这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？

讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。

这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？

在"A Time When You Worked With Other People in a Group"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。

这张题卡还在使用吗？

是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。

IELTS Speaking Part 2

A Time When You Worked With Other People in a Group

最近一次出现于 2026年9–12月当前在用

题卡

Describe a time when you worked with other people in a group.

You should say:

when and where you worked with the group
what the group was doing
how successful the group was
and explain how you felt about working with the group.

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

The account of the clean-up is told in simple, sequential sentences with one plain reason for feeling proud, typical of Band 6.5.关于这次清理活动的叙述用简单、按顺序排列的句子讲述,并用一个平实的理由来说明为什么感到自豪,是6.5分的典型特征。

The group activity I want to talk about happened about two months ago, on a Sunday morning at My Khe Beach, where I usually run at weekends.

A running club I sometimes join, led by a woman named Phương, organised a beach clean-up instead of the usual run that day. About fifteen of us met early, before the sun got too strong, wearing gloves and carrying big plastic bags that Phương had brought along.

We split into small groups and walked along different parts of the beach, picking up plastic bottles, bags, and cigarette ends. By nine o'clock we had filled around twenty bags between us. It was more successful than I expected, honestly, because the beach looked noticeably cleaner by the time we finished, and a couple of tourists even stopped to thank us.

I felt quite proud afterwards, because normally I just run past all that rubbish without really noticing it. Working with the group made me pay proper attention, and doing it together with other people made the whole thing feel faster and more enjoyable than doing it alone.

查看中文翻译

我想说的团队活动发生在大约两个月前，一个星期天的早上，在我平时周末常去跑步的美溪海滩。

一个我偶尔参加的跑步俱乐部，由一位叫Phương的女生带领，那天没有像平时一样跑步，而是组织了一次海滩清洁活动。我们大概十五个人趁太阳还没那么大就早早集合，戴上手套，拿着Phương带来的大塑料袋。

我们分成几个小组，沿着海滩不同的地方走，捡塑料瓶、塑料袋和烟头。到九点的时候，我们大概一起装满了二十个袋子。这比我预想的成功很多，说实话，因为等我们结束的时候，海滩看起来明显干净了不少，甚至有几个游客停下来向我们道谢。

事后我感到挺自豪的，因为平时我跑步经过那些垃圾时，其实并没有真正注意到它们。和大家一起干活让我真正留意起来，而且大家一起做这件事，比一个人做要快得多，也开心得多。

182 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

LR“picking up plastic bottles, bags, and cigarette ends” — This is a straightforward three-item list of concrete, common nouns describing the litter collected, using no more specific waste-related vocabulary ("debris," "litter" as a collective term) than what's strictly needed to be understood. The specificity of the items themselves (bottles, bags, cigarette ends) gives the sentence real texture despite the plain vocabulary, showing that concrete detail rather than lexical sophistication is doing the descriptive work here — exactly the trade-off the Band 6.5 descriptor implies is acceptable.这是一个简单直接的三项列举,用具体常见的名词描述收集到的垃圾,没有使用比理解所需更专业的垃圾相关词汇("debris"、作为集合名词的"litter")。物品本身的具体性(瓶子、袋子、烟蒂)让句子有了真实的质感,尽管词汇很朴素,这说明在这里起描述作用的是具体细节而非词汇的精巧程度——这正是6.5分描述中默许的那种取舍。
GRA“By nine o'clock we had filled around twenty bags between us.” — The past perfect "had filled" is used correctly to mark the completion of the action by a specific point in time ("by nine o'clock"), a genuinely useful and accurately handled tense, even though the sentence around it is otherwise a single simple statement with no subordinate clause. The precise numbers ("nine o'clock," "twenty bags") give the sentence real specificity, but grammatically it remains a self-contained, single-clause sentence, representative of the basic-but-accurate structures the Band 6.5 descriptor expects.过去完成时"had filled"被正确地用来标记动作在某个具体时间点("by nine o'clock")之前已经完成,这是一种真正有用且运用准确的时态,尽管句子的其余部分只是一个没有从句的简单陈述句。精确的数字("nine o'clock"、"twenty bags")让句子具有真实的具体感,但从语法上看,它依然是一个自成一体的单句结构,正代表了6.5分描述所期望的那种基础但准确的句式。
FC“I felt quite proud afterwards, because normally I just run past all that rubbish without really noticing it.” — The speaker states the feeling ("proud") and immediately attaches one because-clause to explain it by contrasting the clean-up day with her normal habit of running past litter unnoticed. This single-reason, self-contrastive move gives the closing reflection some genuine substance without building it into a longer, more layered point, fitting the Band 6.5 pattern of developing an answer with exactly one clear reason rather than multiple connected ideas.说话人说出感受("proud")后,立刻用一个because从句来解释,通过把清理日与自己平时跑步时对垃圾视而不见的习惯做对比。这种单一理由、自我对照式的手法,为结尾的反思增添了一些真实的分量,却没有把它发展成更长、更多层次的论点,正符合6.5分那种用恰好一个明确理由而非多个相互关联的想法来展开答案的模式。

7.0 分

The answer develops the outcome with a specific concrete shift (shy children ending up teaching the volunteers Vietnamese words) and closes with a reflection on group problem-solving, giving fuller development than the 6.5 answer's more linear account.答案通过一个具体而生动的转变(害羞的孩子最后反过来教志愿者越南语单词)来展开结果,并以一段关于团队解决问题的反思收尾,比6.5分答案那种更线性的叙述展现出更充分的发展。

The group I'd talk about was six volunteers, including me, who spent a Saturday teaching basic English to primary school children in a small village about an hour outside Da Nang, organised through a group I follow online.

It was back in June, during the summer holidays, and the group was led by a university student called Trang, who'd grown up in a similar village herself and wanted to give something back before starting her final year.

What the group was doing was running simple English games and songs for around forty children split into two age groups, since none of us were trained teachers and a full lesson would probably have been too much for a single afternoon. I was put in charge of the younger group, teaching basic animal names and colours through drawing games, while the older group learned simple greetings and short conversations with two other volunteers.

How successful it was, I'd say, was better than any of us expected going in. A few of the children were shy at first and wouldn't say a word, but by the end of the afternoon most of them were shouting out answers and trying to teach us Vietnamese words back, which turned into its own kind of lesson. The teachers at the school even asked if we could come back the following month, which we did.

How I felt about working with the group was mostly encouraged, if that makes sense. I'm used to working alone most of the week, so planning games with people I'd only just met, and adjusting on the spot when something wasn't working, reminded me how much faster problems get solved when a few different people are throwing ideas at them together.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个小组是六名志愿者,包括我在内,我们花了一个周六的时间,在离岘港(Da Nang)大约一小时车程的一个小村子里,给小学生教基础英语,这次活动是通过我在网上关注的一个组织安排的。

那是六月的暑假期间,带队的是一位大学生,叫阿庄(Trang),她自己也是在一个类似的村子里长大的,想在读大四之前回馈一下。

我们当时做的事情是给大约四十个孩子组织简单的英语游戏和歌曲活动,按年龄分成两组,因为我们当中没有一个人是受过训练的老师,一整节完整的课对一个下午来说可能太多了。我被分到年纪较小的那组,通过画画游戏教基本的动物名称和颜色,而年纪较大的那组由另外两名志愿者带着学简单的问候语和简短的对话。

要说这次活动有多成功,我觉得比我们任何人一开始预期的都要好。有几个孩子一开始挺害羞的,一句话都不肯说,但到了下午结束的时候,大部分孩子都在大声抢着回答问题,还试着反过来教我们几个越南语单词,这反倒变成了它自己的一种课堂。学校的老师们甚至问我们下个月能不能再来,我们后来也确实又去了。

要说和这个小组一起工作的感受,主要是一种被鼓舞的感觉,如果这么说讲得通的话。我平时一周大部分时间都是一个人工作惯了的,所以和几个刚认识的人一起策划游戏,并且在出现问题时当场随机应变,这让我意识到,当几个不同的人一起集思广益时,问题解决起来会快得多。

289 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

GRA“A few of the children were shy at first and wouldn't say a word, but by the end of the afternoon most of them were shouting out answers and trying to teach us Vietnamese words back” — The sentence pivots on 'but', setting the children's early shyness against their later noise, and marks that shift in time explicitly with 'at first' and 'by the end of the afternoon' rather than leaving the reader to infer it. The past continuous 'were shouting out' also captures the action as ongoing and lively rather than a flat past-simple report, which — combined with the accurate coordination of 'were shouting out answers and trying to teach' — is exactly the comfortable complexity Band 7.0 grammar is looking for, one level up from the simple past-simple statements a 6.5 answer would likely use here.这句话以 'but' 为转折点,将孩子们起初的害羞与后来的喧闹形成对比,并用 'at first' 和 'by the end of the afternoon' 明确标示出这一时间上的转变,而不是让读者自行推断。过去进行时 'were shouting out' 也把这个动作呈现得生动、正在进行,而不是一句平淡的一般过去时陈述——这一点,加上 'were shouting out answers and trying to teach' 这种准确的并列结构,正是7.0分语法所追求的那种从容的复杂度,比6.5分答案在此处很可能采用的简单过去时陈述高出一个层次。
LR“turned into its own kind of lesson” — 'Turned into its own kind of lesson' reframes what was meant to be one-way teaching (the volunteers teaching English) as something that flipped back on the volunteers themselves, and the phrase 'its own kind of' does real work signalling that this wasn't the lesson originally planned. A plainer 6.5 answer would probably just say 'we learned some Vietnamese words too', so the metaphorical stretch here — treating an unplanned exchange as a 'lesson' in its own right — is what pushes the vocabulary choice into 7.0 territory without reaching for anything as marked as an idiom.'Turned into its own kind of lesson' 把原本设想为单向的教学(志愿者教英语)重新框定为一件反过来影响志愿者自身的事情,而 'its own kind of' 这个短语确实起到了信号作用,表明这并非最初计划中的那堂课。一个更平实的6.5分答案大概只会说 'we learned some Vietnamese words too',因此这里的这种隐喻性延伸——把一次意外的交流本身当作一堂"课"——正是把这一词汇选择推向7.0分范畴的原因,而不必借助任何明显如习语般的表达。
FC“reminded me how much faster problems get solved when a few different people are throwing ideas at them together” — Rather than ending on the concrete detail of the children shouting out answers, the speaker generalises from it — collaborative problem-solving with 'a few different people' is faster than working alone — which turns a specific anecdote about a village classroom into a broader claim about teamwork. This kind of closing move, where a personal story is used to support a general observation, is what the 7.0 descriptor means by developing an answer 'with a reason and one short concrete example'; a 6.5 answer would more likely just state that the day 'was successful' and stop there.说话者没有以孩子们喊出答案这一具体细节收尾,而是从中做出概括——与 'a few different people' 一起协作解决问题比单打独斗更快——将一个关于乡村课堂的具体轶事,升华为一个关于团队合作的更广泛论断。这种以个人故事支撑普遍观察的收尾方式,正是7.0分描述所说的用"一个理由加一个简短具体的例子"来展开回答;6.5分的答案更可能只是说那一天 "was successful" 便就此打住。

7.5 分

The semicolon-linked contrast between work and the alley ('At work I'm the one who decides; here I was the man with a brush...') and the parallel closing ('lived there rather than just slept there') show sophisticated structural control typical of Band 7.5.在工作和小巷之间用分号连接的对比句('在公司我是做决定的人;在这里我只是个拿着刷子的人……')以及并列式的结尾('住在那里,而不只是睡在那里'),展现出7.5分典型的精妙结构掌控力。

The group I'd talk about was twelve neighbours from my alley in Da Nang, and the time was a weekend last April, when we repainted the alley's walls together.

The idea came from a retired art teacher who lives at the end, Mrs Tâm, who'd been complaining for years that our alley looked like the inside of a drain. In March she posted in the neighbourhood chat that she'd buy the paint if people would show up, and twelve of us did, on a Saturday at seven.

What the group did was more organised than I expected. Mrs Tâm had chosen the colours: a pale yellow for the walls and a deep blue for the doors. A builder from number six mixed and thinned the paint and told the rest of us, firmly, how not to waste it. Three of us with steady hands did the edges. The children — six of them, aged four to twelve — were given the bottom metre of every wall and a licence to be messy. On Sunday, Mrs Tâm painted a mural at the end of the alley of the old river ferry that ran there before the bridge.

How successful it was: by Sunday evening the alley was yellow and blue and looked, honestly, like a different place. People who'd lived twenty metres apart for years knew each other's names for the first time. The mould came back the following rainy season, of course, and we repainted that section in a single afternoon, because now we knew how.

How I felt was surprised by how much I enjoyed being ordinary. At work I'm the one who decides; here I was the man with a brush being told by a builder that I was holding it wrong, and I found that oddly restful. I also felt, for the first time in eight years in that alley, that I lived there rather than just slept there.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个小组,是我在岘港巷子里的十二位邻居,时间是去年四月的一个周末,当时我们一起重新粉刷了巷子的墙壁。

这个主意来自住在巷尾的一位退休美术老师,谭阿姨(Mrs Tâm),她多年来一直抱怨我们的巷子看起来就像下水道内壁。三月的时候,她在邻里群里发消息说,只要大家愿意出来,她就出钱买漆,结果十二个人真的都来了,时间是一个周六早上七点。

小组做的事情比我预想的要有组织得多。谭阿姨已经选好了颜色:墙面是浅黄色,门是深蓝色。六号的一位建筑工人负责调漆和稀释,还坚定地告诉大家该怎么用才不浪费。我们当中三个手比较稳的人负责刷边缘。孩子们——一共六个,四岁到十二岁不等——被分配到每面墙最下面一米,还被"特许"可以随便弄脏自己。周日那天,谭阿姨在巷尾画了一幅壁画,画的是桥建成之前那里曾经通行的老渡船。

说到成效如何,到周日傍晚,整条巷子变成了黄色和蓝色,老实说,看起来完全像换了一个地方。那些住得相隔只有二十米、却多年互不相识的人,第一次知道了彼此的名字。当然,到了第二年的雨季,霉斑又回来了,我们只用一个下午就把那段墙重新刷了一遍,因为这次我们已经知道该怎么做了。

我的感受是,惊讶于自己居然这么享受做一个普通人的感觉。在工作中我是那个做决定的人;可在这里,我只是一个拿着刷子、被建筑工人说拿法不对的人,而我觉得这种感觉出乎意料地令人放松。我也第一次感觉到,在那条巷子里住了八年之后,自己是真正"住"在那里,而不仅仅是"睡"在那里。

322 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

GRA“At work I'm the one who decides; here I was the man with a brush being told by a builder that I was holding it wrong, and I found that oddly restful.” — The semicolon links two balanced, contrasting clauses — 'At work I'm the one who decides' against 'here I was the man with a brush being told...' — without needing a conjunction to signal the contrast, which is a more advanced piece of sentence punctuation than the 'but' a 7.0 answer would likely use in its place. The second clause also embeds a passive participial phrase ('being told by a builder that I was holding it wrong') carrying reported speech inside it, so two separate grammatical devices are doing work in the same sentence — exactly the 'wide, controlled range' the Band 7.5 descriptor is looking for.分号连接了两个均衡、对比鲜明的从句——'At work I'm the one who decides'对比'here I was the man with a brush being told...'——不需要连接词来传达这种对比,这是一种比Band 7.0答案很可能会用的"but"更高阶的标点手法。第二个从句还嵌入了一个被动分词短语('being told by a builder that I was holding it wrong'),其中带有间接引语,所以同一个句子里有两种不同的语法手段在同时起作用——这正是Band 7.5描述所寻找的那种“范围宽广、掌控良好”的表现。
LR“I found that oddly restful” — 'Oddly restful' pairs an adverb that usually signals something unwelcome ('oddly') with an adjective that's normally calming ('restful'), and the friction between the two captures a genuinely mixed reaction — surprise that being ordered around felt good — better than a single adjective like 'relaxing' would. That kind of precise, slightly counterintuitive word combination, rather than a straightforward descriptive adjective, is the marker of Band 7.5 lexical resource the descriptor has in mind.'Oddly restful' 将一个通常暗示不受欢迎之意的副词('oddly',奇怪地)与一个通常表示令人安心的形容词('restful',令人放松的)搭配在一起,两者之间的张力真实地捕捉到了一种复杂的反应——对被人指挥竟然感觉良好的惊讶——比单一的形容词如'relaxing'表达得更好。这种精准、略带反直觉的词语组合,而不是一个平铺直叙的描述性形容词,正是Band 7.5词汇资源描述中所指的标志。
FC“I also felt, for the first time in eight years in that alley, that I lived there rather than just slept there.” — The parallel contrast between 'lived there' and 'slept there' draws a genuine distinction between physically residing somewhere and actually belonging to it, and the speaker uses that distinction to summarise what eight years in the same alley hadn't given him until this one weekend. Building a closing reflection around a deliberately chosen pair of near-synonyms, rather than a single statement of feeling, is the kind of evaluative coherence the Band 7.5 descriptor asks for, well beyond the flatter 'I felt like I belonged' a lower-band answer would use.'lived there'(住在那里)与'slept there'(只是睡在那里)之间的并列对比,划出了物理意义上“居住在某处”与真正意义上“归属于那里”之间的真实区别,说话人用这种区分来概括:在同一条巷子里住了八年,却直到这个周末才真正获得了归属感。围绕一对刻意挑选的近义词来构建结尾的反思,而不是一句单一的情感陈述,正是Band 7.5描述所要求的评价性连贯,远远超越了较低分数段答案会用的更平淡的说法"I felt like I belonged"。

各考试时段出题记录

Describe a time when you worked with other people in a group.2026年9–12月
Describe a time when you worked with other people in a group2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

1. What activities do young children do in groups at school in your country?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct claim ("Almost everything") and lists the daily routine plainly with "then", closing with a simple final statement about how school works.6.5分的答案以直接的论断("Almost everything")开头,用"then"平铺直叙地列出每日流程,最后以一句朴素的总结句结尾,说明学校是如何运作的。
Almost everything, from the very first day of school. My nephew's kindergarten starts with exercise together in the yard, then a song everyone sings together, then drawing at tables of six children, and then cleaning the classroom together, which the children take very seriously. Vietnamese schools focus a lot on group activities, like class projects, team games, and performances for festivals. Cleaning duties are shared and rotated too. Children eat together and even nap together. Group activity is not something added to school, it is just how things are done here.
查看中文翻译
几乎所有事情,从上学的第一天起就是这样。我侄子的幼儿园每天先是大家一起在院子里做操,然后一起唱一首歌,接着六个孩子一桌画画,最后一起打扫教室,孩子们对打扫这件事非常认真。越南的学校非常重视集体活动,比如班级项目、团队游戏,还有节日表演。值日也是轮流分担的。孩子们一起吃饭,甚至一起午睡。集体活动不是学校额外加上去的东西,这里本来就是这样运作的。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Group activity is not something added to school, it is just how things are done here” — This closing sentence, joined with a plain comma rather than a clearer connector, delivers the final generalisation in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's basic coherence.这句结尾用一个普通的逗号连接,而不是更清晰的连接词,以最直接的方式给出了最后的概括性结论,这正是6.5分典型的基础连贯方式。
LR“Vietnamese schools focus a lot on group activities” — "Focus a lot on" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "group-minded down to the bone", which the 7.5 version uses."Focus a lot on" 是平实、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.5版本中使用的 "group-minded down to the bone"。
GRA“My nephew's kindergarten starts with exercise together in the yard, then a song everyone sings together, then drawing at tables of six children, and then cleaning the classroom together, which the children take very seriously.” — This long sentence strings four events together with repeated "then", a basic listing structure rather than the more varied, compressed phrasing used at higher bands.这个长句用重复的"then"把四件事串联起来,是一种基础的列举结构,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更多样、更精炼的表达方式。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the colon to introduce a compact list, "Vietnamese schools are group-minded: class projects, team games...", and closes with the reflective aside "really", a step beyond the plainer 6.5 phrasing.7.0分的答案用冒号引出一个简洁的列举,"Vietnamese schools are group-minded: class projects, team games...",并以带反思意味的插入语"really"收尾,比6.5分更平实的表达方式更进一步。
Almost everything, from the first day. My nephew's kindergarten begins with exercise in rows in the yard, then a song sung together, then drawing at tables of six, then a collective sweeping of the classroom that the children take extremely seriously. Vietnamese schools are group-minded: class projects, team games, singing and dance performances for festivals, and later the 'class unit' that organises trips and competitions. Cleaning duties are shared and rotated. Children eat together and nap together. Group activity is less something schools add and more the water the children swim in, really.
查看中文翻译
几乎所有事情,从第一天起就是这样。我侄子的幼儿园先是排队在院子里做操,然后大家一起唱一首歌,接着六人一桌画画,再然后是孩子们非常认真对待的集体打扫教室。越南的学校是"以集体为核心"的:班级项目、团队游戏、节日唱歌跳舞表演,后来还有组织郊游和比赛的"班集体"。值日是轮流分担的。孩子们一起吃饭,一起午睡。集体活动与其说是学校额外加上去的东西,不如说其实是孩子们赖以生存的"水",可以说。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Group activity is less something schools add and more the water the children swim in, really” — The trailing reflective "really" softening the final metaphor shows a natural, spoken discourse move the 6.5 answer's flatter, unhedged closing sentence doesn't include.结尾处带反思意味的"really"缓和了最后的比喻,体现出一种自然的口语话语手法,而6.5分答案那句更平淡、没有缓冲语的结尾句并不具备这一点。
LR“a collective sweeping of the classroom that the children take extremely seriously” — "A collective sweeping" is a slightly more precise, almost formal phrase than the plainer "cleaning the classroom together" used at 6.5."A collective sweeping" 是一个略微更精确、近乎正式的说法,比6.5分中更平实的"cleaning the classroom together"更进一步。
GRA“Vietnamese schools are group-minded: class projects, team games, singing and dance performances for festivals, and later the 'class unit' that organises trips and competitions.” — The colon introducing a compact list is a more efficient way of presenting several examples than the repeated "then...then..." structure used at 6.5.用冒号引出简洁列举,比6.5分中反复使用"then...then..."的结构更高效地呈现多个例子。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid verb "slides into" and the idiomatic "down to the bone", closing with the semicolon-joined metaphor and the compact appositive "the solo project, done and presented alone, arrives remarkably late".7.5分的答案使用了生动的动词"slides into"和地道的习语"down to the bone",并以分号连接的比喻和紧凑的同位语"the solo project, done and presented alone, arrives remarkably late"收尾。
Almost everything, right from day one. My nephew's kindergarten opens with exercise in neat rows in the yard, slides into a song sung as one, then drawing at tables of six, then a collective sweeping of the classroom the children take with almost comic seriousness. Vietnamese schools are group-minded down to the bone: class projects, team games, festival performances, and later the 'class unit' that organises trips and competitions as a single body. Cleaning duties rotate, meals happen together, even naps happen together. Group activity here isn't something schools bolt on; it's closer to the water children simply swim in — the solo project, done and presented alone, arrives remarkably late by comparison.
查看中文翻译
几乎所有事情,从第一天起就是这样。我侄子的幼儿园先是在院子里排成整齐的队列做操,接着自然而然地过渡到大家齐声唱一首歌,然后六人一桌画画,再然后是孩子们以近乎滑稽的认真态度对待的集体打扫教室。越南的学校骨子里就是"集体主义"的:班级项目、团队游戏、节日表演,后来还有把大家当作一个整体来组织郊游和比赛的"班集体"。值日轮流分担,吃饭一起吃,连午睡都一起睡。这里的集体活动不是学校硬加上去的东西;更像是孩子们本来就生活在其中的"水"——相比之下,独自完成并独自展示的个人项目,要晚得多才会出现。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Group activity here isn't something schools bolt on; it's closer to the water children simply swim in” — The semicolon-joined, negatively-framed metaphor manages the final generalisation with more sophistication than the plainer, comma-joined sentence used at 6.5.用分号连接、以否定形式构建的比喻,比6.5分中用逗号连接的更朴素的句子,更老练地处理了最后的概括性结论。
LR“Vietnamese schools are group-minded down to the bone” — "Down to the bone" is a genuinely vivid, idiomatic intensifier, well beyond the plain "focus a lot on" used at 6.5."Down to the bone" 是一个真正生动、地道的强调语,远远超出了6.5分中平实的"focus a lot on"。
GRA“the solo project, done and presented alone, arrives remarkably late by comparison” — The appositive fragment "done and presented alone" inserted mid-sentence compresses a whole clause into a compact construction, more economical than a full relative clause would be.插入句中的同位语片段"done and presented alone"把整整一个分句压缩成一个紧凑的结构,比完整的定语从句更经济。
2. Is it important to teach children to work in groups?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct "Yes" answer with one plain reason, describes the alley example simply with "and", and closes with a plain warning introduced by "But".6.5分的答案直接给出"Yes"的回答并附上一个朴素的理由,用"and"简单描述小巷的例子,并以"But"引出的朴素警示句收尾。
Yes, because almost nothing in adult life is done completely alone. I once watched six children painting on the alley walls, and the twelve-year-old took care of the four-year-old's paint without anyone asking her to. That small act of noticing and helping is really what group learning teaches. Children who work in groups learn to listen, compromise, and depend on others. These skills matter more in most jobs than test results do. But teaching needs care, because groups where one child does all the work teach the wrong lesson.
查看中文翻译
是的,因为成年人的生活里几乎没有什么事是完全独自完成的。我曾看到六个孩子在小巷的墙上画画,那个十二岁的孩子在没有人要求的情况下,主动照顾那个四岁孩子的颜料。这种懂得留意并主动帮助的小举动,正是集体学习真正教会孩子的东西。在小组里学习的孩子会学会倾听、妥协,并依靠他人。在大多数工作中,这些能力比考试成绩更重要。但教学需要用心,因为如果小组里只有一个孩子包揽了所有工作,那就是在教孩子错误的一课。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But teaching needs care, because groups where one child does all the work teach the wrong lesson” — The plain contrast connector "But" opening the final sentence delivers the closing qualification in the simplest way, typical of 6.5's direct, unembellished coherence.平实的对比连接词'But'开启了最后一句话，用最简单的方式给出了收尾的限定说明，是6.5分那种直接、不加修饰的连贯性的典型代表。
LR“That small act of noticing and helping is really what group learning teaches” — "Really what group learning teaches" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "is what group learning is for", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Really what group learning teaches" 是朴素、可用的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的说法,比如7.0/7.5版本中使用的"is what group learning is for"。
GRA“I once watched six children painting on the alley walls, and the twelve-year-old took care of the four-year-old's paint without anyone asking her to.” — This sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "and", a straightforward coordination rather than the more compressed, comma-based structure used at higher bands.这句话用基础连词"and"连接两个想法,是一种直白的并列结构,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更凝练的、以逗号为主的结构。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens with the participial phrase "Watching the six children on the alley walls" and uses dash-marked apposition, a step beyond the simpler "I once watched... and" sentence at 6.5.7.0分的答案以分词短语"Watching the six children on the alley walls"开头,并使用破折号标示的同位语,比6.5分中更简单的"I once watched... and"句式更进一步。
Yes, because almost nothing in adult life is done alone. Watching the six children on the alley walls, the twelve-year-old took charge of the four-year-old's paint pot without anyone asking, and that small act — noticing, helping, dividing the work — is what group learning is for. Children who work in groups learn to listen, to compromise, to handle the person who does nothing and the person who does everything, and to depend on others without losing themselves. Those skills matter more in most jobs than anything on a test. The teaching needs care, though.
查看中文翻译
是的,因为成年人的生活里几乎没有什么事是独自完成的。看着那六个孩子在小巷墙上画画时,那个十二岁的孩子在没人要求的情况下主动接管了四岁孩子的颜料罐,而这个小小的举动——留意、帮助、分工——正是集体学习的意义所在。在小组里学习的孩子会学会倾听、妥协,学会应对那个什么都不做的人和那个什么都包办的人,并学会依靠他人而不迷失自我。在大多数工作中,这些能力比任何考试成绩都更重要。不过,教学确实需要用心。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The teaching needs care, though” — The trailing "though" closing the answer as its own short sentence is a natural, understated way of signalling a final qualification, distinct from the fuller "But teaching needs care, because..." sentence used at 6.5.结尾处独立成句的"though"是一种自然、含蓄的方式来表示最后的限定说明,与6.5分中更完整的"But teaching needs care, because..."句式不同。
LR“that small act — noticing, helping, dividing the work — is what group learning is for” — "Is what group learning is for" is a more precise, purpose-focused phrase than the vaguer "is really what group learning teaches" used at 6.5."Is what group learning is for" 是一个更精确、聚焦于目的的说法,比6.5分中更模糊的"is really what group learning teaches"更精准。
GRA“Watching the six children on the alley walls, the twelve-year-old took charge of the four-year-old's paint pot without anyone asking” — Opening the sentence with the participial phrase "Watching the six children..." instead of a plain "I once watched... and" clause is a moderately more flexible construction than the version used at 6.5.用分词短语"Watching the six children..."开头,而不是用朴素的"I once watched... and"分句,是一种比6.5分版本更灵活一些的结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with the idiomatic "precious little" and closes with a colon-introduced restatement of the warning, "a group where one child carries the rest teaches precisely the wrong lesson", instead of a plain "because" clause.7.5分的答案以地道的表达"precious little"开头,并以冒号引出对警示的重新表述"a group where one child carries the rest teaches precisely the wrong lesson"收尾,而不是用朴素的"because"分句。
Yes, since precious little in adult life gets done in complete isolation. Watching six children paint the alley walls, I noticed the twelve-year-old quietly take charge of the four-year-old's paint pot without anyone prompting her to — that small act of noticing, helping, dividing the work, is really what group learning exists to teach. Children who work in groups learn to listen, to compromise, to handle both the freeloader and the one who takes over everything, and to depend on others without dissolving into the group entirely. Those skills outweigh anything on a test, in most jobs. The teaching still needs care, though: a group where one child carries the rest teaches precisely the wrong lesson.
查看中文翻译
是的,因为成年人的生活里几乎没有什么事是完全独自完成的。看着六个孩子在小巷墙上画画,我注意到那个十二岁的孩子在没人示意的情况下,悄悄接管了四岁孩子的颜料罐——这种留意、帮助、分工的小举动,正是集体学习真正想要教会孩子的东西。在小组里学习的孩子会学会倾听、妥协,学会应对那个"搭便车"的人和那个大包大揽的人,也学会依靠他人而不至于完全被小组淹没自我。在大多数工作中,这些能力胜过任何考试成绩。不过,教学仍然需要用心:如果一个小组里只有一个孩子扛起了其他人的工作,那教的恰恰就是错误的一课。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The teaching still needs care, though: a group where one child carries the rest teaches precisely the wrong lesson” — The colon expanding the short closing fragment into a precise restatement is a more sophisticated, essay-like move than the plainer "because groups where one child does all the work teach the wrong lesson" sentence used at 6.5.用冒号把简短的结尾片段展开成一句精确的重新表述,比6.5分中更朴素的"because groups where one child does all the work teach the wrong lesson"更有议论文式的老练感。
LR“since precious little in adult life gets done in complete isolation” — "Precious little" is a genuinely idiomatic intensifier for "almost nothing", well beyond the plain phrasing used at the lower bands."Precious little" 是"almost nothing"的一个真正地道的强调说法,远远超出了较低分段所使用的朴素表达。
GRA“to handle both the freeloader and the one who takes over everything” — "The freeloader" is a precise, slightly informal noun choice compressing the idea of "the person who does nothing" into a single vivid word, more economical than the fuller phrase used at 7.0."The freeloader" 是一个精确、略带口语化的名词选择,把"the person who does nothing"这个概念压缩成一个生动的单词,比7.0分中更完整的表达更经济。
3. Why do some children prefer not to work in groups?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer lists reasons one after another with "Other children are... Some have... Some just have...", closing with a simple, direct final statement.6.5分的答案用"Other children are... Some have... Some just have..."逐一列出各种原因,并以一句简单直接的结尾句收尾。
For different reasons that can look similar from the outside. My niece would rather do a whole project alone than explain it to three classmates, and it is not shyness, she is capable and just impatient, and groups slow her down. Other children are genuinely shy, and a group feels like a stage they did not choose. Some have had bad experiences, like doing all the work and sharing the same grade. Some just have not been taught how to work with others. I think each child needs a different response from teachers.
查看中文翻译
原因各不相同,但从外表看却很相似。我侄女宁愿一个人做完整个项目,也不愿意向三个同学解释,这并不是因为害羞——她能力很强,只是没有耐心,而小组会拖慢她的速度。其他孩子是真的害羞,小组对他们来说就像一个他们没有选择要登上的舞台。有些孩子有过不好的经历,比如自己包揽所有工作却和别人共享同一个分数。还有些孩子只是没有人教过他们如何与人合作。我认为每个孩子都需要老师给予不同的回应。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I think each child needs a different response from teachers” — This short, plain closing sentence, opened with "I think", delivers the final point in the most direct way, typical of 6.5's unembellished coherence.这句简短朴素、以"I think"开头的结尾句,以最直接的方式给出最后的观点,这正是6.5分那种不加修饰的连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“Some just have not been taught how to work with others” — "Have not been taught how to work with others" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "haven't been shown how", which the 7.0 version uses."Have not been taught how to work with others" 是朴素、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的说法,比如7.0版本中使用的"haven't been shown how"。
GRA“My niece would rather do a whole project alone than explain it to three classmates, and it is not shyness, she is capable and just impatient, and groups slow her down.” — This long sentence chains four ideas together with repeated "and" and commas, a basic coordination pattern rather than the more varied, compressed structures used at higher bands.这个长句用重复的"and"和逗号把四个想法串联在一起,是一种基础的并列模式,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更多样、更凝练的结构。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the vivid idiom "have been burned" and closes with the more developed sentence "a teacher who treats them all as 'unwilling' misses most of them", a step beyond the plainer 6.5 phrasing.7.0分的答案使用了生动的习语"have been burned",并以更完整的句子"a teacher who treats them all as 'unwilling' misses most of them"收尾,比6.5分更平实的表达方式更进一步。
For different reasons that look the same from outside. My niece would rather do an entire project alone than explain it to three classmates, and it isn't shyness — she's competent and impatient, and groups slow her down. Other children are shy, and a group is a stage they didn't ask for. Some have been burned: they did the work and shared the mark, or were blamed for someone else's part. Some think differently and need quiet to do it; group work is noise to them. Each needs a different response, and a teacher who treats them all as 'unwilling' misses most of them.
查看中文翻译
原因各不相同,但从外表看却是一样的。我侄女宁愿一个人做完整个项目,也不愿意向三个同学解释——这不是害羞,她能力很强、只是没耐心,小组会拖慢她。其他孩子是害羞的,小组对他们来说是一个他们没有要求登上的舞台。有些孩子曾经"吃过亏":他们做了所有工作却要共享分数,或者因为别人负责的那部分而被责怪。有些孩子思维方式不同,需要安静才能做事;小组作业对他们来说就是噪音。每个孩子都需要不同的应对方式,而把所有孩子都当成"不愿配合"来对待的老师,会错过大多数孩子真正的问题。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Some have been burned: they did the work and shared the mark, or were blamed for someone else's part” — The idiomatic phrase "have been burned" is a natural, vivid way of describing a bad past experience, a step above the plainer "had bad experiences" used at 6.5.地道的表达"have been burned"是一种自然、生动的方式来描述过去的糟糕经历,比6.5分中更平实的"had bad experiences"更进一步。
LR“group work is noise to them” — "Is noise to them" is a moderately vivid, figurative phrase for describing distraction, a step up from the plain "harder" implied at 6.5."Is noise to them" 是一个较为生动、比喻性的说法,用来描述干扰,比6.5分中隐含的朴素说法"harder"更进一步。
GRA“a teacher who treats them all as 'unwilling' misses most of them” — This closing sentence uses a quoted adjective ("'unwilling'") inside a relative clause, a moderately more complex structure than the plain final sentence used at 6.5.这句结尾在定语从句中使用了带引号的形容词("'unwilling'"),比6.5分中朴素的结尾句结构要复杂一些。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid verbs "shoulder" and "thrusts", and closes with the idiomatic "lumps them all together", the kind of precise, less-common word choice that marks the top band.7.5分的答案使用了生动的动词"shoulder"和"thrusts",并以地道的表达"lumps them all together"收尾,这种精确、不常见的用词选择正是最高分段的标志。
For a handful of quite different reasons that happen to look identical from the outside. My niece would rather shoulder an entire project alone than spend twenty minutes explaining it to three classmates, and it isn't shyness at play — she's competent and simply impatient, and a group slows her down. Other children are genuinely shy, and a group thrusts them onto a stage they never asked for. Some have been burned before: they did the work and split the mark, or got blamed for someone else's slice of it. A teacher who lumps them all together as 'unwilling' is missing most of what's actually going on.
查看中文翻译
原因五花八门,却碰巧从外表看起来一模一样。我侄女宁愿独自扛下整个项目,也不愿花二十分钟向三个同学解释——这不是害羞在作祟,她能力很强,只是没耐心,小组会拖慢她。其他孩子是真的害羞,小组把他们硬推上了一个他们从未想要登上的舞台。有些孩子以前曾"吃过亏":他们做了所有工作却要平分分数,或者因为别人负责的那一部分而被责怪。把所有孩子都一股脑归为"不愿配合"的老师,其实错过了大部分真正在发生的事情。
为什么是这个分数
FC“A teacher who lumps them all together as 'unwilling' is missing most of what's actually going on” — The idiomatic phrase "lumps them all together" replacing the plainer "treats them all as" used at 7.0 delivers the same closing warning with more vivid, deliberate word choice.地道的表达"lumps them all together"取代了7.0分中更平实的"treats them all as",用更生动、更用心的措辞传达了同样的收尾警示。
LR“My niece would rather shoulder an entire project alone” — "Shoulder" used as a verb for taking on a burden is a genuinely less-common, precise word choice, well beyond the plain "do" used at the lower bands."Shoulder" 作为动词表示"承担重担",是一个真正不常见、精确的用词选择,远远超出了较低分段所使用的朴素动词"do"。
GRA“Other children are genuinely shy, and a group thrusts them onto a stage they never asked for” — "Thrusts them onto a stage" compresses the idea of unwanted exposure into one vivid verb phrase, a more economical, figurative construction than the plainer "is a stage they didn't ask for" phrasing used at 7.0."Thrusts them onto a stage" 把"被迫暴露在众人面前"这个概念压缩成一个生动的动词短语,比7.0分中更朴素的"is a stage they didn't ask for"更经济、更具比喻性。
4. What can be difficult about leading a group?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct claim ("Mostly the people") and gives one plain example, closing with a simple contrasting statement about blame and credit using "but".6.5分的答案以直接的论断("Mostly the people")开头,给出一个朴素的例子,并以"but"引出关于责怪与功劳的简单对比句收尾。
Mostly the people, and their different opinions. Mrs Tâm led twelve adults who all had opinions about the shade of yellow, and I watched her spend the first hour just managing disagreement instead of painting. This shows that a leader's hardest job is often keeping the group together while they argue. It is also difficult to give people tasks that suit them without offending anyone, and to make decisions that some people will not like. Leaders also get blamed when things go wrong, but have to share the credit when things go well.
查看中文翻译
主要是人的问题,还有大家意见不合。Tâm女士带领十二个成年人,每个人对黄色的具体色调都有自己的看法,我看着她花了整整第一个小时来处理分歧,而不是刷漆。这说明,领导者最难的工作往往是在大家争论的时候还能把团队凝聚在一起。要在不冒犯任何人的情况下分配适合每个人的任务也很难,还要做出一些人不喜欢的决定。出了问题,领导者要被责怪;事情顺利时,却要把功劳分给大家。
为什么是这个分数
FC“This shows that a leader's hardest job is often keeping the group together while they argue” — The plain phrase "This shows that" introducing the generalisation is a basic, direct way of linking example to point, typical of 6.5's straightforward coherence.用朴素的短语"This shows that"来引出概括性结论,是一种基础、直接的方式把例子和观点联系起来,这正是6.5分那种直白连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“just managing disagreement instead of painting” — "Managing disagreement" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "absorbing disagreement", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Managing disagreement" 是朴素、可用的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.0/7.5版本中使用的"absorbing disagreement"。
GRA“Leaders also get blamed when things go wrong, but have to share the credit when things go well.” — This sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "but" in a single coordinated sentence, a straightforward structure rather than the more layered phrasing at higher bands.这句话用基础连词"but"在一个并列句中连接两个想法,是一种直白的结构,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更有层次的表达方式。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the dash to link the example directly to its generalisation, "absorbing disagreement rather than painting — a leader's hardest work is...", a more compact structure than the 6.5 answer's separate sentences.7.0分的答案用破折号把例子直接连接到概括性结论,"absorbing disagreement rather than painting — a leader's hardest work is...",比6.5分那种分开成句的结构更紧凑。
Mostly the people, and mostly their opinions. Mrs Tâm led twelve adults who all had views about the shade of yellow, and I watched her spend the first hour absorbing disagreement rather than painting — a leader's hardest work is often keeping the group together while it argues. It's difficult to give people jobs that fit them without insulting anyone, to deal with the member who does nothing and the one who takes over, and to make decisions that some people will resent. Leaders also take the blame for failures and are expected to share the credit.
查看中文翻译
主要是人的问题,而且主要是他们的意见。Tâm女士带领十二个成年人,每个人对黄色的具体色调都有自己的看法,我看着她花了整整第一个小时来消化大家的分歧,而不是刷漆——领导者最难的工作往往是在团队争论时还能把大家凝聚在一起。要在不冒犯任何人的情况下分配适合的工作很难,要应付那个什么都不做的成员和那个大包大揽的成员也很难,还要做出一些人会心生怨言的决定。领导者还要为失败承担责怪,却被期望在成功时把功劳分给大家。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I watched her spend the first hour absorbing disagreement rather than painting” — "Absorbing disagreement" is a more vivid, figurative verb phrase than the plain "managing disagreement" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Absorbing disagreement" 是一个更生动、更具比喻性的动词短语,比6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素说法"managing disagreement"更进一步。
LR“to deal with the member who does nothing and the one who takes over” — "The member who does nothing and the one who takes over" is a moderately more precise, parallel phrase than the vaguer description implied at 6.5."The member who does nothing and the one who takes over" 是一个较为精确、结构对称的说法,比6.5分中隐含的那种更模糊的描述更进一步。
GRA“I watched her spend the first hour absorbing disagreement rather than painting — a leader's hardest work is often keeping the group together while it argues.” — The dash directly linking the specific example to its generalisation in one sentence is a more compact, integrated structure than the separate "This shows that..." sentence used at 6.5.用破折号在一句话中把具体例子直接连接到概括性结论,比6.5分中分开成句的"This shows that..."结构更紧凑、更整合。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid idiom "argues itself hoarse" and closes with the reflective addition "There's a loneliness to it too: the leader can't complain to the group about the group", a small evaluative touch beyond the lower bands.7.5分的答案使用了生动的习语"argues itself hoarse",并以带反思意味的补充句"There's a loneliness to it too: the leader can't complain to the group about the group"收尾,这是比低分段更进一步的一点评价性笔触。
Mostly the people, and mostly what they think about things that don't actually matter. Mrs Tâm led twelve adults who all had firm opinions about the exact shade of yellow, and I watched her burn the entire first hour absorbing disagreement rather than painting a single wall — a leader's hardest work is often simply holding the group together while it argues itself hoarse. There's the delicate business of assigning tasks that fit people without insulting anyone, managing both the member who does nothing and the one who takes over everything, and making calls that somebody, inevitably, will resent. There's a loneliness to it too: the leader can't complain to the group about the group.
查看中文翻译
主要是人的问题,而且主要是他们对那些其实无关紧要的事情的看法。Tâm女士带领十二个成年人,每个人对黄色具体色调都有坚定的意见,我看着她整整烧掉第一个小时,都在消化大家的分歧,而没有刷哪怕一面墙——领导者最难的工作往往就是在团队争得声嘶力竭时,还能把大家凝聚在一起。还有那种微妙的事情要处理:分配任务时要顾及每个人却不冒犯任何人,既要应付那个什么都不做的成员,也要应付那个大包大揽的成员,还要做出一些人必然会心生怨言的决定。这份工作还带着一种孤独:领导者没法向团队抱怨团队本身。
为什么是这个分数
FC“There's a loneliness to it too: the leader can't complain to the group about the group” — This extra reflective closing sentence, absent from the lower bands, adds a genuinely evaluative, almost paradoxical final touch, showing sophisticated command of tone right to the end.这句额外的、带反思意味的结尾句在较低分段中并不存在,它增添了一个真正具有评价性、近乎悖论式的收尾笔触,展现出对语气老练的掌控,一直延续到结尾。
LR“I watched her burn the entire first hour absorbing disagreement rather than painting a single wall — a leader's hardest work is often simply holding the group together while it argues itself hoarse” — "Argues itself hoarse" is a genuinely vivid, idiomatic image for prolonged arguing, well beyond the plain "argues" used at the lower bands."Argues itself hoarse" 是一个真正生动、地道的意象,用来描绘长时间的争论,远远超出了较低分段所使用的朴素动词"argues"。
GRA“There's the delicate business of assigning tasks that fit people without insulting anyone, managing both the member who does nothing and the one who takes over everything, and making calls that somebody, inevitably, will resent” — This single sentence compresses three separate difficulties into one flowing list using parallel gerunds ("assigning", "managing", "making"), a more compact, flexible construction than the separate "It's difficult to..." clauses used at 7.0.这一整句用三个并列的动名词("assigning"、"managing"、"making")把三个不同的困难压缩成一个流畅的列举,比7.0分中分开使用"It's difficult to..."分句的方式更紧凑、更灵活。
5. What are some personal qualities of a good group leader?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with one plain personal example and closes with a simple, direct final claim, "A good leader makes others feel capable and safe", using basic vocabulary throughout.6.5分的答案以一个朴素的个人例子开头,并以一句简单直接的结尾论断"A good leader makes others feel capable and safe"收尾,全程使用基础词汇。
The builder from number six had no official title, but everyone did what he said, because he was clearly right about the work and clearly working harder than anyone else. So competence and visible effort matter a lot. A good leader also listens more than they speak, and people notice this. They are clear about what everyone's job is, and fair, giving credit where it is deserved. Staying calm matters too, because a group often catches its leader's mood quickly. A good leader makes others feel capable and safe.
查看中文翻译
六号房那位建筑工人没有任何正式头衔,但大家都听他的,因为他对这项工作明显是对的,而且明显比任何人都更努力。所以能力和看得见的努力非常重要。一个好的领导者也是听得多、说得少的人,大家都能注意到这一点。他们把每个人该做什么讲得很清楚,而且公平,该给谁功劳就给谁。保持冷静也很重要,因为团队往往很快就会感染到领导者的情绪。一个好的领导者能让别人感到有能力、有安全感。
为什么是这个分数
FC“So competence and visible effort matter a lot” — The plain "So" opener on this sentence delivers the point in the simplest possible way, typical of 6.5's direct, unembellished coherence.这句话以朴素的"So"开头,以最简单的方式给出观点,这正是6.5分那种直接、不加修饰的连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“everyone did what he said, because he was clearly right about the work” — "Clearly right about the work" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more precise phrase like "plainly right about the paint", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Clearly right about the work" 是朴素、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更精确的说法,比如7.0/7.5版本中使用的"plainly right about the paint"。
GRA“Staying calm matters too, because a group often catches its leader's mood quickly.” — This sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "because" in a single coordinated sentence, a straightforward structure rather than the more layered phrasing at higher bands.这句话用基础连词"because"在一个并列句中连接两个想法,是一种直白的结构,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更有层次的表达方式。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the dash to link the example directly to its claim, "competence and visible effort are the first two", a more compact structure than the 6.5 answer's separate "So" sentence.7.0分的答案用破折号把例子直接连接到论断"competence and visible effort are the first two",比6.5分那种分开成句的"So"结构更紧凑。
The builder from number six had no title and everyone did what he said, because he was obviously right about paint and obviously working harder than anyone — competence and visible effort are the first two. A good leader listens more than they speak, and people can tell. They're clear: everyone on that alley knew what their job was. They're fair, giving credit where it's earned and dealing with problems privately. Calm matters; a group catches its leader's mood in minutes. Charisma helps and is overrated. The leaders people actually follow make them feel capable and safe.
查看中文翻译
六号房那位建筑工人没有头衔,但大家都听他的,因为他在涂料上明显是对的,而且明显比任何人都更努力——能力和看得见的努力,是排在前两位的品质。一个好的领导者听得多、说得少,而大家都能感觉出来。他们思路清晰:那条巷子里的每个人都清楚自己该做什么。他们公平,该给谁功劳就给谁,处理问题也会私下进行。冷静很重要;团队几分钟内就会感染到领导者的情绪。个人魅力有帮助,但也被过度高估了。人们真正愿意追随的领导者,是那些能让他们感到有能力、有安全感的人。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The leaders people actually follow make them feel capable and safe” — The relative clause "people actually follow" modifying "leaders" is a slightly more developed way of framing the closing claim than the plain "A good leader makes others feel..." sentence used at 6.5.用定语从句"people actually follow"来修饰"leaders",比6.5分中朴素的"A good leader makes others feel..."句式更进一步地构建了结尾论断。
LR“Charisma helps and is overrated” — "Overrated" is a moderately precise, evaluative word choice absent from the 6.5 answer, adding a small extra observation with efficient phrasing."Overrated" 是一个较为精确、带评价意味的用词选择,在6.5分答案中并不存在,它用简洁的表达增添了一点额外的观察。
GRA“he was obviously right about paint and obviously working harder than anyone — competence and visible effort are the first two” — The dash linking the specific reason directly to the general claim in one sentence is a more compact, integrated structure than the separate "So competence and visible effort matter a lot" sentence used at 6.5.用破折号在一句话中把具体理由直接连接到总体论断,比6.5分中分开成句的"So competence and visible effort matter a lot"更紧凑、更整合。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the precise verb "absorbs" for mood contagion and the appositive fragment "competence and visible effort, the first two qualities that actually matter" instead of a full sentence, the kind of compact grammar that marks the top band.7.5分的答案用精确的动词"absorbs"来表达情绪感染,并用同位语片段"competence and visible effort, the first two qualities that actually matter"代替完整的句子,这种紧凑的语法正是最高分段的标志。
The builder from number six carried no title whatsoever, yet everyone did exactly what he said, because he was plainly right about the paint and plainly working harder than anyone else on the street — competence and visible effort, the first two qualities that actually matter. A good leader listens more than they speak, and people can tell the difference instantly. They're unambiguous about who's doing what, fair about handing out credit, and deal with problems privately rather than in front of everyone. Calm matters enormously, since a group absorbs its leader's mood within minutes. Charisma helps, and is somewhat overrated. The leaders people genuinely follow are the ones who make them feel both capable and safe.
查看中文翻译
六号房那位建筑工人完全没有任何头衔,但大家都对他言听计从,因为他在涂料上明摆着是对的,而且明摆着比那条街上任何人都更努力——能力和看得见的努力,才是真正重要的头两项品质。一个好的领导者听得多、说得少,而大家立刻就能感觉出这种区别。他们对谁该做什么讲得毫不含糊,分配功劳时也很公平,处理问题时会私下进行,而不是当众。保持冷静极其重要,因为团队几分钟内就会吸收领导者的情绪。个人魅力有帮助,但也被稍稍高估了。人们真正愿意追随的领导者,就是那些能让他们同时感到有能力又安全的人。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The leaders people genuinely follow are the ones who make them feel both capable and safe” — The doubled relative structure ("the ones who make them feel...") gives this closing sentence a more deliberate, essay-like rhythm than the plainer version used at 7.0.双重定语结构("the ones who make them feel...")让这句结尾句带上了一种更用心、更具议论文节奏的语感,比7.0分中更朴素的版本更进一步。
LR“a group absorbs its leader's mood within minutes” — "Absorbs" applied to mood is a genuinely vivid, precise verb, well beyond the plain "catches" used at 7.0 for the same idea."Absorbs" 用于形容情绪,是一个真正生动、精确的动词,远远超出了7.0分中表达同一概念的朴素动词"catches"。
GRA“competence and visible effort, the first two qualities that actually matter” — This appositive noun phrase attached without a verb compresses the claim into the sentence itself, a more economical construction than the separate "competence and visible effort are the first two" sentence used at 7.0.这个不带动词、直接附加的同位语名词短语,把论断压缩进句子本身,比7.0分中分开成句的"competence and visible effort are the first two"更经济。
6. Does the success of a group depend entirely on the ability of its leader?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with the direct "No" and one plain example, closing with a simple "So" summary before adding more points with "But".6.5分的答案以直接的"No"和一个朴素的例子开头,以简单的"So"总结句收尾,再用"But"补充更多观点。
No, although the leader does set the limit. Mrs Tâm had the vision and bought the paint, and without her nothing would have happened, but without twelve people who showed up and were willing to be told what to do, her plan would have stayed just an idea. So success needed both. A weak leader can waste a good group, and a strong leader can get great work from an average one, so leadership matters a lot. But groups also depend on the members' skills and whether they trust each other.
查看中文翻译
不是,虽然领导者确实会设下上限。Tâm女士有构想,也买了油漆,没有她什么都不会发生,但如果没有十二个愿意出现、愿意听从安排的人,她的计划也只会停留在想法阶段。所以成功需要两者兼备。一个软弱的领导者会浪费一个优秀的团队,而一个强大的领导者能让一个普通的团队做出出色的成果,所以领导力非常重要。但团队的成败也取决于成员的能力,以及他们彼此是否信任。
为什么是这个分数
FC“So success needed both” — The plain "So" opener on this short sentence delivers the key point in the simplest possible way, typical of 6.5's direct, unembellished coherence.这句短句以朴素的"So"开头,以最简单的方式给出关键观点,这正是6.5分那种直接、不加修饰的连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“her plan would have stayed just an idea” — "Stayed just an idea" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "stayed a post in a group chat", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Stayed just an idea" 是朴素、可用的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.0/7.5版本中使用的"stayed a post in a group chat"。
GRA“A weak leader can waste a good group, and a strong leader can get great work from an average one, so leadership matters a lot.” — This sentence links three ideas with repeated "and"/"so", a basic coordination pattern rather than the more varied structures used at higher bands.这句话用重复的"and"/"so"连接三个想法,是一种基础的并列模式,而不是更高分段所使用的那种更多样的结构。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the vivid metaphor "the ceiling" and "stayed a post in a group chat", closing with a longer list joined by "on", a step beyond the plainer, shorter phrasing of the 6.5 answer.7.0分的答案使用了生动的比喻"the ceiling"和"stayed a post in a group chat",并以"on"连接的更长列举收尾,比6.5分那种更朴素、更简短的表达方式更进一步。
No, though the leader sets the ceiling. Mrs Tâm had the vision and bought the paint, and without her nothing would have happened; but without twelve people who showed up and were willing to be told how to hold a brush, her vision would have stayed a post in a group chat — success needed both. A weak leader can waste a strong group, and a strong leader can get remarkable work from an ordinary one, so leadership matters a great deal. But groups also depend on the members' skills, on trust, and on the resources available.
查看中文翻译
不是,虽然领导者确实设下了上限。Tâm女士有构想,也买了油漆,没有她什么都不会发生;但如果没有十二个愿意出现、愿意被教怎么拿刷子的人,她的构想也只会停留在群聊里的一条消息——成功需要两者兼备。一个软弱的领导者会浪费一个强大的团队,而一个强大的领导者能让一个普通的团队做出令人瞩目的成果,所以领导力至关重要。但团队的成败也取决于成员的能力、彼此间的信任,以及可用的资源。
为什么是这个分数
FC“No, though the leader sets the ceiling” — The metaphor "sets the ceiling" replacing the plainer "does set the limit" used at 6.5 opens the answer with a more natural, image-based phrase.比喻"sets the ceiling"取代了6.5分中更朴素的"does set the limit",用一个更自然、更具画面感的说法开启答案。
LR“her vision would have stayed a post in a group chat” — "A post in a group chat" is a vivid, modern, slightly humorous image, well beyond the plain "just an idea" used at 6.5 for the same idea."A post in a group chat" 是一个生动、现代、略带幽默感的意象,远远超出了6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素说法"just an idea"。
GRA“But groups also depend on the members' skills, on trust, and on the resources available.” — The repeated "on" structure listing three factors in parallel is a moderately more developed construction than the simpler "and whether they trust each other" phrase used at 6.5.用重复的"on"结构并列列出三个因素,比6.5分中更简单的"and whether they trust each other"更进一步。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer closes with the vivid, wry final sentence "The best-led team in the world can't paint through a typhoon", the kind of small evaluative closing touch expected at the top band, well beyond the flatter closings of the lower bands.7.5分的答案以生动、带调侃意味的结尾句"The best-led team in the world can't paint through a typhoon"收尾,这种小小的评价性收尾笔触正是最高分段所期待的,远远超出了较低分段那种更平淡的收尾方式。
No, though the leader effectively sets the ceiling everyone else operates under. Mrs Tâm supplied the vision and bought the paint, and nothing would have happened without her, yet without twelve people who actually turned up and were willing to be shown how to hold a brush, that vision would have stayed nothing more than a post sitting in a group chat — success genuinely required both halves. A weak leader can squander a strong group; a strong leader can coax remarkable work out of an ordinary one. But groups also lean on the members' own skills, on mutual trust, and frankly on luck. The best-led team in the world can't paint through a typhoon.
查看中文翻译
不是,虽然领导者实际上设下了其他所有人都要在其下运作的上限。Tâm女士提供了构想,也买了油漆,没有她什么都不会发生,但如果没有十二个真正到场、愿意被教怎么拿刷子的人,那个构想也只会停留在群聊里静静躺着的一条消息——成功真正需要这两半都齐备。软弱的领导者会白白浪费一个强大的团队;强大的领导者却能从一个普通团队里哄出令人瞩目的成果。但团队也依赖成员自身的能力、彼此间的信任,老实说,还有运气。世界上再优秀的团队,也没法在台风天里刷墙。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The best-led team in the world can't paint through a typhoon” — This closing sentence adds a vivid, almost proverbial final image entirely absent from the flatter endings of the lower bands, showing confident, essay-like command of tone right to the end.这句结尾句增添了一个生动、近乎谚语式的最终意象,这在较低分段那种更平淡的结尾中完全不存在,展现出自信、有议论文风范的语气掌控,一直延续到结尾。
LR“a strong leader can coax remarkable work out of an ordinary one” — "Coax" is a genuinely precise, figurative verb for gently drawing out effort, well beyond the plain "get" used at the lower bands."Coax" 是一个真正精确、比喻性的动词,用来形容温和地引出成果,远远超出了较低分段所使用的朴素动词"get"。
GRA“A weak leader can squander a strong group; a strong leader can coax remarkable work out of an ordinary one.” — The semicolon joining two precisely parallel clauses is a more polished construction than the "and"-linked version used at 7.0.用分号连接两个精确对称的分句,比7.0分中用"and"连接的版本更精致。
7. What are the advantages of countries working together on joint projects?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct claim ("Mostly scale and shared information") and lists benefits with "also" and "too", closing with a simple final sentence about the cost.6.5分的答案以直接的论断("Mostly scale and shared information")开头,用"also"和"too"列出各项好处,并以一句关于代价的简单结尾句收尾。
Mostly scale and shared information. The river that floods my region starts in another country, and a flood-warning system that now shares data across the border means we can see the water coming days earlier. No single country could have built this alone, because no single country can see the whole river. Joint projects also gather money for expensive things, like vaccine research, that one country could not afford alone. They spread risk and build relationships between countries too. The cost is that decisions take longer and there can be arguments about who pays.
查看中文翻译
主要是规模和信息共享。淹没我家乡的那条河发源于另一个国家,而现在一个跨境共享数据的洪水预警系统,意味着我们能提前好几天看到洪水的到来。没有任何一个国家能单独建成这套系统,因为没有一个国家能看到这条河的全貌。联合项目还能筹集资金去做一些昂贵的事情,比如疫苗研究,而这是一个国家单独负担不起的。它们还能分散风险,建立国家之间的关系。代价是决策会花更长时间,而且可能会因为谁来出钱而产生争执。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The cost is that decisions take longer and there can be arguments about who pays” — This plain closing sentence, using the basic connector "and", delivers the final drawback in the simplest possible way, typical of 6.5's direct, unembellished coherence.这句朴素的结尾句用基础连词"and",以最简单的方式给出最后的缺点,这正是6.5分那种直接、不加修饰的连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“They spread risk and build relationships between countries too” — "Build relationships between countries" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "quietly building relationships", which the 7.5 version uses."Build relationships between countries" 是朴素、可用的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.5版本中使用的"quietly building relationships"。
GRA“No single country could have built this alone, because no single country can see the whole river.” — This sentence repeats the phrase "no single country" and links with the plain connector "because", a workable but slightly repetitive structure typical of 6.5.这句话重复了"no single country"这个短语,并用朴素的连词"because"连接,是一种可用但略显重复的结构,是6.5分的典型表现。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer opens with the fronted, slightly abstract phrase "Scale and shared sight, mostly" and uses short, separate sentences ("They spread risk. They also build relationships.") for rhythmic effect, beyond the 6.5 answer's plainer listing.7.0分的答案以前置、略带抽象的短语"Scale and shared sight, mostly"开头,并用简短独立的句子("They spread risk. They also build relationships.")来营造节奏感,比6.5分那种更朴素的列举方式更进一步。
Scale and shared sight, mostly. The river that floods my region rises in another country, and the flood-warning network that now shares data across the border means we see the water coming days earlier — no single country could have built that alone, because no single country could see the whole river. Joint projects pool money for things too expensive for one nation, like space programmes or vaccine research, and pool knowledge too, since different countries have different strengths. They spread risk. They also build relationships. The costs are slowness and arguments about who pays and who benefits.
查看中文翻译
主要是规模和共享的视野。淹没我家乡的那条河发源于另一个国家,而现在这个跨境共享数据的洪水预警网络,意味着我们能提前好几天看到洪水的到来——没有任何一个国家能单独建成这套系统,因为没有一个国家能看到这条河的全貌。联合项目为那些单个国家负担不起的昂贵事情筹集资金,比如太空计划或疫苗研究,还能汇聚知识,因为不同国家各有所长。它们能分散风险。它们也能建立关系。代价是决策变得缓慢,并且会因为谁出钱、谁受益而产生争执。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Scale and shared sight, mostly” — Fronting the abstract noun phrase "Scale and shared sight" before the main explanation is a more sophisticated opening move than the plainer "Mostly scale and shared information" sentence used at 6.5.把抽象名词短语"Scale and shared sight"前置在主要解释之前,是一种比6.5分中更朴素的"Mostly scale and shared information"句式更老练的开篇手法。
LR“the flood-warning network that now shares data across the border” — "Network" is a slightly more precise, technical word than the plainer "system" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Network" 是一个略微更精确、更专业的用词,比6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素说法"system"更进一步。
GRA“They spread risk. They also build relationships.” — Using two short, separate sentences for rhythmic emphasis is a more deliberate stylistic choice than the single "and"-linked sentence used at 6.5 for the same two ideas.用两个简短独立的句子来营造节奏上的强调,比6.5分中用"and"连接同样两个想法的单句更具刻意的文体选择。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the vivid metaphor "a shared vantage point" and compresses the risk-and-relationship benefits into a participial phrase, "spreading risk and quietly building relationships along the way", instead of separate sentences.7.5分的答案使用了生动的比喻"a shared vantage point",并把关于分散风险与建立关系的好处压缩进一个分词短语"spreading risk and quietly building relationships along the way",而不是分开成句。
Scale, mostly, and a shared vantage point no single country can claim alone. The river that floods my region rises somewhere across the border, and the flood-warning network now sharing data between the two countries lets us see the water coming days sooner — nothing one nation alone could have built, since no single nation can see the whole river at once. Joint projects pool money for things too costly for any one country, like vaccine research or space programmes, and pool differing strengths besides, spreading risk and quietly building relationships along the way. The costs are slowness, arguments over who pays and who benefits, and the friction of shared decisions.
查看中文翻译
主要是规模,以及一个没有任何单一国家能独自拥有的共同制高点。淹没我家乡的那条河发源于边境线的另一侧某处,而现在这个在两国之间共享数据的洪水预警网络,让我们能提前好几天看到洪水的到来——这是任何一个国家单独都无法建成的,因为没有一个国家能一次性看到整条河流的全貌。联合项目为任何单一国家都负担不起的昂贵事情筹集资金,比如疫苗研究或太空计划,还汇聚了各国不同的优势,顺带分散了风险,悄悄地建立起了国家间的关系。代价是决策缓慢,会因为谁出钱、谁受益而产生争执,还有共同决策带来的摩擦。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Scale, mostly, and a shared vantage point no single country can claim alone” — The metaphor "a shared vantage point" opening the answer replaces the plainer "shared sight" used at 7.0, giving the very first sentence a more vivid, deliberate image.开篇的比喻"a shared vantage point"取代了7.0分中更朴素的"shared sight",让第一句话就带上了一个更生动、更用心的意象。
LR“pool differing strengths besides, spreading risk and quietly building relationships along the way” — "Along the way" attached to "quietly building relationships" is a natural, idiomatic closing touch, more economical than the separate short sentences used at 7.0 for the same ideas.附加在"quietly building relationships"后面的"along the way"是一个自然、地道的收尾笔触,比7.0分中为同样想法分开使用的简短句子更经济。
GRA“pool differing strengths besides, spreading risk and quietly building relationships along the way” — The participial phrase "spreading risk and quietly building relationships" compresses two separate short sentences from the 7.0 answer into one flowing construction, a more flexible, economical structure.分词短语"spreading risk and quietly building relationships"把7.0分答案中两个独立的短句压缩成一个流畅的结构,更灵活、更经济。
8. Will translators and interpreters continue to be needed for international projects?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct contrast ("Fewer of them... but the good ones...") and gives one plain example, closing with a simple final statement about the future.6.5分的答案以直接的对比("Fewer of them... but the good ones...")开头,给出一个朴素的例子,并以一句关于未来的简单结尾句收尾。
Fewer of them for simple work, but the good ones will be needed more than ever. A machine once translated a German client's joke into something that sounded like an insult in Vietnamese, and only a human interpreter on the call understood the tone and saved the meeting. Machines now handle documents and normal messages well, so that part of the job is shrinking. But things like tone, humour and cultural meaning still need a human. For law, medicine and diplomacy, a human who can be responsible for mistakes will still be needed for a long time.
查看中文翻译
做简单工作的人会减少,但优秀的译员会比以往任何时候都更被需要。曾经有一台机器把一位德国客户的笑话翻译成越南语后听起来像是一种侮辱,只有通话中的人工口译员理解了语气并挽救了那场会议。机器现在能很好地处理文件和普通消息,所以这部分工作正在萎缩。但像语气、幽默和文化含义这类东西,仍然需要人来把握。在法律、医学和外交领域,能为错误负责的人,在很长一段时间内仍然是需要的。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Machines now handle documents and normal messages well, so that part of the job is shrinking” — This sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "so" in a single coordinated sentence, a straightforward structure typical of 6.5's direct coherence.这句话用基础连词"so"在一个并列句中连接两个想法,是一种直白的结构,这正是6.5分那种直接连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“only a human interpreter on the call understood the tone and saved the meeting” — "Understood the tone and saved the meeting" is plain, functional phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "recognised the tone and rescued the meeting", which the 7.0/7.5 versions use."Understood the tone and saved the meeting" 是朴素、功能性的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.0/7.5版本中使用的"recognised the tone and rescued the meeting"。
GRA“For law, medicine and diplomacy, a human who can be responsible for mistakes will still be needed for a long time.” — This is a fairly long but simply built sentence using one relative clause, a workable structure without the more compressed phrasing used at higher bands.这是一个相当长但结构简单的句子,只用了一个定语从句,是一种可用的结构,但没有更高分段所使用的那种更凝练的表达方式。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the colon to introduce a compact list of what remains hardest, and closes with the parallel triple "smaller, more specialised, and more valuable", a step beyond the plainer 6.5 sentence.7.0分的答案用冒号引出一个简洁列举,列出仍然最难的部分,并以三项并列的"smaller, more specialised, and more valuable"收尾,比6.5分更平实的句子更进一步。
Fewer of them for routine work, and the good ones more than ever. A machine translated a German client's joke into what read, in Vietnamese, as an insult, and only a human interpreter on the call recognised the tone and rescued the meeting — machines now handle documents and ordinary messages well, and that part of the work is shrinking fast. What remains is the part that was always hardest: tone, humour, cultural meaning, the sensitivity of negotiations, and the trust that comes from a person rather than a device. The profession will be smaller, more specialised, and more valuable per person.
查看中文翻译
做常规工作的人会减少,而优秀的译员会比以往任何时候都更被需要。一台机器把一位德国客户的笑话翻译成越南语后,读起来像是一种侮辱,只有通话中的人工口译员察觉了语气并挽救了那场会议——机器现在能很好地处理文件和普通消息,这部分工作正在迅速萎缩。剩下的正是那些一直以来最难的部分:语气、幽默、文化含义、谈判的微妙之处,以及来自真人而非设备的那份信任。这个行业会变得更小、更专业,而每个人的价值也会更高。
为什么是这个分数
FC“What remains is the part that was always hardest: tone, humour, cultural meaning, the sensitivity of negotiations, and the trust that comes from a person rather than a device” — The colon introducing a compact list manages the transition to the harder-to-automate skills more elegantly than the plainer "But things like tone, humour and cultural meaning still need a human" sentence used at 6.5.用冒号引出简洁列举,比6.5分中更朴素的"But things like tone, humour and cultural meaning still need a human"更优雅地过渡到那些更难被自动化的技能。
LR“only a human interpreter on the call recognised the tone and rescued the meeting” — "Rescued the meeting" is a more vivid, dramatic verb than the plainer "saved the meeting" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Rescued the meeting" 是一个更生动、更具戏剧性的动词,比6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素说法"saved the meeting"更进一步。
GRA“The profession will be smaller, more specialised, and more valuable per person.” — This closing sentence uses a parallel triple of adjectives, a more compact and rhythmic structure than the plainer, single-idea final sentence used at 6.5.这句结尾句使用了三个并列的形容词,比6.5分中更朴素、只表达单一想法的结尾句更紧凑、更有节奏感。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer closes with the compact, aphoristic sentence "The profession shrinks, but sharpens", and uses the precise legal phrase "held accountable", the kind of economical, evaluative phrasing that marks the top band.7.5分的答案以简洁、格言式的句子"The profession shrinks, but sharpens"收尾,并使用了精确的法律用语"held accountable",这种经济、带评价意味的表达正是最高分段的标志。
Fewer of them for the routine stuff, and the genuinely skilled ones more indispensable than ever. A machine once rendered a German client's joke into something that read, in Vietnamese, as a flat insult, and only the human interpreter on the call caught the tone in time and rescued the meeting — machines now handle documents and everyday messages competently enough, and that slice of the work is shrinking fast. What survives is the part that was always the hardest: tone, humour, cultural nuance, the sensitivity of a negotiation, the trust that only comes from a person rather than a device. For law, diplomacy and medicine, a human who can actually be held accountable isn't going anywhere soon. The profession shrinks, but sharpens.
查看中文翻译
做常规工作的人会减少,而真正有实力的译员会比以往任何时候都更不可或缺。曾经有一台机器把一位德国客户的笑话翻译成越南语,结果读起来像是彻头彻尾的侮辱,只有通话中的人工口译员及时察觉了语气并挽救了那场会议——机器现在能相当胜任地处理文件和日常消息,这部分工作正在迅速萎缩。留存下来的,正是一直以来最难的部分:语气、幽默、文化的细微差别、谈判的敏感之处,以及只有真人才能带来的那份信任。在法律、外交和医学领域,一个真正能为错误负责的人,短期内不会被取代。这个行业会萎缩,但也会变得更精锐。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The profession shrinks, but sharpens” — This two-word-per-clause closing sentence delivers the final generalisation with a compact, almost aphoristic rhythm well beyond the fuller parallel triple used at 7.0, showing confident economy of expression.这句每个分句只有两个词的结尾句,以一种紧凑、近乎格言式的节奏给出最后的概括,远远超出了7.0分中那种更完整的三项并列结构,展现出自信、精炼的表达方式。
LR“a human who can actually be held accountable isn't going anywhere soon” — "Held accountable" is a precise, slightly formal legal collocation, more exact than the vaguer "responsible for mistakes" phrasing used at 6.5."Held accountable" 是一个精确、略带正式感的法律搭配,比6.5分中更模糊的"responsible for mistakes"更精准。
GRA“only the human interpreter on the call caught the tone in time and rescued the meeting” — "Caught the tone in time" compresses the idea of timely recognition into a compact phrase, a more economical construction than the fuller "recognised the tone" clause used at 7.0."Caught the tone in time" 把"及时察觉"这个概念压缩成一个紧凑的短语,比7.0分中更完整的"recognised the tone"分句更经济。
9. Will modern technology ever be able to guarantee the success of international projects?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a direct "No" opinion and one plain project example, closing with a simple final sentence stating the limit of technology using "cannot".6.5分的答案以直接的"No"观点开头,给出一个朴素的项目例子,并以一句用"cannot"陈述技术局限的简单结尾句收尾。
No, because the things that ruin international projects usually are not technical. I worked on a project between two countries with excellent shared tools, one workspace, live translation, video calls, and it still failed over a question no tool could answer, who owned the result. Technology removes distance and misunderstanding of words, which is real progress, and projects that would have failed from bad logistics before now survive. But politics, trust, money and pride decide most outcomes, and those are human problems technology cannot fix.
查看中文翻译
不会,因为毁掉国际合作项目的原因通常都不是技术层面的。我曾参与一个两国合作的项目,大家有非常好的共享工具——一个工作空间、实时翻译、视频通话——但最后还是因为一个任何工具都回答不了的问题而失败了:成果归谁所有。技术消除了距离和语言上的误解,这确实是真正的进步,过去会因为后勤问题而失败的项目现在能存活下来。但政治、信任、金钱和自尊心决定了大多数结果,而这些都是技术无法解决的人的问题。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But politics, trust, money and pride decide most outcomes, and those are human problems technology cannot fix” — This closing sentence links two ideas with the basic connector "and" in a single coordinated sentence, a straightforward structure typical of 6.5's direct coherence.这句结尾句用基础连词"and"在一个并列句中连接两个想法,是一种直白的结构,这正是6.5分那种直接连贯方式的典型表现。
LR“it still failed over a question no tool could answer, who owned the result” — "A question no tool could answer" is plain, workable phrasing; a higher band would reach for a more vivid phrase like "a question no piece of software could ever answer", which the 7.5 version uses."A question no tool could answer" 是朴素、可用的表达;更高分段会选用更生动的说法,比如7.5版本中使用的"a question no piece of software could ever answer"。
GRA“I worked on a project between two countries with excellent shared tools, one workspace, live translation, video calls, and it still failed over a question no tool could answer, who owned the result.” — This long sentence strings several details together with commas rather than clearer punctuation, a workable but somewhat loose structure typical of 6.5.这个长句用逗号而不是更清晰的标点把好几个细节串联起来,是一种可用但略显松散的结构,是6.5分的典型表现。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer uses the colon to deliver the punchline "who owned the result" and the semicolon-joined sentence about progress, a moderately more sophisticated structure than the comma-heavy 6.5 sentence.7.0分的答案用冒号来抛出结论"who owned the result",并用分号连接了关于进步的句子,比6.5分那种大量使用逗号的句子结构更老练一些。
No, because the things that sink international projects aren't technical. I worked on a two-country project with flawless shared tools — one workspace, live translation, video everywhere — and it collapsed over a question no tool could answer: who owned the result. Technology removes distance, delay and misunderstanding of words, and that's real progress; projects that would have died of logistics twenty years ago now survive. But politics, trust, money, pride and changing governments decide most international outcomes, and they're human problems. Technology can make success more likely and failure more visible.
查看中文翻译
不会,因为拖垮国际合作项目的原因通常不是技术问题。我曾参与一个两国合作的项目,拥有堪称完美的共享工具——一个工作空间、实时翻译、到处都是视频通话——但最后还是因为一个任何工具都回答不了的问题而崩溃:成果归谁所有。技术消除了距离、延迟和语言上的误解,这确实是真正的进步;二十年前会因为后勤问题而夭折的项目,现在能存活下来。但政治、信任、金钱、自尊心和更迭的政府决定了大多数国际合作的结果,而这些都是人的问题。技术能让成功的可能性更高,也能让失败更显而易见。
为什么是这个分数
FC“it collapsed over a question no tool could answer: who owned the result” — The colon delivering the punchline "who owned the result" as a standalone phrase is a more dramatic, controlled way of ending the sentence than the comma-joined version used at 6.5.用冒号把结论"who owned the result"作为一个独立短语抛出来,比6.5分中用逗号连接的版本更具戏剧性、更有掌控感地结束了这句话。
LR“projects that would have died of logistics twenty years ago now survive” — "Died of logistics" is a more vivid, figurative phrase than the plainer "failed from bad logistics" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Died of logistics" 是一个更生动、更具比喻性的说法,比6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素说法"failed from bad logistics"更进一步。
GRA“Technology removes distance, delay and misunderstanding of words, and that's real progress; projects that would have died of logistics twenty years ago now survive.” — The semicolon joining two related but independently complete clauses is a more sophisticated structure than the simpler "which is real progress, and" phrasing used at 6.5.用分号连接两个相关但各自独立完整的分句,比6.5分中更简单的"which is real progress, and"结构更老练。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the precise verb "strips away" and closes with the compact, wry final sentence "Guaranteeing it would mean guaranteeing that people agree, and nobody's built that yet", a small evaluative closing touch beyond the lower bands.7.5分的答案使用了精确的动词"strips away",并以简洁、带调侃意味的结尾句"Guaranteeing it would mean guaranteeing that people agree, and nobody's built that yet"收尾,这是超出较低分段的一点小小的评价性收尾笔触。
No, because what actually sinks international projects rarely has anything to do with technology. I once worked on a two-country project with flawless shared tools — one workspace, live translation, video conferencing everywhere — and it still collapsed over a question no piece of software could ever answer: who owned the result. Technology strips away distance, delay and the misunderstanding of mere words, and that's genuine progress; projects that would once have died of pure logistics now survive comfortably. But politics, trust, money, pride and governments that change halfway through decide most international outcomes, and those remain stubbornly human problems. Guaranteeing it would mean guaranteeing that people agree, and nobody's built that yet.
查看中文翻译
不会,因为真正拖垮国际合作项目的原因,几乎从来都与技术无关。我曾参与一个两国合作的项目,拥有堪称完美的共享工具——一个工作空间、实时翻译、到处都是视频会议——但最后还是因为一个任何软件都永远回答不了的问题而崩溃:成果归谁所有。技术消除了距离、延迟,以及单纯语言层面的误解,这确实是真正的进步;过去会因为纯粹的后勤问题而夭折的项目,现在能顺利地存活下来。但政治、信任、金钱、自尊心,以及中途更迭的政府,决定了大多数国际合作的结果,而这些顽固地属于人的问题。要保证这一点,就意味着要保证人们能够达成一致,而这一点至今还没有人造出来过。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Guaranteeing it would mean guaranteeing that people agree, and nobody's built that yet” — This closing sentence adds a wry, almost proverbial final observation entirely absent from the flatter endings of the lower bands, showing confident, essay-like command of tone right to the end.这句结尾句增添了一个带调侃意味、近乎谚语式的最终观察,这在较低分段那种更平淡的结尾中完全不存在,展现出自信、有议论文风范的语气掌控,一直延续到结尾。
LR“what actually sinks international projects rarely has anything to do with technology” — "Sinks" applied to a project is a genuinely vivid, figurative verb, well beyond the plain "ruin" used at 6.5 for the same idea."Sinks" 用于形容一个项目,是一个真正生动、比喻性的动词,远远超出了6.5分中表达同一概念的朴素动词"ruin"。
GRA“Technology strips away distance, delay and the misunderstanding of mere words” — "Strips away" is a more precise, vivid verb than the plainer "removes" used at the lower bands for describing technology's effect."Strips away" 是一个比较低分段中用来描述技术效果的更朴素的动词"removes"更精确、更生动的动词。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？: 讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？: 在"A Time When You Worked With Other People in a Group"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？: 是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。