IELTS Speaking Part 2

An Important Event in Your Life That You Celebrated

最近一次出现于 2026年5–8月

题卡

Describe an important event in your life that you celebrated

You should say:

  • what this event was
  • who celebrated the event with you
  • how you celebrated the event
  • and explain why the event was important to you

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

The answer explains its significance with one plain, direct reason ('the first time I'd lived completely by myself') and closes with a simple summary feeling ('one of the happiest evenings'), a clear but modest structure typical of Band 6.5.回答用一个简单直接的理由（'第一次完全独立生活'）来解释这件事的意义，并以一句简单的总结性感受收尾（'最快乐的一个夜晚之一'），结构清晰但比较朴素，是Band 6.5的典型特征。

The event I want to talk about is the day I moved into my own apartment here in Da Nang, about two years ago.

I celebrated it with a few close friends from work, Huy, Vy and Khánh, who came over on the evening I got the keys. My parents couldn't come from Hue that day, but they called me on video so they could see the empty rooms.

We celebrated quite simply. We didn't have any furniture yet, so we sat on the floor, ordered some food, mostly bánh xèo and drinks, and just talked and laughed for hours. Someone brought a small plant as a housewarming gift, which is still alive on my windowsill now. We also took a lot of photos in the empty rooms, which look quite funny to look back on now that the apartment is full of things.

This event was important to me because it was the first time I'd lived completely by myself, without my family or roommates. It felt like a real step into being an adult, paying my own rent and making my own decisions about everything, even small things like what colour to paint the walls. I still remember sitting on that empty floor with my friends as one of the happiest evenings I've had in this city.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这件事是大约两年前，我在岘港搬进自己公寓的那一天。

我和几个要好的同事朋友一起庆祝的，阿辉（Huy）、阿薇（Vy）和阿庆（Khánh），他们在我拿到钥匙那天晚上都过来了。我爸妈那天没法从顺化过来，不过他们跟我视频通话，看了看那几间空房间。

我们庆祝得很简单。那时候还没买家具，我们就坐在地板上，点了些吃的，主要是越南煎饼和饮料，聊天说笑聊了好几个小时。有人还带了一小盆植物当乔迁礼物，现在还养在我的窗台上。我们还在那些空荡荡的房间里拍了不少照片，现在公寓摆满东西了，再看那些照片觉得挺好笑的。

这件事对我来说很重要，因为那是我第一次完全一个人生活，没有家人、也没有室友。感觉像是真正迈入了成年人的生活，自己付房租，什么事情都要自己决定，哪怕是墙刷什么颜色这种小事。我到现在还记得那天和朋友们坐在空荡荡的地板上，那是我在这座城市里最开心的夜晚之一。

219 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • FC“This event was important to me because it was the first time I'd lived completely by myself, without my family or roommates.” — The reason for the event's importance is given in one direct "because" clause, immediately and without any further layering — no additional example, no comparison to how life felt before or after. That single, clearly stated reason is exactly the plain development Band 6.5 coherence is built around: a Band 7.0 answer in the same spot would likely extend the reason with a specific consequence (e.g. what living alone actually changed day to day), but here it's left as one clean, self-contained claim.这件事之所以重要的理由,是通过一个直接的"because"从句给出的,立刻交代清楚,没有再叠加任何其他层次——没有额外的例子,也没有和生活前后感受的对比。这个单一、清楚陈述的理由,正是Band 6.5连贯性所围绕建立的那种平实展开方式:同一位置上,Band 7.0的答案很可能会用一个具体后果来扩展这个理由(例如,独居究竟如何改变了日常生活),但这里它被留作一个干净利落、自成一体的论断。
  • GRA“We didn't have any furniture yet, so we sat on the floor, ordered some food” — The sentence links clauses with a basic result connector ('so') rather than varied subordination, showing the mostly simple grammar typical of Band 6.5.这句话用基础的结果连接词（'so'）连接分句，而不是使用多样的从句结构，体现出Band 6.5以简单语法为主的特征。
  • LR“still alive on my windowsill now” — "Still alive on my windowsill now" describes the plant using the most literal, concrete vocabulary available — no metaphor, no more specific gardening term, just a plain statement of fact. Where a higher band might use the detail to make a small wider point (e.g. that the plant has outlasted the plainness of those early empty rooms), here it stays purely descriptive, which is the safe, high-frequency vocabulary that Band 6.5 lexical resource targets."Still alive on my windowsill now"用现成、最字面化的具体词汇描述这株植物——没有比喻,没有更专业的园艺术语,只是一句平实的事实陈述。更高分段的答案可能会借这个细节引出一个更宏观的小论点(例如,这株植物比当初那些空荡荡房间的朴素更长久),而这里它始终保持纯粹的描述性,这正是Band 6.5词汇资源所targeted的安全、高频词汇。
7.0 分

The answer develops the event with one concrete scene — the restaurant owner refusing payment because he'd noticed the table celebrating — and links it clearly to years of family sacrifice, giving fuller development than the 6.5 answer while staying more direct than the 7.5 version's single-line reflections.回答通过一个具体的场景——餐馆老板因注意到这桌在庆祝而拒绝收钱——来展开这件事，并清晰地将其与多年的家庭牺牲联系起来，展现出比Band 6.5答案更充分的展开，但仍比Band 7.5版本那种精炼的单句反思更直白。

I'd choose my graduation from design college in Da Nang, back in 2014, as the event — notable partly because I was the first person in my family to finish a university degree at all.

My parents came up from Hue on the earliest bus that morning, my father in a suit borrowed from my uncle that clearly wasn't cut for him. My sister came too, with her boyfriend, and once the ceremony ended, about ten of my closest classmates joined us — people I'd survived four years of deadlines and instant noodles with.

The day had two halves. First came the ceremony itself, in a hall with no working air conditioning, where my mother apparently jumped to her feet the instant my name was announced, a little ahead of everyone else. That evening, the whole group went to a beachside seafood place — plastic chairs in the sand, plates of grilled squid, plenty of beer going round. When my father went to settle the bill, the owner wouldn't hear of it; he'd noticed our table celebrating all evening and said the meal was his gift to the occasion. My father, someone who almost never shows emotion, quietly went for a walk by the water afterwards.

The reason this day still matters to me has little to do with the degree itself, which counts for very little in my field now. Twenty years of my parents each working two jobs had all been aimed at getting my sister and me through university in the city, and that evening felt like the moment it finally paid off. It was also the first time I really watched my parents step into my world instead of the reverse — meeting my friends, sitting on my beach, being looked after by a stranger in my city. I've had bigger career milestones since, but none involved my mother jumping up a beat too early in a stuffy hall.

查看中文翻译

我会选自己2014年在岘港设计学院的毕业典礼作为那个事件——之所以特别，部分是因为我是家里第一个读完大学的人。

那天早上，父母坐最早一班从顺化出发的长途汽车赶来，我爸穿着从我叔叔那里借来的西装，明显不太合身。我姐姐也来了，带着她男朋友，典礼结束后，大约十位我最要好的同学也加入进来——那些和我一起熬过四年赶due和泡面日子的人。

那一天分成两部分。先是典礼本身，在一个没有空调运转的礼堂里，我妈妈据说在我的名字被念出来的那一刻就一跃而起，比其他人都快了一拍。到了晚上，一大群人去了一家海边的海鲜排档——沙地上摆着塑料椅子，一盘盘烤鱿鱼，啤酒一杯接一杯地传着喝。我爸想去结账时，老板说什么也不肯收钱；他说注意到我们这桌整晚都在庆祝，这顿饭就当作他送给这个特别日子的礼物。我爸这个几乎从不流露情绪的人，后来一个人安静地在海边散了会儿步。

这一天至今对我仍有意义，其实和那张文凭本身关系不大——在我现在这个行业里，那张文凭几乎已经没什么分量了。父母二十年来各自打两份工，一心一意就是要供我和姐姐在城里读完大学，那天晚上感觉就是这一切终于有了回报的时刻。那也是我第一次真正看到父母走进我的世界，而不是反过来——见我的朋友，坐在我的海滩上，被我这座城市里一个陌生人照顾。后来我也有过更大的职业里程碑，但没有一个像那晚一样，有我妈妈在闷热的礼堂里抢先一拍站起来。

323 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • FC“When my father went to settle the bill, the owner wouldn't hear of it” — This sentence commits to one small, concrete scene — a specific moment at the till — rather than summarising the evening in general terms, and the idiom-adjacent phrase "wouldn't hear of it" signals the owner's firm refusal economically. Zooming into a single dramatized moment like this, instead of listing what happened at the celebration in general, is what gives Band 7.0 Fluency and Coherence its fuller development, compared to a Band 6.5 answer that would likely just state "the owner gave us a free meal."这句话专注于一个具体而微小的场景——收银台前的一个特定瞬间——而不是笼统地概括整个晚上,而近乎习语的说法"wouldn't hear of it"经济地传达出店主坚决拒绝的态度。像这样聚焦于一个被戏剧化处理的单一时刻,而不是笼统罗列庆祝活动上发生的事情,正是让Band 7.0流利度与连贯性获得更充分展开的原因,相比之下Band 6.5的答案很可能只会说"the owner gave us a free meal."
  • LR“he'd noticed our table celebrating all evening” — "Noticed our table celebrating" treats the table as a stand-in for the group and pairs it with the verb "celebrating" used almost as a description of an ongoing state the owner had been watching, which is a slightly more literary phrasing than the plainer "he saw we were having a party." This kind of natural but not-quite-everyday collocation is what Band 7.0 lexical resource means by "a few flexible or topic-specific" word choices layered onto an otherwise ordinary vocabulary base."Noticed our table celebrating"把"那张桌子"当作整个小组的代称,并与动词"celebrating"搭配,几乎是在描述店主一直在观察的一种持续状态,这是一种比更平白的说法"he saw we were having a party"稍显文学化的表达。这种自然却又不完全属于日常用语的搭配,正是Band 7.0词汇资源所指的"若干灵活或话题相关"的词语选择,叠加在一个原本普通的词汇基础之上。
  • GRA“Twenty years of my parents each working two jobs had all been aimed at getting my sister and me through university in the city” — The sentence opens with a long noun phrase as subject, followed by a past perfect passive construction, showing the comfortable complex grammar expected at Band 7.0.这句话以一个较长的名词短语作主语开头，接着使用过去完成时的被动结构，体现出Band 7.0所期待的那种运用自如的复杂语法。
7.5 分

The single-sentence metaphor 'That evening was the receipt' compresses the whole point of the story into three words, an economical, figurative move typical of Band 7.5.'那个夜晚就是收据'这一单句隐喻，用短短几个词就压缩了整个故事的核心意涵，是Band 7.5那种简练而富有比喻性的表达方式。

The event I'd talk about is my graduation from design college in Da Nang, in the summer of 2014, which was the first university degree anyone in my family had ever finished.

Who celebrated it with me was, first, my parents, who came up from Hue on the dawn bus, my father in a suit borrowed from my uncle that was slightly too short in the arms. My sister came with her boyfriend. And after the ceremony, about ten classmates, who'd become the closest friends of my life over four years of sharing deadlines and instant noodles.

How we celebrated was in two parts. The formal part was the ceremony itself, in a hall with no air conditioning, where my name was read out and my mother, I'm told, stood up before she was supposed to. Then in the evening we all went to a seafood restaurant on the beach — plastic chairs on the sand, grilled squid, a lot of beer — and when my father went to pay, the owner, who had watched my parents watching me all evening, refused his money and said the meal was a gift for the family. My father, who never cries, went for a walk along the water for ten minutes.

Why the event was important to me is less about the degree, which in my field matters little, and more about what it closed and opened. My parents had spent twenty years in a narrow house and two jobs each so that my sister and I could study in the city. That evening was the receipt. It was also the first time I'd seen my parents in my world rather than me in theirs — meeting my friends, eating on my beach, being looked after by a stranger in my city. I've had bigger professional moments since. None of them had my mother standing up too early in a hot hall, and I don't think anything will.

查看中文翻译

我想说的事件是2014年夏天我在岘港设计学院毕业,那是我们家有史以来第一个拿到大学学位的人。

和我一起庆祝的,首先是我父母,他们坐清晨的班车从顺化赶来,我父亲穿着向叔叔借来的西装,袖子略微短了一截。我姐姐带着她男朋友来了。典礼结束后,还有大约十个同班同学,四年里一起赶deadline、一起吃泡面,他们成了我这辈子最亲密的朋友。

我们的庆祝分两部分。正式的部分是典礼本身,在一个没有空调的礼堂里,我的名字被念到的时候,听说我妈妈提前站了起来,还没轮到她。晚上我们都去了海边的一家海鲜餐厅——沙滩上摆着塑料椅子,烤鱿鱼,还有不少啤酒——我父亲去结账的时候,老板一整晚都在看着我父母看着我,坚决不收钱,说这顿饭是送给这家人的礼物。我父亲,一个从不流泪的人,独自沿着水边走了十分钟。

这件事对我之所以重要,与其说是因为那张学位证书——在我这个行业里它其实没那么重要——不如说是因为它所结束和开启的东西。我父母在一间狭窄的房子里生活了二十年,每人打两份工,就是为了让我和姐姐能在城市里读书。那天晚上就是这一切的收据。那也是我第一次看到父母走进我的世界,而不是我走进他们的世界——见我的朋友,在我的海滩上吃饭,被我这座城市里一个陌生人照顾。后来我经历过更盛大的职业时刻,但没有一个像那晚一样,有我妈妈在闷热的礼堂里提前站起来。我想以后也不会再有了。

326 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LR“That evening was the receipt.” — The metaphor turns an abstract idea (repayment for sacrifice) into one concrete word, a precise figurative touch typical of Band 7.5 lexical resource.这一隐喻把一个抽象概念（对牺牲的回报）浓缩成一个具体的词，是Band 7.5词汇资源中精准的修辞运用。
  • GRA“My father, who never cries, went for a walk along the water for ten minutes.” — The non-defining relative clause 'who never cries' is dropped into the middle of the sentence rather than added afterward as its own statement ('My father went for a walk. He never cries.'), which takes more grammatical control to place correctly while keeping the sentence's rhythm intact. This mid-sentence embedding is precisely the kind of varied complex structure the Band 7.5 grammar target rewards, since it shows the clause being used for economy and effect rather than just to add information. It also does real narrative work: naming the father's usual stoicism right before describing him breaking from it lets the emotional weight land without the speaker stating it outright.非限定性关系从句'who never cries'被嵌入到句子中间,而不是事后作为独立陈述补充上去(比如"My father went for a walk. He never cries.");要把它准确地放在句中同时保持句子的节奏感,需要更强的语法掌控力。这种句中嵌入正是7.5分语法目标所看重的那种多样化复杂结构,因为它体现出从句是为了简练和效果而被使用,而不仅仅是为了补充信息。它也实实在在地起到了叙事作用:在描写父亲打破一贯的隐忍之前先点明他"从不哭泣"的常态,让情感的分量得以自然流露,而不需要说话者直接说出口。
  • FC“None of them had my mother standing up too early in a hot hall, and I don't think anything will.” — Rather than simply restating that the graduation was important, the closing sentence measures every subsequent professional milestone against this one specific, almost mundane detail — the mother standing up too early — and finds them all lacking. That comparative, forward-looking claim ('I don't think anything will') is a genuinely reflective move rather than a summary, which is the evaluative closing the Band 7.5 fluency and coherence target expects, as opposed to a lower-band answer that would likely just restate 'it was a very important day for me.' Returning to the small, specific image from earlier, instead of a new general statement, ties the whole response together with real coherence.结尾句没有简单重复"毕业典礼很重要"这一点,而是拿后来每一个职业里程碑,去和这个具体、近乎平凡的细节——母亲太早站起来鼓掌——做比较,发现它们都相形见绌。这种带有比较意味、面向未来的论断('I don't think anything will')是一种真正的反思性举动,而不是总结,正是7.5分流利度与连贯性目标所期待的评价性收尾,不同于分数较低的答案很可能只会重复"那对我来说是非常重要的一天。"回到前文那个细小具体的画面,而不是抛出一句新的泛泛之谈,让整个回答真正地连贯为一体。

各考试时段出题记录

  • Describe an important event in your life that you celebrated2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

  1. 1. What are the most important events in people's lives?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain observational closer about weddings and parties states the point flatly, unlike 7.5's tighter version which embeds the example inside a dash-parenthesis.结尾那句关于婚礼派对的观察平铺直叙,不像7.5版本更紧凑的处理方式——把例子嵌进一个破折号插入语里。

    I think it depends on who you ask. My grandmother would say marriage, having children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, since these mark the people who have passed away. My colleagues would say different things, like graduation, a first job, a first flat, and a trip that changed them. I think people remember the events that change who they are, like leaving home or having a child. Some events are chosen, and some just happen. Interestingly, weddings have the biggest parties, but older people do not always call them the most important thing in life.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得这要看你问的是谁。我奶奶会说是结婚、生孩子、盖房子,还有家里的忌日,因为这些日子纪念的是已经过世的亲人。我的同事们会说不一样的事,比如毕业、第一份工作、第一套房子,还有一次改变了他们的旅行。我认为人们记住的往往是那些改变自己的事件,比如离开家或者生孩子。有些事件是自己选择的,有些则是自然发生的。有意思的是,婚礼的派对总是最盛大的,但上了年纪的人却不一定把它称为人生中最重要的事。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Interestingly, weddings have the biggest parties, but older people do not always call them the most important thing in life.” — A plain observational closing. Compare 7.5's tighter parenthetical version, which embeds the example inside the sentence itself for a more compact effect.一个平铺直叙的结尾观察句。对比7.5更紧凑的版本,它把例子直接嵌入句子内部,效果更精炼。
    • LR“the people who have passed away” — Plain, everyday phrasing. Contrast 7.5's more formal "the important events of people who are gone."朴素、日常的措辞。对比7.5更正式的说法 "the important events of people who are gone"。
    • GRA“My grandmother would say marriage, having children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, since these mark the people who have passed away.” — One long listing sentence, correct but simpler in structure than 7.5's semicolon-joined double-list sentence covering both grandmother and colleagues.一个很长的罗列句,语法正确,但结构比7.5用分号连接、同时涵盖奶奶和同事两份清单的句子要简单。
    7.0 分

    The trailing "though" in "What's interesting, though" signals natural spoken reflection, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "Interestingly.""What's interesting, though" 里那个尾随的 "though" 透出一种自然的口语式反思,比6.5那句更平淡的 "Interestingly" 更流畅。

    Honestly, it depends a lot on who you ask. My grandmother would say marriage, the birth of children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, since those mark the important people who are gone. My colleagues, on the other hand, would add graduation, the first job, the first flat, and a trip that changed them. I'd say the events people name most are the ones that change who they are — leaving home, finishing education, a serious illness survived. Some are chosen and some simply arrive. What's interesting, though, is that weddings have the biggest ceremonies, but they're not always what older people describe as the most important event of their lives.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,这很大程度上要看你问的是谁。我奶奶会说是结婚、孩子出生、盖房子,还有家里的忌日,因为这些日子纪念的是已经离世的重要亲人。而我的同事们呢,则会加上毕业、第一份工作、第一套房子,还有一次改变了他们的旅行。我会说,人们最常提到的事件,是那些改变了他们是谁的事——离开家、完成学业、挺过一场重病。有些是自己选择的,有些则是自然降临的。不过有意思的是,婚礼的仪式最隆重,但上了年纪的人不一定会把它说成是人生中最重要的事件。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“What's interesting, though, is that weddings have the biggest ceremonies, but they're not always what older people describe as the most important event of their lives.” — The "though" hedge signals natural spoken reflection, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "Interestingly.""though" 这个让步语气词,透出自然的口语式反思,比6.5那句更平淡的 "Interestingly" 更流畅。
    • LR“the events people name most are the ones that change who they are” — A more abstract, precise phrase than 6.5's plainer "events people remember most."比6.5更平淡的说法 "events people remember most" 更抽象、更精准的一个短语。
    • GRA“My grandmother would say marriage, the birth of children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, since those mark the important people who are gone.” — A listing sentence with a "since" clause, simpler than 7.5's semicolon-joined double sentence covering both grandmother and colleagues.一个带 "since" 从句的罗列句,比7.5那句用分号连接、同时涵盖奶奶和同事两份清单的双重罗列句要简单。
    7.5 分

    The dash-parenthesis "the events with the biggest ceremonies — weddings — aren't always..." names the example mid-sentence, a more compact move than the separate closing sentences at the lower bands.破折号插入语 "the events with the biggest ceremonies — weddings — aren't always..." 把例子嵌在句子中间点出,比低分段那种单独收尾句的做法更紧凑。

    The answer changes with who you ask, honestly. My grandmother would say marriage, the birth of children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, which mark the important events of people who are gone; my colleagues would add graduation, the first job, the first flat, and a trip that changed them. The events people name most, I'd say, are the ones that alter who they are: leaving home, finishing education, a partnership, a serious illness survived. Some of these are chosen and some simply arrive uninvited. What's interesting is that the events with the biggest ceremonies — weddings — aren't always the ones people describe as most important once they're older.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,答案会随你问的人而变。我奶奶会说是结婚、孩子出生、盖房子,还有家里的忌日——这些纪念的是已经离世的重要事件;我的同事们则会加上毕业、第一份工作、第一套房子,还有一次改变了他们的旅行。依我看,人们最常提到的事件,是那些改变了他们本身的事:离开家、完成学业、一段感情、挺过一场重病。有些是自己选择的,有些则不请自来。有意思的是,那些仪式最隆重的事件——婚礼——等人们上了年纪之后,却并不总是被他们说成是最重要的事。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“the events with the biggest ceremonies — weddings — aren't always the ones people describe as most important once they're older” — An embedded dash-parenthesis naming the example mid-sentence, a more compact and sophisticated move than 6.5/7.0's separate closing sentences.一个嵌入式的破折号插入语,在句子中间点出例子,比6.5和7.0那种单独的收尾句更紧凑、更老练。
    • LR“alter who they are” — A precise, almost formal verb choice beyond 7.0's plainer "change who they are."一个精准、近乎正式的动词选择,超越了7.0那句更平淡的 "change who they are"。
    • GRA“My grandmother would say marriage, the birth of children, building a house, and the family's death anniversaries, which mark the important events of people who are gone; my colleagues would add graduation, the first job, the first flat, and a trip that changed them.” — A single semicolon-joined sentence carrying two parallel lists, more ambitious than the two separate sentences used at 6.5 and 7.0.一个用分号连接、承载两份并列清单的单句,比6.5和7.0用两个分开的句子更有野心。

  2. 2. What are the benefits to a country of hosting a major international event?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain concessive addition about risks lacks the human consequence 7.5's fuller closing image adds.关于风险那句平淡的让步补充,缺少7.5版本更完整的收尾画面所带出的人情后果。

    I think the main benefit is attention, and sometimes new buildings that stay after the event. Da Nang's international fireworks festival has put the city on foreign travel lists, and it paid for the riverside walkway that people still use every evening. Major events bring tourists and money, create short-term jobs, and push cities to build things like transport and hotels. They also give a country a chance to show it is capable, which can help trade later. But there are risks too, like high costs and empty stadiums afterwards. I think the benefit depends on whether a country builds for itself or just for the cameras.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得主要的好处是关注度,还有有时候留下的新建筑,活动结束后依然存在。岘港的国际烟花节让这座城市登上了外国人的旅行清单,也出资建了那条人们至今每晚还在用的滨江步道。大型活动带来游客和资金,创造短期工作机会,还促使城市修建交通设施和酒店等基础建设。它们也给一个国家展示自身能力的机会,这对以后的贸易也有帮助。但风险也是存在的,比如高昂的成本,以及活动结束后空荡荡的体育场。我觉得好处大小取决于一个国家是为自己而建,还是只是为了摄影机镜头而建。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“But there are risks too, like high costs and empty stadiums afterwards.” — A plain concessive addition. Compare 7.5's fuller closing image, "residents displaced for a spectacle they never asked for," which adds a human consequence.一个平淡的让步补充。对比7.5更完整的收尾画面 "residents displaced for a spectacle they never asked for",后者加入了人情上的后果。
    • LR“give a country a chance to show it is capable” — Plain phrasing. Contrast 7.5's "a stage on which to look capable and welcoming," more idiomatic.平淡的措辞。对比7.5的 "a stage on which to look capable and welcoming",更加地道。
    • GRA“Da Nang's international fireworks festival has put the city on foreign travel lists, and it paid for the riverside walkway that people still use every evening.” — A simple coordinated sentence, less compact than 7.5's semicolon version with the added contrast "the visitors leave, but the walkway stays."一个简单的并列句,不如7.5那句用分号连接、并加入对比 "the visitors leave, but the walkway stays" 的版本紧凑。
    7.0 分

    The connector "That said" plus dash signals a fluent spoken pivot to the risks, beyond 6.5's flatter "But there are risks too."连接词 "That said" 加上破折号,传达出一种流畅的口语式转折,引向风险话题,超越了6.5那句更平淡的 "But there are risks too"。

    Attention, mostly, I'd say, and some infrastructure that outlasts the event itself. Da Nang's international fireworks festival, which the city has hosted for years, put a small city on foreign travel itineraries and paid for the riverside walkway that residents still use every evening. Major events bring tourists and their money, create temporary jobs, and force cities to build things they'd otherwise postpone, like transport and hotels. They give a country a stage to show itself as capable, which can affect trade and investment later on. That said, the risks are well known — huge costs, and empty stadiums once the crowds leave.

    查看中文翻译

    我会说,主要是关注度,还有一些活动结束后依然留存的基础设施。岘港的国际烟花节,这座城市已经举办了多年,把这座小城市带上了外国人的旅行行程,也出资建了那条居民至今每晚还在用的滨江步道。大型活动带来游客和他们的钱,创造临时工作机会,还迫使城市修建那些原本会一再拖延的设施,比如交通和酒店。它们也给一个国家一个舞台去展示自己有能力,这可能会影响以后的贸易和投资。话虽如此,风险也是众所周知的——巨大的成本,还有人群散去后空荡荡的体育场。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“That said, the risks are well known — huge costs, and empty stadiums once the crowds leave.” — The connector "That said" plus dash signals a fluent spoken pivot, beyond 6.5's flatter "But there are risks too."连接词 "That said" 加破折号,传达出流畅的口语式转折,超越了6.5那句更平淡的 "But there are risks too"。
    • LR“a stage to show itself as capable” — A more figurative phrase than 6.5's literal "a chance to show it is capable."比6.5那句直白的 "a chance to show it is capable" 更有比喻色彩的说法。
    • GRA“Da Nang's international fireworks festival, which the city has hosted for years, put a small city on foreign travel itineraries and paid for the riverside walkway that residents still use every evening.” — A relative clause embedded mid-sentence, more layered than 6.5's plain coordination.一个嵌在句子中间的关系从句,比6.5那种简单的并列结构更有层次。
    7.5 分

    The six-word closing contrast "the visitors leave, but the walkway stays" sums up the whole argument, well beyond the plainer sentences of the lower bands.结尾那句六个词的对比 "the visitors leave, but the walkway stays" 把整个论证浓缩了起来,远远超越了低分段更平淡的句子。

    Attention, mostly, and some infrastructure that outlasts the event — that's the honest answer. Da Nang's international fireworks festival, which the city has hosted for years, put a small city on foreign travel itineraries and paid for the riverside walkway that residents still use every single evening; the visitors leave, but the walkway stays. Major events bring tourists and their money, create temporary jobs, and force cities to build things they'd otherwise keep postponing — transport, hotels, stadiums. They also give a country a stage on which to look capable and welcoming, which quietly affects trade and investment down the line. The risks are equally well known, though: enormous costs, empty stadiums afterwards, and residents displaced for a spectacle they never asked for.

    查看中文翻译

    关注度,大部分算,还有一些活动结束后依然存在的基础设施——这才是老实的答案。岘港的国际烟花节,这座城市已经举办了多年,把这座小城市带上了外国人的旅行行程,也出资建了那条居民至今每一个夜晚都在用的滨江步道;游客走了,但步道留了下来。大型活动带来游客和他们的钱,创造临时工作机会,还迫使城市修建那些原本会一直被拖延的设施——交通、酒店、体育场。它们也给一个国家一个舞台,去展现自己有能力、友好待客,这会悄悄地影响以后的贸易和投资。不过风险同样众所周知:巨大的成本、事后空荡荡的体育场,还有居民为了一场他们从未要求过的盛会而被迫搬迁。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“the visitors leave, but the walkway stays” — A compact, aphoristic contrast summing up the whole argument in six words, well beyond the plainer sentences of the lower bands.一个紧凑、格言式的对比,用六个词概括了整个论证,远远超越了低分段更平淡的收尾句。
    • LR“a stage on which to look capable and welcoming” — A more elegant, slightly formal prepositional structure than 7.0's plainer "a stage to show itself as capable."比7.0那句更平淡的介词结构 "a stage to show itself as capable" 更优雅、略显正式的说法。
    • GRA“Major events bring tourists and their money, create temporary jobs, and force cities to build things they'd otherwise keep postponing — transport, hotels, stadiums.” — A triple-verb list closing with a dash-appended set of examples, more controlled than the simpler lists at 6.5 and 7.0.一个以三个动词收尾、后接破折号例子清单的罗列句,比6.5和7.0更简单的清单更有控制力。

  3. 3. Is celebrating national events a waste of public money?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The two-part "when" list at the end is functional but simpler than 7.5's triple-part list ending in "compulsory rather than joyful."结尾那个两部分的 "when" 清单是管用的,但比7.5那个以 "compulsory rather than joyful" 收尾的三部分清单要简单。

    I do not think it is a waste, if the scale is reasonable. On National Day, the city spends money on flags, free concerts and fireworks, while a road near my flat still needs repairing, and I understand why some people are unhappy about that. But the road actually costs much more than the concert, and the concert gives something the road cannot: a day when the whole city feels the same mood. National celebrations build a shared identity and support musicians and small traders. They become a waste only when the money glorifies leaders instead of the public, or when basic services fail.

    查看中文翻译

    我不认为这是浪费,只要规模合理。在国庆节,市政府花钱买旗帜、办免费音乐会和烟花表演,而我家附近的一条路还需要修,我理解有些人为此不满。但那条路的花费其实比音乐会贵得多,而音乐会能带来路修不出来的东西:一个整座城市心情一致的日子。全国性的庆典能建立共同的身份认同,也支持了音乐人和小商贩。只有当这笔钱是为了讨好领导人而不是为了公众,或者基本的公共服务出问题时,它才算是浪费。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“But the road actually costs much more than the concert, and the concert gives something the road cannot: a day when the whole city feels the same mood.” — A clear, direct contrast. Compare 7.5's version, which softens "feels" to "is briefly in," a slightly more evocative choice.一个清晰、直接的对比。对比7.5的版本,后者把 "feels" 软化为 "is briefly in",这是一个稍微更有意境的选择。
    • LR“gives something the road cannot” — Plain phrasing. Contrast 7.5's "produces something the road simply can't," a marginally more idiomatic verb.平淡的措辞。对比7.5的 "produces something the road simply can't",动词用得稍微更地道一些。
    • GRA“They become a waste only when the money glorifies leaders instead of the public, or when basic services fail.” — A simple two-part "when" list, less developed than 7.5's triple-part list ending in "or when the celebration becomes compulsory rather than joyful."一个简单的两部分 "when" 清单,不如7.5那个以 "or when the celebration becomes compulsory rather than joyful" 收尾的三部分清单展开得充分。
    7.0 分

    The hedge-plus-conditional opening "I wouldn't call it a waste, honestly, provided..." is more natural than 6.5's flatter opening sentence.开头那句既带让步又带条件的 "I wouldn't call it a waste, honestly, provided..." 比6.5那句更平淡的开场句自然得多。

    I wouldn't call it a waste, honestly, provided the scale is sensible. On National Day, the city spends on flags, free concerts and fireworks while a road near my flat still needs repairing, and I understand the objection — but the road actually costs many times what the concert does, and the concert produces something the road can't: a day when the whole city shares the same mood. National celebrations build identity, give people free entertainment, and support musicians and small traders. They become wasteful, I'd say, when they glorify leaders rather than the public, or when spending is extravagant while basic services fail.

    查看中文翻译

    老实说,我不会说这是浪费,只要规模合理。在国庆节,市政府花钱买旗帜、办免费音乐会和烟花表演,而我家附近的一条路还需要修,我理解这种不满——但那条路的花费其实是音乐会的好几倍,而音乐会能带来路修不出来的东西:一个整座城市共享同一种心情的日子。全国性的庆典能建立身份认同,给人们免费的娱乐,也支持了音乐人和小商贩。我会说,只有当它们是为了讨好领导人而不是为了公众,或者花销铺张而基本公共服务却出问题时,它们才算是浪费。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I wouldn't call it a waste, honestly, provided the scale is sensible.” — A hedge-plus-conditional opening, more natural than 6.5's flatter "I do not think it is a waste."一个既带让步又带条件的开场句,比6.5那句更平淡的 "I do not think it is a waste" 自然得多。
    • LR“the concert produces something the road can't” — A slightly more active verb ("produces") than 6.5's flat "gives."一个稍微更主动的动词("produces"),比6.5那句平淡的 "gives" 更有力。
    • GRA“the road actually costs many times what the concert does, and the concert produces something the road can't: a day when the whole city shares the same mood” — A colon-extended sentence, more layered than 6.5's simpler coordination.一个用冒号延伸的句子,比6.5的简单并列更有层次。
    7.5 分

    The evaluative "is briefly in the same mood" softens and sharpens the claim at once, more nuanced than the flatter 7.0 version.评价性的 "is briefly in the same mood" 同时软化又加深了这个论点,比7.0那句更平淡的版本更有层次感。

    Not a waste, I'd say, provided the scale stays sensible. On National Day the city spends on flags, free concerts and fireworks while a road near my flat still needs repairing, and I do understand the objection — but the road costs many times what the concert does, and the concert produces something the road simply can't: a day when the whole city is briefly in the same mood. National celebrations build shared identity, hand people free entertainment, and support musicians, cooks and small traders who'd otherwise go unnoticed. They tip into waste when they're used to glorify leaders rather than the public, when spending turns extravagant while basic services fail, or when the celebration becomes compulsory rather than joyful.

    查看中文翻译

    我会说不算浪费,只要规模保持合理。在国庆节,市政府花钱买旗帜、办免费音乐会和烟花表演,而我家附近的一条路还需要修,我确实理解这种不满——但那条路的花费其实是音乐会的好几倍,而音乐会能带来路无论如何也带不来的东西:一个整座城市短暂共享同一种心情的日子。全国性的庆典能建立共同的身份认同,给人们免费的娱乐,也支持了音乐人、厨师和那些原本没人注意的小商贩。当它们被用来讨好领导人而非公众,当花销变得铺张而基本公共服务却出问题,或者当庆祝活动变成了义务而非欢乐时,它们才会滑向浪费。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“the concert produces something the road simply can't: a day when the whole city is briefly in the same mood” — The added intensifier "simply" and the more delicate phrase "briefly in the same mood" give the sentence more evaluative nuance than the flatter 7.0 version.增加的强调词 "simply" 和更细腻的短语 "briefly in the same mood",让这句话比7.0更平淡的版本多了一层评价性的细腻感。
    • LR“support musicians, cooks and small traders who'd otherwise go unnoticed” — A precise three-item list plus a relative clause, richer than 7.0's plain "support musicians and small traders."一个精确的三项清单加一个关系从句,比7.0那句平淡的 "support musicians and small traders" 更丰富。
    • GRA“They tip into waste when they're used to glorify leaders rather than the public, when spending turns extravagant while basic services fail, or when the celebration becomes compulsory rather than joyful.” — A triple parallel "when" clause, more ambitious than the simpler two-part list at 6.5 and 7.0.一个三重并列的 "when" 从句,比6.5和7.0那种更简单的两部分清单更有野心。

  4. 4. How do people celebrate important national events?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The bare three-part summary at the end lacks the small vivid image 7.5 adds to the same closing formula.结尾那个朴素的三段式总结,缺少7.5为同一收尾公式添加的那个生动的小画面。

    On my street, National Day always has the same pattern. Flags go up on every gate early in the morning, and the ward office reminds anyone who forgets. Families eat together, usually with a bigger meal than normal, and neighbours share food outside. Then people go out, like to the square for the free concert or the beach at midnight. Motorbikes with flags drive around the city. On TV, there are parades and speeches, which older people watch more than younger people. So the pattern is flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd at night.

    查看中文翻译

    在我住的那条街上,国庆节总是一个样。一大早,每家每户的门口就挂上了国旗,坊里的人还会提醒忘记挂的人家。家人们会一起吃饭,通常比平时的餐食更丰盛,邻居之间也会分享食物。然后人们就出门了,比如去广场看免费音乐会,或者去海边过午夜。摩托车插着国旗在城里到处巡游。电视上会有游行和讲话,老年人看得比年轻人多。所以整体的模式就是:早上挂旗,中午家人团聚,晚上人群聚集。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“So the pattern is flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd at night.” — A plain three-part summary. Compare 7.5's fuller version, "the crowd out under the lights by night," which adds a small vivid image to the same closing formula.一个平淡的三段式总结。对比7.5更完整的版本 "the crowd out under the lights by night",它给同一个收尾公式加上了一个生动的小画面。
    • LR“Then people go out, like to the square” — Casual, slightly imprecise phrasing ("like to"). Contrast 7.5's cleaner colon-based list of destinations.随意、略显不精确的措辞("like to")。对比7.5那种用冒号引出目的地清单的更干净写法。
    • GRA“On TV, there are parades and speeches, which older people watch more than younger people.” — A single relative clause, less textured than 7.5's contrast "watch faithfully and younger people mostly scroll past."一个单一的关系从句,不如7.5那句对比 "watch faithfully and younger people mostly scroll past" 有质感。
    7.0 分

    The inserted "I'd say" softens the closing summary naturally, more fluent than 6.5's flat "So the pattern is."插入的 "I'd say" 自然地软化了结尾总结,比6.5那句平淡的 "So the pattern is" 更流畅。

    On my street, honestly, a national holiday has a fairly fixed shape. Flags go up on every gate at dawn — the ward office even reminds anyone who forgets. Families eat together, often at a bigger table than usual, and neighbours share food out on the pavement. Then people head out: the square for the free concert, the river for fireworks, or the beach at midnight. Motorbikes decorated with flags do circuits of the city, and television shows parades and speeches that older people tend to watch while younger people mostly ignore. So the general pattern, I'd say, is flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd at night.

    查看中文翻译

    老实说,在我住的那条街上,国定假日的模式相当固定。天刚亮,每家每户的门口就挂上了国旗——坊里的人甚至还会提醒忘记的人家。家人们会一起吃饭,常常摆一桌比平时更丰盛的菜,邻居们也会在人行道上分享食物。然后人们就出门了:去广场看免费音乐会,去河边看烟花,或者去海边过午夜。插着国旗装饰的摩托车在城里绕圈巡游,电视上播放着游行和讲话,老年人往往会看,年轻人则大多不理会。所以我会说,总体的模式是:早上挂旗,中午家人团聚,晚上人群聚集。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“So the general pattern, I'd say, is flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd at night.” — The inserted "I'd say" softens the summary naturally, more fluent than 6.5's flat "So the pattern is."插入的 "I'd say" 自然地软化了总结句,比6.5那句平淡的 "So the pattern is" 更流畅。
    • LR“older people tend to watch while younger people mostly ignore” — A balanced contrast, more developed than 6.5's plain comparative.一个平衡的对比,比6.5那种简单的比较更展开。
    • GRA“Then people head out: the square for the free concert, the river for fireworks, or the beach at midnight.” — A colon-introduced list, more controlled than 6.5's looser "like to" phrasing.一个用冒号引出的清单,比6.5那种较松散的 "like to" 措辞更有控制力。
    7.5 分

    The extra sentence about war anniversaries adds a structural layer the shorter 6.5 and 7.0 versions don't include.关于战争纪念日的那句额外句子,增加了一个结构层次,是较短的6.5和7.0版本没有的。

    On my street, a national holiday has an almost fixed shape by now. Flags go up on every gate at dawn — the ward office reminds anyone who forgets. Families eat together, often at a bigger table than usual, and neighbours share food out on the pavement. Then people head out: the square for the free concert, the river for fireworks, the beach at midnight. Motorbikes decorated with flags do slow circuits of the city, while television carries parades and speeches that older people watch faithfully and younger people mostly scroll past. Some occasions, like the anniversary of a war's end, add a more solemn layer of ceremonies and visits to memorials. But the general pattern holds: flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd out under the lights by night.

    查看中文翻译

    在我住的那条街上,国定假日到现在已经形成了一种近乎固定的模式。天刚亮,每家每户的门口就挂上了国旗——坊里的人还会提醒忘记的人家。家人们会一起吃饭,常常摆一桌比平时更丰盛的菜,邻居们也会在人行道上分享食物。然后人们就出门了:去广场看免费音乐会,去河边看烟花,去海边过午夜。插着国旗装饰的摩托车在城里缓缓巡游,电视上播放着游行和讲话,老年人忠实地守着看,年轻人则大多滑过屏幕不看。有些场合,比如某场战争结束的纪念日,还会增加更庄重的一层——纪念仪式和扫墓。但总体的模式依然成立:早上挂旗,中午家人团聚,晚上人群在灯光下聚集。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“But the general pattern holds: flags in the morning, family at noon, and the crowd out under the lights by night.” — The colon-plus-image close gives the familiar three-part summary a more vivid final beat than the plainer versions at 6.5 and 7.0.冒号加画面的收尾方式,给这个熟悉的三段式总结加上了一个比低分段更生动的最后一笔。
    • LR“watch faithfully and younger people mostly scroll past” — Precise, slightly wry verbs capturing a generational contrast, sharper than 7.0's plainer "tend to watch... mostly ignore."精准、略带诙谐的动词,捕捉到了一种世代对比,比7.0更平淡的 "tend to watch... mostly ignore" 更犀利。
    • GRA“Some occasions, like the anniversary of a war's end, add a more solemn layer of ceremonies and visits to memorials.” — An additional sentence introducing a contrasting category of event, giving the answer a structural layer the shorter 6.5 and 7.0 versions don't include.多加的一句话,引入了一个对比性的活动类别,给答案增加了一个较短的6.5和7.0版本没有的结构层次。

  5. 5. What can people do to make sure an event goes well?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing generalisation lacks the concrete closing examples 7.5 adds to the same idea.结尾平淡的概括,缺少7.5为同一想法加上的那些具体例子。

    I think the key is to prepare the things that cannot be changed later, and then relax about everything else. My sister's graduation dinner went well because she called the restaurant the day before, so ten chairs were ready on the sand when we arrived. The basics are a place, a time, food, and a way for people to get there, and anything that needs booking should be booked. It also helps to have one person in charge, so people know who to ask questions. A budget should be agreed before the event, not after. In the end, good events happen when the host thinks about the guests, not just the show.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得关键是先准备好那些之后无法改变的事情,然后对其他一切放松心态。我妹妹的毕业晚宴之所以顺利,是因为她提前一天打电话给了餐厅,所以我们到的时候,十把椅子已经摆在沙滩上等着了。基本要素就是地点、时间、食物,还有让人能到场的方式,凡是需要预订的都应该提前订好。有一个人负责统筹也很有帮助,这样大家知道该问谁。预算应该在活动之前就商量好,而不是事后。归根结底,好的活动之所以顺利,是因为主人考虑的是客人,而不只是排场。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“In the end, good events happen when the host thinks about the guests, not just the show.” — A plain closing generalisation. Compare 7.5's fuller version, which adds concrete examples like "who might feel left out, who needs a chair" after the same idea.一个平淡的结尾概括。对比7.5更完整的版本,它在同一想法后加上了 "who might feel left out, who needs a chair" 这样的具体例子。
    • LR“relax about everything else” — Plain phrasing shared loosely with the higher bands. Contrast 7.5's tighter opening sentence, which drops the filler "I think the key is to."与高分段松散共享的平淡措辞。对比7.5更紧凑的开场句,它去掉了 "I think the key is to" 这种填充语。
    • GRA“The basics are a place, a time, food, and a way for people to get there, and anything that needs booking should be booked.” — A single long coordinated sentence, less varied than 7.5's semicolon-split version of the same idea.一个很长的单一并列句,不如7.5用分号拆分同一想法的版本那么有变化。
    7.0 分

    The hedge "I'd say" softens the closing claim naturally, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "In the end."让步词 "I'd say" 自然地软化了结尾断言,比6.5那句更平淡的 "In the end" 更流畅。

    Prepare the things that can't be fixed later, honestly, and then relax about the rest. My sister's graduation dinner worked because she'd phoned the restaurant the day before, so ten chairs were already waiting on the sand when we arrived, and the evening itself was free to unfold however it liked. The basics are a place, a time, food, and a way for people to get there — anything that needs booking gets booked. It helps to have one person in charge, so questions have somewhere to go, and a budget agreed on beforehand, not after. Beyond that, I'd say the events that go well are the ones where the host has thought about the guests rather than the spectacle.

    查看中文翻译

    老实说,先准备好那些之后无法补救的事情,然后对其余的事情放松心态。我妹妹的毕业晚宴之所以顺利,是因为她提前一天打了电话给餐厅,所以我们到的时候十把椅子已经在沙滩上等着了,而那个晚上本身则可以随心所欲地自然展开。基本要素就是地点、时间、食物,还有让人能到场的方式——凡是需要预订的都会被预订好。有一个人负责统筹很有帮助,这样问题就有地方问了,预算也要提前商量好,而不是事后。除此之外,我会说,顺利的活动往往是那种主人考虑到了客人、而不是排场的活动。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Beyond that, I'd say the events that go well are the ones where the host has thought about the guests rather than the spectacle.” — The hedge "I'd say" is a natural spoken softener, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "In the end."让步词 "I'd say" 是一种自然的口语式软化,比6.5那句更平淡的 "In the end" 更流畅。
    • LR“free to unfold however it liked” — A more vivid personifying phrase than 6.5's plainer description of the evening.一个比6.5更平淡的晚宴描写更生动的拟人化短语。
    • GRA“so ten chairs were already waiting on the sand when we arrived, and the evening itself was free to unfold however it liked” — A two-clause sentence joined by "and," more developed than 6.5's shorter separate sentences.一个用 "and" 连接的两分句句子,比6.5更短的分开句子更展开。
    7.5 分

    The two short closing examples make the abstract point about "thinking of the guests" tangible, beyond the general statement at the lower bands.结尾那两个简短的具体例子,把 "thinking of the guests" 这个抽象观点变得可触可感,超越了低分段那种笼统的表述。

    Prepare the things that can't be improvised, and then relax about everything else. The graduation dinner worked because my sister had phoned the restaurant the day before, so ten chairs were waiting on the sand when we arrived, and the evening itself was allowed to unfold however it liked. The basics are a place, a time, food, and a way for people to get there; anything that requires booking gets booked. One person should be in charge, so questions have somewhere to go, and the budget gets agreed before, not after. Beyond that, the events that go well tend to be the ones where the host has thought about the guests rather than the spectacle — who might feel left out, who needs a chair.

    查看中文翻译

    先准备好那些无法临场发挥的事情,然后对其余一切放松心态。这场毕业晚宴之所以顺利,是因为我妹妹提前一天打了电话给餐厅,所以我们到的时候十把椅子已经在沙滩上等着了,而那个晚上本身则可以随心所欲地自然展开。基本要素就是地点、时间、食物,还有让人能到场的方式;凡是需要预订的都会被预订好。应该有一个人负责统筹,这样问题就有地方问,预算也要提前商量好,而不是事后。除此之外,顺利的活动往往是那种主人考虑到了客人、而不是排场的活动——谁可能会觉得被冷落,谁需要一把椅子。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“who might feel left out, who needs a chair” — Two short, concrete closing examples that make the abstract point about "thinking of the guests" tangible, beyond the general statement at 6.5 and 7.0.两个简短、具体的结尾例子,让关于 "thinking of the guests" 的抽象观点变得可触可感,超越了6.5和7.0那种笼统的表述。
    • LR“allowed to unfold however it liked” — A precise passive construction personifying the evening, slightly more polished than 7.0's active "free to unfold."一个精准的被动结构,把这个夜晚拟人化,比7.0主动式的 "free to unfold" 略显更精致。
    • GRA“The basics are a place, a time, food, and a way for people to get there; anything that requires booking gets booked.” — A semicolon linking two related but independent statements, more controlled punctuation than the single coordinated sentence at 6.5.用分号连接两个相关但各自独立的陈述,标点用法比6.5那个单一并列句更有控制力。

  6. 6. Is it better to celebrate special events with a large group of people?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain factual account of the father's ten minutes lacks the structural pairing 7.5 builds around the same detail.关于父亲那十分钟的平实叙述,缺少7.5围绕同一细节所构建的结构性对照。

    Sometimes, and I think the best evenings have both. There were sixteen of us on the sand that night, which was perfect for the noise and fun, but the moment that mattered most to me was my father standing alone by the water for ten minutes. Big gatherings bring energy and the feeling that something has really happened, so they suit weddings and graduations. Small groups allow real conversation and feeling, which suits anything private. In my culture, people often prefer large celebrations, because a small one can look like a failure. I would say invite a crowd for the event, but keep some time for the people who really matter.

    查看中文翻译

    有时候是这样,我觉得最好的夜晚是两者都有。那天晚上沙滩上一共有十六个人,对于热闹和欢乐来说正合适,但对我来说最重要的时刻,是我父亲一个人站在水边待了十分钟。大型聚会带来能量,以及某种真的发生了什么的感觉,所以适合婚礼和毕业典礼。小型聚会让人可以真正地交流和感受,适合任何私密的场合。在我们的文化里,人们通常更喜欢大型庆典,因为规模小的庆典可能会显得像是失败。我会说,活动要邀请一群人,但也要留些时间给真正重要的人。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“the moment that mattered most to me was my father standing alone by the water for ten minutes” — A plain factual statement. Compare 7.5's added structural pairing, "the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory," which makes the contrast itself the point.一句平实的陈述。对比7.5增加的结构性对照 "the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory",后者把对比本身变成了论点。
    • LR“which was perfect for the noise and fun” — Generic phrasing. Contrast 7.5's more specific and slightly wry "which was exactly right for the noise and the beer."笼统的措辞。对比7.5更具体、略带诙谐的 "which was exactly right for the noise and the beer"。
    • GRA“Big gatherings bring energy and the feeling that something has really happened, so they suit weddings and graduations.” — A single coordinated sentence, simpler than 7.5's triple-noun list plus dash-elaborated contrast used elsewhere in the answer.一个简单的并列句,不如答案其他部分用到的7.5三名词清单加破折号展开的对比那么简单。
    7.0 分

    The parallel structure "the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory" turns the observation into an aphorism, more developed than 6.5's plain factual sentence.平行结构 "the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory" 把这个观察变成了一句格言,比6.5那句平实的陈述句更展开。

    Sometimes, honestly, and I think the best evenings contain both sizes. There were sixteen of us on the sand that night, which was exactly right for the noise and the laughter, but the moment that mattered most was my father alone by the water for ten minutes — the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory. Big gatherings bring energy, witnesses, and a sense that something has really happened, so they suit weddings and graduations. Small ones allow real conversation and feeling, and suit anything more private. Culture pushes Vietnamese people toward large groups, since a small celebration can look like failure. I'd say invite the crowd for the event, and keep an hour for the people who actually matter.

    查看中文翻译

    老实说,有时候是这样,我觉得最好的夜晚是两种规模都有。那天晚上沙滩上一共有十六个人,对于热闹和欢笑来说正合适,但最重要的时刻是我父亲一个人在水边待了十分钟——大群人成就了庆典,而那个小小的瞬间成就了记忆。大型聚会带来能量、见证者,还有一种确实发生了什么大事的感觉,所以适合婚礼和毕业典礼。小型聚会能让人真正交流和感受,适合更私密的场合。文化把越南人推向大型聚会,因为规模小的庆典可能会显得像失败。我会说,活动要邀请一群人,但也要留一个小时给真正重要的人。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory” — A balanced parallel structure that turns the observation into an aphorism, more developed than 6.5's plain factual sentence.一个均衡的平行结构,把这个观察变成了格言,比6.5那句平实的陈述句更展开。
    • LR“a sense that something has really happened” — Functional phrasing. Contrast 7.5's "the sense that something has genuinely happened," a marginally more precise intensifier.功能性的措辞。对比7.5的 "the sense that something has genuinely happened",后者的强调语稍微更精确。
    • GRA“Culture pushes Vietnamese people toward large groups, since a small celebration can look like failure.” — A single because-style clause, less layered than 7.5's version which adds the image "a quiet failure."一个单一的 because 式从句,不如7.5加入 "a quiet failure" 这个画面的版本有层次。
    7.5 分

    The inserted "at least" gives the closing recommendation a more considered, weighed tone than the flatter versions at the lower bands.插入的 "at least" 让结尾的建议比低分段更平淡的版本多了一种深思熟虑、经过权衡的语气。

    Sometimes, and the best evenings tend to contain both sizes. There were sixteen of us on the sand that night, which was exactly right for the noise and the beer, but the moment that mattered most was my father alone by the water for ten minutes — the large group made the celebration, and the small moment made the memory. Big gatherings bring energy, witnesses, and the sense that something has genuinely happened, so they suit weddings, graduations and national days. Small ones allow real conversation and feeling, and suit anything private or sad. Culture pushes Vietnamese people toward large celebrations, since one with too few guests can look like a quiet failure. I'd say invite the crowd for the event, and keep an hour, at least, for the people who actually matter.

    查看中文翻译

    有时候是这样,最好的夜晚往往两种规模都有。那天晚上沙滩上一共有十六个人,对于热闹和啤酒来说正合适,但最重要的时刻是我父亲一个人在水边待了十分钟——大群人成就了庆典,而那个小小的瞬间成就了记忆。大型聚会带来能量、见证者,还有一种真正发生了什么大事的感觉,所以适合婚礼、毕业典礼和国庆节。小型聚会能让人真正交流和感受,适合任何私密或悲伤的场合。文化把越南人推向大型庆典,因为一场宾客太少的活动可能会显得像一场悄无声息的失败。我会说,活动要邀请一群人,但至少也要留一个小时给真正重要的人。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I'd say invite the crowd for the event, and keep an hour, at least, for the people who actually matter.” — The inserted "at least" gives the closing recommendation a more considered, weighed tone than the flatter versions at 6.5 and 7.0.插入的 "at least" 让结尾的建议比6.5和7.0更平淡的版本多了一种深思熟虑、经过权衡的语气。
    • LR“a quiet failure” — A precise, understated compound image, more vivid than 7.0's plain "failure."一个精准、含蓄的复合意象,比7.0平淡的 "failure" 更生动。
    • GRA“Big gatherings bring energy, witnesses, and the sense that something has genuinely happened, so they suit weddings, graduations and national days.” — A triple-noun list followed by a triple-example list, more layered than the shorter lists at 6.5 and 7.0.一个三名词清单后接一个三例清单,比6.5和7.0更短的清单更有层次。

  7. 7. Does technology mean people no longer need to attend international events?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The literal closing claim about the video stream lacks the compact, vivid image 7.5 compresses the same idea into.结尾关于视频直播的那句直白断言,缺少7.5把同一想法压缩成的那个紧凑生动的意象。

    I think it means people need to attend fewer events, but something is still lost. Last year, I watched a design conference online from my desk, saw every talk, but met nobody. The person I might have met in the corridor, who could have become a client or a friend, is the real reason people travel to these events, and a video stream cannot give you that. For information, technology has made travel almost unnecessary, and the online version is often even better. But for trust and connections, and the lucky accidents that shape careers, being there still does something a screen cannot.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得这意味着人们需要参加的活动变少了,但还是失去了一些东西。去年,我在家里的书桌前在线观看了一场设计大会,看了每一场演讲,却谁也没见到。那个我原本可能在走廊上遇到的人,那个可能会成为客户或朋友的人,才是人们千里迢迢赶去参加这些活动的真正原因,而视频直播给不了你这个。就获取信息而言,技术已经让出行几乎变得没有必要,线上版本往往甚至更好。但就信任和人脉,以及那些塑造职业生涯的幸运巧合而言,亲身到场依然能做到屏幕做不到的事。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The person I might have met in the corridor, who could have become a client or a friend, is the real reason people travel to these events, and a video stream cannot give you that.” — A clear, direct causal claim. Compare 7.5's tighter version, "a stream simply can't deliver corridors," which compresses the same idea into a striking four-word closing clause.一个清晰、直接的因果论断。对比7.5更紧凑的版本 "a stream simply can't deliver corridors",后者把同一想法压缩成一个四个词、令人印象深刻的结尾短句。
    • LR“a video stream cannot give you that” — Plain phrasing. Contrast 7.5's more compact and vivid "a stream simply can't deliver corridors."平淡的措辞。对比7.5更紧凑、更生动的 "a stream simply can't deliver corridors"。
    • GRA“The person I might have met in the corridor, who could have become a client or a friend, is the real reason people travel to these events, and a video stream cannot give you that.” — One long coordinated sentence, less punctuated than 7.5's dash-and-relative-clause version of the same idea.一个很长的并列句,标点使用不如7.5那个用破折号加关系从句处理同一想法的版本丰富。
    7.0 分

    The intensifier "genuinely" adds natural spoken emphasis, beyond 6.5's flat "almost unnecessary."强调词 "genuinely" 加入了自然的口语式强调,超越了6.5那句平淡的 "almost unnecessary"。

    It means they need to attend fewer, I'd say, and the ones they skip cost something invisible. I watched a design conference stream last year from my desk, saw every talk, and met nobody — the person I'd have run into in the corridor, who might have become a client or a friend, was the whole reason people fly to these things, and a stream simply can't deliver corridors. For pure information, technology has genuinely made travel unnecessary, and the streamed version is often better anyway. But for trust, contacts and the lucky accidents that shape careers, being there still does what a screen can't.

    查看中文翻译

    我会说,这意味着人们需要参加的活动变少了,而那些被跳过的活动会付出一些看不见的代价。去年我在家里的书桌前在线观看了一场设计大会,看了每一场演讲,却谁也没见到——那个我原本可能在走廊上碰到的人,那个可能会成为客户或朋友的人,才是人们千里迢迢飞去参加这些活动的全部原因,而一场直播根本给不了你走廊。就纯粹的信息而言,技术确实已经让出行变得没有必要,直播版本往往反而更好。但就信任、人脉,以及那些塑造职业生涯的幸运巧合而言,亲身到场依然能做到屏幕做不到的事。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“was the whole reason people fly to these things, and a stream simply can't deliver corridors” — A compact closing image, more developed than 6.5's plainer, more literal version of the same claim.一个紧凑的结尾意象,比6.5那种更平淡、更直白的同一断言更有层次。
    • LR“genuinely made travel unnecessary” — The intensifier "genuinely" adds natural spoken emphasis beyond 6.5's flat "almost unnecessary."强调词 "genuinely" 加入了自然的口语式强调,超越了6.5那句平淡的 "almost unnecessary"。
    • GRA“the person I'd have run into in the corridor, who might have become a client or a friend, was the whole reason people fly to these things, and a stream simply can't deliver corridors” — A long sentence with an embedded relative clause and a dash-free coordinated ending, more ambitious than 6.5's shorter version.一个带嵌入关系从句、结尾用并列而非破折号的长句,比6.5更短的版本更有野心。
    7.5 分

    The added closing prediction with a triple parallel structure goes beyond the single observation that ends the lower-band answers.新增的那句用三重平行结构写成的结尾预测,超越了低分段答案那种单一观察式的收尾。

    It means they need to attend fewer, and the ones they skip cost something invisible. I watched a design conference stream last year from my desk, saw every talk, and met nobody — the person I'd have run into in the corridor, who might have become a client or a friend, was the entire reason people fly to these things, and a stream simply can't deliver corridors. For information, technology has made travel largely unnecessary, and the streamed version is often better besides. But for trust, contacts and the accidents that quietly shape a career, being there still does what a screen can't. I'd expect fewer people to travel, to more selective events, and the ones that survive to be the ones actually worth a flight.

    查看中文翻译

    这意味着人们需要参加的活动变少了,而那些被跳过的活动会付出一些看不见的代价。去年我在家里的书桌前在线观看了一场设计大会,看了每一场演讲,却谁也没见到——那个我原本可能在走廊上碰到的人,那个可能会成为客户或朋友的人,是人们飞去参加这些活动的全部原因,而一场直播根本给不了你走廊。就信息而言,技术已经让出行在很大程度上变得没有必要,直播版本往往反而更好。但就信任、人脉,以及那些悄悄塑造职业生涯的巧合而言,亲身到场依然能做到屏幕做不到的事。我预计以后会有更少的人出行,去参加更精挑细选的活动,而能存活下来的活动,会是那些真正值得一次飞行的活动。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I'd expect fewer people to travel, to more selective events, and the ones that survive to be the ones actually worth a flight.” — An added closing prediction with a triple parallel structure, going beyond the single observation that ends the 7.0 and 6.5 answers.新增的结尾预测句用了三重平行结构,超越了7.0和6.5答案结尾那种单一观察式的收尾。
    • LR“the accidents that quietly shape a career” — The adverb "quietly" adds a subtle, precise texture beyond 7.0's plainer "shape careers."副词 "quietly" 加入了一种微妙、精确的质感,超越了7.0那句更平淡的 "shape careers"。
    • GRA“a stream simply can't deliver corridors. For information, technology has made travel largely unnecessary, and the streamed version is often better besides.” — Two short, punchy sentences in sequence, a more controlled rhythm than the single longer sentence used at 7.0 for the same content.两个短促有力的句子接连出现,比7.0用同样内容写成的单一长句节奏更有控制力。

  8. 8. Are international events successful in promoting understanding between cultures?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain three-adjective closing is functional, unlike 7.5's version which fronts the adjectives for rhetorical effect.平铺直叙的三形容词收尾虽然管用,但不像7.5那种把形容词前置以取得修辞效果的版本。

    I think they work a little, mostly for the people who are directly involved. After the fireworks festival one year, I saw the teams from five countries eating together on the riverbank, laughing in a mix of languages, and that felt like real understanding, but only for about fifty people. For the rest of the audience, the event was just a beautiful evening that taught them little about the other countries. International events work by putting people together, and contact does change how people think. But they do not solve real problems between countries, and they can sometimes be used to hide them. I would say they are real but small, and still worth having.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得它们起到了一点作用,主要是对那些直接参与的人而言。有一年烟花节结束后,我看到来自五个国家的团队在江边一起吃饭,用几种混杂的语言说笑,那一刻感觉像是真正的理解,但也就大约五十个人而已。对于其余的观众来说,这场活动只是一个美丽的夜晚,让他们对其他国家几乎没学到什么。国际活动的作用在于把人们聚到一起,接触确实会改变人们的想法。但它们解决不了国家之间真正的问题,有时候反而会被用来掩盖这些问题。我会说,这些活动是真实存在的,但规模很小,不过依然值得举办。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I would say they are real but small, and still worth having.” — A plain three-adjective closing judgement. Compare 7.5's more polished version, "Real, small, and worth having — that's my honest assessment," which fronts the adjectives for rhetorical effect.一个平铺直叙的三形容词结尾判断。对比7.5更精致的版本 "Real, small, and worth having — that's my honest assessment",后者把形容词前置以取得修辞效果。
    • LR“eating together on the riverbank, laughing in a mix of languages” — Functional description. Contrast 7.5's addition "made of people, not headlines," a sharper, more figurative phrase used elsewhere in the answer.功能性的描写。对比7.5新增的 "made of people, not headlines",这是答案中另一处用到的更犀利、更有比喻色彩的短语。
    • GRA“International events work by putting people together, and contact does change how people think.” — A plain coordinated sentence, less layered than 7.5's semicolon version with the added parallel clause "where contact stays thin, the effect stays thin too."一个平淡的并列句,不如7.5用分号加平行从句 "where contact stays thin, the effect stays thin too" 的版本有层次。
    7.0 分

    The trailing "though" signals a natural spoken contrast, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "For the rest of the audience."尾随的 "though" 传达出一种自然的口语式转折,比6.5那句更平淡的 "For the rest of the audience" 更流畅。

    Modestly, I'd say, and mostly for the people directly involved. After the fireworks festival one year, I watched the teams from five countries eating together on the riverbank, laughing about something in a mix of languages, and that was real understanding — for maybe fifty people. For the wider audience, though, the event was a beautiful evening that taught them little about Italy or Japan beyond what their fireworks looked like. International events work by putting people in contact, and contact does change minds; where contact stays thin, so does the effect. They create goodwill, but they don't resolve disputes, and honestly, they can be used to paper over them.

    查看中文翻译

    我会说效果有限,主要是对那些直接参与的人而言。有一年烟花节结束后,我看到来自五个国家的团队在江边一起吃饭,用几种混杂的语言说笑着什么,那是真正的理解——大概对五十个人来说。但对更广泛的观众来说,这场活动只是一个美丽的夜晚,除了知道意大利或日本的烟花长什么样,几乎没学到什么。国际活动的作用在于让人们互相接触,而接触确实会改变想法;接触越浅,效果也就越浅。它们能建立善意,但解决不了争端,老实说,它们有时还会被用来掩盖争端。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“For the wider audience, though, the event was a beautiful evening that taught them little about Italy or Japan beyond what their fireworks looked like.” — The trailing "though" signals a natural spoken contrast, more fluent than 6.5's flatter "For the rest of the audience."尾随的 "though" 传达出一种自然的口语式转折,比6.5那句更平淡的 "For the rest of the audience" 更流畅。
    • LR“paper over them” — An idiomatic phrase beyond 6.5's plain "hide them."一个比6.5那句直白的 "hide them" 更地道的短语。
    • GRA“contact does change minds; where contact stays thin, so does the effect” — A semicolon-joined parallel structure, more controlled than 6.5's simple coordination.一个用分号连接的平行结构,比6.5那种简单的并列更有控制力。
    7.5 分

    Fronting the three adjectives before the dash gives the closing line more punch than the plainer sentence-final version at the lower bands.把三个形容词前置到破折号之前,让结尾这句话比低分段那种句末放置的平淡版本更有力量。

    Modestly, and mostly for the people directly involved. After the fireworks festival one year, I watched the teams from five countries eating together on the riverbank, laughing about something in a mix of languages, and that was real understanding — for perhaps fifty people. For the wider audience, the event was a beautiful evening that taught them little about Italy or Japan beyond what their fireworks looked like. International events work by putting people in contact, and contact changes minds; where contact stays thin, the effect stays thin too. They also build goodwill and a quiet sense that other countries are made of people, not headlines. They don't resolve disputes, and they can even be used to paper over them. Real, small, and worth having — that's my honest assessment.

    查看中文翻译

    效果有限,主要是对那些直接参与的人而言。有一年烟花节结束后,我看到来自五个国家的团队在江边一起吃饭,用几种混杂的语言说笑着什么,那是真正的理解——对大约五十个人来说。但对更广泛的观众来说,这场活动只是一个美丽的夜晚,除了知道意大利或日本的烟花长什么样,几乎没学到什么。国际活动的作用在于让人们互相接触,而接触会改变想法;接触越浅,效果也就越浅。它们还能建立一种善意,以及一种悄然的认知,即其他国家是由人组成的,而不是由新闻标题组成的。它们解决不了争端,有时甚至还会被用来掩盖争端。真实、规模小、值得拥有——这是我诚实的评价。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Real, small, and worth having — that's my honest assessment.” — Fronting the three adjectives before the dash for rhetorical effect gives the closing line more punch than the plainer sentence-final version at 6.5 and 7.0.把三个形容词前置到破折号之前以取得修辞效果,让结尾这句话比6.5和7.0那种句末放置的平淡版本更有力量。
    • LR“made of people, not headlines” — A vivid, contemporary contrast beyond 7.0's plainer statement about goodwill.一个生动、具有当代感的对比,超越了7.0那句关于善意的更平淡的陈述。
    • GRA“contact changes minds; where contact stays thin, the effect stays thin too” — A semicolon-joined sentence with a repeated adjective ("thin... thin") for rhetorical parallelism, more polished than 7.0's similar but less symmetrical version.一个用分号连接、重复形容词("thin... thin")以取得修辞平行效果的句子,比7.0那个内容相似但不够对称的版本更精致。

  9. 9. Why is it important to remember national events?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain "so" clause about remembering selectively lacks the vivid metaphor 7.5 uses for the same idea.关于选择性记忆的那句平淡的 "so" 从句,缺少7.5为同一想法用到的那个生动比喻。

    I think a country that forgets its important events forgets what they cost. Every year, my grandmother goes quiet on a certain anniversary, and her silence taught me more about a war I never saw than any book could. Remembering keeps the price of the past visible to people who did not pay for it themselves. National events also connect a country across generations, so strangers feel like they belong together. They also honour people who deserve it. The danger is remembering only the good parts, so the past becomes a nicer story than it really was. Remembering honestly, even the hard parts, is what makes it worth doing.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得一个忘记自己重大历史事件的国家,也会忘记这些事件所付出的代价。每年到了某个纪念日,我奶奶都会沉默下来,她的沉默教会我的关于那场我从未亲历的战争的东西,比任何一本书都多。纪念活动能让过去的代价,对那些自己没有亲身付出过代价的人来说,依然可见。全国性的活动也能把一个国家跨代际地联系起来,让陌生人感觉彼此是一体的。它们也是对那些应得敬意的人的纪念。危险在于只记住好的部分,这样过去就会变成一个比实际更美好的故事。诚实地记住,包括那些艰难的部分,才是让这件事值得去做的原因。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Remembering honestly, even the hard parts, is what makes it worth doing.” — A plain, direct closing claim. Compare 7.5's fuller version, "including the uncomfortable parts," and the added intensifier "actually," which sharpens the same idea.一个平实、直接的结尾断言。对比7.5更完整的版本 "including the uncomfortable parts",以及新增的强调词 "actually",后者让同一想法更加犀利。
    • LR“her silence taught me more about a war I never saw than any book could” — A functional comparison. Contrast 7.5's "than any textbook ever could," a marginally stronger intensifier.一个功能性的比较。对比7.5的 "than any textbook ever could",强调语稍微更强烈一些。
    • GRA“The danger is remembering only the good parts, so the past becomes a nicer story than it really was.” — A plain "so" clause, less vivid than 7.5's metaphor "hardens into a flattering myth."一个平淡的 "so" 从句,不如7.5那句 "hardens into a flattering myth" 的比喻生动。
    7.0 分

    The inserted "of course" signals natural spoken concession, more fluent than 6.5's flatter opening to the same claim.插入的 "of course" 传达出自然的口语式让步,比6.5那句更平淡的开场更流畅。

    Because a country that forgets its events forgets what they cost, honestly. My grandmother goes quiet on one particular anniversary every year, and her silence has taught me more about a war I never saw than any textbook could. Remembering keeps the price of the past visible to people who didn't pay it themselves. National events also hold a country together across generations and regions — they're the shared story that makes strangers feel like fellow citizens. They honour people who deserved it, and they carry a kind of warning, since the things a nation commemorates are often the things it's promising not to repeat. The danger, of course, is remembering selectively, so the past turns into a flattering myth.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,因为一个忘记自己重大事件的国家,也会忘记这些事件所付出的代价。每年到了某个特定的纪念日,我奶奶都会沉默下来,她的沉默教会我的关于那场我从未亲历的战争的东西,比任何一本教科书都多。纪念活动能让过去的代价,对那些没有亲身付出过代价的人来说,依然可见。全国性的活动也能把一个国家跨代际、跨地域地凝聚在一起——它们是那个让陌生人感觉自己是同胞的共同故事。它们纪念那些应得敬意的人,也承载着一种警示,因为一个民族所纪念的事情,往往正是它承诺不再重演的事情。当然,危险在于选择性地记忆,这样过去就会变成一个美化过的神话。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The danger, of course, is remembering selectively, so the past turns into a flattering myth.” — The inserted "of course" signals natural spoken concession, more fluent than 6.5's flatter opening to the same sentence.插入的 "of course" 传达出自然的口语式让步,比6.5那句更平淡的开场更流畅。
    • LR“turns into a flattering myth” — A figurative phrase beyond 6.5's literal "a nicer story than it really was."一个比6.5那句直白的 "a nicer story than it really was" 更有比喻色彩的短语。
    • GRA“they're the shared story that makes strangers feel like fellow citizens” — Part of a two-sentence layered argument, less compact than 7.5's semicolon-joined single-sentence version of the same content.属于一个双句式的分层论证的一部分,不如7.5用分号连接、写成单句的版本紧凑。
    7.5 分

    The more physical verb "hardens" gives the closing metaphor more force than 7.0's plainer "turns into."更有具象感的动词 "hardens" 让结尾的比喻比7.0那句更平淡的 "turns into" 更有力量。

    Because a country that forgets its events forgets what they cost. My grandmother goes quiet on one particular anniversary every year, and her silence has taught me more about a war I never saw than any textbook ever could. Remembering keeps the price of the past visible to people who never had to pay it. National events also hold a country together across generations and regions; they're the shared story that makes strangers feel like fellow citizens. They honour the people who deserved it, and they carry a quiet warning too, since the things a nation commemorates are often exactly the things it's promising not to repeat. The danger is remembering selectively, so the past hardens into a flattering myth. Remembering honestly, including the uncomfortable parts, is what actually makes it worth doing.

    查看中文翻译

    因为一个忘记自己重大事件的国家,也会忘记这些事件所付出的代价。每年到了某个特定的纪念日,我奶奶都会沉默下来,她的沉默教会我的关于那场我从未亲历的战争的东西,比任何一本教科书能教的都多。纪念活动能让过去的代价,对那些从未被迫承受过的人来说,依然可见。全国性的活动也能把一个国家跨代际、跨地域地凝聚在一起;它们是那个让陌生人感觉自己是同胞的共同故事。它们纪念那些应得敬意的人,也悄悄地承载着一种警示,因为一个民族所纪念的事情,往往正是它承诺不再重演的事情。危险在于选择性地记忆,这样过去就会硬化成一个美化过的神话。诚实地记住,包括那些令人不安的部分,才是真正让这件事值得去做的原因。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Remembering honestly, including the uncomfortable parts, is what actually makes it worth doing.” — The added qualifier "including the uncomfortable parts" and intensifier "actually" give the final claim more precision than the plainer closings at 6.5 and 7.0.新增的限定语 "including the uncomfortable parts" 和强调词 "actually",让结尾的断言比6.5和7.0那种更平淡的收尾更精确。
    • LR“hardens into a flattering myth” — A more vivid, almost physical verb ("hardens") than 7.0's plainer "turns into."一个更生动、近乎具象化的动词("hardens"),比7.0那句更平淡的 "turns into" 更有力量。
    • GRA“National events also hold a country together across generations and regions; they're the shared story that makes strangers feel like fellow citizens.” — A semicolon joining two closely related independent clauses into one fluent unit, more controlled than the two separate sentences at 7.0.用分号把两个密切相关的独立分句连成一个流畅的整体,比7.0那种分开的两句更有控制力。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？
讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？
在"An Important Event in Your Life That You Celebrated"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？
考生最近一次报告它出现在 2026年5–8月。题卡每四个月轮换一次，许多话题会在之后的季度以略有不同的措辞回归。