IELTS Speaking Part 2

A TV or Online Programme That You Enjoy Watching

最近一次出现于 2026年5–8月

题卡

Describe a TV or online programme/show that you enjoy watching

You should say:

  • What this TV or online programme/show is about
  • Which country the programme/show comes from
  • How often you watch it
  • And explain why you enjoy watching this TV or online programme/show

范文:6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本,分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看,能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

The answer explains enjoyment with simple, direct statements ('it feels calming', 'it makes me realise') using plain, everyday vocabulary, typical of Band 6.5.答案用简单直接的句子解释了喜欢的原因('它让人感觉很平静'、'它让我意识到'),使用平实、日常的词汇,是6.5分的典型特征。

The programme I want to talk about is a nature documentary called Blue Planet. It shows different oceans around the world and all the strange, beautiful animals living in them, like whales, sharks, and fish that glow in the dark.

It comes from Britain. I found it on a streaming app last year, and I remember being surprised at how good the pictures were, almost like watching a movie instead of a documentary.

I usually watch one episode a week, on a quiet evening at home. Each episode is fairly long, about an hour, so I like to watch it slowly, without checking my phone or doing anything else at the same time.

I enjoy it mainly because it feels calming after a busy day at work. The music is beautiful and the camera work is really impressive, so it almost feels like a small holiday even though I'm still sitting on my sofa. I also like learning small facts, like how deep some fish actually live. It makes me realise how little we really know about the ocean, which I find quite exciting.

查看中文翻译

我想说的节目是一部叫《蓝色星球》的自然纪录片。它展示了世界各地不同的海洋,还有生活在里面的各种奇怪又美丽的动物,比如鲸鱼、鲨鱼,还有会在黑暗中发光的鱼。

这部纪录片来自英国。我是去年在一个流媒体软件上找到的,记得当时很惊讶画面拍得那么好,感觉像在看电影,不像纪录片。

我通常一周看一集,在家里安静的晚上看。每一集都比较长,大概一个小时,所以我喜欢慢慢看,不看手机,也不做别的事情。

我喜欢它主要是因为忙碌一天之后看会让人很放松。音乐很好听,拍摄画面也很厉害,所以虽然我还是坐在自己家的沙发上,却有点像在度一个小假。我也喜欢学到一些小知识,比如有些鱼到底生活在多深的海里。它让我意识到我们对海洋了解得其实很少,我觉得这一点挺有意思的。

184 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LRthe pictures were, almost like watching a movie instead of a documentaryThe comparison 'like watching a movie instead of a documentary' uses two familiar, high-frequency genre words to convey production quality, rather than a more precise or evaluative term (cinematic, polished) a higher-band answer might reach for. It's a single, plain comparison rather than an extended or original image, and it does its job clearly — establishing that the documentary looked unusually good — without needing further vocabulary support. This matches the 6.5 lexical target: everyday words used effectively, with clarity prioritised over range.比喻'like watching a movie instead of a documentary'用两个熟悉、高频的体裁词来传达制作质量,而不是更高分段答案可能会选用的、更精确或更具评价色彩的词(cinematic、polished)。这是一个简单、未加延展的比喻,而非精心营造的原创意象,但它清楚地完成了任务——说明这部纪录片看起来异常精良——不需要更多词汇支撑。这符合Band 6.5的词汇目标:有效使用日常词汇,把清晰度置于词汇广度之上。
  • GRAI usually watch one episode a week, on a quiet evening at home.The sentence is built from a single main clause with two stacked prepositional phrases ('on a quiet evening', 'at home') adding detail without any subordination at all — a straightforward, accurate way to state a habit using present simple for routine. A 7.0 answer covering the same detail might instead fold this into a longer sentence connecting the habit to a reason, but here it stands alone as a simple factual statement, which is exactly the 6.5 grammar target's comfort zone: correct, unadorned, low-risk structure.这句话由一个单独的主句构成,叠加了两个介词短语('on a quiet evening'、'at home')来添加细节,完全没有任何从属结构——用现在简单时描述日常习惯的一种直白、准确的方式。描述同样细节的Band 7.0答案可能会把它折叠进一个更长的句子里,把习惯和理由联系起来,但这里它作为一个简单的事实陈述独立存在,恰恰是Band 6.5语法目标的舒适区:正确、不加修饰、低风险的结构。
  • FCIt makes me realise how little we really know about the ocean, which I find quite exciting.The closing sentence links the documentary's content (ocean facts) to a single stated reaction ('quite exciting') via a relative clause, giving the answer's ending one clear payoff rather than building toward a more layered reflection on what that realisation means personally. It's a complete and relevant close — connecting back to the cue card's 'why do you enjoy it' — but it stops at naming the feeling rather than exploring it further, which is the ceiling the 6.5 Fluency & Coherence descriptor sets for closing statements.结尾句通过一个关系从句,把纪录片的内容(关于海洋的事实)与一种单一陈述的反应('quite exciting')联系起来,让答案的结尾有一个清楚的落点,而不是构建出对这一感悟在个人层面意味着什么的更多层次的反思。这是一个完整且切题的收尾——回扣了cue card"你为什么喜欢它"这一问题——但它只停留在说出这种感觉的层面,没有进一步探究,而这正是Band 6.5流利度与连贯性描述语为结尾句设定的上限。
7.0 分

The answer develops the 'why' section with a specific contrast (bakers helping rather than competing destructively) and a closing personal reflection, showing fuller idea development than 6.5's simple reasons, while staying plainer than the extended, image-driven paragraphs of the 7.5 answer.答案在'原因'部分通过一个具体的对比(选手们互相帮助,而不是搞破坏式的竞争)来展开,并以个人反思收尾,比6.5分简单的理由展现出更充分的思路发展,但仍比7.5分答案那种延展、意象丰富的段落要朴素一些。

The programme I'd talk about is a British baking competition called The Great British Bake Off, where a group of amateur bakers compete in a tent in the English countryside, making cakes, bread, and pastries each week under a fairly brutal time limit.

It comes from the UK, and I first came across it almost by accident, scrolling through a streaming app late one night when I couldn't sleep. I remember watching one episode just to see what it was and ending up finishing the whole series within a week.

How often I watch it depends on the season, honestly. When a new series is released, I'll watch two or three episodes a week, usually while cooking dinner myself, which is probably not the best combination since it makes me hungrier than I already was. Between seasons, I sometimes go back and rewatch old episodes I already know the results of, just for comfort.

Why I enjoy it so much is mainly the atmosphere. Unlike a lot of competition shows, nobody's really trying to destroy anyone else — the bakers actually help each other when something goes wrong, which I find quite touching to watch. I also like learning small technical details, like why a cake collapses or how to get pastry to rise properly, even though I'm honestly a fairly average cook myself. There's something relaxing about watching people take a simple task seriously and put real effort into it, especially after a stressful day at work. It's become a bit of a ritual for me now, and I'd genuinely recommend it to anyone who wants something calm rather than dramatic to watch in the evening.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个节目是一档英国烘焙比赛节目,叫《英国家庭烘焙大赛》(The Great British Bake Off),一群业余烘焙爱好者在英国乡下的一个帐篷里比赛,每周要在相当苛刻的时限内做出蛋糕、面包和各种酥皮点心。

这个节目来自英国,我第一次接触到它几乎完全是偶然的——有天晚上睡不着,我在一个流媒体应用上随便刷着看,就点开了。我记得当时只是想看一集了解一下这是个什么节目,结果一周之内就把整季追完了。

说实话,我看的频率要看当季情况。新一季播出的时候,我一周会看两三集,通常是一边看一边自己做晚饭,这大概不是什么好组合,因为它会让我本来就饿的肚子更饿。两季之间,我有时会重新看以前的老集数,哪怕结果早就知道了,纯粹是为了图个舒心。

我这么喜欢这个节目,主要是因为它的氛围。跟很多竞赛类节目不一样,这里没有谁真的想把别人比下去——选手们在有人出状况时会真心帮忙,这一点我看了觉得挺感动的。我也喜欢从中学到一些小小的技术细节,比如为什么蛋糕会塌陷,或者怎样才能让酥皮正确膨起来,尽管说实话我自己做饭水平也就一般般。看着人们认真对待一件简单的事情,并真正付出努力,总有种让人放松的感觉,尤其是在忙碌紧张的一天工作之后。它现在已经成了我的一种小小的仪式,我真心会推荐给任何想在晚上看点平静而不是充满戏剧性内容的人。

277 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LRunder a fairly brutal time limit"Brutal" is a flexible, slightly less-common word choice used loosely, not literally violent, to emphasize how strict the baking competition's deadlines are, which is more vivid than a plain alternative like "a very short time limit." This fits the 7.0 lexical target of a few flexible, topic-specific word choices layered onto otherwise common vocabulary. It also sets the tone for the show's tension described in this opening sentence, before the answer moves on to the more relaxed atmosphere the speaker actually enjoys."Brutal"(残酷、极其严苛)是一个灵活、略微不那么常见的用词选择,在这里被松散地使用,而非字面上的暴力含义,用来强调烘焙比赛截止时间的严苛程度,比"a very short time limit"这样的简单说法更生动。这符合Band 7.0词汇目标——在通用词汇的基础上叠加几个灵活的、与主题相关的用词选择。它也为这句开场白所描述的节目紧张感定下了基调,随后答案才转向说话人真正喜欢的、更放松的氛围。
  • GRAUnlike a lot of competition shows, nobody's really trying to destroy anyone else — the bakers actually help each other when something goes wrong, which I find quite touching to watch.This sentence opens with a contrastive phrase, "Unlike a lot of competition shows," then adds a relative clause, "which I find quite touching to watch," onto the main statement, combining two distinct grammatical devices accurately in one sentence. It's the comfortable, accurate grammar range the 7.0 descriptor describes, more ambitious than a flat statement like "the show is friendly" but not layering in additional subordination a 7.5 sentence might use. The contrast also does real work, explaining precisely what differentiates this show from competition programmes generally.这句话以一个转折短语"Unlike a lot of competition shows"开头,然后在主句陈述上又加了一个关系从句"which I find quite touching to watch",在一句话里准确地结合了两种不同的语法手段。这正是Band 7.0描述中那种从容、准确的语法幅度,比"the show is friendly"这样平淡的陈述更有野心,但还没有叠加Band 7.5句子可能用到的额外从属结构。这个对比也承担着实际的说理功能,精确地解释了这档节目与一般竞赛类节目的不同之处。
  • FCThere's something relaxing about watching people take a simple task seriously and put real effort into it, especially after a stressful day at work.This adds a reflective, evaluative point about why the show specifically suits the speaker's own life, unwinding after work stress, rather than a general statement that the show is enjoyable. That's the kind of development beyond simple description the 7.0 fluency descriptor asks for; a 6.5 answer would likely just say "I find it relaxing to watch." It also ties the show's content, effort and seriousness, to the speaker's personal need for unwinding, making the explanation feel specific rather than generic.这句话加入了一个反思性、评价性的观点,说明这档节目为什么特别适合说话人自己的生活——用来在下班后放松下来,而不是泛泛地说这档节目很有趣。这正是Band 7.0流利度描述所要求的、超越单纯描述的发展方式;Band 6.5的答案很可能只会说"I find it relaxing to watch."它还把节目的内容(努力与认真)与说话人个人需要放松这一点联系起来,让这个解释显得具体而非笼统。
7.5 分

The extended comparative sentence about the nerve-racking road-crossing and the closing reflection on trust show sustained evaluative development and precise vocabulary characteristic of Band 7.5.关于令人紧张的过马路场景的延展比较句,以及结尾关于信任的反思,展现出7.5分典型的持续评价性发展和精确的词汇运用。

The programme I'd talk about is a Japanese show called 'Old Enough!'. The idea is almost absurdly simple: a small child, usually two to five years old, is sent on their first errand alone — to buy tofu, to deliver a lunchbox to a parent's workplace, to take a bus across town — while a camera crew disguised as ordinary people follows. Each episode is about ten minutes, and nothing else happens.

It comes from Japan, where it's apparently been on television for thirty years, and it reached me through a streaming service that put a batch of episodes online with subtitles. My sister found it first and messaged me a clip of a three-year-old who bought the tofu, got distracted by a dog, walked home, and only remembered the tofu at the front door.

How often I watch it is mostly Sunday evenings, at my sister's flat, with her two children, who are four and eleven. It's become a small ritual: dinner, then two or three episodes, then bed for the small one. Perhaps twice a month. I'd never watch it alone, but with children it becomes something else, because the four-year-old watches with an intensity I've never seen him give anything — he's checking whether he could do it.

Why I enjoy it is the tension, first. Watching a tiny person cross a road with a bag of vegetables is more nerve-racking than any thriller, and the relief when they make it is real. But underneath that, it's a programme about trust. The parents trust the child, the shopkeepers play along, the whole street quietly makes sure the errand succeeds, and the child comes home slightly bigger than they left. As a designer, I also admire how little it needs — no music, no host, no prizes, just a child and a task. It's the most honest thing on my screen, and the only programme that makes my nephew want to go and buy something.

查看中文翻译

我想谈的节目是一档名叫《Old Enough!》的日本节目。它的理念简单到近乎荒谬:一个通常在两到五岁之间的小孩子,被独自派去完成人生中第一次跑腿任务——去买豆腐,把便当送到爸爸或妈妈的工作单位,或者搭公交车穿过整个城镇——而一队伪装成普通路人的摄制组则在一旁跟拍。每一集大约十分钟,除此之外几乎没有别的情节。

这个节目来自日本,据说已经在电视上播出了三十年,而我是通过一个流媒体平台知道它的,那个平台把一批带字幕的集数放到了网上。我妹妹最先发现了这个节目,还给我发了一段视频片段:一个三岁的孩子去买豆腐,路上被一只狗分了心,然后走回了家,直到站在家门口才想起来自己是去买豆腐的。

我看这个节目的频率大概是每逢周日晚上,在我妹妹家,和她四岁与十一岁的两个孩子一起看。这已经变成了一个小小的仪式:吃晚饭,然后看两三集,接着小的那个就该睡觉了。大概一个月两次左右吧。我自己一个人是绝不会看这个节目的,但和孩子们一起看,它就变成了另一回事,因为那个四岁的孩子看的时候,专注程度是我从未在他身上见过的——他在暗暗检验自己能不能做到。

我之所以喜欢它,首先是因为那种紧张感。看一个小小的孩子拎着一袋蔬菜过马路,比任何惊悚片都更让人揪心,而当他们成功完成任务时,那种如释重负的感觉是真实的。但在这层紧张感之下,这其实是一档关于信任的节目。父母信任孩子,店主们也配合演出,整条街道都在默默确保这次任务能够顺利完成,而孩子回家时,会比出门时“长大”了一点点。作为一名设计师,我也很欣赏它所需要的东西是如此之少——没有音乐,没有主持人,没有奖品,只有一个孩子和一项任务。这是我屏幕上最诚实的一档节目,也是唯一一档能让我外甥主动想去买东西的节目。

327 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LRIt's the most honest thing on my screenThis figurative, evaluative superlative treats the show as morally distinct from everything else the speaker watches, using "honest" in a metaphorical sense (unpretentious, unmanipulative) rather than its literal meaning, a genuinely idiomatic touch beyond a plain claim like "it's a simple, realistic programme" that a Band 6.5 or 7.0 answer would offer. The phrase directly follows a list of everything the show deliberately lacks ("no music, no host, no prizes"), so the metaphor is earned by concrete supporting detail rather than asserted in isolation. It functions as the thesis of the closing paragraph, tying the speaker's admiration for the show's simplicity to their professional identity as a designer.这个带有比喻色彩、充满评价意味的最高级用法,把这档节目塑造成与说话人看过的其他一切在道德层面都截然不同的存在,"honest"(诚实)在这里用的是比喻义(不做作、不操纵),而非字面意思,这是一种真正习语化的笔触,超越了Band 6.5或7.0答案会给出的那种平淡断言,比如"it's a simple, realistic programme"。这个短语紧接在一份罗列节目刻意舍弃的一切的清单之后("no music, no host, no prizes"),所以这个隐喻是靠具体细节支撑起来的,而不是孤立地被断言出来。它充当了结尾段的论点,把说话人对节目简朴风格的欣赏,与自己作为设计师的职业身份联系了起来。
  • GRAWatching a tiny person cross a road with a bag of vegetables is more nerve-racking than any thriller, and the relief when they make it is real.A gerund phrase functions as the sentence's subject ("Watching a tiny person cross a road..."), which is then compared using "more... than any thriller" before a second, coordinated clause adds a further evaluative point -- a wide, mostly error-free range of structures working together in one sentence, rather than the single basic complex clause a Band 6.5 or 7.0 answer would attempt. The deliberately mismatched comparison (a toddler's errand versus a thriller film) is also what makes the grammar meaningful rather than mechanical, capturing the show's real emotional effect in a way a simpler sentence couldn't.一个动名词短语充当句子的主语("Watching a tiny person cross a road..."),随后用"more... than any thriller"进行比较,接着又用第二个并列从句补充了一层评价——这是一系列范围宽广、几乎不出错的结构协同作用于同一个句子中,而不是Band 6.5或7.0答案会尝试的那种单一基础复杂从句。这个故意不相称的比较(一个蹒跚学步的孩子过马路的小事对比一部惊悚片)也正是让这个语法结构变得有意义、而非机械堆砌的原因,以一种更简单的句子无法做到的方式,捕捉到了这档节目真正的情感效果。
  • FCunderneath that, it's a programme about trustThis line marks an explicit shift from describing the show's surface appeal (tension, drama) to naming its deeper theme, using the phrase "underneath that" to signal the movement from description to interpretation -- the reflective coherence move the 7.5 descriptor highlights as distinguishing a strong answer from a merely accurate one. A Band 6.5 or 7.0 answer would likely stay at the level of what happens in each episode without naming an abstract theme like "trust." The claim is also immediately supported by concrete evidence in the following sentence (parents, shopkeepers, the whole street cooperating), so the interpretation is argued rather than simply asserted.这句话标志着从描述节目表面的吸引力(紧张、戏剧性)明确转向指出其更深层的主题,用短语"underneath that"(在这之下)来标示从描述到诠释的转变——这正是Band 7.5描述中强调的、能把一个出色答案与一个仅仅准确的答案区分开来的反思性连贯手法。Band 6.5或7.0的答案更可能停留在每一集发生了什么的层面,而不会点出像"trust"(信任)这样的抽象主题。这个论断在紧接着的下一句里也立刻得到了具体证据的支持(父母、店主、整条街的人齐心协力),所以这个诠释是被论证出来的,而不仅仅是被断言出来。

各考试时段出题记录

  • Describe a TV or online programme/show that you enjoy watching2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题,已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

  1. 1. What types of TV or online programmes/shows are popular in your country?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'which my grandmother watches very loyally' states the observation simply, without a vivid comparison.平实的结尾"which my grandmother watches very loyally"简单地陈述了这一观察,没有生动的比喻。

    My parents' evening covers most of it in about three hours: first the seven o'clock news, which almost everyone their age watches, then a Korean drama, and then a dating game show, all without even changing the channel. Korean and Chinese dramas are very popular on television, but younger people have mostly moved to streaming shows, reality competitions, and short videos that aren't really programmes at all. Comedy game shows with celebrities are also huge and quite loud, which feels very Vietnamese. Football is the one thing that brings all ages together, especially when the national team plays. And there's a long history of historical dramas, which my grandmother watches very loyally.

    查看中文翻译

    我父母的一个晚上大约三个小时就能把大部分类型都看遍了:先是七点钟的新闻,几乎他们那个年纪的人都在看,然后是一部韩剧,接着是一档相亲游戏节目,而且中间甚至都不用换台。韩剧和中国电视剧在电视上非常受欢迎,但年轻人大多已经转向了流媒体剧集、真人秀竞赛,还有那些根本算不上是节目的短视频。带名人的搞笑游戏节目也非常火爆,而且相当吵闹,这感觉特别越南。足球是唯一能把各个年龄层的人聚在一起的东西,尤其是国家队出场的时候。而且历史剧也有很悠久的传统,我奶奶就非常忠实地追看。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCMy parents' evening covers most of it in about three hours:A plain, complete-sentence opener with a colon leading into a list, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's 'basically' and 7.5's leaner unhedged version of the same structure.一个平实、完整句子的开头,用冒号引出一个列表,这是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分中的"basically"和7.5分中同一结构更精炼的不加缓冲语版本。
    • LRbrings all ages togetherA general, everyday phrase, less precise than the more specific 'unites the ages' used at higher bands.一个笼统的日常短语,不如更高分段中使用的更具体的"unites the ages"精确。
    • GRAComedy game shows with celebrities are also huge and quite loud, which feels very Vietnamese.A simple sentence with a relative clause tacked on, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the noun-phrase construction used at 7.5.一个附加了定语从句的简单句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于7.5分中使用的名词短语结构。
    7.0 分

    The simile 'something close to religious loyalty' adds a more developed, reflective comparison than a plain adverb.明喻"something close to religious loyalty"比平实的副词加入了更成熟、更具反思性的比较。

    My parents' evening basically covers most of it in about three hours: the seven o'clock news, which almost every household of their age watches, then a Korean drama, then a dating or matchmaking show, all without ever changing the channel. Korean and Chinese-language dramas still dominate television, whereas younger people have largely moved on to streaming series from everywhere, reality competitions, and short videos that aren't really programmes at all. Comedy game shows with celebrities are huge too, and pretty loud, which honestly feels very Vietnamese. Football is the one thing that unites the ages, especially when the national team is playing. And there's a long tradition of historical dramas, which my grandmother follows with something close to religious loyalty.

    查看中文翻译

    我父母的一个晚上基本上三个小时就能把大部分类型都看遍了:七点钟的新闻,几乎他们那个年纪的每个家庭都在看,然后是一部韩剧,接着是一档相亲或配对节目,而且中间从来不用换台。韩语和中文剧集仍然主导着电视荧屏,而年轻人则大多已经转向了来自世界各地的流媒体剧集、真人秀竞赛,还有那些根本算不上是节目的短视频。带名人的搞笑游戏节目也非常火爆,而且相当吵闹,老实说这感觉特别越南。足球是唯一能把各个年龄层的人凝聚在一起的东西,尤其是国家队出场比赛的时候。而且历史剧也有着悠久的传统,我奶奶追看的那份忠诚,几乎带着一种近乎宗教般的虔诚。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCMy parents' evening basically covers most of itThe tag 'basically' softens and personalises the topic sentence, a slightly more natural spoken move than 6.5's unhedged version.标记语"basically"软化并让这个主题句更具个人色彩,比6.5分中不加缓冲语的版本略微更自然、更口语化。
    • LRlargely moved on to streaming seriesThe phrasal verb 'moved on to' is a more natural, idiomatic collocation than 6.5's plainer 'moved to'.短语动词"moved on to"是一个比6.5分中更平实的"moved to"更自然、更地道的搭配。
    • GRAwhich my grandmother follows with something close to religious loyaltyThe noun phrase 'something close to religious loyalty' as the object of 'follows... with' shows more flexible grammar than 6.5's simpler adverbial 'watches very loyally'.名词短语"something close to religious loyalty"作为"follows... with"的宾语,展现出比6.5分中更简单的状语"watches very loyally"更灵活的语法。
    7.5 分

    The semicolon-linked 'Korean and Chinese-language dramas dominate television; younger people have moved to streaming series' and the closing comparison to religion give the answer a tighter, more vivid shape.用分号连接的"Korean and Chinese-language dramas dominate television; younger people have moved to streaming series",以及结尾与宗教的比较,让这篇答案的结构更紧凑、更生动。

    My parents' evening covers most of it in three hours: the seven o'clock news, which almost every household of their age watches, then a Korean drama, then a dating or matchmaking game show, all without changing channel. Korean and Chinese-language dramas dominate television; younger people have moved to streaming series from everywhere, reality competitions, and short videos that aren't programmes at all. Comedy game shows with celebrities are huge and very Vietnamese in their sheer noise level. Football is the one thing that unites the ages, especially when the national team plays. And there's a long tradition of historical dramas, which my grandmother watches with the same loyalty other people reserve for religion.

    查看中文翻译

    我父母的一个晚上三个小时就能把大部分类型都看遍了:七点钟的新闻,几乎他们那个年纪的每个家庭都在看,然后是一部韩剧,接着是一档相亲或配对游戏节目,而且中间不用换台。韩语和中文剧集主导着电视荧屏;年轻人则已经转向了来自世界各地的流媒体剧集、真人秀竞赛,还有那些根本算不上是节目的短视频。带名人的搞笑游戏节目也非常火爆,那种十足的吵闹劲儿特别越南。足球是唯一能把各个年龄层的人凝聚在一起的东西,尤其是国家队出场比赛的时候。而且历史剧也有着悠久的传统,我奶奶追看时那份忠诚,不亚于别人留给宗教的那种虔诚。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCdominate television; younger people have moved to streaming series from everywhereThe semicolon links the generational contrast directly, a tighter cohesive device than 7.0's 'whereas'-joined version.分号直接连接了代际对比,比7.0分中用"whereas"连接的版本更紧密的衔接手法。
    • LRsheer noise levelThe intensifier 'sheer' paired with 'noise level' is more vivid and precise than 7.0's plainer 'pretty loud'.强调词"sheer"搭配"noise level",比7.0分中更平实的"pretty loud"更生动、更精确。
    • GRAmy grandmother watches with the same loyalty other people reserve for religionThe comparative clause 'the same loyalty other people reserve for religion' is a more flexible, extended construction than 7.0's shorter 'something close to religious loyalty'.比较从句"the same loyalty other people reserve for religion"比7.0分中更短的"something close to religious loyalty"是一种更灵活、更扩展的结构。
  2. 2. Do younger and older people enjoy watching similar programmes/shows?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'the idea of everyone watching the same programme together is slowly disappearing' states the trend directly.平实的结尾"the idea of everyone watching the same programme together is slowly disappearing"直接陈述了这一趋势。

    Rarely, I think, which is why that Japanese show is unusual — it's the only programme that both my four-year-old nephew and my sixty-year-old father ask for. I think that's because it doesn't really depend on any cultural background to enjoy. In general, older people want familiar formats, their own language, and news or dramas with a clear message. Younger people want speed, humour, and content from anywhere in the world. They even watch differently — a television in the living room versus a phone in bed. They do share some things, like sport and family game shows. But the idea of everyone watching the same programme together is slowly disappearing.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为很少,这就是为什么那档日本节目显得如此特别——它是唯一一部我四岁的侄子和我六十岁的父亲都会主动要求看的节目。我认为这是因为它其实不太依赖任何文化背景就能被人欣赏。总的来说,年长的人想要熟悉的形式、自己的语言,以及带有明确信息的新闻或电视剧。年轻人想要的是速度、幽默,以及来自世界各地的内容。他们观看的方式甚至也不同——客厅里的电视对床上的手机。他们确实也有共同点,比如体育赛事和家庭游戏节目。但大家一起看同一个节目的这种想法,正在慢慢消失。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCRarely, I think, which is why that Japanese show is unusualA plain statement with the hedge 'I think' inserted, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's fuller 'Rarely, I'd say, which is exactly why' and 7.5's leaner, unhedged version.一个插入了缓冲语"I think"的平实陈述,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分更完整的"Rarely, I'd say, which is exactly why"和7.5分更精炼、不加缓冲语的版本。
    • LRa clear messageA general, plain phrase, less precise than the more specific 'a fairly clear moral' used at higher bands.一个笼统、平实的短语,不如更高分段中使用的更具体的"a fairly clear moral"精确。
    • GRAThey do share some things, like sport and family game shows.A simple sentence with a comparative example, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the cleft construction 'Where they do overlap is' used at higher bands.一个带有比较性例子的简单句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的强调句结构"Where they do overlap is"。
    7.0 分

    The cleft structure 'Where they do overlap is sport, family game shows, and the occasional national event' shows more developed, economical grammar.强调句结构"Where they do overlap is sport, family game shows, and the occasional national event"展现出更成熟、更精炼的语法。

    Rarely, I'd say, which is exactly why that Japanese show is so unusual: it's the only programme both my four-year-old nephew and my sixty-year-old father actually request. I think it's because there's no cultural reference in it to be excluded by. In general, older people tend to want familiar formats, their own language, and news and drama with a fairly clear moral; younger people want speed, irony, and content from literally anywhere on earth. The way they watch differs too — a television in the living room versus a phone in bed. Where they do overlap is sport, family game shows, and the occasional national event. But honestly, the shared living room is disappearing, and with it the whole habit of watching the same thing together at all.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说很少,这正是为什么那档日本节目如此特别的原因:它是唯一一部我四岁的侄子和我六十岁的父亲都会真正主动要求看的节目。我认为这是因为里面没有任何会把人排除在外的文化梗。总的来说,年长的人往往想要熟悉的形式、自己的语言,以及带有相当明确寓意的新闻和电视剧;年轻人想要的是速度、反讽,以及真正来自地球上任何地方的内容。他们观看的方式也不同——客厅里的电视对床上的手机。他们确实有重叠的地方,那就是体育赛事、家庭游戏节目,以及偶尔的全国性事件。但老实说,共享的客厅正在消失,连同它一起消失的,还有大家一起看同一个节目这整个习惯本身。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCRarely, I'd say, which is exactly why that Japanese show is so unusual:The colon leading into the explanation, with the hedge 'I'd say' inserted mid-sentence, is a slightly more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's dash-based version.用冒号引出解释,并在句子中间插入缓冲语"I'd say",这是一种比6.5分基于破折号的版本略微更自然的口语节奏。
    • LRno cultural reference in it to be excluded byThis precise phrase is more developed and specific than 6.5's vaguer 'doesn't really depend on any cultural background to enjoy'.这个精确的短语比6.5分中更模糊的"doesn't really depend on any cultural background to enjoy"更成熟、更具体。
    • GRAWhere they do overlap is sport, family game shows, and the occasional national event.A cleft sentence ('Where... is...') shows more economical, sophisticated grammar than 6.5's plain 'They do share some things, like...' sentence.一个强调句("Where... is...")展现出比6.5分中平实的"They do share some things, like..."句子更精炼、更成熟的语法。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener with no hedge and the tight semicolon-linked contrasts give the answer an economical, confident shape.紧凑的开头不加缓冲语,配上紧密的分号对比,让这篇答案呈现出精炼、自信的结构。

    Rarely, which is why that Japanese show is unusual: it's the only programme both my four-year-old nephew and my sixty-year-old father request, and I think it's because it has no cultural reference to be excluded by. In general, older people want familiar formats, their own language, news and drama with clear morals; younger people want speed, irony, and content from anywhere on earth. The delivery differs too — a television in the living room versus a phone in bed. Where they overlap is sport, family game shows and the occasional national event. The shared living room is disappearing, and with it the habit of watching the same thing at all.

    查看中文翻译

    很少,这就是为什么那档日本节目如此特别的原因:它是唯一一部我四岁的侄子和我六十岁的父亲都会主动要求看的节目,而我认为这是因为它没有任何会把人排除在外的文化梗。总的来说,年长的人想要熟悉的形式、自己的语言,以及带有明确寓意的新闻和电视剧;年轻人想要的是速度、反讽,以及来自地球上任何地方的内容。呈现方式也不同——客厅里的电视对床上的手机。他们的重叠之处在于体育赛事、家庭游戏节目,以及偶尔的全国性事件。共享的客厅正在消失,连同它一起,大家一起看同一个节目这整个习惯本身也在消失。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCRarely, which is why that Japanese show is unusual:This version drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, joining the claim and its explanation directly with a colon, a more confident fluency than 7.0's hedged opener.这个版本完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",用冒号直接把论点和它的解释连接起来,比7.0分带缓冲语的开头更自信、更流畅。
    • LRno cultural reference to be excluded byThis slightly tighter version of the same phrase, dropping 'in it', is a more economical variant than 7.0's fuller wording.这个略微更精炼的同一短语版本,去掉了"in it",是一种比7.0分更完整的措辞更精简的变体。
    • GRAolder people want familiar formats, their own language, news and drama with clear morals; younger people want speed, irony, and content from anywhere on earthThe semicolon links the two contrasting generational clauses directly, a tighter construction than 7.0's version, which uses the word 'whereas' is absent and instead relies on the plainer 'younger people want' as a fresh sentence.分号直接连接了两个对比性的代际从句,比7.0分中缺少"whereas"、而是依靠更平实的"younger people want"作为一个新句子的版本更紧凑。
  3. 3. Why do some people spend so much time watching TV and online programmes/shows?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'this is where most stories are now' states the point simply.平实的结尾"this is where most stories are now"简单地陈述了这一观点。

    Often it's to avoid thinking about something else. A colleague of mine watched four seasons of a series in one week after a breakup, and when I asked her why, she said it was 'to stop thinking' — a screen is a cheap and easy way to distract yourself. Also, shows are designed to keep you watching, because the next episode starts automatically and each episode ends with a question. Some people are lonely, and a familiar group of characters feels like company. Some people are just tired, and watching doesn't require any effort. And some people genuinely love stories, and this is where most stories are now.

    查看中文翻译

    通常是为了避免去想别的事情。我的一位同事在分手后一周内看完了一部剧的四季,我问她为什么,她说是"为了不去想"——屏幕是一种便宜又简单的分散注意力的方式。而且,节目本身也是被设计成让你一直看下去的,因为下一集会自动开始播放,而且每一集都会以一个悬念结尾。有些人很孤独,而一群熟悉的角色会给人一种陪伴的感觉。有些人只是累了,而看剧不需要付出任何努力。还有些人是真心热爱故事,而现在大部分故事都在这里。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCOften it's to avoid thinking about something else.A plain, short topic sentence, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's fuller hedged version and 7.5's leaner unhedged one.一个平实、简短的主题句,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分更完整的带缓冲语版本和7.5分更精炼的不加缓冲语版本。
    • LRa cheap and easy way to distract yourselfA general, everyday phrase, less vivid than 7.0's and 7.5's more precise 'the cheapest, most available anaesthetic there is'.一个笼统的日常短语,不如7.0分和7.5分中更精确的"the cheapest, most available anaesthetic there is"生动。
    • GRAAlso, shows are designed to keep you watching, because the next episode starts automatically and each episode ends with a question.A long sentence with a single 'because' clause, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the colon-introduced version used at higher bands.一个只用一个"because"从句的长句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的冒号引出版本。
    7.0 分

    The metaphor 'the cheapest, most available anaesthetic there is' adds a more developed, vivid comparison than a plain description.比喻"the cheapest, most available anaesthetic there is"比平实的描述增添了更成熟、更生动的比较。

    Often it's to avoid something else, I'd say. A colleague of mine watched four seasons of a series in a single week after a breakup, and when I asked her why, she said it was 'to stop thinking' — screens are basically the cheapest, most available anaesthetic there is. Beyond that, programmes are genuinely designed to keep you hooked: the next episode starts by itself, and the plot ends nearly every episode on some kind of question. Some people are lonely, and a familiar cast becomes a sort of company. Some are simply exhausted, and watching asks absolutely nothing of them. And some people genuinely love stories, and this happens to be where the stories mostly are now. The time spent is rarely the plan; it's really just what fills the hours nobody planned for.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,通常是为了避免别的事情。我的一位同事在分手后一周内看完了一部剧的四季,我问她为什么,她说是"为了不去想"——屏幕基本上就是最便宜、最容易获得的麻醉剂。除此之外,节目确实是被设计成让你上瘾的:下一集会自动开始,而且几乎每一集的剧情都会以某种悬念结尾。有些人很孤独,而一群熟悉的角色会变成一种陪伴。有些人只是精疲力尽,而看剧对他们没有任何要求。还有些人是真心热爱故事,而这恰好就是现在大部分故事所在的地方。花掉的这些时间很少是计划好的;它其实只是填满了那些没人计划要填满的时间。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCOften it's to avoid something else, I'd say.The hedge 'I'd say' is appended to the short topic sentence, a more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's unhedged version.缓冲语"I'd say"附加在这个简短的主题句后面,比6.5分不加缓冲语的版本呈现出更自然的口语节奏。
    • LRthe cheapest, most available anaesthetic there isThis vivid medical metaphor is far more developed than 6.5's plainer 'a cheap and easy way to distract yourself'.这个生动的医学比喻远比6.5分中更平实的"a cheap and easy way to distract yourself"更成熟。
    • GRAThe time spent is rarely the plan; it's really just what fills the hours nobody planned for.The semicolon-linked antithesis shows more controlled cohesion than 6.5's simpler standalone sentences making the same point.用分号连接的对句展现出比6.5分中表达同一观点的更简单的独立句子更受控的连贯性。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener 'Often to avoid something else' and the adverb 'quietly' in the closing give the answer an economical, understated finish.紧凑的开头"Often to avoid something else"和结尾的副词"quietly",让这篇答案呈现出精炼、含蓄的收尾。

    Often to avoid something else. A colleague of mine watched four seasons of a series in a single week after a breakup, and when I asked why, she said 'to stop thinking' — screens are the cheapest and most available anaesthetic there is. Beyond that, programmes are designed to keep you hooked: the next episode starts by itself, and the plot ends every episode on a question. Some people are lonely and a familiar cast is company. Some are exhausted and watching asks nothing of them. And some genuinely love stories, and this is where the stories are now. The time is rarely the plan; it's what quietly fills the hours nobody planned.

    查看中文翻译

    通常是为了避免别的事情。我的一位同事在分手后一周内看完了一部剧的四季,我问她为什么,她说"为了不去想"——屏幕是最便宜、最容易获得的麻醉剂。除此之外,节目是被设计成让你上瘾的:下一集会自动开始,而且每一集的剧情都会以一个悬念结尾。有些人很孤独,而一群熟悉的角色就是陪伴。有些人精疲力尽,而看剧对他们没有任何要求。还有些人是真心热爱故事,而这就是现在故事所在的地方。这些时间很少是计划好的;它只是悄悄填满了那些没人计划要填满的时间。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCOften to avoid something else.This three-word fragment drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, the most compact and confident opener of the three versions.这个三词片段完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",是三个版本中最精炼、最自信的开头。
    • GRAthe cheapest and most available anaesthetic there isThis slightly tightened version of the same metaphor, using 'and' instead of a comma, is marginally more economical than 7.0's wording.这个同一比喻略微收紧的版本,用"and"取代了逗号,比7.0分的措辞略微更精炼。
    • LRit's what quietly fills the hours nobody plannedThe adverb 'quietly' adds a subtle, vivid touch beyond 7.0's plainer 'it's really just what fills the hours nobody planned for'.副词"quietly"在7.0分中更平实的"it's really just what fills the hours nobody planned for"之上,增添了一丝微妙而生动的笔触。
  4. 4. What makes some TV or online programmes/shows popular?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing idiom 'basically half the battle' states the observation directly, in a familiar everyday phrase.平实的结尾习语"basically half the battle"用一个熟悉的日常短语直接陈述了这一观察。

    They need a risk that everyone understands, and a moment worth sharing. That toddler-errand show works because everyone, in any country, understands what's at risk when a three-year-old crosses a road, and a video clip of a child forgetting something can be sent to a friend in ten seconds. Popular programmes give viewers something to feel, like suspense, laughter, or sadness, and something to talk about the next day. Characters that people care about matter more than the plot. Timing also matters — a show that appears when people need comfort spreads faster. And now, being easy to cut into short clips is basically half the battle.

    查看中文翻译

    它们需要一种每个人都能理解的风险,和一个值得分享的瞬间。那档幼儿跑腿节目之所以成功,是因为无论在哪个国家,每个人都明白当一个三岁孩子过马路时,风险意味着什么,而一段孩子忘事的视频片段,十秒钟内就能发给朋友。受欢迎的节目会给观众一些可以感受的东西,比如悬念、笑声或悲伤,还有第二天可以拿来聊天的话题。人们在意的角色,比情节本身更重要。时机也很重要——一档在人们需要安慰时出现的节目,传播速度会更快。而现在,一档节目容不容易剪成短片,基本上就已经成功了一半。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCThey need a risk that everyone understands, and a moment worth sharing.A plain, complete-sentence opener, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's fuller hedged version and 7.5's leaner, unhedged rewording.一个平实、完整句子的开头,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分更完整的带缓冲语版本和7.5分更精炼、不加缓冲语的重述版本。
    • LRa video clip of a child forgetting somethingA general, plain phrase, less specific than the vivid 'a single clip of a child forgetting the tofu' used at higher bands.一个笼统、平实的短语,不如更高分段中使用的生动的"a single clip of a child forgetting the tofu"具体。
    • GRAPopular programmes give viewers something to feel, like suspense, laughter, or sadness, and something to talk about the next day.A long sentence with a simple 'like' list, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the dash-set list used at higher bands.一个用简单的"like"列表构成的长句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的破折号列表。
    7.0 分

    The dash-set list 'suspense, laughter, tears' and the semicolon-linked closing shows more developed structure than a plain listing sentence.破折号列表"suspense, laughter, tears"和用分号连接的结尾,展现出比平实的列举句更成熟的结构。

    A stake everyone understands, I'd say, and a moment that's genuinely worth sharing. That errand show works because anyone, in any country, immediately understands what's at risk when a three-year-old crosses a road, and a single clip of a child forgetting the tofu can be sent to a friend in ten seconds and make them stop and watch. Popular programmes give viewers something to actually feel — suspense, laughter, tears — and something to talk about the next day. Characters people genuinely care about matter more than the plot ever does. Timing matters too: a show that arrives exactly when people need comfort or escape tends to spread faster. And these days, being clippable is basically half the game; a programme that can't be cut into thirty seconds struggles to even be found.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,是一种每个人都能理解的利害关系,和一个真正值得分享的瞬间。那档跑腿节目之所以成功,是因为无论在哪个国家,任何人都能立刻明白,当一个三岁孩子过马路时,什么东西正处于危险之中,而一段孩子忘了拿豆腐的短片,十秒钟内就能发给朋友,并让他们停下来看。受欢迎的节目会给观众一些真正能感受到的东西——悬念、笑声、眼泪——还有第二天可以拿来聊天的话题。人们真心在意的角色,永远比情节本身更重要。时机也很重要:一档恰好在人们需要安慰或逃避时出现的节目,往往传播得更快。而如今,一档节目能不能被剪成短片,基本上已经决定了一半的成败;一档没法被剪成三十秒的节目,连被发现都很难。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCA stake everyone understands, I'd say, and a moment that's genuinely worth sharing.The hedge 'I'd say' is inserted mid-sentence, a more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's unhedged version of the same opener.限制语 'I'd say' 被插入句中,这种节奏比6.5分中同样开头但不加限制语的版本更接近自然口语。
    • LRa single clip of a child forgetting the tofuThis precise, vivid detail is more developed and specific than 6.5's vaguer 'a video clip of a child forgetting something'.这个精确、生动的细节比6.5分中更模糊的"a video clip of a child forgetting something"更成熟、更具体。
    • GRAbeing clippable is basically half the game; a programme that can't be cut into thirty seconds struggles to even be foundThe semicolon links two related independent clauses directly, a tighter, more complex construction than 6.5's single standalone closing sentence.分号直接连接了两个相关的独立从句,比6.5分中单一独立的结尾句更紧凑、更复杂。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener with no hedge and the idiom 'in ten seconds flat' give the answer an economical, vivid edge.不加缓冲语的紧凑开头,以及习语"in ten seconds flat",让这篇答案带有精炼、生动的锐度。

    A stake everyone understands, and a moment worth sharing. That toddler-errand show works because anyone, anywhere, knows exactly what's at risk when a three-year-old crosses a road, and a single clip of a child forgetting the tofu can be sent to a friend in ten seconds flat and make them stop and watch. Popular programmes give viewers something to feel — suspense, laughter, tears — and something to talk about the next day. Characters people care about matter more than plots ever do. Timing matters: a show that lands exactly when people need comfort or escape spreads faster. And now, being clippable is half the game; a programme that can't be cut into thirty seconds struggles to be found at all.

    查看中文翻译

    一种每个人都能理解的利害关系,和一个值得分享的瞬间。那档幼儿跑腿节目之所以成功,是因为无论在哪里,任何人都清楚地知道当一个三岁孩子过马路时,什么东西正处于危险之中,而一段孩子忘了拿豆腐的短片,能在整整十秒钟内发给朋友,并让他们停下来看。受欢迎的节目会给观众一些可以感受的东西——悬念、笑声、眼泪——还有第二天可以拿来聊天的话题。人们在意的角色,永远比情节本身更重要。时机很重要:一档恰好在人们需要安慰或逃避时降临的节目,传播得更快。而现在,一档节目能不能被剪成短片,已经是成败的一半;一档没法被剪成三十秒的节目,根本很难被发现。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCA stake everyone understands, and a moment worth sharing.This version drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, joining the two elements directly with 'and', a more confident fluency than 7.0's hedged opener.这个版本完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",用"and"直接连接了两个元素,比7.0分带缓冲语的开头更自信、更流畅。
    • LRin ten seconds flatThe idiom 'flat' intensifies the time phrase, more vivid and natural than 7.0's plainer 'in ten seconds'.习语"flat"强化了这个时间短语,比7.0分中更平实的"in ten seconds"更生动、更自然。
    • GRAa show that lands exactly when people need comfort or escape spreads fasterThe verb 'lands' replaces 7.0's more neutral 'arrives', a small but telling grammatical choice that adds idiomatic precision to the clause.动词"lands"取代了7.0分中更中性的"arrives",这是一个虽小却意味深长的语法选择,为这个从句增添了地道的精确度。
  5. 5. Do you agree or disagree that there are too many programmes/shows for people to choose from these days?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'choice has become more of a chore than a benefit' states the conclusion directly.平实的结尾"choice has become more of a chore than a benefit"直接陈述了这一结论。

    I agree, and I have proof from my own Sunday nights. My sister and I once spent forty minutes scrolling through a streaming menu, rejected everything, and ended up watching the same Japanese show again — so much choice actually made us feel stuck instead of happy. More choice sounds like freedom, but every new option makes you worry that something better exists somewhere. Good programmes also get lost in the flood, so things I might have loved I never even found. There is a good side — smaller interests are served now, and nobody has to watch whatever the one channel decided. But I think choice has become more of a chore than a benefit.

    查看中文翻译

    我同意,而且我自己的周日晚上就是证明。我和我妹妹有一次花了四十分钟在一个流媒体菜单里滑来滑去,把所有东西都否决了,最后还是又看了同一部日本节目——太多的选择反而让我们感到困住,而不是开心。选择多听起来像是自由,但每一个新选项都会让你担心是不是某个更好的东西存在于别的地方。好的节目也会在这股洪流中被淹没,所以有些我本可能会喜欢的东西,我根本没找到过。这确实有好的一面——现在小众的兴趣也能得到满足,而且没有人非得看那唯一一个频道决定要播的东西。但我认为,选择已经变得更像是一件苦差事,而不是一种好处。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI agree, and I have proof from my own Sunday nights.A plain statement with the evidence tacked on via 'and', typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's fuller 'I've got the evidence... to prove it' and 7.5's leaner version.一个平实的陈述句,用"and"附加了证据,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分更完整的"I've got the evidence... to prove it"和7.5分更精炼的版本。
    • LRmade us feel stuck instead of happyA general, everyday phrase, less precise than the more abstract, technical 'the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure' used at higher bands.一个笼统的日常短语,不如更高分段中使用的更抽象、更专业的"the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure"精确。
    • GRAso much choice actually made us feel stuck instead of happyA simple clause using everyday adjectives, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the abstract noun pairing 'paralysis, not pleasure' used at higher bands.一个使用日常形容词的简单从句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的抽象名词搭配"paralysis, not pleasure"。
    7.0 分

    The abstract noun pairing 'the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure' shows more developed, precise phrasing than a plain description.抽象名词搭配"the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure"展现出比平实描述更成熟、更精确的措辞。

    I agree, and I've got the evidence of my own Sunday nights to prove it. My sister and I once spent forty minutes scrolling through a streaming menu, rejected absolutely everything, and ended up rewatching the same Japanese show we always watch — the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure. More choice sounds like freedom, but honestly, each new option just raises the fear that something better must exist, and the platforms have turned the menu itself into a kind of entertainment. Good programmes also drown in the flood; plenty of things I'd probably have loved, I never found. The upside is real, to be fair — niche tastes get served now, and nobody has to watch whatever the one channel decided for them. But there's a point past which choice turns into a chore, and I'd say we're well past it.

    查看中文翻译

    我同意,而且我有自己周日晚上的证据来证明这一点。我和我妹妹有一次花了四十分钟在一个流媒体菜单里滑来滑去,把所有东西都彻底否决了,最后还是又重看了我们一直在看的那部日本节目——丰富的选择带来的是瘫痪,而不是愉悦。选择多听起来像是自由,但老实说,每一个新选项只会加剧一种恐惧,那就是一定有更好的东西存在,而平台本身已经把这个菜单变成了一种娱乐形式。好的节目也会淹没在这股洪流中;很多我本可能会喜欢的东西,我从来没找到过。公平地说,这确实有实实在在的好处——小众的品味现在得到了满足,没有人非得看那唯一一个频道替他们决定要播的东西。但选择超过一个程度就会变成苦差事,而我想说,我们早就已经远远超过了那个程度。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI agree, and I've got the evidence of my own Sunday nights to prove it.The added verb phrase 'to prove it' extends the claim with a small rhetorical flourish, more developed than 6.5's plainer version of the same idea.加入的动词短语"to prove it"用一个小小的修辞点缀扩展了这个论断,比6.5分中同一想法更平实的版本更成熟。
    • LRthe abundance produced paralysis, not pleasureThis precise abstract-noun antithesis is far more developed than 6.5's plainer 'made us feel stuck instead of happy'.这个精确的抽象名词对比,远比6.5分中更平实的"made us feel stuck instead of happy"更成熟。
    • GRAGood programmes also drown in the flood; plenty of things I'd probably have loved, I never found.The semicolon-linked clause, with the fronted object 'plenty of things I'd probably have loved', shows more flexible word order than 6.5's plainer 'so'-clause sentence.用分号连接的从句,配上前置的宾语"plenty of things I'd probably have loved",展现出比6.5分中更平实的"so"从句句子更灵活的词序。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener and the fronted clause 'things I'd have genuinely loved, I simply never found' give the answer an economical, emphatic shape.紧凑的开头,加上前置的从句"things I'd have genuinely loved, I simply never found",让这篇答案呈现出精炼、有力的结构。

    I agree, and I have the evidence of my own Sunday nights. My sister and I once spent forty minutes scrolling through a streaming menu, rejected everything, and ended up rewatching the same Japanese show — the abundance produced paralysis, not pleasure. More choice sounds like freedom, but each new option raises the fear that something better exists, and the platforms have turned the menu itself into a form of entertainment. Good programmes also drown in the flood; things I'd have genuinely loved, I simply never found. The upside is real — niche tastes are served, and nobody has to watch whatever the one channel decided. But there's a point past which choice becomes a chore, and we're well past it.

    查看中文翻译

    我同意,而且我有自己周日晚上的证据。我和我妹妹有一次花了四十分钟在一个流媒体菜单里滑来滑去,把所有东西都否决了,最后还是又重看了那部日本节目——丰富的选择带来的是瘫痪,而不是愉悦。选择多听起来像是自由,但每一个新选项都会加剧一种恐惧,那就是一定有更好的东西存在,而平台本身已经把这个菜单变成了一种娱乐形式。好的节目也会淹没在这股洪流中;那些我本会真心喜欢的东西,我就是从来没找到过。这确实有实实在在的好处——小众的品味得到了满足,没有人非得看那唯一一个频道决定要播的东西。但选择超过一个程度就会变成苦差事,而我们早就已经远远超过了那个程度。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI agree, and I have the evidence of my own Sunday nights.This version drops the verb phrase 'to prove it', ending the sentence more economically than 7.0's fuller version of the same opener.这个版本去掉了动词短语"to prove it",比7.0分中同一开头更完整的版本更精炼地结束了这句话。
    • LRthings I'd have genuinely loved, I simply never foundThe intensifier 'genuinely' paired with 'simply' sharpens the emotional contrast beyond 7.0's plainer 'plenty of things I'd probably have loved, I never found'.强调词"genuinely"搭配"simply",让情感上的对比比7.0分中更平实的"plenty of things I'd probably have loved, I never found"更加尖锐。
    • GRAthere's a point past which choice becomes a chore, and we're well past itThe confident, unhedged closing 'we're well past it' replaces 7.0's hedged 'I'd say we're well past it', a more flexible and assertive grammatical choice.自信、不加缓冲语的结尾"we're well past it"取代了7.0分中带缓冲语的"I'd say we're well past it",这是一个更灵活、更果断的语法选择。
  6. 6. What do you think of the view that parents should choose what programmes/shows their children watch?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'Choosing is only for one stage, but knowing is permanent' states the conclusion simply.平实的结尾"Choosing is only for one stage, but knowing is permanent"简单地陈述了这一结论。

    I think it's right for young children, but less so as they get older. My sister chooses everything for her four-year-old, but she negotiates with her eleven-year-old, and watches with both of them, which seems like the correct approach. A small child can't judge what might frighten or mislead them, and programmes made for children aren't always good for them. As children grow older, choosing for them stops working well and can even teach them to hide things — it's better to watch together and talk about what they saw. But at any age, I think a parent should always know what their child is watching. Choosing is only for one stage, but knowing is permanent.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为对年幼的孩子来说这是对的,但随着他们长大就没那么对了。我妹妹会替她四岁的孩子选好一切,但她会和十一岁的孩子商量,并且和两个孩子一起看,这似乎是正确的做法。一个小孩子无法判断什么可能会吓到他们或误导他们,而专门为儿童制作的节目也不一定对他们有好处。随着孩子长大,替他们做选择就不再那么管用了,甚至还可能教会他们隐瞒事情——更好的做法是一起看,然后聊聊他们看到了什么。但不管在哪个年龄段,我认为父母都应该始终知道孩子在看什么。替孩子选择只适用于某一个阶段,但了解孩子在看什么却是永久的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI think it's right for young children, but less so as they get older.A plain statement with the hedge 'I think' fronted, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's mid-sentence 'I'd say' and 7.5's unhedged version.以前置缓和语 'I think' 开头的朴素陈述,体现了6.5分典型的直接风格,相较于7.0分插入句中的 'I'd say' 和7.5分不带缓和语的版本。
    • LRaren't always good for themA general, plain phrase, less precise than the more specific 'aren't always on their side' used at higher bands.一个笼统、平实的短语,不如更高分段中使用的更具体的"aren't always on their side"精确。
    • GRAChoosing is only for one stage, but knowing is permanent.A simple contrastive sentence with 'but', typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the tighter semicolon version at higher bands.一个用"but"构成的简单对比句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的更紧凑的分号版本。
    7.0 分

    The semicolon-linked antithesis 'Choosing is really a stage; knowing is permanent' shows a tighter, more developed closing than a plain contrastive sentence.用分号连接的对句"Choosing is really a stage; knowing is permanent"展现出比平实对比句更紧凑、更成熟的结尾。

    Right for young children, I'd say, and gradually less so as they get older. My sister chooses everything for her four-year-old, negotiates with her eleven-year-old, and watches with both, which seems to me the correct shape overall: a small child genuinely can't judge what will frighten or mislead them, and programmes aimed at them aren't always on their side. As children grow, choosing for them stops working and starts teaching secrecy instead; it's better to watch together, talk about what they've seen, and set limits on time rather than on specific titles. The one thing I'd hold to at any age, though, is that a parent should know what their child watches. Choosing is really a stage; knowing is permanent.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,对年幼的孩子来说是对的,但随着他们长大会逐渐没那么对了。我妹妹会替她四岁的孩子选好一切,和十一岁的孩子商量,并且和两个孩子一起看,在我看来这总体上是正确的形式:一个小孩子确实无法判断什么会吓到他们或误导他们,而专门给他们看的节目也不一定站在他们那一边。随着孩子长大,替他们做选择就不再管用了,反而开始教会他们隐瞒事情;更好的做法是一起看,聊聊他们看到了什么,并且对时间设限,而不是对具体的片名设限。不过,不管在哪个年龄段,我都会坚持一件事,那就是父母应该知道自己的孩子在看什么。选择其实是一个阶段;了解则是永久的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCRight for young children, I'd say, and gradually less so as they get older.This fragment opener with the hedge inserted mid-phrase is more compact than 6.5's fuller sentence with the hedge fronted.这个在短语中间插入缓冲语的片段式开头,比6.5分中把缓冲语前置的更完整句子更紧凑。
    • LRstops working and starts teaching secrecy insteadThe precise phrase 'teaching secrecy' is more developed and specific than 6.5's vaguer 'can even teach them to hide things'.精确的短语"teaching secrecy"比6.5分中更模糊的"can even teach them to hide things"更成熟、更具体。
    • GRAChoosing is really a stage; knowing is permanent.The semicolon-balanced antithesis is a tighter, more compact construction than 6.5's 'but'-joined version of the same idea.用分号平衡的对比,比6.5分中用"but"连接的同一想法版本更紧凑、更精炼。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener 'Right for young children, and gradually less so' drops the hedge for an economical, confident start.紧凑的开头"Right for young children, and gradually less so"去掉了缓冲语,以精炼、自信的方式开篇。

    Right for young children, and gradually less so. My sister chooses everything for her four-year-old, negotiates with the eleven-year-old, and watches with both, which seems to me the correct shape: a small child can't judge what will frighten or mislead them, and the programmes aimed at them aren't always on their side. As children grow, choosing for them stops working and starts teaching secrecy; better to watch together, talk about what they've seen, and set limits on time rather than on titles. The one thing I'd hold to at any age is that a parent should know what their child watches. Choosing is a stage; knowing is permanent.

    查看中文翻译

    对年幼的孩子来说是对的,而且会逐渐没那么对。我妹妹会替她四岁的孩子选好一切,和十一岁的孩子商量,并且和两个孩子一起看,在我看来这就是正确的形式:一个小孩子无法判断什么会吓到他们或误导他们,而针对他们制作的节目也不一定站在他们那一边。随着孩子长大,替他们做选择就不再管用了,反而开始教会他们隐瞒事情;更好的做法是一起看,聊聊他们看到了什么,并且对时间设限,而不是对片名设限。不过,不管在哪个年龄段,我都会坚持一件事,那就是父母应该知道自己的孩子在看什么。选择是一个阶段;了解则是永久的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCRight for young children, and gradually less so.This version drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, joining the claim and its qualification directly with 'and', a more confident fluency than 7.0's hedged opener.这个版本完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",用"and"直接把论点和它的限定条件连接起来,比7.0分带缓冲语的开头更自信、更流畅。
    • GRAbetter to watch together, talk about what they've seen, and set limits on time rather than on titlesThe verbless imperative-style clause 'better to watch together' is a slightly more economical construction than 7.0's fuller 'it's better to watch together'.没有动词的祈使式从句"better to watch together"是一种比7.0分中更完整的"it's better to watch together"略微更精炼的结构。
    • LRstarts teaching secrecyThis slightly tighter version, dropping 'instead', is marginally more economical while keeping the same precise collocation used at 7.0.这个去掉了"instead"的略微更紧凑的版本,在保留7.0分中使用的同一精确搭配的同时,略微更精炼。
  7. 7. What social problems might individuals have when they spend too much time watching a screen?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain opener 'The first problem is simply not being there' states the idea directly, in everyday words.平实的开头"The first problem is simply not being there"用日常的措辞直接陈述了这一想法。

    The first problem is simply not being there. A friend of mine stopped coming to our monthly dinners because every evening had a TV series in it, and when he came back after a year, he found normal conversation really difficult. Watching too much screen time takes away the time that friendships actually need. It can also change what people expect — someone whose social life is on a screen might compare real friends to TV characters and find real friends boring. Sleep gets worse, then mood, then patience. And there's a quieter problem too — someone who just watches life instead of joining it slowly becomes an audience, and audiences don't get invited back.

    查看中文翻译

    第一个问题很简单,就是不在场。我的一个朋友不再来参加我们每月一次的聚餐,因为他每个晚上都被一部电视剧占据了,一年后他终于回来时,发现正常的交谈变得非常困难。看太多屏幕的时间,会夺走友谊真正需要的那种时间。它也会改变人们的期待——一个社交生活都在屏幕上的人,可能会拿真实的朋友和电视角色作比较,然后觉得真实的朋友很无聊。睡眠会变差,然后是情绪,然后是耐心。还有一个更隐蔽的问题——一个只是旁观生活而不参与其中的人,会慢慢变成一个观众,而观众是不会被再次邀请的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCThe first problem is simply not being there.A plain, short topic sentence, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's hedged 'The first problem, I'd say, is simply absence' and 7.5's leaner, more formal noun 'absence'.一个平实、简短的主题句,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分带缓冲语的"The first problem, I'd say, is simply absence"和7.5分更精炼、更正式的名词"absence"。
    • LRnot being thereA plain, everyday phrase, less precise than the more formal single noun 'absence' used at higher bands.一个平实、日常的短语,不如更高分段中使用的更正式的单个名词"absence"精确。
    • GRAWatching too much screen time takes away the time that friendships actually need.A simple sentence with a relative clause, typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the more formal 'crowds out' construction used at higher bands.一个带有定语从句的简单句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的更正式的"crowds out"结构。
    7.0 分

    The formal noun 'absence' and the verb phrase 'crowds out' show more precise, developed vocabulary than a plain description.正式的名词"absence"和动词短语"crowds out"展现出比平实描述更精确、更成熟的词汇。

    The first problem, I'd say, is simply absence. A friend of mine stopped coming to our monthly dinners because every evening had a series in it, and when he finally came back after a year, he genuinely found conversation hard — he was out of practice with the pauses, the interruptions, the general effort of dealing with other people. Heavy screen time crowds out the unplanned contact that friendships are actually built on. It can also distort expectations: people whose social life happens mostly on screen sometimes compare their real friends to written ones and find the real ones dull by comparison. Sleep suffers first, then mood, then patience. And there's a quieter problem underneath it all — a person who just watches life rather than joining it slowly turns into an audience, and audiences don't tend to get invited back.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,第一个问题很简单,就是缺席。我的一个朋友不再来参加我们每月一次的聚餐,因为他每个晚上都被一部剧占据了,一年后他终于回来时,真的发现交谈很困难——他已经不习惯那些停顿、打断,以及应付别人所需要的那种普遍的精力投入。大量的屏幕时间挤占了友谊真正建立所需要的那种未经计划的接触。它也会扭曲人们的期待:一个社交生活大多发生在屏幕上的人,有时会拿真实的朋友和虚构的角色作比较,然后觉得真实的朋友相比之下很无趣。睡眠会先受损,然后是情绪,然后是耐心。而在这一切之下,还有一个更隐蔽的问题——一个只是旁观生活而不参与其中的人,会慢慢变成一个观众,而观众通常是不会被再次邀请的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCThe first problem, I'd say, is simply absence.The hedge 'I'd say' is inserted mid-sentence, a more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's unhedged version.缓冲语"I'd say"插入在句子中间,比6.5分不加缓冲语的版本呈现出更自然的口语节奏。
    • LRabsenceThis single, formal, abstract noun is more precise than 6.5's plainer phrase 'simply not being there'.这个单一、正式的抽象名词,比6.5分中更平实的短语"simply not being there"更精确。
    • GRAHeavy screen time crowds out the unplanned contact that friendships are actually built on.The verb phrase 'crowds out' plus the passive 'are actually built on' shows more sophisticated grammar than 6.5's plainer 'takes away the time that friendships actually need'.动词短语"crowds out"加上被动语态"are actually built on",展现出比6.5分中更平实的"takes away the time that friendships actually need"更成熟的语法。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener with no hedge and the phrase 'the sheer effort of other people' give the answer an economical, precise finish.不加缓冲语的紧凑开头,以及短语"the sheer effort of other people",让这篇答案呈现出精炼、精确的收尾。

    The first problem is simply absence. A friend of mine stopped coming to our monthly dinners because every evening had a series in it, and when he came back after a year he found conversation genuinely hard — out of practice with the pauses, the interruptions, the sheer effort of other people. Heavy screen time crowds out the unplanned contact that friendships are actually made of. It can also distort expectations: people whose social life sits mostly on a screen start comparing real friends to written ones and finding them dull. Sleep suffers, then mood, then patience. And there's a quieter problem still — a person who watches life rather than joining it slowly becomes an audience, and audiences don't get invited back.

    查看中文翻译

    第一个问题很简单,就是缺席。我的一个朋友不再来参加我们每月一次的聚餐,因为他每个晚上都被一部剧占据了,一年后他回来时,真的发现交谈很困难——他已经不习惯那些停顿、打断,以及应付别人所需要的那种十足的精力投入。大量的屏幕时间挤占了友谊真正建立所依靠的那种未经计划的接触。它也会扭曲人们的期待:一个社交生活大多发生在屏幕上的人,会开始拿真实的朋友和虚构的角色作比较,然后觉得真实的朋友无趣。睡眠会先受损,然后是情绪,然后是耐心。而还有一个更加隐蔽的问题——一个只是旁观生活而不参与其中的人,会慢慢变成一个观众,而观众是不会被再次邀请的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCThe first problem is simply absence.This version drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, stating the claim directly, a more confident fluency than 7.0's hedged opener.这个版本完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",直接陈述了这个论点,比7.0分带缓冲语的开头更自信、更流畅。
    • LRthe sheer effort of other peopleThe intensifier 'sheer' is more vivid and precise than 7.0's plainer 'the general effort of dealing with other people'.强调词"sheer"比7.0分中更平实的"the general effort of dealing with other people"更生动、更精确。
    • GRAhe found conversation genuinely hard — out of practice with the pauses, the interruptions, the sheer effort of other peopleThe dash introduces a fragment list without repeating the subject and verb, a more compact, elliptical construction than 7.0's fuller 'he was out of practice with' clause.破折号引出了一个片段式列表,而不重复主语和动词,这是一种比7.0分中更完整的"he was out of practice with"从句更紧凑、更省略的结构。
  8. 8. Do you agree or disagree that the programmes/shows people watch can influence their expectations of society?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing 'the shows a society watches quietly tell people what to expect' states the conclusion directly.平实的结尾"the shows a society watches quietly tell people what to expect"直接陈述了这一结论。

    I strongly agree, and I've actually watched it happen with one four-year-old. After a few weeks of that errand show, my nephew asked why he couldn't go to the shop alone 'like the Japanese children', and his idea of what a child is allowed to do had changed. Programmes show us what's normal — how families argue, what homes look like, how police behave, what success means. People who watch a lot of crime shows tend to think crime is more common than it really is, and people who watch a lot of wealth can start to feel poor. It isn't usually done on purpose, and real life still pushes back a bit. But the shows a society watches quietly tell people what to expect.

    查看中文翻译

    我强烈同意,而且我确实亲眼见证过这件事发生在一个四岁孩子身上。在看了那档跑腿节目几个星期后,我侄子问我为什么他不能像"日本的孩子那样"自己一个人去商店,他对孩子被允许做什么的想法已经改变了。节目向我们展示了什么是"正常的"——家庭如何争吵、家是什么样子、警察如何表现、成功意味着什么。经常看犯罪节目的人往往会觉得犯罪比实际情况更普遍,而经常看到财富的人则可能开始觉得自己很穷。这通常不是故意为之的,而且现实生活还是会多少给予一些反驳。但一个社会所看的节目,会在潜移默化中告诉人们该期待什么。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI strongly agree, and I've actually watched it happen with one four-year-old.A plain statement of position with the evidence tacked on via 'and', typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's fuller hedged version and 7.5's terser dash-linked one.一个用"and"附加了证据的平实立场陈述,是6.5分典型的直白风格,相较于7.0分更完整的带缓冲语版本和7.5分更简洁的用破折号连接的版本。
    • LRthink crime is more common than it really isA general, plain phrase, less precise than the single formal verb 'overestimate' used at higher bands.一个笼统、平实的短语,不如更高分段中使用的单个正式动词"overestimate"精确。
    • GRAIt isn't usually done on purpose, and real life still pushes back a bit.A simple contrastive sentence with 'and', typical of plain 6.5 grammar, compared with the more formal 'rarely deliberate, and never total' construction at higher bands.一个用"and"构成的简单对比句,是6.5分平实语法的典型特征,相较于更高分段中使用的更正式的"rarely deliberate, and never total"结构。
    7.0 分

    The formal verb 'overestimate' and the balanced 'rarely deliberate, and never total' show more precise, developed phrasing.正式的动词"overestimate"以及平衡的"rarely deliberate, and never total"展现出更精确、更成熟的措辞。

    Strongly agree, I'd say — I've watched it happen at the scale of exactly one four-year-old. After a few weeks of that errand show, my nephew asked why he couldn't go to the shop alone 'like the Japanese children', and his sense of what a child is actually allowed to do had genuinely shifted, without anyone deciding it should. Programmes tell us what's supposedly normal: how families argue, what homes look like, how police behave, what counts as success. People who watch a lot of crime drama tend to overestimate how much crime there actually is, and people who watch a lot of wealth on screen can start to feel poor by comparison. It's rarely deliberate, and never total, since real life pushes back eventually. But the stories a society watches are, quietly, its instructions for what to expect.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,强烈同意——而我亲眼目睹的规模,正好就是一个四岁孩子。在看了那档跑腿节目几个星期后,我侄子问我为什么他不能像"日本的孩子那样"自己一个人去商店,他对孩子究竟被允许做什么的认知,真的已经改变了,而且没有任何人刻意决定要让它改变。节目告诉我们什么被认为是"正常的":家庭如何争吵、家是什么样子、警察如何表现、什么才算成功。经常看犯罪剧的人,往往会高估实际存在的犯罪数量,而经常在屏幕上看到财富的人,则可能开始因为比较而觉得自己贫穷。这种影响很少是刻意为之的,也从来不是彻底的,因为现实生活终究会有所反驳。但一个社会所看的这些故事,其实就是它悄悄给出的、关于该期待什么的指南。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCStrongly agree, I'd say — I've watched it happen at the scale of exactly one four-year-old.The hedge 'I'd say' inserted after the two-word opener, plus the dash-linked elaboration, is a more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's fuller 'and'-joined sentence.缓冲语"I'd say"插入在两词开头之后,再加上用破折号连接的进一步阐述,比6.5分中更完整的用"and"连接的句子呈现出更自然的口语节奏。
    • LRtend to overestimate how much crime there actually isThe single precise verb 'overestimate' is more formal and economical than 6.5's plainer 'think crime is more common than it really is'.单一、精确的动词"overestimate"比6.5分中更平实的"think crime is more common than it really is"更正式、更精炼。
    • GRAIt's rarely deliberate, and never total, since real life pushes back eventually.The parallel adverbial pair 'rarely deliberate, and never total' followed by a 'since' clause shows more complex, balanced grammar than 6.5's simpler 'and'-joined sentence.平行的状语对"rarely deliberate, and never total",后面跟着一个"since"从句,展现出比6.5分中更简单的用"and"连接的句子更复杂、更平衡的语法。
    7.5 分

    The semicolon-balanced pair 'People who watch a lot of crime drama overestimate crime; people who watch a lot of wealth start to feel poor' gives the answer a tight, memorable rhythm.用分号平衡的对句"People who watch a lot of crime drama overestimate crime; people who watch a lot of wealth start to feel poor"让这篇答案呈现出紧凑、令人难忘的节奏。

    Strongly agree — I've watched it happen at the scale of one four-year-old. After a few weeks of that errand show, my nephew asked why he couldn't go to the shop alone 'like the Japanese children', and his sense of what a child is allowed to do had shifted without anyone deciding it should. Programmes tell us what's normal: how families argue, what homes look like, how police behave, what success means. People who watch a lot of crime drama overestimate crime; people who watch a lot of wealth start to feel poor. It's rarely deliberate and never total, since real life pushes back. But the stories a society watches are, quietly, its instructions for what to expect.

    查看中文翻译

    强烈同意——而我亲眼目睹的规模,就是一个四岁孩子。在看了那档跑腿节目几个星期后,我侄子问我为什么他不能像"日本的孩子那样"自己一个人去商店,他对孩子被允许做什么的认知,已经改变了,而没有任何人刻意决定要让它改变。节目告诉我们什么是"正常的":家庭如何争吵、家是什么样子、警察如何表现、什么才算成功。经常看犯罪剧的人会高估犯罪;经常看到财富的人会开始觉得自己贫穷。这种影响很少是刻意的,也从来不是彻底的,因为现实生活终究会有所反驳。但一个社会所看的这些故事,悄悄地就是它关于该期待什么的指南。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCStrongly agree — I've watched it happen at the scale of one four-year-old.This version drops both the hedge 'I'd say' and the word 'exactly', stating the claim in the most compact and confident form of the three.这个版本同时去掉了缓冲语"I'd say"和词"exactly",以三个版本中最精炼、最自信的形式陈述了这个论点。
    • GRAPeople who watch a lot of crime drama overestimate crime; people who watch a lot of wealth start to feel poor.The semicolon-balanced pair of parallel clauses is tighter and more rhythmic than 7.0's fuller version joined with 'and'.这对用分号平衡的平行从句,比7.0分中用"and"连接的更完整的版本更紧凑、更有节奏感。
    • LRoverestimate crimeThis compact two-word collocation is even more economical than 7.0's fuller 'tend to overestimate how much crime there actually is'.这个紧凑的两词搭配,比7.0分中更完整的"tend to overestimate how much crime there actually is"更加精炼。
  9. 9. How might society change if most people watched only entertainment programmes/shows and never watched the news?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    The plain closing image 'finds out about the flood only when the water finally arrives' states the conclusion directly.平实的结尾意象"finds out about the flood only when the water finally arrives"直接陈述了这一结论。

    I think it would become easier to govern, but harder to govern well. During the floods upriver from Da Nang last year, some of my colleagues only heard about it days later because their social media feeds were full of comedy videos. Without news, people lose the shared facts that arguments actually need, so public discussion turns into rumours, and people in power get less scrutiny. Charity and protest both depend on people knowing something bad is happening. There is a small upside — news can also distort things, and a less worried public isn't all bad. But a society that only entertains itself finds out about the flood only when the water finally arrives.

    查看中文翻译

    我认为治理会变得更容易,但要治理得好会变得更难。去年岘港上游发洪水的时候,我的一些同事是好几天之后才听说这件事的,因为他们的社交媒体动态全是搞笑视频。没有了新闻,人们就会失去争论真正需要的那些共同的事实,于是公共讨论就变成了谣言,而当权者受到的监督也会变少。慈善和抗议都依赖于人们知道有坏事正在发生。这确实有一点好处——新闻也会扭曲事情,而一个不那么焦虑的公众也不完全是坏事。但一个只顾自娱自乐的社会,要等到洪水真正来临的时候,才会发现有洪水。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCI think it would become easier to govern, but harder to govern well.A plain statement with the hedge 'I think' fronted, typical of 6.5's directness, compared with 7.0's mid-sentence hedge and 7.5's unhedged version.这是一个把限制语 'I think' 前置的朴素陈述,是6.5分直接风格的典型特征,相比之下7.0分把限制语放在句中,7.5分则完全不用限制语。
    • LRcomedy videosA general, plain phrase, less precise than the more specific 'comedy clips' used consistently at higher bands.一个笼统、平实的短语,不如更高分段中一贯使用的更具体的"comedy clips"精确。
    • GRAWithout news, people lose the shared facts that arguments actually need, so public discussion turns into rumours, and people in power get less scrutiny.A long sentence chaining 'so' and 'and' clauses, a simple additive structure typical of plain 6.5 grammar.一个把"so"和"and"从句串联起来的长句,是6.5分平实语法典型的简单累加结构。
    7.0 分

    The idiom 'the water is already at the door' gives the closing image a more vivid, developed edge than a plain statement.习语"the water is already at the door"比平实的陈述给结尾的意象增添了更生动、更成熟的锐度。

    It would become easier to govern, I'd say, but genuinely harder to govern well. During the floods upriver from Da Nang last year, several of my colleagues found out days late, simply because their feeds were entirely comedy clips — a small preview, really, of a society that's both amused and uninformed at the same time. Without news, people lose the shared facts that real arguments depend on, so public debate slides into rumour, and those in power face noticeably less scrutiny. Both charity and protest depend on people actually knowing something is wrong. There's a small upside, to be fair — news can distort things too, and a slightly less anxious public isn't entirely bad. But a society that only entertains itself is, in the end, one that finds out about the flood only when the water is already at the door.

    查看中文翻译

    我想说,治理会变得更容易,但要真正治理得好会变得更难。去年岘港上游发洪水的时候,我的好几位同事是好几天之后才知道的,单纯是因为他们的动态里全是搞笑视频片段——这其实是一个小小的预演,预示着一个既娱乐又无知的社会将会是什么样子。没有了新闻,人们就会失去真正的辩论所依赖的那些共同事实,于是公共讨论就滑向了谣言,而当权者面对的监督也明显变少了。慈善和抗议都依赖于人们真正知道有什么地方出了问题。公平地说,这确实有一点小小的好处——新闻也会扭曲事情,而一个稍微不那么焦虑的公众也不完全是坏事。但一个只顾自娱自乐的社会,说到底,就是一个只有在洪水已经到了家门口时才会发现有洪水的社会。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCIt would become easier to govern, I'd say, but genuinely harder to govern well.The hedge 'I'd say' is inserted mid-sentence, a more natural spoken rhythm than 6.5's fronted 'I think'.缓冲语"I'd say"插入在句子中间,比6.5分中前置的"I think"呈现出更自然的口语节奏。
    • LRa small preview, really, of a society that's both amused and uninformed at the same timeThis precise, reflective aside is more developed than 6.5's plainer, unelaborated description of the same event.这个精确、反思性的插入语,比6.5分中更平实、未加展开的同一事件描述更成熟。
    • GRAa society that only entertains itself is, in the end, one that finds out about the flood only when the water is already at the doorThe cleft construction 'is, in the end, one that...' with the idiom 'at the door' shows more complex, flexible grammar than 6.5's plainer final sentence.强调句结构"is, in the end, one that..."搭配习语"at the door",展现出比6.5分中更平实的结尾句更复杂、更灵活的语法。
    7.5 分

    The compact opener with no hedge and the colon-introduced concession give the answer an economical, confident shape.不加缓冲语的紧凑开头,以及由冒号引出的让步,让这篇答案呈现出精炼、自信的结构。

    It would become easier to govern and harder to govern well. During floods upriver from Da Nang last year, several colleagues learned about them days late because their feeds were entirely comedy clips — a small preview of a society that's amused and uninformed at the same time. Without news, people lose the shared facts that arguments need, so public debate turns into rumour, and those in power face less scrutiny. Charity and protest both depend on people knowing something is wrong. There's a small upside: news can distort too, and a less anxious public isn't all bad. But a society that only entertains itself is one that finds out about the flood only once the water is already at the door.

    查看中文翻译

    治理会变得更容易,但也会更难治理得好。去年岘港上游发洪水的时候,好几位同事是好几天之后才知道的,因为他们的动态里全是搞笑视频片段——这是一个小小的预演,预示着一个既娱乐又无知的社会会是什么样子。没有了新闻,人们就会失去争论所需要的共同事实,于是公共讨论就变成了谣言,当权者面对的监督也变少了。慈善和抗议都依赖于人们知道有什么地方出了问题。这确实有一点小小的好处:新闻也会扭曲事情,一个不那么焦虑的公众也不完全是坏事。但一个只顾自娱自乐的社会,就是一个只有在洪水已经到了家门口时才会发现有洪水的社会。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FCIt would become easier to govern and harder to govern well.This version drops the hedge 'I'd say' entirely, joining the two contrasting outcomes directly with 'and', a more confident fluency than 7.0's hedged opener.这个版本完全去掉了缓冲语"I'd say",用"and"直接连接了两个对比的结果,比7.0分带缓冲语的开头更自信、更流畅。
    • GRAThere's a small upside: news can distort too, and a less anxious public isn't all bad.The colon introduces the concession directly onto the claim, a tighter cohesive device than 7.0's dash-linked 'to be fair' version.冒号把让步直接引到了论点上,比7.0分中用破折号连接的"to be fair"版本更紧凑的衔接手法。
    • LRfinds out about the flood only once the water is already at the doorThe conjunction 'once' replaces 7.0's 'when', a small but more precise temporal choice that sharpens the final image.连接词"once"取代了7.0分中的"when",这是一个虽小却更精确的时间选择,让最后的意象更加尖锐。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长?
讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你,因此目标约 220-300 词,覆盖题卡上的每一点,并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题?
在"A TV or Online Programme That You Enjoy Watching"之后,考官提出过 9 个讨论题,见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗?
考生最近一次报告它出现在 2026年5–8月。题卡每四个月轮换一次,许多话题会在之后的季度以略有不同的措辞回归。