这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？

讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。

这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？

在"A Time When You Wrote a Message and Had to Wait a Long Time for a Reply"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。

这张题卡还在使用吗？

是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。

IELTS Speaking Part 2

A Time When You Wrote a Message and Had to Wait a Long Time for a Reply

最近一次出现于 2026年9–12月当前在用

题卡

Describe a time when you wrote a message, email or letter to someone, but you had to wait a long time for the person to reply.

You should say:

When this happened
Who you sent the message/email/letter to
Why you wrote to this person
and explain how you felt about waiting a long time for this person to reply.

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

This answer stays close to plain, chronological reporting — sentences like 'She didn't reply for almost a month' state facts directly with little elaboration, and the closing line delivers a simple, stated lesson rather than a developed reflection.这段回答基本停留在平铺直叙、按时间顺序讲述事情的层面——像'她差不多一个月都没回复'这样的句子只是直接陈述事实，几乎没有展开说明，结尾也只是简单地给出一个明确的道理，而不是深入的反思。

The message I want to talk about is a Zalo message I sent to an old friend from university, Hà, about two years ago. She had moved to Ho Chi Minh City for a new job, and we had lost touch for a while.

I sent it in the spring, just before Tết. I had been thinking about the old days at university in Hanoi, and I found some old photos of our class on my phone. I decided to send her a few of the photos and ask how she was doing.

The reason I wrote to her was simple. We used to be very close, but after graduation we both got busy with work and slowly stopped talking. I missed her, and I thought Tết was a good time to reconnect, since everyone thinks about family and old friends at that time of year.

She didn't reply for almost a month. At first I checked my phone every day, then I stopped expecting anything. I thought maybe she didn't want to talk anymore. Finally, she replied with a long message explaining she had changed jobs and phones and had only just seen it. We talked for hours after that, and now we message every week. I learned that a late reply doesn't always mean something bad.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这条消息,是大约两年前我通过 Zalo 发给大学老朋友 Hà 的。她当时刚搬到胡志明市开始新工作,我们已经有一段时间没联系了。

我是在春天,快过年前发的这条消息。当时我一直在想在河内读大学的那些日子,又在手机里翻到几张我们班的老照片,于是决定发几张给她,顺便问问她过得怎么样。

我写信给她的原因很简单。我们以前关系很好,但毕业后各自忙于工作,慢慢就不怎么联系了。我很想她,而且觉得过年前后是重新联系的好时机,因为那段时间大家都会想起家人和老朋友。

她差不多一个月都没有回复。一开始我每天都看手机,后来就不抱什么期待了,甚至以为她可能不想再联系了。终于,她回了一条很长的消息,解释说她换了工作也换了手机号,刚看到我的消息。之后我们聊了好几个小时,现在每周都会互相发消息。我学到的是,回复晚了不一定代表什么坏事。

218 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

FC“I sent it in the spring, just before Tết.” — A short factual sentence gives the timing directly, with "just before Tết" adding one culturally specific but simply-stated detail rather than any elaboration on why the timing mattered. This direct, fact-first approach to answering the cue card's "when" point is exactly the plain, on-topic development the Band 6.5 fluency and coherence target asks for.这是一句简短的事实性陈述,直接给出时间信息,其中"just before Tết"添加了一个具有文化特色但表达简单的细节,而没有进一步阐述为什么这个时间点很重要。这种先给事实、直接回应题卡"何时"这一要点的做法,正是6.5分流利度与连贯性标准所要求的那种平实、切题的展开方式。
LR“She didn't reply for almost a month.” — "Didn't reply" uses the simplest, most common verb available rather than a more specific alternative like "went silent" or "left me hanging," which a higher band might choose to add emotional colour. This restraint, stating the bare fact plainly, is consistent with Band 6.5's preference for everyday vocabulary over more expressive or idiomatic phrasing."Didn't reply"用的是最简单、最常见的动词,而不是像"went silent"或"left me hanging"这类更具体、能为叙述增添情感色彩的表达,后者可能出现在更高分的答案里。这种克制、平实地陈述基本事实的方式,与6.5分偏好日常词汇、而非更具表现力或习语色彩措辞的特点相符。
GRA“I thought maybe she didn't want to talk anymore.” — The sentence embeds a reported thought using the basic pattern "I thought (that) + clause," with the "that" dropped as is natural in speech, correctly formed but structurally the simplest way to report an internal thought -- a higher band might use a more hedged or nuanced construction. This is squarely within Band 6.5's "mostly simple sentences plus a few basic complex ones."这句话用最基本的句式"I thought (that) + 从句"来转述一个内心想法,并像口语中常见的那样省略了"that",语法正确,但在结构上是转述内心想法最简单的方式——更高分的答案可能会用更委婉或更细腻的结构。这完全落在6.5分"以简单句为主、辅以少量基础复杂句"的范围之内。
FC“I learned that a late reply doesn't always mean something bad.” — The closing sentence states the lesson learned in one direct clause, using the plain verb "learned" rather than more reflective phrasing a higher band might use (e.g. "It taught me not to assume the worst") -- this single, unelaborated takeaway is exactly the modest, functional closing Band 6.5 answers are expected to produce rather than a more developed personal reflection.结尾句用一个直接的分句陈述所吸取的教训,使用平实的动词"learned",而不是更高分答案可能采用的更具反思性的措辞(例如"It taught me not to assume the worst")——这种单一、未加展开的收获,正是6.5分答案应有的那种朴素、功能性的收尾,而不是更充分展开的个人反思。

7.0 分

This answer adds a comfortable mix of complex sentences (the 'which was longer than I expected, so...' clause) and one natural collocation ('drifted apart'), while still explaining the wait and reunion in a straightforward, unforced way typical of Band 7.0.这段回答自然地混用了复杂句（比如'比我预想的要久得多，所以……'这样的从句）和一个自然的固定搭配（'疏远'），同时依然以一种流畅、不刻意的方式讲述了等待和重逢的过程，是Band 7.0的典型特征。

The message I'd like to talk about was a Facebook message I sent to Mai, a close friend from high school, around eight months ago, after we'd more or less lost contact once she moved to Can Tho for university.

It happened just before the Mid-Autumn Festival last year. I'd been going through some old photos on my phone and came across a few pictures of our class trip, which made me think of her straight away. Instead of just letting the memory pass, I decided to message her and see how she was getting on.

I wrote to her mainly because we used to be really close, and I felt a bit guilty that we'd drifted apart without any particular reason — it was just that life got busy and neither of us made the effort to keep in touch. I also thought the festival was a natural moment to reconnect, since it's the kind of time when people tend to think about family and old friends.

She didn't reply for almost three weeks, which was longer than I expected, so I checked my phone more often than I'd like to admit at first, wondering if I'd said something wrong or if she just wasn't interested anymore. Eventually she messaged back with a long explanation — her phone had broken and she'd only just set up a new one, so she hadn't seen anything for weeks.

Once we started chatting again, it felt like no time had passed at all, and we ended up talking for almost two hours that evening. We still message quite regularly now, and looking back, I've realised that a slow reply doesn't necessarily mean someone doesn't care.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这条信息是大约八个月前发给玛依(Mai)的一条Facebook消息，她是我高中时的一个好朋友，自从她去芹苴上大学后，我们几乎就断了联系。

事情发生在去年中秋节前不久。当时我在翻看手机里的一些旧照片，无意中看到几张我们班级出游时拍的照片，一下子就想起了她。我没有让这份回忆就这么过去，而是决定给她发消息，问问她最近过得怎么样。

我之所以给她写信，主要是因为我们以前关系特别好，而且我心里也有点内疚，觉得我们莫名其妙就疏远了——其实也没什么特别的原因，就是生活忙起来了，两个人都没花心思去保持联系。我还觉得中秋节是一个很自然的重新联系的时机，因为这种节日总会让人想起家人和老朋友。

她差不多三个星期都没回复，比我预想的要久得多，所以一开始我查看手机的频率高到自己都不太好意思承认，一直在想是不是自己说错了什么话，或者她已经不感兴趣了。最后她终于回信了，还附上了一长串解释——原来她的手机坏了，刚换了新手机，所以那几个星期什么消息都没看到。

等我们重新聊起来之后，感觉就像完全没有间断过一样，那天晚上我们聊了差不多两个小时。现在我们还是经常互发消息，回想起来，我意识到回复得慢并不一定代表对方不在乎。

283 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

FC“Instead of just letting the memory pass, I decided to message her and see how she was getting on.” — The phrase 'instead of just letting the memory pass' explicitly names the alternative the speaker chose not to take, making the link between finding old photos and deciding to message Mai a deliberate narrative choice rather than an unexplained jump -- the kind of extra linking development the 7.0 fluency descriptor rewards. It reads as natural spoken reasoning rather than a formulaic connector like 'therefore', keeping the story about reconnecting before the Mid-Autumn Festival grounded and personal.短语'instead of just letting the memory pass'明确点出了说话者没有选择的那条路,把"翻到旧照片"和"决定给梅(Mai)发消息"之间的联系,变成了一个刻意的叙事选择,而不是一次没有解释的跳跃——这正是7.0分流利度描述所看重的那种额外的连接性展开。它读起来像是自然的口头推理,而不是像'therefore'这样公式化的连接词,让中秋节前重新联系这段故事显得真实而个人化。
LR“we'd drifted apart” — 'Drifted apart' is a natural collocation for describing a friendship fading without conflict, more precise than a plain equivalent like 'we stopped talking' that a 6.5 answer would likely use, while still being common enough to carry no error risk. This fits the 7.0 descriptor's target of a few flexible, well-chosen phrases layered over otherwise everyday vocabulary, and it accurately captures the passive, no-one's-fault nature of losing touch with Mai after she moved to Can Tho.'Drifted apart'是一个描述友谊在没有冲突的情况下逐渐淡去的自然搭配,比6.5分答案很可能会用的平淡说法'we stopped talking'更精准,同时又足够常见,不会带来出错风险。这符合7.0分描述"在日常词汇基础上点缀几个精心挑选的灵活短语"的目标,也准确捕捉到了梅搬去芹苴后彼此渐行渐远、并非任何一方过错的那种被动性质。
GRA“which was longer than I expected, so I checked my phone more often than I'd like to admit” — A non-defining relative clause ('which was longer than I expected') is chained into a result clause with 'so', and the sentence closes with a self-deprecating comparative ('more often than I'd like to admit'), all handled accurately within one flowing spoken sentence. This layering of two subordinate structures without losing control is the comfortable complexity the 7.0 grammar descriptor targets, and the honesty about compulsively checking the phone adds a natural, relatable detail to the three-week wait.一个非限定性定语从句('which was longer than I expected')被连接到一个由'so'引导的结果从句中,句子最后以一个带有自嘲意味的比较结构('more often than I'd like to admit')收尾,所有这些都在一句流畅的口语句子中被准确地处理。这种在不失控的情况下叠加两种从属结构的做法,正是7.0分语法描述所瞄准的从容复杂度,而对"忍不住反复查看手机"这一点的坦诚,也为这三周的等待增添了一个自然、令人感同身受的细节。
FC“a slow reply doesn't necessarily mean someone doesn't care” — 'Doesn't necessarily mean' hedges the closing generalisation, allowing for exceptions rather than stating an absolute rule like 'a slow reply means someone doesn't care', which is a more nuanced piece of reasoning than a 6.5 answer would typically produce. This hedged reflection is exactly the reason-plus-insight development the 7.0 fluency descriptor rewards, converting the specific story about Mai's three-week silence into a more general, considered lesson.'Doesn't necessarily mean'为结尾的概括性论断加上了限定,允许存在例外,而不是像'a slow reply means someone doesn't care'那样陈述一条绝对的规则,这是一种比6.5分答案通常会给出的更细致的推理。这种带有限定的反思正是7.0分流利度描述所看重的"理由加见解"式展开,把关于梅三周沉默的具体故事转化为一条更具普遍性、经过深思的教训。

7.5 分

The answer builds real narrative tension through pacing devices like the fragmented 'Then nothing. A week, two, four.' and closes on an unexpected, vivid concrete detail (the box of dried squid) rather than a stated moral, both hallmarks of Band 7.5 fluency and lexical control.这段回答通过节奏营造出了真正的叙事张力，比如刻意断句的'然后就没了消息。一周，两周，四周。'并且没有用一句道理来收尾，而是以一个出人意料、生动具体的细节（那盒干鱿鱼）作结——这两点都是Band 7.5流利度和词汇掌控力的典型标志。

The message I'd describe was an email I sent last summer to a type designer in Japan, an elderly man whose typeface I wanted to use for a client's brand, and who took seven weeks to reply.

When it happened was July, in the middle of the seafood branding project I'd been working on since the fish-market shoot. I'd found a typeface online — a slightly rough, handmade-looking script that reminded me of the painted signs on the fishing boats — and discovered it had been drawn thirty years earlier by a designer in Kanazawa who had no website, no agent, and one email address.

Who I wrote to, then, was a man I knew almost nothing about, in a language I don't speak, using a translation tool. I explained who I was, what the brand was, why his letters suited it, and asked what a licence would cost.

Why I wrote was partly professional correctness — using a font without permission is theft, and the studio doesn't do it — and partly that nothing else looked right. I'd tried eleven alternatives. The client, who had never heard of typography, kept pointing at his and saying 'that one'.

Then nothing. A week, two, four. I sent one gentle follow-up at three weeks and got silence again. By week six I'd redesigned the whole brand with a different typeface and was preparing to show it. In week seven, a reply arrived, written in careful English by his daughter, explaining that her father was eighty-one, checked his email roughly once a season, and had been delighted to learn that his letters were wanted for boats in Vietnam. The licence fee, she said, was a box of dried squid, which he'd once eaten in Da Nang in the 1990s and had never forgotten. I sent two. The brand launched with his typeface. We still exchange a message every New Year, and I've learned to wait.

查看中文翻译

我要说的这条消息,是去年夏天我发给一位日本字体设计师的一封邮件——一位年长的男士,我想把他设计的字体用在一个客户的品牌上,而他花了七周时间才回复。

事情发生在七月,正值我自鱼市拍摄之后一直在做的那个海鲜品牌项目进行到一半的时候。我在网上找到一款字体——一种略带粗糙、手写质感的书法体,让我想起渔船上手绘的招牌字——后来发现它是三十年前由一位住在金泽(Kanazawa)的设计师绘制的,那人没有网站,没有经纪人,只有一个邮箱地址。

于是,我写信的对象,是一个我几乎一无所知的人,用的是一种我不会说的语言,借助翻译工具完成。我解释了自己是谁、这个品牌是什么、为什么他的字体适合这个品牌,并问了授权费用是多少。

我之所以写这封信,一部分是出于职业上的严谨——未经许可使用字体等同于盗用,我们工作室从不这么做——另一部分是因为其他任何字体都不对味。我已经试过十一种替代方案。而那位客户,一个从没听说过"字体排印学"这个词的人,一直指着那款字体说"就是它了"。

然后就是杳无音信。一周,两周,四周。我在第三周发了一条委婉的跟进消息,又是石沉大海。到第六周,我已经用另一款字体重新设计了整个品牌,准备拿去展示。到了第七周,回复终于来了,由他女儿用措辞谨慎的英文写成,解释说她父亲已经八十一岁,大概每隔一季才查一次邮件,得知自己的字体被想用在越南的渔船上时非常高兴。她说,授权费是一盒干鱿鱼——那是他九十年代在岘港吃过、一直念念不忘的味道。我寄了两盒过去。这个品牌最终用他的字体上市了。我们如今每年新年还会互相发一条消息,而我也学会了等待。

322 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

LR“using a font without permission is theft” — Calling unlicensed font use 'theft' is a deliberately blunt, moralised word choice -- far stronger and more precise than a safer phrase like 'not allowed' or 'against the rules' that a 7.0 answer would likely use -- and it's dropped in as a professional conviction rather than flagged as dramatic. This kind of precise, slightly provocative vocabulary, used naturally and without over-explaining, is exactly what the 7.5 lexical descriptor means by several precise or less-common words deployed with control.把未经授权使用字体称为'theft',是一种故意直白、带有道德批判色彩的措辞选择——比7.0分答案很可能会用的更安全的说法'not allowed'或'against the rules'要强烈、精确得多——而且它是作为一种职业上的坚定信念被自然带出的,而非刻意渲染的戏剧化表达。这种精确、略带挑衅意味的词汇,用得自然而不过度解释,正是7.5分词汇描述所说的"若干精确或不常见词汇的受控运用"。
GRA“In week seven, a reply arrived, written in careful English by his daughter” — Fronting the time phrase 'In week seven' for emphasis, then attaching a past-participial clause ('written in careful English by his daughter') to the noun 'reply', packs two distinct grammatical devices into one clean sentence without any errors -- exactly the varied, controlled complexity the 7.5 grammar descriptor asks for, layered on top of the semicolons and relative clauses used elsewhere in the same story. A 7.0 answer would more likely state this information across two plainer sentences.把时间状语'In week seven'提前以示强调,再把一个过去分词从句('written in careful English by his daughter')附加到名词'reply'上,在一句干净利落的句子里融入了两种不同的语法手段,且没有任何错误——这正是7.5分语法描述所要求的那种多样化、受控的复杂结构,叠加在同一故事中其他地方使用的分号和定语从句之上。7.0分的答案更可能会用两个较为平淡的句子来表达这些信息。
FC“Then nothing. A week, two, four.” — Breaking the narrative into sentence fragments here -- 'Then nothing', then a bare list of week-counts -- deliberately slows the pacing to mimic the waiting itself, a stylistic choice made possible by confidence rather than a grammatical requirement. This kind of controlled fluency device, used for effect rather than by accident, is characteristic of the reflective, well-shaped delivery the 7.5 fluency descriptor rewards, going beyond the straightforward narration a 7.0 answer would use for the same stretch of silence.在这里把叙述打散成句子片段——'Then nothing',接着是一串赤裸裸的周数列表——刻意放慢节奏,以模拟等待本身的感觉,这是一种由自信驱动、而非语法要求所致的文体选择。这种有意为之、用以营造效果而非无心为之的受控流利手段,正是7.5分流利度描述所看重的那种富有反思、精心打磨的表达方式,远超7.0分答案在描述同一段沉默时期时会采用的直白叙述。
LR“The licence fee, she said, was a box of dried squid” — Stating the payment as 'a box of dried squid' with no further comment lets the surprising, warm detail speak for itself rather than being explained or exclaimed over, which is a subtle control of tone that a 7.0 answer would be less likely to attempt, more likely adding 'which was funny' or similar. This dry, understated delivery of an unexpected concrete fact is exactly the kind of idiomatic control the 7.5 descriptor rewards, and it rewards the listener for following the whole seven-week wait.把报酬说成'a box of dried squid',不加任何额外评论,让这个意外而温暖的细节自己说话,而不是被解释或惊叹出来,这是一种7.0分答案不太可能尝试的微妙语气把控,后者更可能会补上一句'which was funny'之类的话。这种对意外具体事实的干脆、含蓄的处理方式,正是7.5分描述所看重的那种地道的语言掌控力,也是对听众耐心跟随整整七周等待的一种回报。

各考试时段出题记录

Describe a time when you wrote a message, email or letter to someone, but you had to wait a long time for the person to reply.2026年9–12月
Describe a time when you wrote a message, email or letter to someone, but you had to wait a long time for the person to reply2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

1. Why do people sometimes take a long time to reply to messages?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct claim ("There are many reasons") and lists causes one after another with "Other people are... Some people wait...", closing with a personal example.6.5分范文以一个直接的论断开头("There are many reasons"),然后用"Other people are... Some people wait..."这样的句式逐一列出原因,最后以一个个人例子收尾。
There are many reasons, from innocent to avoiding the message. A Japanese designer I know replied late because he only checks his email once a season, so nothing in his life feels urgent. Other people are busy with too many messages, and yours is just one of many. Some people wait until they can answer properly instead of quickly, which feels polite but seems like silence. I also have a drafts folder full of replies I am 'thinking about', which is my own way of avoiding messages that need a difficult answer.
查看中文翻译
原因有很多种,有的很无辜,有的则是在回避这条信息。我认识一位日本设计师,他回复很晚,因为他一个季度才查一次邮件,所以他生活中没有什么事让他觉得紧急。还有些人忙于处理太多信息,你的信息只是众多之一。有些人会等到能好好回答的时候才回复,而不是匆匆应付,这看起来很有礼貌,但也可能显得像是沉默不语。我自己也有一个草稿箱,里面塞满了我"正在考虑"的回复,这其实是我用来回避那些需要给出艰难答案的信息的方式。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Other people are busy with too many messages, and yours is just one of many” — This plain sentence, linked with the basic connector "and", states a fact in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's straightforward, unembellished coherence.这个简单的句子用基础连接词"and"连接,以最直接的方式陈述了一个事实,体现出6.5分典型的直白、不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“Other people are busy with too many messages” — "Busy with too many messages" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "drowning in messages", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Busy with too many messages"是一种平实、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用像"drowning in messages"这样更生动的说法,7.0/7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“I also have a drafts folder full of replies I am 'thinking about', which is my own way of avoiding messages that need a difficult answer.” — This long sentence links two ideas with a plain "which" clause, a workable but fairly straightforward structure typical of 6.5.这个长句用一个简单的"which"从句连接两个想法,这种结构虽然可行,但相当直白,是6.5分的典型特征。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens with a fronted phrase, "For reasons ranging from the innocent to the avoidant", and uses the vivid idiom "drowning in messages", a step beyond the flatter, more direct 6.5 opening.7.0分范文以一个前置短语开头,"For reasons ranging from the innocent to the avoidant",并使用了生动的习语"drowning in messages",比6.5分更平直、更直接的开头更进一步。
For reasons ranging from the innocent to the avoidant, honestly. The Japanese designer replied late because he checks email once a season, and his life is arranged so that nothing in it is urgent — some people simply live at a different speed. Others are drowning in messages and yours is one of two hundred. Some are waiting until they can answer properly rather than quickly, which is respectful but reads as silence. I have a drafts folder of replies I'm 'thinking about', which is my own version of avoidance — a message that needs a decision gets postponed.
查看中文翻译
说实话,原因五花八门,从无心之失到刻意回避都有。那位日本设计师回复晚,是因为他一个季度才查一次邮件,他的生活安排得让任何事都不显得紧急——有些人就是活在不同的节奏里。有的人则被信息淹没,你的消息只是两百条中的一条。有的人在等自己能好好回答而不是草草应付,这样做很尊重人,但看起来却像是沉默。我自己也有一个装满"正在考虑"的回复的草稿箱,这是我自己版本的回避——需要做决定的信息就这样被一拖再拖。
为什么是这个分数
FC“For reasons ranging from the innocent to the avoidant, honestly” — The trailing hedge "honestly" attached to the fronted opening phrase is a natural conversational marker the 6.5 answer's plainer, unhedged opening sentence doesn't include.附加在前置开头短语后面的缓冲词"honestly"是一个自然的口语标记,而6.5分答案更平实、没有缓冲语的开头句中并没有使用。
LR“Others are drowning in messages and yours is one of two hundred” — "Drowning in messages" is a vivid, figurative phrase for being overwhelmed, well beyond the plain "busy with too many messages" used at 6.5."Drowning in messages"是一个生动的比喻性表达,用来形容被信息淹没的状态,远胜于6.5分中使用的平实说法"busy with too many messages"。
GRA“which is respectful but reads as silence” — The contrast structure "respectful but reads as silence" is a moderately more developed way of expressing the tension than the plainer "which feels polite but seems like silence" sentence used at 6.5.对比结构"respectful but reads as silence"是一种比6.5分中更平实的"which feels polite but seems like silence"句子更进一步发展的表达张力的方式。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses a fronted participial phrase, "his whole life arranged so that nothing in it counts as urgent", and closes with the colon-introduced restatement "my own quiet form of avoidance: anything requiring a decision or an apology just gets postponed indefinitely".7.5分范文使用了一个前置的分词短语,"his whole life arranged so that nothing in it counts as urgent",并以冒号引出的重述句"my own quiet form of avoidance: anything requiring a decision or an apology just gets postponed indefinitely"收尾。
For reasons that range from the entirely innocent to the quietly avoidant. The Japanese designer I correspond with replied late because he checks email once a season, his whole life arranged so that nothing in it counts as urgent — some people simply operate at a different speed altogether. Others are drowning under a backlog and your message is one of two hundred sitting there. Some hold off until they can answer properly rather than quickly, which is well-intentioned but reads, from the outside, as silence. I keep a drafts folder of replies I'm supposedly 'thinking about', my own quiet form of avoidance: anything requiring a decision or an apology just gets postponed indefinitely.
查看中文翻译
原因从完全无心到悄然回避,五花八门。和我通信的那位日本设计师回复晚,是因为他一个季度才查一次邮件,他的整个生活都安排得让任何事都算不上紧急——有些人就是完全活在另一种节奏里。有的人则被堆积如山的信息淹没,你的消息只是那堆里两百条中的一条。有的人要等到能好好回答而不是草草应付才回复,这本是好意,但从外人看来却像是沉默。我自己留着一个草稿箱,里面装满我据称"正在考虑"的回复,这是我自己悄悄回避的方式:凡是需要做决定或道歉的信息,都会被无限期地搁置下去。
为什么是这个分数
FC“my own quiet form of avoidance: anything requiring a decision or an apology just gets postponed indefinitely” — The colon expanding the closing noun phrase into a precise final restatement is a more sophisticated, essay-like move than the plainer "which is my own way of avoiding" clause used at 6.5.用冒号将结尾的名词短语展开为一个精确的最终重述,这是一种比6.5分中更平实的"which is my own way of avoiding"从句更成熟、更具论说文风格的写作手法。
LR“Others are drowning under a backlog and your message is one of two hundred sitting there” — "A backlog" is a precise, slightly technical word for accumulated unanswered messages, a step beyond the plainer "drowning in messages" phrasing used at 7.0."A backlog"是一个精确、略带专业色彩的词,用来指积压的未回复信息,比7.0分中更平实的"drowning in messages"说法更进一步。
GRA“his whole life arranged so that nothing in it counts as urgent” — This participial phrase ("his whole life arranged so that...") compresses an entire separate clause into the main sentence, a more economical construction than the coordinated "and his life is arranged so that" clause used at 7.0.这个分词短语("his whole life arranged so that...")把原本独立的一整个从句压缩进主句中,是一种比7.0分中并列的"and his life is arranged so that"从句更精炼的结构。
2. What can people do when they don't receive a response to a message?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct recommendation ("I think you should follow up once") and closes with a simple warning introduced by "I think people should avoid".6.5分范文以一个直接的建议开头("I think you should follow up once"),并以"I think people should avoid"引出的简单警示收尾。
I think you should follow up once, kindly, and then continue with a plan that does not depend on the reply. I once sent one gentle follow-up after three weeks, thinking my message had been lost, and then made a backup plan so my project was not stuck waiting on a stranger. The reply actually came anyway after that. Checking that the message really arrived is also worth doing, since addresses can change. I think people should avoid sending an angry message, because that can end a relationship that patience might have saved.
查看中文翻译
我认为你应该友善地跟进一次,然后继续执行一个不依赖对方回复的计划。我曾经在三周后发过一次温和的跟进消息,以为我的信息丢失了,然后制定了一个备用方案,这样我的项目就不会被困在等待一个陌生人的回复上。结果那次跟进之后,对方还是回复了。检查一下信息是否真的送达也值得一做,因为地址可能会变。我认为大家应该避免发送愤怒的信息,因为那可能会毁掉一段本来靠耐心就能挽救的关系。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I think people should avoid sending an angry message, because that can end a relationship that patience might have saved” — This closing sentence, using the plain phrase "I think people should avoid", delivers the final warning in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这个结尾句用平实的短语"I think people should avoid"以最直接的方式传达了最后的警示,体现了6.5分典型的不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“Checking that the message really arrived is also worth doing” — "Really arrived" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise word like "actually arrived", used similarly across bands but with more varied surrounding vocabulary at higher bands such as "filters eat things"."Really arrived"是一种平实、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的词,如"actually arrived",这个词在各分段中用法相似,但更高分段周围会搭配更丰富多样的词汇,比如"filters eat things"。
GRA“The reply actually came anyway after that.” — This short, separate sentence tacked on after the main example is typical of 6.5-level sentence variety, adding a detail as its own simple statement rather than folding it into a longer sentence.这个附加在主要例子后面的简短独立句子,是6.5分典型的句式变化方式,它把一个细节作为独立的简单陈述加进来,而不是把它融入一个更长的句子中。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens with the imperative "Follow up once, kindly" instead of a hedged recommendation, and uses the vivid metaphor "hostage to a stranger's inbox", a step beyond the plainer 6.5 phrasing.7.0分范文以祈使句"Follow up once, kindly"开头,而不是用委婉的建议句式,并使用了生动的比喻"hostage to a stranger's inbox",比6.5分更平实的表达更进一步。
Follow up once, kindly, and then get on with a plan that doesn't need the reply, I'd say. I sent one gentle follow-up at three weeks, assuming my message had been lost rather than ignored, and then designed an alternative so that my project wasn't hostage to a stranger's inbox — and the reply came anyway. A second channel sometimes helps too, a call after a message, or a mutual contact. Checking that the message actually arrived is worth doing; addresses change and filters eat things. Beyond that, resist the temptation to send an angry third message, which ends relationships.
查看中文翻译
我会说,友善地跟进一次,然后继续执行一个不需要对方回复的计划。我在第三周发过一次温和的跟进,假设我的信息是被弄丢了而不是被无视,然后设计了一个替代方案,这样我的项目就不会被人质般困在一个陌生人的收件箱里——结果对方还是回复了。有时第二种渠道也有帮助,比如发完信息后打个电话,或者找一个共同的熟人。检查信息是否真的送达也值得一做;地址会变,过滤器也会把东西吞掉。除此之外,要抵住诱惑,别发第三条愤怒的信息,那会毁掉关系。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Follow up once, kindly, and then get on with a plan that doesn't need the reply, I'd say” — Opening with the bare imperative "Follow up once, kindly" before the trailing hedge "I'd say" is a more confident, natural spoken structure than the fuller "I think you should follow up once" sentence used at 6.5.以裸祈使句"Follow up once, kindly"开头,后面再加上缓冲语"I'd say",这是一种比6.5分中更完整的"I think you should follow up once"句子更自信、更自然的口语结构。
LR“my project wasn't hostage to a stranger's inbox” — "Hostage to a stranger's inbox" is a vivid, figurative phrase for dependency, well beyond the plain "stuck waiting on a stranger" used at 6.5."Hostage to a stranger's inbox"是一个生动的比喻性短语,用来形容依赖状态,远胜于6.5分中使用的平实说法"stuck waiting on a stranger"。
GRA“Checking that the message actually arrived is worth doing; addresses change and filters eat things.” — The semicolon joining two related clauses is a moderately more sophisticated structure than the simpler "since addresses can change" sentence used at 6.5.用分号连接两个相关的从句,是一种比6.5分中更简单的"since addresses can change"句子稍微更成熟一些的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid idiom "filters swallow things whole" and closes with the compact relative clause "which tends to end relationships a little patience would otherwise have kept", showing precise, flexible top-band grammar.7.5分范文使用了生动的习语"filters swallow things whole",并以精炼的定语从句"which tends to end relationships a little patience would otherwise have kept"收尾,展现出精确而灵活的高分段语法水平。
Follow up once, kindly, and then quietly get on with a plan that doesn't depend on the reply arriving at all. I sent one gentle nudge at the three-week mark, choosing to assume my message had been lost rather than ignored, and built an alternative so my project wasn't held hostage to a stranger's inbox — the reply turned up anyway, as it happens. A second channel sometimes helps: a call after the message, or a mutual contact who can nudge things along. It's worth checking the message actually arrived, since addresses change and filters swallow things whole. Beyond that, resist firing off an angry third message, which tends to end relationships a little patience would otherwise have kept.
查看中文翻译
友善地跟进一次,然后默默地继续执行一个完全不依赖对方回复的计划。我在第三周那个节点发过一次温和的提醒,选择相信自己的信息是被弄丢了而不是被无视,并制定了一个替代方案,这样我的项目就不会被人质般困在陌生人的收件箱里——碰巧的是,对方后来还是回复了。有时第二种渠道也有帮助:发完信息后打个电话,或者找一个能帮忙推动一下的共同熟人。确认信息是否真的送达值得一做,因为地址会变,过滤器也会把东西整个吞掉。除此之外,要克制住冲动,别发出第三条愤怒的信息,那种信息往往会毁掉一段本来只需一点耐心就能维系的关系。
为什么是这个分数
FC“the reply turned up anyway, as it happens” — The trailing fragment "as it happens" is a natural, understated closing touch the 6.5 and 7.0 answers' fuller sentences don't attempt, showing confident economy of expression.结尾附加的片段"as it happens"是一种自然、含蓄的收尾手法,6.5分和7.0分答案中更完整的句子都没有尝试使用,体现出自信而精炼的表达方式。
LR“addresses change and filters swallow things whole” — "Swallow things whole" is a genuinely vivid, idiomatic image for messages disappearing, well beyond the plain "eat things" used at 7.0 for the same idea."Swallow things whole"是一个真正生动、地道的意象,用来形容信息消失不见,远胜于7.0分中表达同一意思时使用的平实说法"eat things"。
GRA“resist firing off an angry third message, which tends to end relationships a little patience would otherwise have kept” — The compressed relative clause "a little patience would otherwise have kept" attached without an explicit connector is a more flexible, economical construction than a fuller "because it can end a relationship that patience might have saved" clause.这个压缩的定语从句"a little patience would otherwise have kept"没有用明确的连接词就直接附加上去,是一种比更完整的"because it can end a relationship that patience might have saved"从句更灵活、更精炼的结构。
3. Is it fair to expect people to reply quickly to messages at all times?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct "No" opinion, gives one plain workplace example, and closes with a simple recommendation introduced by "I think a fairer rule is".6.5分范文以直接的"No"表态开头,给出一个平实的职场例子,并以"I think a fairer rule is"引出的简单建议收尾。
No, although many workplaces act like it is. My studio has an unwritten rule that messages should get a reply within about ten minutes, and the week I turned off my notifications to finish some work, people thought something was wrong. Quick replies make sense during emergencies or for people whose job is to respond fast. But outside of that, expecting instant answers treats everyone's attention like it is public, and this is why many people feel like they are always on duty. I think a fairer rule is to say clearly what is urgent.
查看中文翻译
不公平,尽管很多职场表现得好像这是理所当然的。我的工作室有一条不成文的规定,信息要在大约十分钟内得到回复,有一周我关掉通知专心完成工作,大家就以为出了什么事。在紧急情况下,或者对那些工作本身就是要快速回应的人来说,快速回复是合理的。但除此之外,期待别人立刻回复,就是把每个人的注意力都当成公共财产,这也是为什么很多人觉得自己好像永远在值班。我认为更公平的规则是明确说明什么才是真正紧急的事。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I think a fairer rule is to say clearly what is urgent” — This closing sentence, using the plain phrase "I think a fairer rule is", delivers the final recommendation in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这个结尾句使用平实的短语"I think a fairer rule is",以最直接的方式给出了最后的建议,体现了6.5分典型的不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“expecting instant answers treats everyone's attention like it is public” — "Treats everyone's attention like it is public" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "as public property", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Treats everyone's attention like it is public"是一种平实、可行的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"as public property",7.0/7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“the week I turned off my notifications to finish some work, people thought something was wrong” — This is a fairly simple sentence stating one fact plainly, without the added reflective clause the higher bands attach to develop the same idea further.这是一个相当简单的句子,平铺直叙地陈述一个事实,没有添加更高分段用来进一步展开同一想法的反思性从句。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer adds the reflective closing phrase "the expectation had become invisible and total" to the example, and closes with the colon-introduced sentence "A fairer norm is clarity: say what's urgent and what isn't", a step beyond the plainer 6.5 phrasing.7.0分范文在例子后加上了反思性的收尾短语"the expectation had become invisible and total",并以冒号引出的句子"A fairer norm is clarity: say what's urgent and what isn't"收尾,比6.5分更平实的表达更进一步。
No, though a lot of workplaces behave as if it is. My studio has an unwritten rule that messages get a reply within about ten minutes, and the week I turned notifications off to finish a design, people assumed something was wrong — the expectation had become invisible and total. Quick replies are reasonable in an emergency, during agreed hours, and for people whose job is responding. Outside that, expecting instant answers treats everyone's attention as public property, and it's the reason so many people feel permanently on duty. A fairer norm is clarity: say what's urgent and what isn't.
查看中文翻译
不公平,尽管很多职场表现得好像理所当然。我的工作室有一条不成文的规定,信息要在大约十分钟内得到回复,有一周我关掉通知去完成一个设计,大家就以为出了什么事——这种期待已经变得无形却又无处不在。在紧急情况下、在约定好的时段内,或者对那些工作本身就是回应的人来说,快速回复是合理的。除此之外,期待即时回应,就是把每个人的注意力都当成公共财产,这也是为什么这么多人觉得自己永远在值班。更公平的准则是明确:说清楚什么是紧急的,什么不是。
为什么是这个分数
FC“people assumed something was wrong — the expectation had become invisible and total” — The dash introducing the reflective aside "the expectation had become invisible and total" is a more developed, essay-like observation than the plain "people thought something was wrong" sentence used at 6.5.用破折号引出反思性的插入语"the expectation had become invisible and total",这是一种比6.5分中平实的"people thought something was wrong"句子更成熟、更具论说文风格的观察方式。
LR“expecting instant answers treats everyone's attention as public property” — "Public property" is a more precise, idiomatic phrase than the vaguer "like it is public" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Public property"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更模糊的"like it is public"更精确、更地道的短语。
GRA“A fairer norm is clarity: say what's urgent and what isn't.” — The colon introducing a compact imperative restatement is a more efficient, developed structure than the plainer "I think a fairer rule is to say clearly what is urgent" sentence used at 6.5.用冒号引出一个紧凑的祈使性重述句,这是一种比6.5分中更平实的"I think a fairer rule is to say clearly what is urgent"句子更高效、更成熟的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the precise phrase "on call" and closes with the extended sentence "flag what's urgent, and accept that a reply within a day still counts as a reply", the kind of compact, evaluative phrasing that marks the top band.7.5分范文使用了精确的短语"on call",并以扩展句"flag what's urgent, and accept that a reply within a day still counts as a reply"收尾,这正是标志着最高分段的那种紧凑而带有评价性的表达方式。
No, though plenty of workplaces carry on as if it were. My studio operates on an unwritten rule that messages get answered within about ten minutes, and the week I switched notifications off to actually finish a design, people assumed something had gone wrong — the expectation had become so invisible it was total. Quick replies make sense in a genuine emergency, during agreed hours, or for whoever's job it literally is to respond. Beyond that, treating instant answers as the default effectively treats everyone's attention as public property, which is exactly why so many people feel permanently on call. A fairer norm would simply be clarity: flag what's urgent, and accept that a reply within a day still counts as a reply.
查看中文翻译
不公平,尽管很多职场表现得好像理所应当。我的工作室按照一条不成文的规定运作,信息要在大约十分钟内得到回复,有一周我关掉通知真正去完成一个设计,大家就以为出了什么问题——这种期待已经变得如此无形,以至于变得无处不在。在真正的紧急情况下、在约定好的时段内,或者对那些工作本身就是回应的人来说,快速回复是合理的。除此之外,把即时回应当作默认标准,实际上就是把每个人的注意力都当成公共财产,这正是为什么这么多人觉得自己永远处于待命状态。更公平的准则其实很简单,就是清晰明确:标明什么是紧急的,并且接受一天之内的回复仍然算是回复。
为什么是这个分数
FC“so many people feel permanently on call” — "On call" is a precise, idiomatic phrase borrowed from professional contexts, more vivid and exact than the plainer "on duty" used at 6.5 for the same idea."On call"是一个精确、地道的短语,借用自职业语境,比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"on duty"更生动、更准确。
LR“the expectation had become so invisible it was total” — The "so... it was..." result construction intensifies the observation beyond the plainer "had become invisible and total" phrasing used at 7.0, showing a modest widening of expressive range."so... it was..."这种结果状语结构把这个观察进一步强化,超越了7.0分中更平实的"had become invisible and total"表达,展现出表达范围的适度拓宽。
GRA“A fairer norm would simply be clarity: flag what's urgent, and accept that a reply within a day still counts as a reply” — This closing sentence extends the colon-introduced imperative from 7.0 with an added clause ("and accept that..."), a more fully developed, compact construction than the shorter version used at 7.0.这个结尾句在7.0分中冒号引出的祈使句基础上,又加上了一个从句("and accept that..."),是一种比7.0分中更短的版本更充分发展、更紧凑的结构。
4. How can people show respect when communicating online?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with one plain example ("The daughter's reply") and lists behaviours with the repeated phrase "This means... It also means... And it means...", a simple additive structure typical of 6.5.6.5分范文以一个平实的例子开头("The daughter's reply"),并用重复的短语"This means... It also means... And it means..."列出各种行为,这是6.5分典型的简单累加结构。
The daughter's reply is a good model for this, a greeting, an apology for the delay, an explanation, thanks, and only then the actual answer. Respect online is mostly about small things that only take a few extra seconds. This means using the person's name, reading the whole message before replying, and actually answering the question that was asked. It also means acknowledging a message you cannot answer yet, so the person is not left wondering. And it means not writing anything you would not say to someone's face.
查看中文翻译
那位女儿的回复就是一个很好的范例:问候、为延迟道歉、解释原因、表达感谢,然后才是真正的回答。网上的尊重大多体现在一些只需多花几秒钟的小事上。这意味着要称呼对方的名字,回复前先读完整条信息,并且真正回答对方提出的问题。这也意味着要对暂时无法回答的信息给予确认,不让对方一直猜测。而且这也意味着不写任何你不会当面对别人说的话。
为什么是这个分数
FC“And it means not writing anything you would not say to someone's face” — The repeated plain connector "And it means" opening the final sentence is the most basic way of adding another point, typical of 6.5's straightforward, list-like coherence.用重复的平实连接词"And it means"开启最后一句,这是添加另一个论点最基本的方式,体现了6.5分典型的直白、列举式连贯性。
LR“Respect online is mostly about small things that only take a few extra seconds” — "Small things that only take a few extra seconds" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "the handful of things that cost a few extra seconds", which the 7.5 version uses."Small things that only take a few extra seconds"是一种平实、可行的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"the handful of things that cost a few extra seconds",7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“This means using the person's name, reading the whole message before replying, and actually answering the question that was asked.” — This sentence lists three actions joined with commas and "and", a basic listing structure rather than the more varied fragment style used at higher bands.这个句子用逗号和"and"连接列出了三个动作,是一种基本的列举结构,而不是更高分段所使用的更富变化的片段式风格。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer breaks the list into short standalone fragments ("Using the person's name. Reading the whole message before replying."), a more stylistically deliberate structure than the 6.5 answer's single listing sentence.7.0分范文把列表拆成了简短独立的片段句("Using the person's name. Reading the whole message before replying."),这是一种比6.5分答案中单一列举句更具文体匠心的结构。
The daughter's reply is my model: a greeting, an apology for the delay, an explanation, thanks for the interest, and only then the answer — respect online is mostly the things that take a few extra seconds. Using the person's name. Reading the whole message before replying. Answering the actual question. Acknowledging a message you can't yet answer, so the other person isn't left guessing. Not writing anything you wouldn't say to their face, and remembering that tone doesn't travel, so a little warmth has to be added on purpose. Most online rudeness is simply speed without care.
查看中文翻译
那位女儿的回复就是我的范本:问候、为延迟道歉、解释原因、感谢对方的关心,然后才是真正的回答——网上的尊重大多就是那些只需多花几秒钟的事。称呼对方的名字。回复前读完整条信息。真正回答提出的问题。对暂时无法回答的信息给予确认,不让对方一直猜测。不写任何你不会当面说的话,并记住语气无法通过文字传递,所以要特意加入一点温度。大多数网上的无礼,说到底只是速度快过了用心。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Most online rudeness is simply speed without care” — This short, aphoristic closing sentence delivers the final generalisation with more punch than the plainer, listing sentences used throughout the 6.5 answer.这个简短、格言式的结尾句以更有力的方式传达了最后的概括,胜过6.5分答案中通篇使用的更平实的列举句。
LR“respect online is mostly the things that take a few extra seconds” — "The things that take a few extra seconds" is a slightly more natural phrasing than the fuller "small things that only take a few extra seconds" used at 6.5."The things that take a few extra seconds"这一表达比6.5分中更完整的"small things that only take a few extra seconds"略显自然。
GRA“Using the person's name. Reading the whole message before replying. Answering the actual question.” — Breaking the list into short, standalone verb-phrase fragments instead of one long comma-joined sentence is a more stylistically varied structure than the single listing sentence used at 6.5.把列表拆分成简短、独立的动词短语片段,而不是一个用逗号连接的长句,这是一种比6.5分中单一列举句更具文体多样性的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer adds the parenthetical aside "it turns out" and closes with the extended reflective phrase "when you get down to it", a small evaluative touch beyond the tidier 7.0 closing sentence.7.5分范文加入了插入语"it turns out",并以扩展的反思性短语"when you get down to it"收尾,这是超越7.0分更简洁收尾句的一点评价性细节。
The daughter's reply is my template for this: a greeting, an apology for the delay, a brief explanation, thanks for the interest, and only then the actual answer — respect online, it turns out, is mostly the handful of things that cost a few extra seconds. Using someone's name. Reading the whole message before firing back a reply. Actually answering the question that was asked. Acknowledging a message you can't yet answer properly, so the other person isn't left guessing in silence. Never writing anything you wouldn't say to their face, and remembering tone simply doesn't travel through text, so a little warmth has to be added on purpose. Most online rudeness, when you get down to it, is really just speed without care.
查看中文翻译
那位女儿的回复就是我的范本:问候、为延迟道歉、简短的解释、感谢对方的关心,然后才是真正的回答——原来网上的尊重,大多就是那么几件只需多花几秒钟的小事。称呼对方的名字。回复前读完整条信息,而不是急着甩回去一句话。真正回答提出的问题。对还不能好好回答的信息给予确认,不让对方在沉默中一直猜测。绝不写任何你不会当面说的话,并记住语气根本无法通过文字传递,所以必须特意加入一点温度。说到底,大多数网上的无礼其实只是速度快过了用心。
为什么是这个分数
FC“respect online, it turns out, is mostly the handful of things that cost a few extra seconds” — The parenthetical aside "it turns out" inserted mid-sentence is a more natural, reflective discourse move than the plainer dash-linked clause used at 7.0.插入句中的插入语"it turns out"是一种比7.0分中更平实的破折号连接从句更自然、更具反思性的话语手法。
LR“firing back a reply” — "Firing back a reply" is a genuinely vivid, idiomatic verb phrase for a quick response, well beyond the plain "replying" used at the lower bands."Firing back a reply"是一个真正生动、地道的动词短语,用来形容快速回应,远胜于较低分段中使用的平实说法"replying"。
GRA“Most online rudeness, when you get down to it, is really just speed without care” — Inserting the parenthetical "when you get down to it" into the closing aphorism is a more developed, flexible construction than the shorter, plainer version of the same sentence used at 7.0.把插入语"when you get down to it"插入结尾的格言句中,是一种比7.0分中同一句子更短、更平实的版本更成熟、更灵活的结构。
5. Do people show more respect when communicating with strangers than with their friends?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct "In form, yes, but... the opposite" opinion and one plain personal example, closing with a simple sentence about neglect introduced by "But".6.5分范文给出了一个直接的观点"In form, yes, but... the opposite",并给出一个平实的个人例子,最后以"But"引出的关于忽视的简单句子收尾。
In form, yes, but in reality, it is often the opposite. I once wrote eleven careful paragraphs to a stranger in Japan, and that same afternoon replied to my friend Linh's long message with just one letter, 'k'. The stranger got my good manners, and my friend got my trust instead. With strangers we are polite because we do not know the rules yet, and there is no relationship to forgive a mistake. With friends we relax because respect is already assumed, and this usually works. But it can become neglect, when friends get the late replies and sharp words.
查看中文翻译
表面上看是的,但实际上往往恰恰相反。我曾经给一个日本的陌生人写了十一段用心措辞的文字,而就在同一天下午,我回复我朋友玲的长信息时只用了一个字母"k"。陌生人得到了我的好礼貌,而我的朋友得到的却是我的信任。对陌生人,我们讲礼貌是因为还不了解彼此的规则,而且也没有一段关系可以去原谅一个失误。对朋友,我们会放松下来,因为尊重已经是默认存在的,而这通常也行得通。但它也可能变成一种忽视,朋友们得到的反而是迟来的回复和尖锐的言辞。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But it can become neglect, when friends get the late replies and sharp words” — The plain contrast connector "But" opening the final sentence delivers the closing point in the simplest way, typical of 6.5's direct, unembellished coherence.用平实的转折连接词"But"开启最后一句,以最简单的方式传达了结尾的论点,体现了6.5分典型的直接、不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“The stranger got my good manners, and my friend got my trust instead” — "Good manners" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "walked away with my manners", which the 7.5 version uses."Good manners"是一种平实、可行的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"walked away with my manners",7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“I once wrote eleven careful paragraphs to a stranger in Japan, and that same afternoon replied to my friend Linh's long message with just one letter, 'k'.” — This sentence links two contrasting actions with the basic connector "and", a straightforward coordination rather than the dash-based structure used at higher bands.这个句子用基础连接词"and"连接两个对比的动作,是一种直白的并列结构,而不是更高分段所使用的基于破折号的结构。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens with the semicolon-joined "In form, yes; in substance, often the opposite" and closes with the fronted clause "Where it goes wrong is when...", a step beyond the plainer, fuller sentences of the 6.5 answer.7.0分范文以分号连接的"In form, yes; in substance, often the opposite"开头,并以前置从句"Where it goes wrong is when..."收尾,比6.5分答案中更平实、更完整的句子更进一步。
In form, yes; in substance, often the opposite. I wrote eleven careful paragraphs to a stranger in Japan and, that same afternoon, replied to Linh's long message with the single letter 'k' — the stranger got my manners and my friend got my trust. With strangers we use politeness because we don't know the rules yet, and because there's no relationship to absorb a mistake. With friends we drop the form because the respect is assumed, and mostly that works. Where it goes wrong is when the assumption becomes neglect, and friends get the late replies and cancelled plans.
查看中文翻译
表面上是的;实质上却往往相反。我给一个在日本的陌生人写了十一段用心措辞的文字,而就在同一天下午,我回复玲的长信息时只用了一个字母"k"——陌生人得到了我的礼貌,我的朋友得到的却是我的信任。对陌生人,我们讲礼貌是因为还不了解规则,也因为没有一段关系可以去消化一个失误。对朋友,我们会卸下礼节,因为尊重已经是被默认的,而这大多数时候也行得通。出问题的地方在于,当这种默认变成忽视时,朋友们得到的就是迟来的回复和被取消的计划。
为什么是这个分数
FC“In form, yes; in substance, often the opposite” — The semicolon joining two balanced, parallel fragments delivers the opening contrast with more sophistication than the fuller, comma-joined sentence used at 6.5.用分号连接两个平衡的、对称的短句,以更成熟的方式呈现了开头的对比,胜过6.5分中更完整的、用逗号连接的句子。
LR“there's no relationship to absorb a mistake” — "Absorb a mistake" is a more vivid, figurative phrase than the plainer "forgive a mistake" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Absorb a mistake"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"forgive a mistake"更生动、更具比喻性的短语。
GRA“Where it goes wrong is when the assumption becomes neglect, and friends get the late replies and cancelled plans.” — Fronting "Where it goes wrong is when..." instead of a plain "But it can become neglect, when..." clause is a moderately more sophisticated construction than the version used at 6.5.用前置结构"Where it goes wrong is when..."代替平实的"But it can become neglect, when..."从句,是一种比6.5分所用版本稍微更成熟一些的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid verb "curdles" for the moment respect turns bad and closes with the compact participial phrase "friends quietly inheriting the late replies... a stranger would never be risked with", instead of a plain "and" clause.7.5分范文用生动的动词"curdles"来形容尊重变质的那一刻,并以紧凑的分词短语"friends quietly inheriting the late replies... a stranger would never be risked with"收尾,而不是用一个平实的"and"从句。
In form, certainly; in substance, very often the opposite. I once wrote eleven painstaking paragraphs to a stranger in Japan and, that same afternoon, fired off a reply to Linh's long message consisting of the single letter 'k' — the stranger walked away with my manners, and my closest friend got my trust instead. With strangers we deploy politeness because we don't yet know the rules, and there's no relationship built up to absorb a slip. With friends we drop the formality because respect is simply assumed, and most of the time that holds up fine. It curdles, though, the moment that assumption tips into neglect — friends quietly inheriting the late replies, the sharp words, the cancelled plans a stranger would never be risked with.
查看中文翻译
表面上,当然是的;实质上,却往往恰恰相反。我曾经给一个在日本的陌生人写了十一段字斟句酌的文字,而就在同一天下午,我给玲的长信息回了一封只有一个字母"k"的信——陌生人带走了我的礼貌,而我最亲密的朋友得到的却是我的信任。对陌生人,我们施展礼貌,是因为还不了解规则,也没有积累起足够的关系来消化一个小失误。对朋友,我们卸下礼节的外衣,因为尊重已经被简单地默认了,而大多数时候这也确实行得通。可一旦这种默认变成了忽视,事情就会变质——朋友们悄悄承受着那些迟来的回复、尖锐的话语,以及那些永远不会拿去冒险试探陌生人的、被取消的计划。
为什么是这个分数
FC“It curdles, though, the moment that assumption tips into neglect” — The vivid verb "curdles" opening this final sentence delivers the turning point with more sophistication than the plainer "Where it goes wrong is" phrasing used at 7.0.用生动的动词"curdles"开启这最后一句,以更成熟的方式呈现了转折点,胜过7.0分中更平实的"Where it goes wrong is"表达。
LR“the stranger walked away with my manners, and my closest friend got my trust instead” — "Walked away with" is a genuinely vivid, idiomatic phrase for what someone ends up receiving, well beyond the plain "got" used at the lower bands."Walked away with"是一个真正生动、地道的短语,用来形容某人最终得到了什么,远胜于较低分段中使用的平实说法"got"。
GRA“friends quietly inheriting the late replies, the sharp words, the cancelled plans a stranger would never be risked with” — This participial phrase ("friends quietly inheriting...") compresses an entire final clause into a compact construction, more economical than the plain "and friends get the late replies..." clause used at 7.0.这个分词短语("friends quietly inheriting...")把整个结尾从句压缩成一个紧凑的结构,比7.0分中平实的"and friends get the late replies..."从句更精炼。
6. Has modern communications technology made it acceptable to ignore people?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct opinion ("I think it has made ignoring people easier") and closes with a simple, plain restatement of the same idea, using basic vocabulary throughout.6.5分范文以一个直接的观点开头("I think it has made ignoring people easier"),并以对同一想法的简单、平实的重述收尾,全文使用基础词汇。
I think it has made ignoring people easier, but also more visible at the same time. The 'seen' mark under a message turns silence from something that might be an accident into something that is clearly a choice, which actually makes people feel more hurt when ignored, not less. On the other hand, because there are so many messages now, people have accepted that not everything can be answered, so some ignoring is forgiven that would have seemed rude before. I think technology has made ignoring normal, without really making it acceptable.
查看中文翻译
我认为科技让忽视别人变得更容易,但同时也让这种忽视变得更明显。信息下方的"已读"标记,把沉默从一种可能只是意外的事,变成了一种明显是刻意选择的事,这其实让人被忽视时感觉更受伤,而不是更轻松。另一方面,因为现在信息量太大,人们已经接受了不是所有信息都能被回复,所以一些原本会显得无礼的忽视,现在反而被原谅了。我认为科技让忽视变得普遍,却并没有真正让它变得可以被接受。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I think technology has made ignoring normal, without really making it acceptable” — This closing sentence, opened with the plain phrase "I think", delivers the final restatement in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这个结尾句以平实的短语"I think"开头,以最直接的方式传达了最后的重述,体现了6.5分典型的不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“which actually makes people feel more hurt when ignored, not less” — "Makes people feel more hurt" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "left people more wounded", which the 7.5 version uses."Makes people feel more hurt"是一种平实、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"left people more wounded",7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“On the other hand, because there are so many messages now, people have accepted that not everything can be answered, so some ignoring is forgiven that would have seemed rude before.” — This long sentence chains ideas together with "because" and "so", a workable but somewhat mechanical structure compared to the more varied phrasing at higher bands.这个长句用"because"和"so"把几个想法串联在一起,这种结构虽然可行,但相较于更高分段更富变化的表达,显得有些机械。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens directly with "It's made ignoring easier" instead of a hedged "I think" opening, and uses the sophisticated "not so much X as Y" contrast, a step beyond the plainer 6.5 phrasing.7.0分范文直接以"It's made ignoring easier"开头,而不是用带缓冲语的"I think"开头,并使用了成熟的"not so much X as Y"对比结构,比6.5分更平实的表达更进一步。
It's made ignoring easier and, strangely, more visible at the same time. The 'seen' receipt under a message turns silence from something that might be an accident into something that's clearly a choice, and that has made people more hurt by being ignored, not less — technology hasn't made it acceptable so much as made it undeniable. On the other hand, the sheer volume of messages has produced a quiet consensus that not everything can be answered, and some ignoring is now forgiven that once would have been an insult. I'd say technology has made ignoring people normal without making it acceptable.
查看中文翻译
科技让忽视别人变得更容易,而奇怪的是,同时也让它变得更明显。信息下方的"已读"回执,把沉默从一种可能只是意外的事,变成了一种明显是刻意选择的事,这让人被忽视时感觉更受伤,而不是更轻松——科技与其说是让这种行为变得可以接受,不如说是让它变得无可否认。另一方面,信息量之大产生了一种无声的共识,那就是不是所有信息都能被回复,于是一些原本会被视为羞辱的忽视,现在反而被原谅了。我会说,科技让忽视别人变得普遍,却并没有让它变得可以接受。
为什么是这个分数
FC“technology hasn't made it acceptable so much as made it undeniable” — The "not so much X as Y" construction manages the nuanced contrast more elegantly than the plainer "without really making it acceptable" phrase used at 6.5."not so much X as Y"这种结构以更优雅的方式处理了这种微妙的对比,胜过6.5分中更平实的"without really making it acceptable"短语。
LR“the sheer volume of messages has produced a quiet consensus” — "A quiet consensus" is a more precise, abstract phrase than the vaguer "people have accepted" used at 6.5 for the same idea."A quiet consensus"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更模糊的"people have accepted"更精确、更抽象的短语。
GRA“that has made people more hurt by being ignored, not less — technology hasn't made it acceptable so much as made it undeniable” — The dash linking the observation directly to its sharper restatement is a more compact, integrated structure than the separate, comma-heavy sentence used at 6.5.用破折号把这个观察直接连接到其更犀利的重述上,这是一种比6.5分中独立、逗号较多的句子更紧凑、更融合的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the precise verb "legalised" figuratively and closes with the vivid metaphor "a lot of modern hurt lives in that gap", the kind of evaluative, idiomatic phrasing that marks the top band.7.5分范文以比喻方式使用了精确的动词"legalised",并以生动的比喻"a lot of modern hurt lives in that gap"收尾,这正是标志着最高分段的那种带有评价性、地道的表达方式。
It's made ignoring easier and, oddly, far more visible at the same time. The 'seen' receipt sitting under a message turns silence from something that might once have been an accident into something unmistakably a choice, and that shift has left people more wounded by being ignored, not less — technology hasn't so much legalised it as made it impossible to deny. Conversely, the sheer volume of messages now flying around has produced a quiet consensus that not everything deserves an answer, so a certain amount of ignoring gets forgiven that once would have counted as an insult. Technology, I'd say, has normalised ignoring people without ever actually making it acceptable, and a lot of modern hurt lives in that gap.
查看中文翻译
科技让忽视别人变得更容易,而奇怪的是,同时也让它变得远比以前更明显。信息下方那个"已读"回执,把沉默从一种曾经可能只是意外的事,变成了一种毫无疑问是刻意选择的事,这种转变让人被忽视时感觉更受伤,而不是更轻松——与其说科技让这种行为合法化了,不如说是让它变得无可否认。反过来看,如今满天飞的信息量之大,催生出了一种无声的共识,那就是不是所有信息都值得被回复,于是一定程度的忽视现在也能被原谅,而这在过去可是会被当作一种羞辱的。我想说,科技让忽视别人变得正常化,却始终没有真正让它变得可以接受,而如今许多现代人的伤痛,就活在这道裂缝之中。
为什么是这个分数
FC“a lot of modern hurt lives in that gap” — The metaphor "lives in that gap" delivering the final generalisation is a more sophisticated, essay-like closing image than the plainer sentences used at the lower bands for the same idea.用比喻"lives in that gap"来传达最后的概括,这是一种比较低分段中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的句子更成熟、更具论说文风格的收尾意象。
LR“technology hasn't so much legalised it as made it impossible to deny” — "Legalised" applied figuratively to a social behaviour is a genuinely less-common, precise word choice, well beyond the plain "made it acceptable" used at the lower bands.把"Legalised"以比喻方式用在一种社会行为上,是一个真正不常见、精确的用词选择,远胜于较低分段中使用的平实说法"made it acceptable"。
GRA“that shift has left people more wounded by being ignored, not less” — "Left people more wounded" is a more vivid, figurative phrase than the plainer "made people more hurt" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Left people more wounded"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"made people more hurt"更生动、更具比喻性的短语。
7. Are body language and tone more important than words when communicating?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct "For feeling, yes, but for facts, no" opinion and one plain personal example, closing with a simple contrasting sentence using "But".6.5分范文给出了一个直接的观点"For feeling, yes, but for facts, no",并给出一个平实的个人例子,最后以"But"引出的简单转折句收尾。
For feeling, yes, but for facts, no. I once read seven weeks of silence as rejection, and when the words finally came, they were actually full of warmth. With no tone to guide me, I had imagined one myself, and it was wrong. In person, tone and facial expressions carry most of what people feel, and the same sentence can sound like a joke or a threat depending on someone's face. This is why messages cause so many misunderstandings, the words arrive without any tone. But words still carry the actual information, like the time of a meeting.
查看中文翻译
在情感表达上是的,但在事实传递上则不然。我曾经把七周的沉默解读为拒绝,结果当文字终于传来时,里面其实满是温暖。因为没有语气可以引导我,我自己想象出了一种语气,而那是错的。面对面交流时,语气和表情承载了人们大部分的感受,同一句话根据一个人的表情,可能听起来像玩笑,也可能像威胁。这就是为什么信息会造成这么多误解,因为文字传来时没有任何语气。但文字仍然承载着真正的信息,比如会议的时间。
为什么是这个分数
FC“This is why messages cause so many misunderstandings, the words arrive without any tone” — This sentence links two ideas with a comma rather than a clearer connector, a basic and slightly loose way of linking ideas typical of 6.5.这个句子用逗号而不是更清晰的连接词来连接两个想法,这是一种基础且略显松散的连接方式,是6.5分的典型特征。
LR“With no tone to guide me, I had imagined one myself, and it was wrong” — "Imagined one myself" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "I'd invented one", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Imagined one myself"是一种平实、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"I'd invented one",7.0/7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“In person, tone and facial expressions carry most of what people feel, and the same sentence can sound like a joke or a threat depending on someone's face.” — This sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "and", a straightforward coordination rather than the more compressed phrasing used at higher bands.这个句子用基础连接词"and"连接两个想法,是一种直白的并列结构,而不是更高分段所使用的更精炼的表达。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the semicolon to balance the opening contrast and the vivid metaphor "the words arrive without the music", a step beyond the plainer, fuller sentences of the 6.5 answer.7.0分范文用分号来平衡开头的对比,并使用了生动的比喻"the words arrive without the music",比6.5分答案中更平实、更完整的句子更进一步。
For feeling, yes; for facts, no. I read seven weeks of silence as rejection, and when the words finally came they were nothing but warmth — with no tone to go on, I had invented one, and it was wrong. In person, tone and face carry most of what people feel, and the same sentence can be a joke or a threat depending on the eyes. That's why messages cause so many arguments: the words arrive without the music. But words carry the content, and no amount of warm tone tells you what time the meeting is. Where they conflict, people believe the body.
查看中文翻译
在情感上是的;在事实上则不是。我把七周的沉默解读为拒绝,结果当文字终于传来时,里面满满都是温暖——没有语气可以依凭,我自己想象出了一种,而那是错的。面对面交流时,语气和表情承载了人们大部分的感受,同一句话可能是玩笑,也可能是威胁,全看一个人的眼神。这就是为什么信息会引发这么多争吵:文字传来时没有旋律相伴。但文字仍然承载着内容,再温暖的语气也不会告诉你会议是几点。当两者冲突时,人们相信的是身体语言。
为什么是这个分数
FC“That's why messages cause so many arguments: the words arrive without the music” — The colon introducing the metaphor "the words arrive without the music" delivers the explanation with more sophistication than the comma-linked, plainer sentence used at 6.5.用冒号引出比喻"the words arrive without the music",以更成熟的方式传达了这一解释,胜过6.5分中用逗号连接的更平实的句子。
LR“the same sentence can be a joke or a threat depending on the eyes” — "Depending on the eyes" is a more vivid, concrete image than the plainer "depending on someone's face" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Depending on the eyes"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"depending on someone's face"更生动、更具体的意象。
GRA“Where they conflict, people believe the body.” — This short, fronted conditional sentence ("Where they conflict...") is a more compact structure than the fuller sentences used at 6.5 to express similar ideas.这个简短的前置条件句("Where they conflict...")是一种比6.5分中用来表达类似想法的更完整的句子更紧凑的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer intensifies the opening contrast with "absolutely... not remotely" and closes with the trailing emphatic fragment "every time", the kind of precise, confident closing touch that marks the top band.7.5分范文用"absolutely... not remotely"强化了开头的对比,并以结尾的强调性片段"every time"收尾,这正是标志着最高分段的那种精确、自信的收尾手法。
For feeling, absolutely; for facts, not remotely. I once read seven weeks of silence as outright rejection, and when the words finally arrived they turned out to be nothing but warmth — with no tone to work from, I'd simply invented one, and got it badly wrong. In person, tone and face carry most of what people actually feel, and identical sentences can land as a joke or a threat depending purely on the eyes behind them. That's precisely why messages spark so many arguments: the words show up without the music underneath them. But words still carry the content itself, and no amount of warmth in someone's voice tells you what time the meeting starts. Where the two conflict, people believe the body, every time.
查看中文翻译
在情感上,绝对是的;在事实上,则完全不是。我曾经把七周的沉默解读为彻头彻尾的拒绝,结果当文字终于传来时,里面竟然满满都是温暖——没有语气可以作为依据,我干脆自己想象出了一种,结果大错特错。面对面交流时,语气和表情承载了人们大部分的真实感受,一模一样的句子,可能听起来是玩笑,也可能是威胁,全凭说话人眼神背后的东西而定。这正是为什么信息会引发这么多争吵:文字出现时,底下并没有旋律相伴。但文字仍然承载着内容本身,再温暖的语气也不会告诉你会议几点开始。每当两者发生冲突,人们相信的永远是身体语言。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Where the two conflict, people believe the body, every time” — The trailing fragment "every time" tacked onto the closing sentence delivers the final point with more emphatic confidence than the plainer, unembellished version of the same sentence used at 7.0.附加在结尾句后面的片段"every time"以更强调、更自信的方式传达了最后的论点,胜过7.0分中同一句子更平实、不加修饰的版本。
LR“For feeling, absolutely; for facts, not remotely” — "Not remotely" is a genuinely emphatic, idiomatic intensifier, well beyond the plain "no" used at 6.5 for the same contrast."Not remotely"是一个真正强调、地道的强化词,远胜于6.5分中表达同一对比时使用的平实说法"no"。
GRA“identical sentences can land as a joke or a threat depending purely on the eyes behind them” — "Land as" is a precise, figurative verb choice for how a sentence is received, a more economical construction than the plainer "can sound like" or "can be" phrasing used at the lower bands."Land as"是一个精确、具比喻性的动词选择,用来形容一句话是如何被接收的,是一种比较低分段中使用的更平实的"can sound like"或"can be"表达更精炼的结构。
8. If people learned to communicate more effectively, could all disagreements be avoided?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct "No" answer with one plain example, and closes with a simple final sentence linking two ideas with "and".6.5分范文给出了直接的"No"回答,并配有一个平实的例子,最后以"and"连接两个想法的简单句子收尾。
No, because a client once understood my typography argument completely and still wanted the design he originally wanted. That was a disagreement about taste, not about communication failing. Better communication would remove many conflicts, because a lot of arguments happen just because two people mean different things by the same word, or react to a tone that was not intended. It would make the remaining disagreements cleaner and kinder. But people genuinely want different things sometimes, like money or different plans for the future, and understanding someone perfectly does not always mean you agree with them.
查看中文翻译
不会,因为有一次一位客户完全理解了我的排版论点,却仍然想要他一开始就想要的那个设计。那是一场关于品味的分歧,而不是沟通失败。更好的沟通能消除很多冲突,因为很多争论的发生,只是因为两个人对同一个词的理解不同,或者对一种并非本意的语气做出了反应。它会让剩下的分歧变得更干净、更友善。但有时人们真的想要不同的东西,比如钱,或者对未来有不同的规划,而完全理解一个人,并不总是意味着你会同意他。
为什么是这个分数
FC“understanding someone perfectly does not always mean you agree with them” — This closing clause, joined to the previous idea with the basic connector "and", delivers the final point in a plain, direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这个结尾从句用基础连接词"and"与前一个想法相连,以平实、直接的方式传达了最后的论点,体现了6.5分典型的不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“a lot of arguments happen just because two people mean different things by the same word” — "A lot of arguments" is plain, general vocabulary; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "a surprising share of arguments", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."A lot of arguments"是一种平实、笼统的词汇;更高分段会选用更精确的短语,如"a surprising share of arguments",7.0/7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“No, because a client once understood my typography argument completely and still wanted the design he originally wanted.” — This sentence links its ideas with the plain connector "and", a straightforward coordination rather than the more compressed phrasing used at higher bands.这个句子用平实的连接词"and"连接各个想法,是一种直白的并列结构,而不是更高分段所使用的更精炼的表达。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the dash to link the example directly to its claim and the colon to introduce a compact list ("money, land, different futures..."), a step beyond the plainer, comma-based 6.5 sentence.7.0分范文用破折号把例子直接与其论点相连,并用冒号引出一个紧凑的列表("money, land, different futures..."),比6.5分中更平实的、以逗号为主的句子更进一步。
No — the seafood client understood my typography argument perfectly and still wanted the one he wanted, and that was a disagreement about taste, not a failure of communication. Better communication would remove a great many conflicts, because a surprising share of arguments are two people meaning different things by the same word, or reacting to a tone that wasn't intended. It would make the remaining disagreements cleaner and kinder. But people genuinely want different things: money, land, different futures for the same country. Perfect understanding of an opponent's position doesn't make you agree with it.
查看中文翻译
不会——那位做海鲜生意的客户完全理解了我的排版论点,却仍然想要他一开始就想要的那个,而那是一场关于品味的分歧,不是沟通的失败。更好的沟通能消除很多冲突,因为出乎意料的一大部分争论,都是两个人对同一个词有着不同的理解,或者对一种并非本意的语气做出了反应。它会让剩下的分歧变得更干净、更友善。但人们有时真的想要不同的东西:金钱、土地,或是对同一个国家有着不同的未来规划。完全理解对方的立场,并不会让你因此就同意它。
为什么是这个分数
FC“No — the seafood client understood my typography argument perfectly and still wanted the one he wanted, and that was a disagreement about taste, not a failure of communication” — The dash linking the specific example directly to the opening "No" is a more compact, integrated structure than the fuller "No, because..." sentence used at 6.5.用破折号把具体的例子直接与开头的"No"相连,这是一种比6.5分中更完整的"No, because..."句子更紧凑、更融合的结构。
LR“a surprising share of arguments are two people meaning different things by the same word” — "A surprising share of" is a more precise, reflective phrase than the vaguer "a lot of" used at 6.5 for the same idea."A surprising share of"是一个比6.5分中表达同一意思时使用的更模糊的"a lot of"更精确、更具反思性的短语。
GRA“But people genuinely want different things: money, land, different futures for the same country.” — The colon introducing a compact list of examples is a more efficient structure than the fuller "like money or different plans for the future" phrase used at 6.5.用冒号引出一个紧凑的例子列表,这是一种比6.5分中更完整的"like money or different plans for the future"短语更高效的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid verb "dissolve" and closes with the semicolon-joined extra clause "sometimes it only sharpens the disagreement", a small evaluative addition beyond the tidier endings of the lower bands.7.5分范文使用了生动的动词"dissolve",并以分号连接的额外从句"sometimes it only sharpens the disagreement"收尾,这是超越较低分段更简洁结尾的一点评价性补充。
No — the seafood client understood my typography argument down to the last detail and still wanted the typeface he'd wanted from the start, and that was a disagreement about taste, not a breakdown in communication. Better communication would dissolve a great many conflicts, since a surprising share of arguments boil down to two people meaning different things by the same word, or reacting to a tone nobody intended. It would leave the remaining disagreements cleaner, at least, and kinder. But people genuinely want incompatible things sometimes — money, land, the last piece of fish, different futures for the same country — and understanding an opponent's position perfectly doesn't make you agree with it; sometimes it only sharpens the disagreement.
查看中文翻译
不会——那位做海鲜生意的客户把我的排版论点理解到了每一个细节,却仍然想要他从一开始就想要的那款字体,而那是一场关于品味的分歧,不是沟通上的破裂。更好的沟通能化解掉很多冲突,因为出乎意料的一大部分争论,归根结底都是两个人对同一个词有着不同的理解,或者对一种谁都没有的本意的语气做出了反应。至少它会让剩下的分歧变得更干净、更友善。但有时人们真的想要互不相容的东西——金钱、土地、最后那一份鱼、对同一个国家的不同未来规划——完全理解对方的立场,并不会让你因此就同意它;有时反而只会让分歧变得更加尖锐。
为什么是这个分数
FC“understanding an opponent's position perfectly doesn't make you agree with it; sometimes it only sharpens the disagreement” — This extra semicolon-joined clause, absent from the lower bands, adds a genuinely paradoxical final observation, showing sophisticated command of tone right to the end.这个用分号连接的额外从句,在较低分段中并不存在,它加入了一个真正带有悖论意味的结尾观察,展现出对语气的成熟掌控,直到最后一句依然如此。
LR“Better communication would dissolve a great many conflicts” — "Dissolve" is a more vivid, figurative verb than the plainer "remove" used at the lower bands for the same idea."Dissolve"是一个比较低分段中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"remove"更生动、更具比喻性的动词。
GRA“the seafood client understood my typography argument down to the last detail and still wanted the typeface he'd wanted from the start” — "Down to the last detail" compresses the idea of complete, thorough understanding into one compact phrase, a more economical construction than the plainer "completely" or "perfectly" used at the lower bands."Down to the last detail"把彻底、完全理解这一概念压缩进一个紧凑的短语中,是一种比较低分段中使用的更平实的"completely"或"perfectly"更精炼的结构。
9. Will artificial intelligence have a positive or negative effect on communication in the future?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct "Both" answer and gives two plain contrasting examples, closing with a simple summary sentence using "but".6.5分范文以直接的"Both"回答开头,给出两个平实的对比例子,最后以"but"连接的简单总结句收尾。
Both, and I have already experienced both sides of it. A translation tool is the only reason I could write to a man in Kanazawa at all, and that is a real benefit AI has given me, across languages and for people who struggle to express themselves. But the client emails I now get that were clearly written by AI all sound like the same polite stranger, and something is lost when everyone sounds the same. There is a risk that people stop practising how to express themselves. I think it is positive for reaching people, but uncertain for depth.
查看中文翻译
两者皆有,而我已经亲身经历过这两方面。翻译工具是我唯一能够给金泽的一位男士写信的原因,这是人工智能带给我的一项真实的好处,跨越了语言,也帮助了那些不擅长表达自己的人。但我现在收到的客户邮件,一看就是人工智能写的,听起来都像同一个礼貌的陌生人,而当所有人听起来都一样时,总有些东西被丢失了。存在这样一种风险,那就是人们不再练习如何表达自己。我认为它在触达他人方面是积极的,但在深度方面则不确定。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I think it is positive for reaching people, but uncertain for depth” — This closing sentence, opened with the plain phrase "I think" and linked with "but", delivers the final summary in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这个结尾句以平实的短语"I think"开头,并用"but"连接,以最直接的方式传达了最后的总结,体现了6.5分典型的不加修饰的连贯性。
LR“something is lost when everyone sounds the same” — "Everyone sounds the same" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "every voice is smoothed to the same finish", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Everyone sounds the same"是一种平实、可行的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的短语,如"every voice is smoothed to the same finish",7.0/7.5版本中正是如此使用的。
GRA“A translation tool is the only reason I could write to a man in Kanazawa at all, and that is a real benefit AI has given me, across languages and for people who struggle to express themselves.” — This sentence links its ideas with the basic connector "and", a straightforward coordination rather than the more compressed phrasing used at higher bands.这个句子用基础连接词"and"连接各个想法,是一种直白的并列结构,而不是更高分段所使用的更精炼的表达。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the vivid metaphor "a door AI opened" and closes with the compact, semicolon-joined final sentence "Positive for reach; uncertain for depth", a step beyond the fuller, plainer 6.5 sentence.7.0分范文使用了生动的比喻"a door AI opened",并以紧凑的、用分号连接的结尾句"Positive for reach; uncertain for depth"收尾,比6.5分更完整、更平实的句子更进一步。
Both, and I've already felt both. A translation tool is the only reason I could write to a man in Kanazawa at all, and that's a door AI opened that was closed to me before — across languages, for people with disabilities, for anyone who struggles to find words, the gain is enormous. But the client emails I now receive that were clearly drafted by AI all sound like the same polite nobody, and something is lost when everyone's voice is smoothed to the same finish. There's a risk that people stop developing the skill of expressing themselves. Positive for reach; uncertain for depth.
查看中文翻译
两者皆有,而我已经亲身感受过这两方面。翻译工具是我唯一能够给金泽的一位男士写信的原因,这是人工智能为我打开的一扇原本对我关闭的门——跨越语言,帮助残障人士,也帮助任何在遣词造句上感到吃力的人,这种收获是巨大的。但我现在收到的客户邮件,一看就是人工智能起草的,听起来都像同一个礼貌的无名氏,而当每个人的声音都被打磨成同一种光滑的质地时,总有些东西被丢失了。存在这样一种风险,那就是人们不再培养表达自己的能力。它在触达范围上是积极的;但在深度上则不确定。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Positive for reach; uncertain for depth” — This short, semicolon-joined closing sentence delivers the final judgment with a compact, almost aphoristic rhythm well beyond the fuller "I think it is positive for reaching people, but uncertain for depth" sentence used at 6.5.这个用分号连接的简短结尾句,以一种紧凑、近乎格言式的节奏传达了最后的判断,远胜于6.5分中更完整的"I think it is positive for reaching people, but uncertain for depth"句子。
LR“the client emails I now receive that were clearly drafted by AI all sound like the same polite nobody” — "The same polite nobody" is a vivid, slightly witty phrase, well beyond the plainer "the same polite stranger" used at 6.5."The same polite nobody"是一个生动、略带机智的短语,远胜于6.5分中使用的更平实的"the same polite stranger"。
GRA“that's a door AI opened that was closed to me before” — The metaphor "a door AI opened that was closed to me before" compresses the idea of newly gained access into one vivid image, a more economical construction than the plainer "a real benefit AI has given me" phrase used at 6.5.比喻"a door AI opened that was closed to me before"把新获得的机会这一概念压缩进一个生动的意象中,是一种比6.5分中更平实的"a real benefit AI has given me"短语更精炼的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the precise verb "prised open" and the vivid phrase "sanded down to the same smooth finish", adding the extra reflective risk about never knowing "whether it's a person or a machine", a small evaluative touch beyond the tidier 7.0 closing.7.5分范文使用了精确的动词"prised open"和生动的短语"sanded down to the same smooth finish",并额外加入了一个反思性的风险,即永远无法确定"whether it's a person or a machine",这是超越7.0分更简洁收尾的一点评价性细节。
Both, and I've already lived both sides of it. A translation tool is the sole reason I could write to a man in Kanazawa at all, and that's a door AI prised open that had previously been shut to me — across languages, for people with disabilities, for anyone who struggles to find the right words, the gain is genuinely enormous. But the client emails now landing in my inbox, obviously AI-drafted, all sound like the same polite nobody, and something gets lost when every voice is sanded down to the same smooth finish. There's a real risk people stop developing the skill of expressing themselves, and a risk of never quite knowing whether it's a person or a machine on the other end. Positive for reach; genuinely uncertain for depth.
查看中文翻译
两者皆有,而我已经亲身经历过这两方面。翻译工具是我唯一能够给金泽的一位男士写信的原因,这是人工智能撬开的一扇原本对我紧闭的门——跨越语言,帮助残障人士,也帮助任何在寻找恰当词语上感到吃力的人,这种收获是真真切切巨大的。但如今出现在我收件箱里的客户邮件,显然是人工智能起草的,听起来都像同一个礼貌的无名氏,而当每一种声音都被打磨成同一种光滑质地时,总有些东西会消失。这里存在一个真实的风险,那就是人们不再培养表达自己的能力,还有一个风险是,你永远无法真正确定对方到底是一个人还是一台机器。在触达范围上是积极的;但在深度上则确实不确定。
为什么是这个分数
FC“There's a real risk people stop developing the skill of expressing themselves, and a risk of never quite knowing whether it's a person or a machine on the other end” — This extended second risk clause, absent from the 7.0 answer's shorter version, adds a genuinely reflective extra layer, showing sophisticated development of the argument right to the end.这个扩展的第二个风险从句,在7.0分答案更短的版本中并不存在,它加入了一层真正具有反思性的额外内容,展现出论证的成熟发展,直到最后一句依然如此。
LR“that's a door AI prised open that had previously been shut to me” — "Prised open" is a genuinely vivid, physical verb for forcing something open, well beyond the plainer "opened" used at 7.0 for the same idea."Prised open"是一个真正生动、具有物理动作感的动词,用来形容强行打开某物,远胜于7.0分中表达同一意思时使用的更平实的"opened"。
GRA“something gets lost when every voice is sanded down to the same smooth finish” — "Sanded down to the same smooth finish" compresses the idea of homogenised writing into one vivid, extended metaphor, a more economical and figurative construction than the plainer "smoothed to the same finish" phrase used at 7.0."Sanded down to the same smooth finish"把文字风格趋同这一概念压缩进一个生动的扩展比喻中,是一种比7.0分中更平实的"smoothed to the same finish"短语更精炼、更具比喻性的结构。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？: 讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？: 在"A Time When You Wrote a Message and Had to Wait a Long Time for a Reply"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？: 是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。