with their things. For phones and some devices, tracking apps.” — This run of short sentence fragments, each ending in a relative clause or bare noun phrase, is a noticeably more flexible, list-like structure than the fuller, more conventional sentences used at 6.5 and 7.0 for the same content.这一连串简短的句子片段,每个都以一个定语从句或纯粹的名词短语收尾,是一种明显比6.5分和7.0分中用于同样内容的更完整、更常规的句子更灵活、更像列表的结构。

  7. 7. Should archaeological objects stay in the country where they are found?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Hedges the opener twice with 'I think, as a general rule, yes, but'.开头连续使用了两次让步,'I think, as a general rule, yes, but'。

    I think, as a general rule, yes, but with some room for lending them out. The Cham museum in Da Nang, which holds art from the civilisation that built Mỹ Sơn, shows some of its most important pieces only as photographs, because the real objects were taken to a museum in Paris a long time ago. I think objects belong to the culture that made them and the place that gives them meaning. Some people argue that certain countries cannot protect their finds well, or that big museums let more people see them, but loans and shared exhibitions can solve both problems.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为,总的原则上,是的,但也应该留有一些出借的余地。岘港的占族博物馆收藏着建造美山遗址那个文明的艺术品,其中一些最重要的展品只能以照片形式展示,因为真品很久以前就被带去了巴黎的一家博物馆。我认为文物应该属于创造它们的文化,以及赋予它们意义的地方。有些人认为某些国家无法很好地保护他们的发现,或者说大型博物馆能让更多人看到这些文物,但出借和联合展览可以同时解决这两个问题。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think, as a general rule, yes, but with some room for lending them out.” — This opener hedges twice with 'I think... but'; 7.0 trims this to 'As a rule, yes, I'd say, with some room for exchange.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the bare 'As a rule, yes, with some room for exchange.'这个开头用'I think... but'让步了两次;7.0分把它精简为'As a rule, yes, I'd say, with some room for exchange.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,变成简洁的'As a rule, yes, with some room for exchange.'
    • LR“with some room for lending them out” — 'lending them out' is plain, everyday phrasing; 7.0 and 7.5 both replace it with the more precise, formal noun 'exchange', a single word doing the same job more economically.'lending them out'是平实的日常说法;7.0分和7.5分都换成更精确、更正式的名词'exchange',用一个词就更经济地完成了同样的任务。
    • GRA“Some people argue that certain countries cannot protect their finds well, or that big museums let more people see them, but loans and shared exhibitions can solve both problems.” — This sentence packs the counter-arguments and the answer into one long clause with 'but'; 7.0 and 7.5 both split this into two separate sentences, a clearer, more structured two-step argument.这句话用'but'把反驳论点和答案都塞进了一个长分句里;7.0分和7.5分都把它拆成两个独立的句子,论证更清晰、更有条理,分两步走。
    7.0 分

    Trims the double hedge of 6.5 down to a single mid-placed 'I'd say'.把6.5分开头的双重让步压缩为句中单一的'I'd say'。

    As a rule, yes, I'd say, with some room for exchange. The Cham museum in Da Nang, which holds the art of the civilisation that built Mỹ Sơn, shows some of its most important pieces only as photographs, because the originals were taken to a museum in Paris a century ago - and a country's past being displayed elsewhere while its own museum shows pictures is genuinely hard to defend. Objects belong to the culture that made them and the place that gives them meaning. The counter-arguments are that some countries can't yet protect their finds, and that great museums let the whole world see them. Both can be answered with loans and shared exhibitions instead.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,总的原则上是的,但应该留有一些交流的余地。岘港的占族博物馆收藏着建造美山遗址那个文明的艺术品,其中一些最重要的展品只能以照片形式展示,因为真品在一个世纪前就被带去了巴黎的一家博物馆——一个国家的过去在别处展出,而自己的博物馆却只能展示照片,这实在很难说得过去。文物应该属于创造它们的文化,以及赋予它们意义的地方。反对的论点是,有些国家还无法保护好自己的发现,而大型博物馆能让全世界的人都看到这些文物。这两点都可以用出借和联合展览来解决。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“As a rule, yes, I'd say, with some room for exchange.” — Trimming the double hedge of 6.5 down to a single mid-placed 'I'd say' is more compact; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely, stating the same position with full confidence.把6.5分的双重让步压缩为句中单一的'I'd say'更加简洁;7.5分完全去掉让步语,以十足的自信陈述同样的立场。
    • LR“is genuinely hard to defend” — The intensifier 'genuinely' adds emphasis to this evaluative claim; 7.5 keeps the sentence almost identical but drops 'genuinely', trimming it to the slightly sharper 'is hard to defend'.强调词'genuinely'为这个评价性陈述增添了强调;7.5分保留了几乎相同的句子,但去掉了'genuinely',精简成略微更犀利的'is hard to defend'。
    • GRA“The counter-arguments are that some countries can't yet protect their finds, and that great museums let the whole world see them.” — This is the one moderately complex sentence expected at 7.0, listing two counter-arguments with 'and that'; 7.5 keeps this sentence almost unchanged, showing it already reaches 7.5-level fluency, and instead extends the closing solution with a third element, 'help with conservation'.这是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂句,用'and that'列出两个反驳论点;7.5分保留了几乎不变的这句话,说明它已经达到了7.5分水平的流利度,并转而在结尾的解决方案中又加上了第三个要素'help with conservation'。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence, the leanest and most direct opener.去掉了7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',成为最精简、最直接的开头。

    As a rule, yes, with some room for exchange. The Cham museum in Da Nang, which holds the art of the civilisation that built Mỹ Sơn, shows some of its most important pieces as photographs, because the originals were taken to a museum in Paris a century ago - and a country's past being displayed elsewhere while its own museum shows pictures is hard to defend. Objects belong to the culture that made them and the place that gives them meaning. The counter-arguments are that some countries can't yet protect their finds, and that great museums let the whole world see them. Both can be answered by loans, shared exhibitions and help with conservation. Keeping the object and lending it is fairer than keeping it and refusing.

    查看中文翻译

    总的原则上是的,但应该留有一些交流的余地。岘港的占族博物馆收藏着建造美山遗址那个文明的艺术品,其中一些最重要的展品只以照片形式展示,因为真品在一个世纪前就被带去了巴黎的一家博物馆——一个国家的过去在别处展出,而自己的博物馆却只能展示照片,这实在难以说得过去。文物应该属于创造它们的文化,以及赋予它们意义的地方。反对的论点是,有些国家还无法保护好自己的发现,而大型博物馆能让全世界的人都看到这些文物。这两点都可以用出借、联合展览以及协助文物保护来解决。留着文物同时出借,比留着文物却拒绝分享要公平得多。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“As a rule, yes, with some room for exchange.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence makes this the leanest and most direct of the three openers, stating the position as a flat fact.去掉7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精简、最直接的一个,把立场当作一个平实的事实来陈述。
    • LR“Keeping the object and lending it is fairer than keeping it and refusing.” — This closing aphoristic sentence, absent from 6.5 and 7.0, condenses the whole argument into a punchy, parallel final judgement, giving the answer a sharper, more memorable conclusion.这个结尾格言在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,它把整个论证浓缩成一个有力、对称的最终判断,让答案的结论更犀利、更令人难忘。
    • GRA“Both can be answered by loans, shared exhibitions and help with conservation.” — Extending 7.0's two-item solution ('loans and shared exhibitions') to a three-item list adds an extra clause within the same sentence pattern, showing the fuller range of connected ideas typical of 7.5.把7.0分两项的解决方案('loans and shared exhibitions')扩展成三项列表,在同样的句式中加入了一个额外的分句,展现出7.5分典型的更丰富的关联思路。

  8. 8. Will anything from this century interest archaeologists in the future?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Spells the claim out fully with 'I think... and there will be' rather than a compact fragment.用'I think... and there will be'完整地表达出这个观点,而不是压缩成简洁的片段。

    I think almost everything will interest them, and there will be too much of it. The plastic in the sand on my beach will probably outlast every building in the city, and future archaeologists will find a layer of it in soil everywhere on earth - a strange but very durable record of our century. They will be interested in what we ate, based on the packaging, and in how we lived, based on all the things we threw away. Their problem will actually be the opposite of the usual one - not too little evidence, but far too much of it.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为几乎所有东西都会让他们感兴趣,而且会多到过剩。我家海滩沙子里的塑料很可能会比这座城市里的每一栋建筑都存在得更久,未来的考古学家会在地球上到处的土壤里发现一层塑料——这是我们这个世纪奇怪但十分耐久的记录。他们会通过包装了解我们吃什么,通过我们扔掉的一切东西了解我们是怎么生活的。他们的问题其实和通常的问题正好相反——不是证据太少,而是证据太多。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I think almost everything will interest them, and there will be too much of it.” — This full sentence spells the claim out with 'I think... and there will be'; 7.0 compresses this into the fragment 'Almost everything, I'd say, and they'll be overwhelmed by it.', and 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the leaner 'Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed.'这个完整句子用'I think... and there will be'表达出这个观点;7.0分把它压缩成片段'Almost everything, I'd say, and they'll be overwhelmed by it.',7.5分则完全去掉让步语,变成更精简的'Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed.'
    • LR“very durable record” — 'very durable record' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both sharpen this to 'our century's most durable record', a more precise, superlative phrase.'very durable record'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都把它改得更犀利,变成'our century's most durable record',这是一个更精确的最高级表达。
    • GRA“They will be interested in what we ate, based on the packaging, and in how we lived, based on all the things we threw away.” — This sentence repeats 'based on' twice, which is workable but repetitive; 7.0 and 7.5 both vary this with semicolon-linked 'from' phrases instead, a more parallel, less repetitive structure.这句话重复使用了两次'based on',虽然行得通但有些重复;7.0分和7.5分都改用分号连接的'from'短语,结构更对称、重复更少。
    7.0 分

    Compresses the opener to a fragment with a mid-placed hedge, tighter than 6.5's full sentence.把开头压缩成一个片段,让步语放在句中,比6.5分的完整句更紧凑。

    Almost everything, I'd say, and they'll be overwhelmed by it. The plastic in the sand on my beach will outlast every building in the city, and future archaeologists will find a layer of it in every soil on earth - our century's most durable record, unfortunately. They'll be interested in what we ate, from the packaging; in how we lived, from the vast quantity of objects we threw away; and in our cities, probably the largest things humans have ever built. Their puzzle will be the opposite of the usual one: not too little evidence, but too much, with much of our actual life stored in formats that may not last at all.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,几乎所有东西都会让他们感兴趣,而且会多到让他们不知所措。我家海滩沙子里的塑料会比这座城市里的每一栋建筑都存在得更久,未来的考古学家会在地球上每一处的土壤里发现一层塑料——很不幸,这将是我们这个世纪最耐久的记录。他们会通过包装了解我们吃什么;通过我们扔掉的海量物品了解我们是怎么生活的;还会关注我们的城市,那大概是人类有史以来建造过的最大的东西。他们面对的谜团将和通常的正好相反:不是证据太少,而是太多,而我们实际生活中的许多内容都存储在可能根本无法保存下来的格式里。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Almost everything, I'd say, and they'll be overwhelmed by it.” — This fragment with a mid-placed hedge is more compact than 6.5's full sentence; 7.5 removes the hedge entirely for the leaner 'Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed.'这个让步语放在句中的片段比6.5分的完整句更紧凑;7.5分完全去掉让步语,变成更精简的'Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed.'
    • LR“our century's most durable record, unfortunately” — This superlative phrase with the trailing evaluative 'unfortunately' is more precise and original than 6.5's plain 'very durable record'; 7.5 keeps this exact phrase unchanged, showing 7.0 had already found the right wording here.这个最高级表达加上句末评价词'unfortunately',比6.5分平淡的'very durable record'更精确、更独特;7.5分完全保留了这个表达,说明7.0分在这里已经找到了合适的措辞。
    • GRA“in our cities, probably the largest things humans have ever built” — This appositive phrase with the hedge 'probably' is the one moderately complex addition expected at 7.0; 7.5 removes 'probably' and restructures it as a full relative clause, 'which are the largest things humans have ever built', for a more assertive, grammatically fuller structure.这个带有让步词'probably'的同位语短语是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的补充;7.5分去掉了'probably',把它重新组织成一个完整的定语从句'which are the largest things humans have ever built',结构更肯定、语法上更完整。
    7.5 分

    Removes the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence, the leanest and most direct opener.去掉了7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',成为最精简、最直接的开头。

    Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed. The plastic in the sand on my beach will outlast every building in the city, and future archaeologists will find a layer of it in every soil on earth - our century's most durable record, unfortunately. They'll be interested in what we ate, from the packaging; in how we lived, from the vast quantity of objects we threw away; and in our cities, which are the largest things humans have ever built. The puzzle for them will be the opposite of the usual one: not too little evidence but too much, and much of our actual life - messages, photographs, money - stored in formats that will be unreadable within decades. They may know our rubbish perfectly and our thoughts not at all.

    查看中文翻译

    几乎所有东西都会让他们感兴趣,而且他们会不知所措。我家海滩沙子里的塑料会比这座城市里的每一栋建筑都存在得更久,未来的考古学家会在地球上每一处的土壤里发现一层塑料——很不幸,这将是我们这个世纪最耐久的记录。他们会通过包装了解我们吃什么;通过我们扔掉的海量物品了解我们是怎么生活的;还会关注我们的城市,那是人类有史以来建造过的最大的东西。他们面对的谜团将和通常的正好相反:不是证据太少,而是太多,而我们实际生活中的许多内容——信息、照片、金钱——都存储在几十年内就将无法读取的格式里。他们也许会对我们的垃圾了如指掌,却对我们的思想一无所知。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Almost everything, and they'll be overwhelmed.” — Removing the hedge 'I'd say' that 7.0 keeps mid-sentence makes this the leanest and most direct of the three openers.去掉7.0分保留在句中的让步语'I'd say',使这个开头成为三者中最精简、最直接的一个。
    • LR“They may know our rubbish perfectly and our thoughts not at all.” — This closing aphoristic sentence, absent from 6.5 and 7.0, condenses the whole answer into a punchy, parallel final judgement using the precise contrast between 'rubbish' and 'thoughts'.这个结尾格言在6.5分和7.0分中都没有出现,它用'rubbish'和'thoughts'之间精确的对比,把整个答案浓缩成一个有力、对称的最终判断。
    • GRA“much of our actual life - messages, photographs, money - stored in formats that will be unreadable within decades” — This dash-bracketed list embedded mid-sentence, followed by a relative clause, is a more compact and layered structure than 7.0's simpler 'much of our actual life stored in formats that may not last at all', packing in more specific detail within the same sentence.这个嵌入句中、用破折号括起来的列表,后面跟着一个定语从句,是一种比7.0分较简单的'much of our actual life stored in formats that may not last at all'更紧凑、更有层次的结构,在同一句话里塞进了更具体的细节。

  9. 9. What can people do to avoid losing things?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    States the claim in full with 'I do two things now, and both are quite boring but effective.'用'I do two things now, and both are quite boring but effective.'完整地陈述观点。

    I do two things now, and both are quite boring but effective. My sketchbook now stays in a bag I never take off, and every notebook I own has my name and phone number written inside the cover, so a finder does not have to be a detective. Beyond that, having a fixed place for important things means you notice quickly if something is missing. Checking the seat before leaving a bus, cafe, or taxi only takes two seconds and becomes automatic after a while. Carrying fewer things also helps, because each one gets more attention. And putting your phone away before standing up really helps too.

    查看中文翻译

    我现在会做两件事,虽然都挺无聊,但很有效。我的素描本现在一直放在一个我从不摘下来的包里,而且我拥有的每一本笔记本封面内页都写着我的名字和电话号码,这样拾到的人就不用当侦探了。除此之外,给重要的东西固定一个位置,意味着一旦有东西不见了,你能很快察觉。离开公交车、咖啡馆或出租车前检查一下座位,只需要两秒钟,时间久了就会变成一种习惯性动作。少带点东西也有帮助,因为每一样东西都能得到更多的关注。还有,起身之前把手机收好,这一点也确实很有用。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I do two things now, and both are quite boring but effective.” — This full sentence states the claim with 'I do... and both are'; 7.0 and 7.5 both tighten this to the more compact fragment 'Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.', dropping 'quite... but effective' for a leaner rhythm.这个完整句子用'I do... and both are'陈述观点;7.0分和7.5分都收紧为更紧凑的片段'Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.',去掉了'quite... but effective',节奏更精简。
    • LR“does not have to be a detective” — 'does not have to be a detective' is plain; 7.0 and 7.5 both tighten this to 'doesn't need to be a detective', a slightly more natural, idiomatic modal choice.'does not have to be a detective'比较平淡;7.0分和7.5分都收紧为'doesn't need to be a detective',这个情态动词的选择略微更自然、更地道。
    • GRA“Beyond that, having a fixed place for important things means you notice quickly if something is missing.” — This is a single plain sentence; 7.0 and 7.5 both restructure the same list of habits using a colon and semicolons, a more compact, list-like structure covering more ground in the same space.这是一个单独的平铺直叙的句子;7.0分和7.5分都用冒号和分号重新组织了同样这份习惯清单,结构更紧凑、更像列表,在同样的篇幅里涵盖了更多内容。
    7.0 分

    Tightens the opener to the compact fragment 'Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.'把开头收紧为紧凑的片段'Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.'

    Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring. The sketchbook now lives in a bag I never take off, and every notebook I own has my name and number inside the cover, so a finder doesn't need to be a detective. Beyond that: a fixed home for the things that matter, so their absence is noticed immediately; a quick check of the seat before leaving any bus, café or taxi, which takes two seconds and becomes automatic; and fewer things carried, so each one gets more attention. Tracking tags for keys and bags are cheap now too. And the hardest one - putting the phone down before standing up, since most losses happen in a moment of distraction.

    查看中文翻译

    有两件事让我避免重蹈覆辙,虽然两件都挺无聊。素描本现在一直放在一个我从不摘下来的包里,而我拥有的每一本笔记本封面内页都写着我的名字和电话号码,这样拾到的人就不用当侦探了。除此之外:给重要的东西一个固定的“家”,这样一旦不见了就能立刻察觉;离开任何公交车、咖啡馆或出租车前快速检查一下座位,只需要两秒钟,慢慢就会变成一种自动的习惯;还有少带点东西,这样每一样都能得到更多关注。现在给钥匙和包配追踪标签也很便宜了。还有最难的那一条——起身之前把手机放下,因为大多数丢东西都发生在分心的一瞬间。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.” — This compact fragment-based opener is tighter than 6.5's fuller sentence with its extra qualifiers 'quite... but effective'; 7.5 keeps this exact same sentence, showing 7.0 had already found the sharpest possible opening here.这个以紧凑片段为基础的开头比6.5分带有额外修饰语'quite... but effective'的更完整句子更紧凑;7.5分完全保留了这个句子,说明7.0分在这里已经找到了最犀利的开头方式。
    • LR“doesn't need to be a detective” — This slightly more natural modal phrasing is a small upgrade on 6.5's 'does not have to be a detective'; 7.5 keeps the exact same phrase, showing 7.0 had already reached the right register.这个略微更自然的情态动词表达是对6.5分'does not have to be a detective'的小幅升级;7.5分保留了完全相同的表达,说明7.0分在这里已经达到了合适的语域。
    • GRA“Beyond that: a fixed home for the things that matter, so their absence is noticed immediately; a quick check of the seat before leaving any bus, café or taxi, which takes two seconds and becomes automatic; and fewer things carried, so each one gets more attention.” — This colon-and-semicolon list of three habits is the one moderately complex structure expected at 7.0; 7.5 keeps a nearly identical list but removes the final 'and', instead adding two further separate short sentences about bright colours and tracking tags, extending the range even further.这个用冒号和分号列出三个习惯的列表是7.0分应有的那种中等复杂的结构;7.5分保留了几乎相同的列表,但去掉了最后的'and',转而加上两句关于鲜艳颜色和追踪标签的独立短句,进一步拓展了范围。
    7.5 分

    Keeps 7.0's opener unchanged, but adds two extra short closing sentences to the habit list.保持7.0分的开头不变,但在习惯清单末尾加上了两句额外的短句。

    Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring. The sketchbook now lives in a bag I never take off, and every notebook I own has my name and number inside the cover, so a finder doesn't need to be a detective. Beyond that: a fixed home for the things that matter, so their absence is noticed immediately; a quick check of the seat before leaving any bus, café or taxi, which takes two seconds and becomes automatic; fewer things carried, so each one gets more attention. Bright colours help for small objects. Tracking tags for keys and bags are cheap now. And the hardest one: putting the phone down before standing up, since most losses happen in the moment of distraction, not the moment of forgetting.

    查看中文翻译

    有两件事让我避免重蹈覆辙,虽然两件都挺无聊。素描本现在一直放在一个我从不摘下来的包里,而我拥有的每一本笔记本封面内页都写着我的名字和电话号码,这样拾到的人就不用当侦探了。除此之外:给重要的东西一个固定的“家”,这样一旦不见了就能立刻察觉;离开任何公交车、咖啡馆或出租车前快速检查一下座位,只需要两秒钟,慢慢就会变成一种自动的习惯;还有少带点东西,这样每一样都能得到更多关注。鲜艳的颜色对小物件有帮助。现在给钥匙和包配追踪标签也很便宜了。还有最难的那一条:起身之前把手机放下,因为大多数丢东西发生在分心的那一刻,而不是遗忘的那一刻。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Two things saved me from a repeat, and both are boring.” — This identical opening fragment to 7.0 shows the sentence was already working at its sharpest by 7.0; the real differences at 7.5 appear later, in the extra habits added to the closing list.这个和7.0分完全相同的开头片段说明,这句话在7.0分时就已经达到了最犀利的状态;7.5分真正的差异出现在后面,即在结尾清单中加入的额外习惯。
    • LR“not the moment of forgetting” — This closing contrastive phrase, absent from 7.0's version, adds a precise final distinction between distraction and forgetting, showing a sharper, more original final observation.这个结尾的对比表达在7.0分的版本中并未出现,它补充了一个精确的最终区分——分心和遗忘之间的区别,展现出一个更犀利、更独特的收尾观察。
    • GRA“Bright colours help for small objects. Tracking tags for keys and bags are cheap now.” — These two short separate sentences, added beyond 7.0's list, show the wider range of connected, practical suggestions typical of 7.5, extending the answer's closing advice further within the same overall length.这两句在7.0分列表之外额外加入的独立短句,展现出7.5分典型的更广泛的关联性实用建议范围,在大致相同的篇幅内把答案结尾的建议进一步拓展了。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？
讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？
在"An Occasion When You Lost Something in a Public Place"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？
考生最近一次报告它出现在 2026年5–8月。题卡每四个月轮换一次，许多话题会在之后的季度以略有不同的措辞回归。