A Piece of Technology (Not a Phone) That You Would Like to Own

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

1. 1. What are the different types of technology that young people often use?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Lists devices in a fairly plain, evenly weighted sentence, 'She uses a laptop... a smartwatch... a games console', without much rhythmic variation.用一个相当平实、结构均衡的句子来列举设备,“She uses a laptop... a smartwatch... a games console”,没有太多节奏上的变化。

   If I think about my sister's day, it covers most of the list. She uses a laptop for lectures and streaming, wireless earbuds that seem always in her ears, a smartwatch she checks all the time, and a games console she shares with her flatmates. Of course, her phone holds her banking, transport, and social life too. Young people I know are also getting into cameras again, real ones, not just phone cameras. Tablets for drawing or notes are common among students too. I think a lot of this technology is more about entertainment and connection than actually making things.

   查看中文翻译

   如果我想想我妹妹的一天,基本上就涵盖了大部分清单。她用笔记本电脑上网课、看流媒体,戴着那副似乎永远挂在耳朵上的无线耳机,还有一块她时不时就要看一眼的智能手表,以及一台和室友共用的游戏机。当然,她的手机也承载着她的银行业务、出行和社交生活。我认识的年轻人也重新开始迷上相机了,是真正的相机,而不只是手机摄像头。用于绘画或做笔记的平板电脑在学生中也很常见。我认为这些科技产品当中,很多更多是关于娱乐和社交连接,而不是真正用来创造什么东西。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Of course, her phone holds her banking, transport, and social life too.” — The 6.5 answer places the phone in a separate sentence starting with 'Of course,'. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead fold it directly into the main list with a dash, 'and, of course, the phone itself, which holds...', keeping the whole inventory inside one flowing sentence.6.5分范文把手机放在一个以“Of course,”开头的独立句子里。7.0和7.5分范文则用破折号,把它直接折叠进主列表中,“and, of course, the phone itself, which holds...”,让整个清单都保持在一个流畅的句子里。
   • LR“always in her ears” — This is plain, everyday phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more vivid, slightly exaggerated 'surgically attached', a much more memorable image for the same idea.这是平实的日常措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更生动、略带夸张的“surgically attached”,为同一想法提供了更令人印象深刻的画面。
   • GRA“Young people I know are also getting into cameras again, real ones, not just phone cameras.” — This sentence uses a short appositive, 'real ones, not just phone cameras', a fairly simple structure. The 7.5 answer expresses a similar idea more economically with 'proper ones, for a certain kind of photo', showing a more compact phrase doing the same explanatory work.这个句子使用了一个简短的同位语“real ones, not just phone cameras”,结构相当简单。7.5分范文用“proper ones, for a certain kind of photo”更经济地表达了类似的想法,展现出一个更紧凑的短语完成了同样的解释性工作。

   7.0 分

   The aside 'oddly enough' before the point about cameras adds a small reflective, spoken touch beyond the flatter 6.5 statement.在谈到相机之前插入的“oddly enough”这个插入语,比6.5分更平淡的陈述增添了一丝反思性的口语色彩。

   If I trace my sister's day, it's honestly most of the list. There's a laptop for lectures and streaming, wireless earbuds that seem almost surgically attached, a smartwatch she checks more often than her phone, and a games console shared with her flatmates — and, of course, the phone itself, which holds her banking, transport, and pretty much her entire social life. Younger people I know are also getting into cameras again, oddly enough — proper ones, for a certain kind of photo. Tablets for drawing or notes are common among students too. What stands out to me is how much of it is about connection and entertainment rather than actually making things.

   查看中文翻译

   如果我追溯我妹妹的一天,说实话,几乎涵盖了整份清单。有一台用来上网课和看流媒体的笔记本电脑,一副几乎像是“长在”耳朵上的无线耳机,一块她查看频率比手机还高的智能手表,还有一台和室友共用的游戏机——当然,还有手机本身,它承载着她的银行业务、出行,以及几乎她全部的社交生活。我认识的年轻人也在重新迷上相机,说来也怪——是真正的相机,专门拍某一类照片用的。用于绘画或做笔记的平板电脑在学生中也很常见。让我印象深刻的是,这其中有那么多是关于社交连接和娱乐,而不是真正用来创造什么东西。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“There's a laptop for lectures and streaming, wireless earbuds that seem almost surgically attached” — This opens the list with an existential 'There's' construction rather than the subject-verb pattern used at 6.5, 'She uses a laptop', giving the inventory a slightly more detached, itemised feel. The 7.5 answer removes even the verb, opening with the bare noun phrase 'A laptop for lectures and streaming', an even more compressed listing style.这里用存在句“There's”结构来开启列表,而不是6.5分使用的“主语+动词”模式“She uses a laptop”,让整个清单显得更抽离、更像是逐项列举。7.5分范文甚至连动词都去掉了,直接以光秃秃的名词短语“A laptop for lectures and streaming”开篇,是一种更压缩的列举风格。
   • LR“almost surgically attached” — This vivid, exaggerated image is shared closely with the 7.5 answer, both well beyond the plain 'always in her ears' used at 6.5.这个生动、夸张的画面与7.5分范文高度一致,两者都远远超越了6.5分范文使用的平淡说法“always in her ears”。
   • GRA“a smartwatch she checks more often than her phone, and a games console shared with her flatmates — and, of course, the phone itself, which holds her banking, transport, and pretty much her entire social life” — This long sentence stacks a comparative clause, a passive participle phrase, and a dash-marked relative clause, considerably more developed than the shorter, separated sentences at 6.5. It closely matches the density of the 7.5 answer, differing mainly in small wording choices like 'pretty much' versus a bare statement.这个长句叠加了一个比较从句、一个被动分词短语,以及一个破折号标记的关系从句,比6.5分中更短、分开的句子要复杂得多。它在信息密度上与7.5分范文十分接近,主要区别在于“pretty much”这类小的措辞选择,相较于更简洁直白的说法。

   7.5 分

   The closing distinction between 'production' and 'consuming' gives the answer an analytical final layer that neither lower band attempts.“production”和“consuming”之间的结尾区分,为整篇回答增添了一层低分段都未曾尝试过的分析性收尾。

   If I trace my sister's day, it's most of the list. A laptop for lectures and streaming, wireless earbuds that seem surgically attached, a smartwatch she checks more often than her phone, a games console shared with flatmates, and, of course, the phone itself, which holds banking, transport and her entire social life. Younger people I know are also into cameras again, oddly — proper ones, for a certain kind of photo. Tablets for drawing or notes are common among students. What stands out is how much of it is about connection and entertainment rather than production; the tools for making things are a smaller part of most young people's kit than the tools for consuming.

   查看中文翻译

   如果我追溯我妹妹的一天,几乎涵盖了整份清单。一台用来上网课和看流媒体的笔记本电脑,一副仿佛“长”在耳朵上的无线耳机,一块她查看频率比手机还高的智能手表,一台和室友共用的游戏机,当然,还有手机本身,它承载着银行业务、出行,以及她全部的社交生活。我认识的年轻人也在重新迷上相机,说来也怪——是真正的相机,专门拍某一类照片用的。用于绘画或做笔记的平板电脑在学生中也很常见。让人印象深刻的是,这其中有那么多是关于社交连接和娱乐,而不是生产创造;对大多数年轻人来说,用来制作东西的工具在他们的装备里所占的比重,远小于用来消费内容的工具。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“A laptop for lectures and streaming, wireless earbuds that seem surgically attached, a smartwatch she checks more often than her phone, a games console shared with flatmates, and, of course, the phone itself” — Dropping the introductory verb entirely and opening straight with a list of noun phrases is a bolder, more compressed structure than the 'There's' construction at 7.0 or the full subject-verb sentences at 6.5, reading almost like a catalogue.彻底去掉引导性动词,直接以一份名词短语列表开篇,这是一种比7.0分的“There's”结构或6.5分完整的主谓句更大胆、更压缩的结构,读起来几乎像一份产品目录。
   • LR“production” — This abstract, almost technical noun is more precise and analytical than the plainer 'actually making things' used at both 6.5 and 7.0, exemplifying the more academic register available at the top band.这个抽象、近乎技术性的名词,比6.5和7.0分范文都使用的更平淡的“actually making things”更精确、更具分析性,体现出最高分段所能达到的更学术化的语域。
   • GRA“the tools for making things are a smaller part of most young people's kit than the tools for consuming” — This closing sentence uses a comparative structure built around the parallel nouns 'kit' and 'consuming', a more abstract and economical construction than the simpler closing sentences at 6.5 and 7.0.这个结尾句使用了一个围绕并列名词“kit”和“consuming”构建的比较结构,比6.5和7.0分范文更简单的结尾句更抽象、更经济。

2. 2. Do you agree or disagree that technology has a positive effect on young people's lives?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Closes with the plain generalisation 'I think young people who use technology as a tool benefit the most', without the sharper contrast used in the upper bands.以平实的概括句“I think young people who use technology as a tool benefit the most”收尾,没有使用高分段那种更犀利的对比。

   On balance, I agree that technology has a positive effect on young people, though maybe less than it used to. A cousin of mine in a village in Quang Tri learned graphic design from free videos online and now works remotely for a company in Ho Chi Minh City. Without technology, that life wouldn't exist for him. Technology gives access to information, jobs, and people beyond your town, which is a huge benefit, especially for young people outside big cities. On the other hand, I also see anxiety, comparison, and hours spent with nothing to show for it. I think young people who use technology as a tool benefit the most.

   查看中文翻译

   总体来说,我同意科技对年轻人有积极影响,不过也许不如以前那么明显了。我有个表弟住在广治省的一个村子里,靠着网上的免费视频学会了平面设计,现在为胡志明市的一家公司远程工作。没有科技,他根本不可能过上这样的生活。科技让人能够接触到本地之外的信息、工作机会和人脉,这是一个巨大的好处,对大城市以外的年轻人来说尤其如此。另一方面,我也看到了焦虑、攀比,以及大把时间被消耗掉却毫无所获的情况。我认为那些把科技当作工具来使用的年轻人受益最多。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“On the other hand, I also see anxiety, comparison, and hours spent with nothing to show for it.” — The 6.5 answer introduces this counterpoint with the standard connector 'On the other hand,'. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead use the more integrated 'Against that,', both folding the pivot more tightly into the flow of the argument than the fuller phrase at 6.5.6.5分范文用标准连接词“On the other hand,”来引出这个反面观点。7.0和7.5分范文则使用更融合的“Against that,”,都比6.5分更完整的短语更紧密地把转折融入论述的流程中。
   • LR“Without technology, that life wouldn't exist for him.” — This is plain, direct phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both compress this into a dash-marked clause within the previous sentence, 'without technology, that life simply doesn't exist' or 'without technology that life doesn't exist', a punchier, unhedged present tense claim.这是平实、直接的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都把它压缩进前一句中一个破折号标记的从句里,“without technology, that life simply doesn't exist”或“without technology that life doesn't exist”,是一个更有力、不加缓和的现在时论断。
   • GRA“Technology gives access to information, jobs, and people beyond your town, which is a huge benefit, especially for young people outside big cities.” — This sentence uses a relative clause after a three-item list, workable but fairly standard. The 7.5 answer restructures the same list using a colon, 'Access to information, to jobs, to people beyond your town: those are enormous positives', a more rhetorically deliberate structure.这个句子在三项列表后面使用了一个关系从句,可行但相当标准。7.5分范文用冒号重新组织了同样的列表,“Access to information, to jobs, to people beyond your town: those are enormous positives”,是一个修辞上更用心的结构。

   7.0 分

   The closing sentence, 'I'd say the technology itself is positive; it's the way it's designed to be used that often isn't', gives the ending more analytical precision than the flatter final sentence at 6.5.结尾句“I'd say the technology itself is positive; it's the way it's designed to be used that often isn't”,比6.5分更平淡的结尾句带来更精确的分析性收尾。

   On balance I agree, though the balance is a bit closer than it used to be. A cousin of mine in a village in Quang Tri learnt graphic design entirely from free videos and now works remotely for a company in Ho Chi Minh City — without technology, that life simply doesn't exist. Access to information, to jobs, to people beyond your town: those are genuinely enormous positives, especially for young people outside the big cities. Against that, though, I do see the anxiety, the constant comparison, and the attention spans shrinking, plus hours that vanish without anything to show for them. I'd say the technology itself is positive; it's the way it's designed to be used that often isn't.

   查看中文翻译

   总体来说我同意,不过这个“总体”的天平比以前更接近持平了。我有个表弟住在广治省的一个村子里,完全靠网上的免费视频学会了平面设计,现在为胡志明市的一家公司远程工作——没有科技,这种生活根本不会存在。接触到本地以外的信息、工作机会和人脉:这些确实是巨大的好处,对大城市以外的年轻人来说尤其如此。不过,与此相对的是,我也确实看到了焦虑、无休止的攀比、注意力持续时间不断缩短,还有大把时间悄然流逝却毫无所获。我想说,科技本身是积极的;真正出问题的,往往是它被设计出来的使用方式。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Against that, though, I do see the anxiety, the constant comparison, and the attention spans shrinking” — This phrase uses 'Against that, though' to frame the counterpoint as a direct rebuttal, more integrated than the 6.5 answer's standard 'On the other hand,'. The 7.5 answer trims this further to simply 'Against that,', an even more economical version of the same pivot.这个短语用“Against that, though”把反面观点框定为一种直接反驳,比6.5分范文标准的“On the other hand,”更融合。7.5分范文把它进一步修剪成简单的“Against that,”,是同一转折点更为经济的版本。
   • LR“the constant comparison” — This precise noun phrase is more specific than the plain 'comparison' used at 7.5, interestingly showing that lexical intensity doesn't always increase in a straight line — sometimes a plainer noun at 7.5 lands harder because of the sentence rhythm around it.这个精确的名词短语比7.5分范文使用的平淡的“comparison”更具体,有趣的是,这说明词汇强度并不总是随分数直线上升——有时7.5分范文中更平淡的名词,反而因为句子周围的节奏而显得更有力。
   • GRA“Access to information, to jobs, to people beyond your town: those are genuinely enormous positives, especially for young people outside the big cities.” — This sentence uses a colon to set up a three-part list before the main clause, a sophisticated structure. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, showing this particular technique is already well established by 7.0.这个句子用冒号在主句之前引出一个三部分的列表,是一个成熟的结构。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,说明这种特定的技巧到7.0分时就已经相当成熟了。

   7.5 分

   The closing parallel sentence, 'Young people who use it as a tool win; those used by it lose', gives the argument a crisp, aphoristic finish beyond the plainer endings of the lower bands.结尾的平行句“Young people who use it as a tool win; those used by it lose”,为整个论述带来一个干净利落、近乎格言式的收尾,超越了低分段更平淡的结尾方式。

   On balance I agree, though the balance is closer than it used to be. A cousin of mine in a village in Quảng Trị learnt graphic design entirely from free videos and now works remotely for a company in Ho Chi Minh City — without technology that life doesn't exist. Access to information, to jobs, to people beyond your town: those are enormous positives, especially for young people outside big cities. Against that, I see the anxiety, the comparison, the attention spans shrinking, and hours that vanish without anything to show. The technology is positive; the way it's designed to be used often isn't. Young people who use it as a tool win; those used by it lose.

   查看中文翻译

   总体来说我同意,不过这个天平比以前更接近持平了。我有个表弟住在广治省的一个村子里,完全靠网上的免费视频学会了平面设计,现在为胡志明市的一家公司远程工作——没有科技,这种生活是不存在的。接触到本地以外的信息、工作机会和人脉:这些是巨大的好处,对大城市以外的年轻人来说尤其如此。与此相对,我看到了焦虑、攀比、注意力持续时间不断缩短,还有大把时间悄然流逝却毫无所获。科技本身是积极的;它被设计出来的使用方式,往往才是问题所在。把科技当作工具来使用的年轻人是赢家;被科技所利用的年轻人则是输家。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Against that, I see the anxiety, the comparison, the attention spans shrinking, and hours that vanish without anything to show.” — This trimmed opening, dropping 'though' and 'do' from the 7.0 equivalent, is a more compact and confident version of the same pivot, letting the list of concerns speak for itself without extra hedging.这个经过修剪的开头,去掉了7.0分对应句中的“though”和“do”,是同一个转折更紧凑、更自信的版本,让这份担忧清单不加多余的缓和语,自己说明问题。
   • LR“used by it lose” — This compact passive construction is a precise, almost proverbial way of framing the negative case, more economical and memorable than any equivalent phrasing in the lower bands.这个紧凑的被动结构是一种精确、近乎谚语式的方式,来阐述负面情况,比低分段中任何对应的措辞都更经济、更令人难忘。
   • GRA“Young people who use it as a tool win; those used by it lose.” — This closing sentence uses a semicolon to balance two short, mirrored clauses built around active and passive verb forms, 'use... win' and 'used... lose', a more sophisticated and rhetorically balanced structure than the plainer closing generalisations at 6.5 and 7.0.这个结尾句用分号平衡了两个围绕主动和被动动词形式构建的、相互映照的短句,“use... win”和“used... lose”,是一个比6.5和7.0分范文更平淡的结尾概括更成熟、修辞上更平衡的结构。

3. 3. How healthy is it for young people to spend a lot of time online?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Splits the cousin's recovery into two short, separate sentences, 'All three got better... so I think the hours were the real problem', rather than one flowing sentence.把表弟康复的过程拆分成两个简短、独立的句子,“All three got better... so I think the hours were the real problem”,而不是一个流畅的长句。

   It really depends on what 'online' means, but a lot of it isn't healthy. My cousin's sleep fell apart during a gaming phase, and his mood and grades got worse too. All three got better within weeks of the console leaving his bedroom, so I think the hours were the real problem, not the game itself. Physically, spending too much time on screens usually means less movement and worse sleep. Mentally, comparing yourself to other people's edited lives online isn't good either, especially for teenagers. I think passive scrolling is the unhealthy part, and that's what most apps are designed for.

   查看中文翻译

   这真的取决于“上网”具体指什么,但其中很大一部分确实是不健康的。我表弟在沉迷游戏的那段时间里,睡眠彻底乱了,情绪和成绩也随之变差。游戏机从他卧室搬走后的几周内,这三方面都好转了,所以我认为真正的问题在于时间,而不是游戏本身。从身体上讲,花太多时间盯着屏幕通常意味着运动减少、睡眠变差。从心理上讲,拿自己和别人在网上经过修饰的生活相比较也不是什么好事,对青少年来说尤其如此。我认为被动地刷手机才是不健康的那部分,而这恰恰是大多数应用程序的设计初衷。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“All three got better within weeks of the console leaving his bedroom, so I think the hours were the real problem, not the game itself.” — The 6.5 answer separates this into its own sentence with 'so I think'. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead attach it directly after a dash to the previous clause about the cousin's sleep, mood, and grades, keeping the whole anecdote and its conclusion inside a single continuous sentence.6.5分范文用“so I think”把这一点拆成独立的句子。7.0和7.5分范文则用破折号,把它直接附加在前面关于表弟睡眠、情绪和成绩的从句之后,让整个轶事及其结论都保持在一个连续的句子里。
   • LR“comparing yourself to other people's edited lives online isn't good either” — This is plain, general phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more precise, almost clinical 'endless comparison with edited, curated lives is genuinely corrosive' or 'edited lives is corrosive', a stronger, more specific verb than the vague 'isn't good'.这是平淡、笼统的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更精确、近乎临床用语的“endless comparison with edited, curated lives is genuinely corrosive”或“edited lives is corrosive”,比含糊的“isn't good”更有力、更具体的动词。
   • GRA“Physically, spending too much time on screens usually means less movement and worse sleep.” — This sentence uses a two-item list after 'means', a fairly simple structure. The 7.5 answer extends this into a three-item list, 'less movement, worse posture and worse sleep', showing a slightly wider grammatical pattern within the same sentence type.这个句子在“means”后面使用了一个两项列表,结构相当简单。7.5分范文把它扩展成一个三项列表,“less movement, worse posture and worse sleep”,在同一种句型中展现出略微更宽的语法模式。

   7.0 分

   The closing aside 'I'd say' before naming passive scrolling as the real problem adds a considered, spoken quality beyond the flatter 6.5 conclusion.在点明被动刷屏才是真正问题之前插入的“I'd say”,为结尾增添了一种深思熟虑的口语质感,超越了6.5分更平淡的结论。

   It depends heavily on what 'online' actually means, but honestly a lot of it isn't healthy. My cousin's sleep fell apart during a gaming phase, along with his mood and his grades, and all three recovered within weeks of the console moving out of his bedroom — so the hours were clearly the problem, not the game itself. Physically, long screen time usually means less movement, worse posture, and worse sleep. Mentally, endless comparison with edited, curated lives is genuinely corrosive at an age when identity still feels fragile. Online time that involves making something, learning, or real friendship seems fine in moderate doses. The unhealthy part, I'd say, is passive scrolling, and that's exactly what most apps are built to maximise.

   查看中文翻译

   这在很大程度上取决于“上网”到底指什么,但说实话,其中很大一部分确实是不健康的。我表弟在沉迷游戏的那段时间里,睡眠彻底乱了,情绪和成绩也随之受影响,而游戏机搬出他卧室后的几周内,这三方面全都恢复了——所以显然问题出在时间上,而不是游戏本身。从身体上讲,长时间盯着屏幕通常意味着运动更少、姿势更差、睡眠更差。从心理上讲,在这个身份认同还很脆弱的年纪,无休止地拿自己和别人经过修饰、精心打造的生活相比较,确实具有真正的腐蚀性。涉及创造、学习或真实友谊的上网时间,只要适度,看起来还算可以。我想说,真正不健康的部分是被动刷屏,而这恰恰是大多数应用程序被设计出来要最大化的东西。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“so the hours were clearly the problem, not the game itself” — This dash-introduced clause folds the conclusion directly into the anecdote's main sentence, more fluid than the 6.5 answer's separate 'so I think' sentence. The 7.5 answer keeps an almost identical structure, dropping only 'clearly', showing this technique is already well set by 7.0.这个用破折号引出的从句,把结论直接折叠进轶事的主句中,比6.5分范文独立的“so I think”句子更流畅。7.5分范文保留了几乎一模一样的结构,只是去掉了“clearly”,说明这种技巧到7.0分时已经相当成熟了。
   • LR“genuinely corrosive” — This precise, almost chemical metaphor for psychological harm is shared closely with the 7.5 answer, both well beyond the vague 'isn't good either' used at 6.5.这个精确、近乎化学隐喻的表达用来形容心理伤害,与7.5分范文高度一致,两者都远远超越了6.5分范文使用的含糊说法“isn't good either”。
   • GRA“My cousin's sleep fell apart during a gaming phase, along with his mood and his grades, and all three recovered within weeks of the console moving out of his bedroom” — This sentence chains three linked ideas together with commas and 'and', more developed than the two separate sentences at 6.5. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, showing this level of sentence-combining is already established by 7.0.这个句子用逗号和“and”把三个相互关联的想法串联在一起,比6.5分中两个独立的句子更为发展成熟。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,说明这种句子组合水平到7.0分时就已经确立了。

   7.5 分

   The closing sentence, 'that's exactly what most apps are built to maximise', ends on a pointed, slightly critical observation about design intent.结尾句“that's exactly what most apps are built to maximise”,以一个犀利、略带批判性的关于设计意图的观察收尾。

   It depends heavily on what 'online' means, but a lot of it isn't healthy. My cousin's sleep fell apart during a gaming phase, along with his mood and his grades, and all three recovered within weeks of the console moving out of his bedroom — the hours were the problem, not the game. Physically, long screen time means less movement, worse posture and worse sleep. Mentally, endless comparison with edited lives is corrosive at an age when identity is fragile. Online time that involves making something, learning, or genuine friendship seems fine in moderate doses. The unhealthy part is passive scrolling, and that's exactly what most apps are built to maximise.

   查看中文翻译

   这在很大程度上取决于“上网”指什么,但其中很大一部分确实是不健康的。我表弟在沉迷游戏的那段时间里,睡眠彻底乱了,情绪和成绩也一并受影响,而游戏机搬出他卧室后的几周内,这三方面全都恢复了——问题出在时间上,而不是游戏本身。从身体上讲,长时间盯着屏幕意味着运动更少、姿势更差、睡眠更差。从心理上讲,在身份认同还很脆弱的年纪,无休止地拿自己和别人经过修饰的生活相比较,具有腐蚀性。涉及创造、学习或真实友谊的上网时间,只要适度,看起来还算可以。真正不健康的部分是被动刷屏,而这恰恰是大多数应用程序被设计出来要最大化的东西。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“the hours were the problem, not the game” — This trimmed clause, dropping 'clearly' and 'itself' from the 7.0 equivalent, is a more economical and assured version of the same conclusion, letting the contrast between 'hours' and 'game' stand on its own.这个经过修剪的从句,去掉了7.0分对应句中的“clearly”和“itself”,是同一个结论更经济、更有把握的版本,让“hours”和“game”之间的对比自己说明问题。
   • LR“built to maximise” — This precise, almost technical phrase about deliberate design intent is sharper and more analytical than any equivalent closing phrase in the lower bands, which stop at simply noting that apps are 'designed for' this.这个精确、近乎技术性的短语,谈的是刻意的设计意图,比低分段中任何对应的结尾短语都更犀利、更具分析性,低分段只是简单地指出应用程序“designed for”这一点。
   • GRA“that's exactly what most apps are built to maximise” — This closing clause uses the passive infinitive 'are built to maximise', a more technical and economical grammatical structure than the plainer 'designed for' construction used to close the 6.5 answer.这个结尾从句使用了被动不定式“are built to maximise”,比用来收束6.5分范文的更平淡的“designed for”结构更具技术性、更经济。

4. 4. What are the differences between talking to people online and talking to them face to face?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Uses two shorter, separate sentences to explain the client dispute, connected loosely with 'but', a clear but somewhat choppy structure.用两个较短、独立的句子来解释与客户的争执,用“but”松散地连接起来,结构清晰但略显生硬。

   Mainly, online you lose almost everything except the words themselves. A disagreement with a client got worse over a week of emails, until it felt quite hostile, but it was solved in five minutes when we finally sat down together. The emails had removed all the tone, so both sides had imagined the worst version of it. Face to face, you get expression and pauses, and you can fix a misunderstanding quickly. Online, you get more time to think, and some distance, which can help certain people say what they mean. I think online is better for information, and face to face is better for feelings.

   查看中文翻译

   主要区别在于,在线上,除了文字本身,你几乎失去了一切。一次和客户的分歧,在一周的邮件往来中愈演愈烈,变得相当有敌意,但当我们终于坐下来当面谈的时候,五分钟就解决了。邮件把所有的语气都剥离掉了,所以双方都在脑海中想象出了最糟糕的版本。面对面交流时,你能看到表情和停顿,也能很快化解误会。在线上交流时,你有更多时间思考,也有一定的距离感,这能帮助某些人更容易说出自己真正想说的话。我认为在线交流更适合传递信息,而面对面交流更适合处理情感。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“A disagreement with a client got worse over a week of emails, until it felt quite hostile, but it was solved in five minutes when we finally sat down together.” — The 6.5 answer joins escalation and resolution with a plain 'but'. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead use 'and then it dissolved' or 'and then dissolved', continuing the same sentence with 'and' rather than pivoting with 'but', which lets the story unfold as one continuous movement.6.5分范文用平淡的“but”把冲突升级和化解连接起来。7.0和7.5分范文则使用“and then it dissolved”或“and then dissolved”,用“and”延续同一个句子,而不是用“but”来转折,这让整个故事像一个连续的动作那样展开。
   • LR“got worse” — This is a plain, general verb. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more precise, almost technical 'escalated', a stronger and more specific word for the same process.这是一个平淡、笼统的动词。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更精确、近乎技术性的“escalated”,是描述同一过程时更有力、更具体的词。
   • GRA“The emails had removed all the tone, so both sides had imagined the worst version of it.” — This sentence uses 'so' to link cause and effect, clear but fairly standard. The 7.5 answer folds a very similar idea into a dash-marked clause attached to the previous sentence instead of starting a new one, 'the emails had stripped out the tone and both sides had filled it in with the worst version', a more compact, integrated structure.这个句子用“so”来连接因果关系,清晰但相当标准。7.5分范文把一个非常相似的想法,折叠进一个附加在前一句后面、由破折号标记的从句中,而不是另起一句,“the emails had stripped out the tone and both sides had filled it in with the worst version”,是一种更紧凑、更融合的结构。

   7.0 分

   The closing aside 'which, honestly, is more things than we usually admit' extends the final claim further than the plainer ending at 6.5.结尾插入语“which, honestly, is more things than we usually admit”,把最后的论断延伸得比6.5分更平淡的结尾更远。

   Mainly, online you lose everything except the words. A disagreement with a client escalated over a week of emails until it genuinely felt hostile, and then it dissolved in about five minutes once we were sitting across a table, because we could finally see that neither of us was actually angry — the emails had stripped out all the tone, and both sides had quietly filled it in with the worst version. Face to face, you get expression, pauses, and the chance to repair a misunderstanding almost instantly. Online, you get time to think and the safety of distance, which does help some people say what they actually mean. I'd say online is better for information, and face to face is better for anything involving feelings — which, honestly, is more things than we usually admit.

   查看中文翻译

   主要区别在于,在线上,除了文字之外你会失去一切。一次和客户的分歧,在一周的邮件往来中不断升级,直到真的让人觉得充满敌意,但当我们终于面对面坐下来谈的时候,大约五分钟就化解了,因为我们终于能看清彼此其实都没有真的生气——邮件把所有语气都剥离掉了,而双方都在悄悄地用最糟糕的版本去填补那个空白。面对面交流时,你能看到表情、停顿,还能几乎立刻修复一场误会。在线上交流时,你有时间思考,也有距离带来的安全感,这确实能帮助有些人说出他们真正想表达的意思。我想说,在线交流更适合传递信息,而面对面交流更适合处理任何涉及情感的事——说实话,这样的事情比我们通常愿意承认的要多得多。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“and then it dissolved in about five minutes once we were sitting across a table, because we could finally see that neither of us was actually angry” — This long clause links resolution, timing, and cause together in one continuous flow, more developed than the two separate sentences at 6.5. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, showing this level of complexity is already established by 7.0.这个长从句把化解、时间和原因串联进一个连续的流程中,比6.5分中两个独立的句子更为发展成熟。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,说明这种复杂程度到7.0分时就已经确立了。
   • LR“the safety of distance” — This is a precise, slightly abstract noun phrase for a psychological effect, more developed than a plainer equivalent would be. The 7.5 answer keeps this exact phrase, showing the two upper bands share this piece of lexis closely.这是一个精确、略带抽象色彩的名词短语,用来描述一种心理效应,比更平淡的对应说法更成熟。7.5分范文保留了完全一样的短语,说明这两个高分段在这个词汇点上高度一致。
   • GRA“I'd say online is better for information, and face to face is better for anything involving feelings — which, honestly, is more things than we usually admit.” — This sentence adds a dash-marked relative clause onto an already balanced comparison, extending it further than the simpler final sentence at 6.5. The 7.5 answer achieves a very similar structure, differing mainly by dropping the comma before 'which' and the aside 'honestly', a marginally tighter version.这个句子在一个已经平衡的比较句后面加上了一个破折号标记的关系从句,比6.5分更简单的结尾句延伸得更远。7.5分范文实现了非常相似的结构,主要区别在于去掉了“which”前面的逗号和插入语“honestly”,是一个略微更紧凑的版本。

   7.5 分

   The closing clause, 'which is more things than we admit', trims the 7.0 version's extra hedge 'honestly, is more things than we usually admit' into a more economical final line.结尾从句“which is more things than we admit”,把7.0版本额外的缓和语“honestly, is more things than we usually admit”修剪成一句更经济的收尾。

   Mainly that online, you lose everything except the words. A disagreement with a client escalated over a week of emails until it felt genuinely hostile, and then dissolved in five minutes across a table, because we could see that neither of us was angry — the emails had stripped out the tone and both sides had filled it in with the worst version. Face to face, you get expression, pauses, the chance to repair a misunderstanding instantly. Online, you get time to think and the safety of distance, which helps some people say what they mean. I'd say online is better for information and face to face is better for anything involving feelings, which is more things than we admit.

   查看中文翻译

   主要在于,在线上,除了文字之外你会失去一切。一次和客户的分歧,在一周的邮件往来中不断升级,直到真的让人觉得充满敌意,但当我们面对面坐在一张桌子旁时,五分钟就化解了,因为我们能够看清彼此都没有真的生气——邮件把所有语气都剥离掉了,而双方都用最糟糕的版本填补了那个空白。面对面交流时,你能看到表情、停顿,还能立刻修复一场误会。在线上交流时,你有时间思考,也有距离带来的安全感,这能帮助有些人说出他们真正想表达的意思。我想说,在线交流更适合传递信息,而面对面交流更适合处理任何涉及情感的事,这样的事情比我们愿意承认的要多得多。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Mainly that online, you lose everything except the words.” — Opening the answer with the fragment 'Mainly that' rather than the fuller 'Mainly, online you lose' used at 6.5 and 7.0 is a bolder, more conversational opening move, sounding like the direct continuation of an unspoken question.用片段“Mainly that”而不是6.5和7.0分使用的更完整的“Mainly, online you lose”来开篇,这是一个更大胆、更具对话感的开场方式,听起来像是对一个未说出口的问题的直接延续。
   • LR“stripped out the tone” — This vivid, precise verb phrase matches the 7.0 answer closely, both clearly ahead of the plainer 'removed all the tone' used at 6.5, showing this lexical upgrade is locked in from 7.0 onward.这个生动、精确的动词短语与7.0分范文高度一致,两者都明显领先于6.5分使用的更平淡的“removed all the tone”,说明这个词汇上的升级从7.0分开始就已经固定下来了。
   • GRA“which is more things than we admit” — This closing relative clause is trimmed of the extra adverb 'honestly' and modal softening used at 7.0, a more economical and confident final structure than either lower band's ending.这个结尾关系从句去掉了7.0分中额外的副词“honestly”和情态软化,是一个比两个低分段的结尾都更经济、更自信的最终结构。

5. 5. What do you think of the view that it is possible for people to make good friends online?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Introduces the caveat about depth with the plain phrase 'The one problem is depth', a clear but slightly flat way of shifting the argument.用平实的短语“The one problem is depth”引出关于深度的补充说明,这是一种清晰但略显平淡的转折方式。

   I think it's true, but it depends what we mean by 'good'. I've worked with a designer in Poland for four years on a shared project, and we message most weeks about more than just work, so I'd call him a real friend, even though we've never been in the same room. Doing things together builds friendship, and the internet gives people plenty of shared activities, like games, projects, or communities around a hobby. The one problem is depth. Online friendships are often about one shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end quietly when that thing ends.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这是对的,但这取决于我们所说的“好”是什么意思。我和一位波兰的设计师在一个共同项目上合作了四年,几乎每周都会聊聊工作之外的事情,所以尽管我们从未同处一室,我还是会称他为真正的朋友。一起做事能建立友谊,而互联网给人们提供了大量共同活动的机会,比如游戏、项目,或者围绕某种爱好形成的社群。唯一的问题在于深度。网络友谊往往只围绕某一件共同的事情,而不是共同的生活,当那件事结束时,这段友谊也可能悄无声息地结束。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“The one problem is depth.” — The 6.5 answer marks this shift with the bare noun phrase 'The one problem is depth.' The 7.0 answer extends this slightly with 'The caveat is depth, though.', and 7.5 trims it back down to 'The caveat is depth.', showing that word count doesn't rise in a straight line between the bands — sometimes 7.5 is simply more economical than 7.0.6.5分范文用光秃秃的名词短语“The one problem is depth.”来标记这个转折。7.0分范文把它略微扩展为“The caveat is depth, though.”,而7.5分又把它精简回“The caveat is depth.”,这说明字数并不会随分数直线上升——有时7.5分只是比7.0分更经济而已。
   • LR“Doing things together builds friendship” — This is plain, functional phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more precise noun phrase 'Shared activity builds friendship', turning the verb phrase into a compact abstract noun, a more academic register.这是平实、功能性的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更精确的名词短语“Shared activity builds friendship”,把动词短语转化为一个紧凑的抽象名词,是一种更学术化的语域。
   • GRA“Online friendships are often about one shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end quietly when that thing ends.” — This sentence coordinates two clauses with 'and', clear but standard. The 7.5 answer achieves the same content with almost identical wording but slightly tighter phrasing, 'tend to be about a shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end silently when the thing ends', showing the sentence structure itself has little room left to develop further at this level.这个句子用“and”并列连接两个分句,清晰但标准。7.5分范文用几乎一模一样的措辞表达了相同的内容,但更为紧凑一些,“tend to be about a shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end silently when the thing ends”,说明在这个水平上,句子结构本身已经没有太多进一步发展的空间了。

   7.0 分

   The closing contrast, 'Good friends online, definitely — but the friend who drives you to hospital still usually lives nearby', gives the ending more punch than the flatter final sentence at 6.5.结尾的对比“Good friends online, definitely — but the friend who drives you to hospital still usually lives nearby”,比6.5分更平淡的结尾句更有力度。

   I think it's true, with a caveat about what 'good' actually means. I've worked with a designer in Poland for four years through a shared project, we message most weeks about far more than just work, and honestly I'd call him a real friend despite never having been in the same room as him. Shared activity builds friendship, and the internet supplies shared activity in real abundance — games, projects, communities built around almost any interest. The caveat is depth, though. Online friendships tend to be about a shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end pretty silently once the thing itself ends. Good friends online, definitely — but the friend who drives you to hospital still usually lives nearby.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这是对的,但有一个关于“好”到底是什么意思的但书。我和一位波兰的设计师通过一个共同项目合作了四年,几乎每周都会聊聊远不止工作的事情,说实话,尽管我们从未同处一室,我还是会称他为真正的朋友。共同活动能建立友谊,而互联网提供了真正丰富的共同活动——游戏、项目,以及围绕几乎任何兴趣建立起来的社群。不过,这里有个但书,那就是深度。网络友谊往往只围绕某一件共同的事情,而不是共同的生活,一旦那件事本身结束了,这段友谊也可能相当悄无声息地结束。网上确实能交到好朋友,这一点毋庸置疑——但那个开车送你去医院的朋友,通常还是住在附近的那个人。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Good friends online, definitely — but the friend who drives you to hospital still usually lives nearby.” — This closing sentence uses a sentence fragment plus a dash-marked contrast, a bolder rhetorical move than the plain final sentence at 6.5. The 7.5 answer achieves a similar effect but splits it into two short separate sentences instead of one dash-linked one, 'Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.', a slightly different but equally deliberate stylistic choice.这个结尾句用一个句子片段加上一个破折号标记的对比,是比6.5分平淡的结尾句更大胆的修辞手法。7.5分范文实现了类似的效果,但把它拆成两个简短、独立的句子,而不是一个破折号连接的句子,“Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.”,是一个略有不同但同样用心的文体选择。
   • LR“shared activity in real abundance” — The intensifier 'real' here adds emphasis beyond the plain 'plenty of shared activities' at 6.5. The 7.5 answer drops 'real' for the simpler 'in abundance', showing that at the very top band, restraint can be just as effective as intensification.这里的强调词“real”比6.5分平淡的“plenty of shared activities”增添了更多的强调语气。7.5分范文去掉了“real”,改用更简单的“in abundance”,说明在最顶尖的分数段,克制可以和强调一样有效。
   • GRA“we message most weeks about far more than just work, and honestly I'd call him a real friend despite never having been in the same room as him” — This sentence links two clauses with 'and', the second containing a concessive 'despite' phrase, a well-developed structure. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, trimming only 'just' and 'as him', showing this sentence pattern is already close to settled by 7.0.这个句子用“and”连接两个分句,第二个分句里带有一个让步性的“despite”短语,是一个成熟的结构。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,只是去掉了“just”和“as him”,说明这种句型到7.0分时就已经基本定型了。

   7.5 分

   The two short closing sentences, 'Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.', replace the dash-linked version at 7.0 with a punchier, two-beat ending.两个简短的结尾句“Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.”,用一个更有力的两拍式收尾,取代了7.0分那种破折号连接的版本。

   I think it's true, with a caveat about what 'good' means. I've worked with a designer in Poland for four years through a shared project, we message most weeks about far more than work, and I'd call him a real friend despite never having been in the same room. Shared activity builds friendship, and the internet supplies shared activity in abundance — games, projects, communities around any interest. The caveat is depth. Online friendships tend to be about a shared thing rather than a shared life, and they can end silently when the thing ends. Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这是对的,但有一个关于“好”到底是什么意思的但书。我和一位波兰的设计师通过一个共同项目合作了四年,几乎每周都会聊聊远不止工作的事情,尽管我们从未同处一室,我还是会称他为真正的朋友。共同活动能建立友谊,而互联网提供了丰富的共同活动——游戏、项目,以及围绕任何兴趣建立起来的社群。这里的但书是深度。网络友谊往往只围绕某一件共同的事情,而不是共同的生活,当那件事结束时,这段友谊也可能悄无声息地结束。网上确实能交到好朋友,这一点毫无疑问。但那个开车送你去医院的朋友,通常还是住在附近的那个人。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Good friends online, yes.” — This four-word sentence fragment is even more compact than the 7.0 answer's dash-linked version, creating a deliberate pause before the final contrasting sentence lands.这个四个词的句子片段,比7.0分破折号连接的版本更为紧凑,在最后的对比句落地之前,制造了一个刻意的停顿。
   • LR“in abundance” — This trimmed phrase, dropping the intensifier 'real' used at 7.0, shows a more restrained, confident register — the word 'abundance' itself already carries enough weight without extra emphasis.这个经过修剪的短语,去掉了7.0分使用的强调词“real”,展现出一种更克制、更自信的语域——“abundance”这个词本身已经足够有分量,不需要额外的强调。
   • GRA“Good friends online, yes. The friend who drives you to hospital usually still lives nearby.” — Splitting the closing idea into two short, separate sentences rather than joining them with a dash, as the 7.0 answer does, creates a more deliberate rhetorical pause, showing flexible control over sentence boundaries for effect.把结尾的想法拆分成两个简短、独立的句子,而不是像7.0分范文那样用破折号连接起来,这营造出一种更刻意的修辞停顿,展现出对句子边界的灵活掌控,以达到特定的修辞效果。

6. 6. What types of impacts can technology have on family relationships?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Opens with the full frame 'I think technology affects family relationships in both directions', a clear but fuller and more explanatory opening than the upper bands use.以完整的框架句“I think technology affects family relationships in both directions”开篇,清晰但比高分段使用的开篇更完整、更具解释性。

   I think technology affects family relationships in both directions, and I see this in my own family. I video-call my grandmother in Hue every Sunday, and she feels more present in my life now than when I lived two hours away and only visited once a month. At the same time, our family dinners often have six phones on the table, and the conversation keeps stopping. My mother has even started taking the phones away, like a teacher. I think technology helps families stay connected across distance, but it can also disconnect them when they're sitting at the same table.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为科技对家庭关系的影响是双向的,我在自己家里就能看到这一点。我每个周日都会给在顺化的奶奶视频通话,而现在她在我生活中的存在感,反而比我住在两小时车程之外、每月只探望一次的时候更强。与此同时,我们家的晚餐桌上经常摆着六部手机,谈话总是被不断打断。我妈妈甚至开始像老师一样,把手机收走。我认为科技能帮助家人跨越距离保持联系,但当大家坐在同一张桌子旁时,它也可能让彼此疏远。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“she feels more present in my life now than when I lived two hours away and only visited once a month” — The 6.5 answer states this comparison in full. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both attach the dash-marked conclusion 'technology basically stitched that relationship back together' or 'technology stitched that relationship back together' directly afterward, extending the same sentence with an evaluative image rather than leaving the comparison to stand alone.6.5分范文完整地陈述了这个比较。7.0和7.5分范文都在后面直接附加了一个破折号标记的结论——“technology basically stitched that relationship back together”或“technology stitched that relationship back together”,用一个评价性的意象来延伸同一个句子,而不是让这个比较独立存在。
   • LR“My mother has even started taking the phones away, like a teacher.” — This is plain, direct phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more specific, slightly formal verb 'confiscating' in place of the everyday 'taking away', a small but clear upgrade in precision.这是平实、直接的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更具体、略带正式色彩的动词“confiscating”来代替日常用语“taking away”,这是精确度上一个虽小但明确的提升。
   • GRA“I think technology helps families stay connected across distance, but it can also disconnect them when they're sitting at the same table.” — This sentence uses 'but' to join two contrasting clauses, clear but fairly standard. The 7.5 answer expresses the same contrast using two parallel verb phrases joined by 'and' instead, 'lets families stay connected across distance and lets them disconnect across a table', a more rhythmic, repeated structure.这个句子用“but”连接两个对比分句,清晰但相当标准。7.5分范文则用两个由“and”连接的并列动词短语来表达同样的对比,“lets families stay connected across distance and lets them disconnect across a table”,是一种更有节奏感、带有重复结构的表达。

   7.0 分

   The simile 'like some kind of teacher' adds a slightly exaggerated, humorous touch beyond the plainer 'like a teacher' used at 6.5.明喻“like some kind of teacher”比6.5分使用的更平淡的“like a teacher”多了一丝略带夸张的幽默色彩。

   I'd say technology pulls family relationships in both directions at once, and I see it clearly in my own family. I video-call my grandmother in Hue every Sunday, and honestly she's more present in my life now than when I lived two hours away and only visited monthly — technology basically stitched that relationship back together. At the same time, our family dinners have six phones face-up on the table and conversations that keep pausing, and my mother has actually started confiscating them, like some kind of teacher. Technology lets families stay connected across distance and lets them disconnect across a table. Whether the overall effect is positive seems to depend on whether a family sets rules, and most families, mine included, tend to set them far too late.

   查看中文翻译

   我想说,科技同时把家庭关系往两个方向拉扯,我在自己家里就能清楚地看到这一点。我每个周日都会给在顺化的奶奶视频通话,说实话,现在她在我生活中的存在感,反而比我住在两小时车程之外、每月只探望一次的时候更强——科技基本上把那段关系重新缝合了起来。与此同时,我们家的晚餐桌上摆着六部朝上放着的手机,对话总是不断被打断,我妈妈甚至真的开始像某种老师一样把它们收走。科技既能让家人跨越距离保持联系,也能让他们即使坐在同一张桌子旁也彼此疏远。整体效果是否是积极的,似乎取决于一个家庭是否设立了规矩,而大多数家庭——包括我家在内——往往设立得太晚了。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“technology basically stitched that relationship back together” — This vivid metaphor is shared closely with the 7.5 answer, both considerably more evocative than the plain factual comparison at 6.5, which doesn't use any such image at all.这个生动的隐喻与7.5分范文高度一致,两者都比6.5分那种没有使用任何此类意象的平实事实性比较更具感染力。
   • LR“confiscating them, like some kind of teacher” — This phrase intensifies the image with 'some kind of', slightly more exaggerated than the 7.5 answer's plainer 'confiscating them like a teacher', showing that at 7.0 a little extra emphasis can sometimes do the same job as the sharper economy found at 7.5.这个短语用“some kind of”强化了这个意象,比7.5分范文更平淡的“confiscating them like a teacher”略微更夸张一些,说明在7.0分,一点额外的强调有时能起到和7.5分更犀利的简练同样的作用。
   • GRA“Whether the overall effect is positive seems to depend on whether a family sets rules, and most families, mine included, tend to set them far too late.” — This sentence uses a noun clause as subject, 'Whether the overall effect is positive', a sophisticated structure. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, trimming 'overall' to 'net' and 'tend to set them far too late' to 'set them late', a more economical final version.这个句子用一个名词从句作主语,“Whether the overall effect is positive”,是一个成熟的结构。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,把“overall”精简为“net”,把“tend to set them far too late”精简为“set them late”,是一个更经济的最终版本。

   7.5 分

   Opens with the fragment 'Both directions at once, in my own family', skipping the full explanatory sentence used at 6.5 and 7.0, a bolder, more compressed start.以片段“Both directions at once, in my own family”开篇,跳过了6.5和7.0分使用的完整解释性句子,是一个更大胆、更压缩的开场。

   Both directions at once, in my own family. I video-call my grandmother in Hue every Sunday, and she's more present in my life now than when I lived two hours away and visited monthly — technology stitched that relationship back together. At the same time, our family dinners have six phones face-up on the table and conversations that keep pausing, and my mother has started confiscating them like a teacher. Technology lets families stay connected across distance and lets them disconnect across a table. Whether the net effect is positive seems to depend on whether a family sets rules, and most families, including mine, set them late.

   查看中文翻译

   双向拉扯,同时进行,在我自己家里就是如此。我每个周日都会给在顺化的奶奶视频通话,现在她在我生活中的存在感,比我住在两小时车程之外、每月才探望一次的时候更强——科技把那段关系重新缝合了起来。与此同时,我们家的晚餐桌上摆着六部朝上放着的手机,对话总是不断被打断,我妈妈已经开始像老师一样把它们收走。科技既能让家人跨越距离保持联系,也能让他们即使坐在同一张桌子旁也彼此疏远。整体效果是否是积极的,似乎取决于一个家庭是否设立规矩,而大多数家庭——包括我家在内——设立得都太晚了。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Both directions at once, in my own family.” — This four-word opening fragment states the thesis immediately without any framing verb, a considerably more compact and confident opening than the fuller sentences 'I think technology affects...' at 6.5 and 'I'd say technology pulls...' at 7.0.这个四个词的开篇片段直接陈述论点,不使用任何框架性动词,是一个比6.5分更完整的句子“I think technology affects...”和7.0分的“I'd say technology pulls...”更紧凑、更自信的开篇。
   • LR“stitched that relationship back together” — This vivid metaphor matches the 7.0 answer closely, both well beyond the plain factual statement at 6.5, showing this particular image is already established by 7.0 and simply carried through.这个生动的隐喻与7.0分范文高度一致,两者都远远超越了6.5分那种平实的事实性陈述,说明这个特定的意象到7.0分时就已经确立,只是被延续了下来。
   • GRA“most families, including mine, set them late” — This closing clause is trimmed of the intensifiers 'tend to' and 'far too' used at 7.0, a more economical and understated final statement that lets the simple fact speak for itself.这个结尾从句去掉了7.0分使用的强调词“tend to”和“far too”,是一个更经济、更低调的最终陈述,让简单的事实自己说明问题。

7. 7. Do advances in technology always improve the quality of education?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Gives two separate reasons for the tablet failure in short, list-like sentences, 'The tablets were mostly used for games... and the money could have paid', a plain sequence.用简短、列举式的句子给出了平板电脑计划失败的两个独立理由,“The tablets were mostly used for games... and the money could have paid”,是一种平实的顺序陈述。

   No, I don't think technology always improves education, and sometimes it makes things worse while looking like progress. A school near Da Nang gave every child a tablet, and it was announced publicly, but a maths teacher there told me privately that results had actually fallen. The tablets were mostly used for games under the desk, and the money could have paid for two more teachers instead. I think technology improves education when it does something a teacher can't do alone, like showing a video or giving access to lessons a small school could never offer. But it fails when it's added just because it's new.

   查看中文翻译

   不,我不认为科技总能改善教育,有时候它会让情况变得更糟,却又表现得像是一种进步。岘港附近的一所学校给每个孩子都配发了一台平板电脑,还大张旗鼓地对外宣布了这件事,但一位在那里教书的数学老师私下告诉我,成绩其实是下滑了。这些平板电脑大多数时候被用来在课桌底下打游戏,而那笔钱本来可以用来多聘请两位老师。我认为,当科技能做一些老师单靠自己无法做到的事情时,它才能改善教育,比如放映一段视频,或者提供一所小学校永远无法提供的课程资源。但如果科技的加入仅仅是因为它够新,那它就会以失败告终。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“A school near Da Nang gave every child a tablet, and it was announced publicly, but a maths teacher there told me privately that results had actually fallen.” — The 6.5 answer chains this with 'and... but', producing a slightly loose three-part sentence. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead use a dash after the main clause to attach the teacher's private admission directly, tightening the same information into a more controlled structure.6.5分范文用“and... but”把这几点串联起来,形成一个略显松散的三部分句子。7.0和7.5分范文则在主句后面用破折号,直接把老师私下的坦白附加上去,把同样的信息收紧成一个更受控的结构。
   • LR“gave every child a tablet, and it was announced publicly” — This is plain, workable phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more compact 'with a lot of publicity' or 'with great publicity', a prepositional phrase doing the same descriptive work more economically.这是平实、可用的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更紧凑的“with a lot of publicity”或“with great publicity”,用一个介词短语更经济地完成了同样的描述性工作。
   • GRA“I think technology improves education when it does something a teacher can't do alone, like showing a video or giving access to lessons a small school could never offer.” — This sentence uses a 'like' example with two coordinated items, workable but fairly standard. The 7.5 answer restructures this using a colon followed by a three-item list, 'a video of a beating heart, a language app a child uses at home, access to lectures a village school could never host', a more vivid, itemised, and rhythmically deliberate structure.这个句子用“like”引出一个带两个并列项的例子,可用但相当标准。7.5分范文用冒号加三项列表重新组织了这个结构,“a video of a beating heart, a language app a child uses at home, access to lectures a village school could never host”,是一个更生动、更具条理、节奏感更用心的结构。

   7.0 分

   The closing reflection, 'Honestly, the best classroom I ever sat in just had a blackboard and a teacher who cared', adds a personal, spoken final touch beyond the plainer ending at 6.5.结尾的反思“Honestly, the best classroom I ever sat in just had a blackboard and a teacher who cared”,比6.5分更平淡的结尾增添了一丝个人化的口语色彩。

   Not always, and sometimes it actually makes things worse while looking like progress. A school near Da Nang gave every child a tablet, with a lot of publicity, and a maths teacher there told me privately that results had fallen — the tablets were mostly used for games under the desk, and that money could have paid for two extra teachers instead. Technology improves education when it does something a teacher genuinely can't, like a video of a beating heart, or a language app a child uses at home, or access to lectures a village school could never host on its own. It fails, I'd say, when it's introduced simply because it's new rather than because it actually solves a problem. Honestly, the best classroom I ever sat in just had a blackboard and a teacher who cared.

   查看中文翻译

   并非总是如此,有时它反而会让事情变得更糟,却仍表现得像是一种进步。岘港附近的一所学校给每个孩子都配发了一台平板电脑,还大张旗鼓地宣传——一位在那里教书的数学老师私下告诉我,成绩其实下滑了,这些平板电脑大多数时候被用来在课桌底下打游戏,那笔钱本来可以用来多聘请两位老师。当科技能做一些老师确实做不到的事情时,它才能改善教育,比如一段跳动心脏的视频,或者一个孩子在家使用的语言学习应用,又或者一所村小自己永远无法提供的讲座资源。我想说,当科技的引入仅仅是因为它够新,而不是因为它真正解决了某个问题时,它就会失败。说实话,我坐过的最棒的教室,就只有一块黑板,和一位真心关心学生的老师。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“the tablets were mostly used for games under the desk, and that money could have paid for two extra teachers instead” — This dash-introduced clause attaches the criticism directly to the main sentence, more fluid than the 6.5 answer's separated, list-like sentences. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, trimming only 'mostly' and 'that... instead', a slightly more economical version.这个用破折号引出的从句,把批评意见直接附加在主句上,比6.5分范文那种分开、列举式的句子更为流畅。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,只是去掉了“mostly”和“that... instead”,是一个略微更经济的版本。
   • LR“results had fallen” — This plain, direct phrase is shared closely with the 7.5 answer, both more blunt and confident than the 6.5 answer's softened 'results had actually fallen', showing that at this point a plainer statement can carry more weight than an intensified one.这个平实、直接的短语与7.5分范文高度一致,两者都比6.5分范文软化过的说法“results had actually fallen”更直白、更有把握,说明在这一点上,更平淡的陈述反而能比强调过的说法更有分量。
   • GRA“Technology improves education when it does something a teacher genuinely can't, like a video of a beating heart, or a language app a child uses at home, or access to lectures a village school could never host on its own.” — This sentence uses a colon-like 'like' list with three items joined by repeated 'or', a well-developed structure. The 7.5 answer achieves a similar list but drops the repeated 'or' in favour of commas after a colon, 'a video of a beating heart, a language app a child uses at home, access to lectures a village school could never host', a more compact, rhythmic variant.这个句子用类似冒号功能的“like”列举了三项,由重复的“or”连接,是一个成熟的结构。7.5分范文实现了类似的列表,但去掉了重复的“or”,改用冒号后接逗号的形式,“a video of a beating heart, a language app a child uses at home, access to lectures a village school could never host”,是一个更紧凑、更有节奏感的变体。

   7.5 分

   The closing sentence, 'The best classroom I ever sat in had a blackboard and a teacher who cared', drops the hedge 'Honestly' used at 7.0 for a more direct, confident final statement.结尾句“The best classroom I ever sat in had a blackboard and a teacher who cared”,去掉了7.0分使用的缓和语“Honestly”,换来一个更直接、更自信的收尾。

   Not always, and sometimes they make it worse while looking like progress. A school near Da Nang gave every child a tablet, with great publicity, and a maths teacher there told me privately that results had fallen — the tablets were used for games under the desk, and the money could have paid for two extra teachers. Technology improves education when it does something a teacher can't: a video of a beating heart, a language app a child uses at home, access to lectures a village school could never host. It fails when it's introduced because it's new rather than because it solves a problem. The best classroom I ever sat in had a blackboard and a teacher who cared.

   查看中文翻译

   并非总是如此,有时它们反而会让事情变得更糟,却仍表现得像是一种进步。岘港附近的一所学校给每个孩子都配发了一台平板电脑,大张旗鼓地宣传,一位在那里教书的数学老师私下告诉我,成绩下滑了——这些平板电脑被用来在课桌底下打游戏,那笔钱本来可以用来多聘请两位老师。当科技能做一些老师做不到的事情时,它才能改善教育:一段跳动心脏的视频,一个孩子在家使用的语言学习应用,或者一所村小自己永远无法提供的讲座资源。当科技的引入仅仅是因为它够新,而不是因为它解决了某个问题时,它就会失败。我坐过的最棒的教室,就只有一块黑板,和一位真心关心学生的老师。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“the tablets were used for games under the desk, and the money could have paid for two extra teachers” — This trimmed version, dropping 'mostly' and 'instead' from the 7.0 equivalent, is a more economical and assured statement of the same criticism.这个经过修剪的版本,去掉了7.0分对应句中的“mostly”和“instead”,是同一个批评意见更经济、更有把握的陈述。
   • LR“access to lectures a village school could never host” — This precise, image-rich phrase matches the 7.0 answer closely, both considerably more vivid than the plainer 'giving access to lessons a small school could never offer' used at 6.5.这个精确、富含画面感的短语与7.0分范文高度一致,两者都比6.5分使用的更平淡的“giving access to lessons a small school could never offer”更生动得多。
   • GRA“The best classroom I ever sat in had a blackboard and a teacher who cared.” — This closing sentence drops the hedge 'Honestly' used at 7.0, ending instead on a bare, confident statement, a slightly more assured final structure than the hedged version at 7.0 or the fuller explanatory sentence at 6.5.这个结尾句去掉了7.0分使用的缓和语“Honestly”,转而以一个光秃秃、自信的陈述句收尾,比7.0分带缓和语的版本或6.5分更完整的解释性句子都更有把握。

8. 8. To what extent do you think technological progress will lead to increased unemployment?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   Explains the studio example with the plain connector 'because', a clear but fairly literal way of stating cause and effect.用平实的连接词“because”来解释工作室的例子,是一种清晰但相当直白的因果陈述方式。

   I think there will be some unemployment, especially in the short term, and the pain won't be spread evenly. My studio no longer has a receptionist, because a booking app took over that role, but we gained two new jobs in data and client support that didn't exist before. That's roughly how it has gone in the past. The problem is that the people who lose the old jobs are rarely the same people who get the new ones, and that gap is where unemployment really comes from. AI now threatens office and creative jobs too, including parts of my own job. I expect a difficult ten years rather than permanent mass unemployment.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为会出现一些失业情况,尤其是在短期内,而这种痛苦不会被均匀地分摊。我的工作室已经不再需要前台接待了,因为一款预约应用接手了这个角色,但我们也因此多出了两个以前不存在的新岗位,分别负责数据和客户支持。过去大致也是这样的情况。问题在于,失去旧工作岗位的人,很少会是得到新工作岗位的那批人,而这中间的落差,才是失业真正的来源。如今,AI也开始威胁到办公室和创意类的工作,包括我自己工作的一部分。我预计未来十年会很艰难,但不会出现永久性的大规模失业。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“My studio no longer has a receptionist, because a booking app took over that role, but we gained two new jobs in data and client support that didn't exist before.” — The 6.5 answer uses a full 'because' clause to explain the change. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead compress this into a dash-marked aside, 'a booking app absorbed that role —' or 'a booking app absorbed the role —', embedding the explanation more tightly into the sentence.6.5分范文用一个完整的“because”从句来解释这个变化。7.0和7.5分范文则把它压缩进一个破折号标记的插入语中,“a booking app absorbed that role —”或“a booking app absorbed the role —”,把解释更紧密地嵌入句子里。
   • LR“took over that role” — This is plain, functional phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more precise, slightly formal verb 'absorbed', which suggests the role being quietly folded into something larger, a more evocative choice.这是平实、功能性的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更精确、略带正式色彩的动词“absorbed”,暗示这个角色被悄悄地并入了某个更大的事物之中,是一个更具画面感的选择。
   • GRA“The problem is that the people who lose the old jobs are rarely the same people who get the new ones, and that gap is where unemployment really comes from.” — This sentence uses 'that... and that' to link two clauses, clear but somewhat repetitive with the word 'that'. The 7.5 answer achieves a cleaner version using a comma-set-off 'though' instead, 'The people who lose the old jobs, though, are rarely the people who get the new ones', avoiding the repetition.这个句子用“that... and that”来连接两个从句,清晰但在“that”这个词上略显重复。7.5分范文用逗号隔开的“though”实现了一个更干净的版本,“The people who lose the old jobs, though, are rarely the people who get the new ones”,避免了这种重复。

   7.0 分

   The final aside 'though historically, they've reached them pretty late' adds a reflective qualifying note beyond the plainer closing statement at 6.5.结尾插入语“though historically, they've reached them pretty late”,比6.5分更平淡的结尾陈述增添了一层反思性的限定说明。

   Some, especially in the short term, and honestly the pain will be spread pretty unevenly. My studio no longer has a receptionist — a booking app absorbed that role — but we gained two jobs in data and client support that didn't exist before, which is roughly how it's gone historically. The people who lose the old jobs, though, are rarely the people who get the new ones, and that gap is exactly where unemployment tends to live. AI now threatens office and creative work that used to feel fairly safe, including parts of my own job, honestly. I'd expect a genuinely difficult decade of displacement rather than permanent mass unemployment, provided training and support actually reach the people affected — though historically, they've reached them pretty late.

   查看中文翻译

   会有一些失业,尤其是在短期内,说实话,这种痛苦的分布会相当不均。我的工作室已经不再有前台接待了——一款预约应用吸纳了这个角色——但我们也因此多出了两个以前不存在的岗位,负责数据和客户支持,而这大致就是历史上一直以来的情况。不过,失去旧工作岗位的人,很少会是得到新工作岗位的那批人,而这中间的落差,恰恰就是失业往往产生的地方。如今,AI也开始威胁到过去感觉相当安全的办公室和创意类工作,说实话,包括我自己工作的一部分。我预计会有一个真正艰难的、充满职业变迁的十年,而不是永久性的大规模失业,前提是培训和支持措施真的能触及那些受影响的人——不过从历史上看,这些措施触及他们的时间往往相当滞后。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“a booking app absorbed that role — but we gained two jobs in data and client support that didn't exist before, which is roughly how it's gone historically” — This sentence links a dash-marked explanation to a relative clause, more developed than the 'because' clause at 6.5. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, differing only in dropping 'that' before 'role', showing this pattern is already close to settled by 7.0.这个句子把一个破折号标记的解释和一个关系从句连接起来,比6.5分的“because”从句更为发展成熟。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,唯一的区别是去掉了“role”前面的“that”,说明这种模式到7.0分时就已经基本定型了。
   • LR“displacement” — This precise, slightly technical noun for job loss caused by change is more specific than the general 'unemployment' repeated throughout the 6.5 answer, showing a finer distinction in vocabulary.这个精确、略带技术性色彩的名词,用来形容由变革引起的失业,比6.5分范文中反复使用的笼统的“unemployment”更具体,展现出更细腻的词汇区分。
   • GRA“I'd expect a genuinely difficult decade of displacement rather than permanent mass unemployment, provided training and support actually reach the people affected — though historically, they've reached them pretty late.” — This sentence stacks a conditional 'provided' clause onto a dash-marked concession, a well-developed and layered structure. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure but splits the final clause into its own short sentence instead, 'Historically they've reached them late.', a slightly different but equally deliberate rhetorical choice.这个句子在一个破折号标记的让步从句之上又叠加了一个条件性的“provided”从句,是一个成熟、有层次的结构。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,但把最后一个从句拆分成独立的短句,“Historically they've reached them late.”,是一个略有不同但同样用心的修辞选择。

   7.5 分

   The final two-word sentence, 'Historically they've reached them late.', breaks off from the longer sentence before it, a bold, deliberate closing rhythm.结尾这个简短的句子“Historically they've reached them late.”,从前面的长句中断开来,是一种大胆、刻意的收尾节奏。

   Some, especially in the short term, and the pain will be uneven. My studio no longer has a receptionist — a booking app absorbed the role — but we gained two jobs in data and client support that didn't exist before, which is roughly how it's gone historically. The people who lose the old jobs, though, are rarely the people who get the new ones, and that gap is where unemployment lives. AI now threatens office and creative work that used to feel safe, including parts of mine. I'd expect a difficult decade of displacement rather than permanent mass unemployment, provided training and support actually reach the people affected. Historically they've reached them late.

   查看中文翻译

   会有一些失业,尤其是在短期内,而这种痛苦会分布得很不均衡。我的工作室已经不再有前台接待了——一款预约应用吸纳了这个角色——但我们也因此多出了两个以前不存在的岗位,负责数据和客户支持,而这大致就是历史上一直以来的情况。不过,失去旧工作岗位的人,很少会是得到新工作岗位的那批人,而这中间的落差,正是失业所在的地方。如今,AI也开始威胁到过去感觉安全的办公室和创意类工作,包括我自己工作的一部分。我预计会有一个艰难的、充满职业变迁的十年,而不是永久性的大规模失业,前提是培训和支持措施真的能触及那些受影响的人。而从历史上看,这些措施触及他们的时间往往很晚。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“that gap is where unemployment lives” — This trimmed, almost aphoristic phrase, dropping 'really comes from' in favour of the simpler 'lives', is a more economical and confident final image than either the 6.5 or 7.0 equivalents.这个经过修剪、近乎格言式的短语,去掉了“really comes from”,改用更简单的“lives”,是一个比6.5和7.0分对应版本都更经济、更自信的最终意象。
   • LR“displacement” — This precise noun matches the 7.0 answer exactly, both clearly more specific than the repeated general noun 'unemployment' used throughout the 6.5 answer.这个精确的名词与7.0分范文完全一致,两者都明显比6.5分范文中反复使用的笼统名词“unemployment”更具体。
   • GRA“Historically they've reached them late.” — This short closing sentence, broken off from the longer conditional sentence before it rather than folded in with a dash as at 7.0, shows a bolder, more deliberate use of sentence length for rhetorical effect.这个简短的结尾句,从前面更长的条件句中断开来,而不是像7.0分那样用破折号折叠进去,展现出对句子长度更大胆、更刻意的运用,以达到修辞效果。

9. 9. What do you think of the view that the rate of technological innovation will slow down in years to come?

   2026年5–8月
   查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比

   6.5 分

   States the phone comparison and its implication in two separate sentences, 'Phones haven't changed much... My current phone is basically the same', a plain step-by-step structure.用两个独立的句子来陈述手机的比较及其含义,“Phones haven't changed much... My current phone is basically the same”,是一种平实的按部就班的结构。

   I think this view is half right, depending on where you look. Phones haven't changed much in five years. My current phone is basically the same as the one before it, and that kind of visible innovation for consumers does seem to be slowing down as the easy improvements run out. But the tools I use for design have changed more in the last two years than in the ten years before that, mostly because of AI. I think innovation might slow down in the products we hold, but speed up in the systems working behind them, which are less visible to most people.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这个观点说对了一半,这取决于你看的是哪个方面。手机在过去五年里没有太大变化。我现在用的手机和上一部基本一样,而这种面向消费者的、看得见的创新,似乎确实随着容易实现的改进都用完了而慢下来。但我用于设计的工具,在过去两年里的变化,比之前十年加起来还要大,主要是因为AI。我认为创新可能会在我们手中的产品上放慢脚步,但会在这些产品背后运作的系统里加快,而这些系统对大多数人来说是不太看得见的。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“My current phone is basically the same as the one before it, and that kind of visible innovation for consumers does seem to be slowing down as the easy improvements run out.” — The 6.5 answer states the phone comparison as its own sentence before drawing the wider conclusion. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers instead fold both ideas into one sentence using a dash, 'my current one is essentially the one before it —', a tighter, more integrated structure.6.5分范文先用独立的句子陈述手机的比较,再引出更宽泛的结论。7.0和7.5分范文则用破折号,把两个想法折叠进一个句子里,“my current one is essentially the one before it —”,是一个更紧凑、更融合的结构。
   • LR“visible innovation for consumers” — This is workable but slightly clunky phrasing. The 7.0 and 7.5 answers both use the more compact, natural 'visible, consumer-facing innovation' or 'visible consumer innovation', a tighter compound adjective doing the same descriptive job.这是可用但略显笨拙的措辞。7.0和7.5分范文都使用了更紧凑、更自然的“visible, consumer-facing innovation”或“visible consumer innovation”,用一个更紧凑的复合形容词完成了同样的描述工作。
   • GRA“I think innovation might slow down in the products we hold, but speed up in the systems working behind them, which are less visible to most people.” — This sentence uses 'but' to join two parallel verb phrases, then adds a relative clause, workable but somewhat loosely stacked. The 7.5 answer tightens this into 'innovation may slow in the products we hold and speed up in the systems behind them', dropping the relative clause and the repeated subject for a more compact, balanced structure.这个句子用“but”连接两个并列的动词短语,再加上一个关系从句,可用但堆叠得有些松散。7.5分范文把它收紧为“innovation may slow in the products we hold and speed up in the systems behind them”,去掉了关系从句和重复的主语,形成一个更紧凑、更平衡的结构。

   7.0 分

   The closing image, 'while the real changes are happening somewhere far less visible', gives the ending a slightly more developed final image than the plainer 6.5 equivalent.结尾的意象“while the real changes are happening somewhere far less visible”,比6.5分更平淡的对应版本带来了略微更成熟的最终意象。

   I think it's half right, depending on where you actually look. Phones have barely changed in five years — my current one is essentially the one before it — and that kind of visible, consumer-facing innovation does seem to be slowing as the easy improvements run out. But the tools I use for design have changed more in the last two years than in the previous ten, mostly because of AI, and biology and energy seem to be entering a similar kind of acceleration right now. So innovation may well be slowing in the products we actually hold while speeding up in the systems behind them. Honestly, the view feels like something people say when their own gadgets stop surprising them, while the real changes are happening somewhere far less visible.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这个观点说对了一半,这取决于你实际看的是哪个方面。手机在过去五年里几乎没什么变化——我现在用的这部,基本上就是上一部——而这种面向消费者的、看得见的创新,似乎确实随着容易实现的改进逐渐耗尽而慢了下来。但我用于设计的工具,在过去两年里的变化,比之前十年还要大,主要是因为AI,而生物学和能源领域现在似乎也正在进入类似的加速阶段。所以,创新很可能正在我们实际拿在手里的产品上放慢脚步,同时在这些产品背后的系统里加快速度。说实话,这种观点感觉就像是人们在自己的小玩意儿不再让他们感到惊喜时才会说出的话,而真正的变革正在某个远不那么显眼的地方发生。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“Honestly, the view feels like something people say when their own gadgets stop surprising them” — This hedge 'Honestly,' plus the vivid closing image is a more developed, opinionated final move than the plain explanatory sentence at 6.5. The 7.5 answer keeps an almost identical image but drops the hedge and 'own', trusting the observation to stand on its own.缓和语“Honestly,”再加上这个生动的结尾意象,是一个比6.5分平实的解释性句子更成熟、更具主观色彩的收尾手法。7.5分范文保留了几乎一模一样的意象,但去掉了缓和语和“own”,让这个观察自己站得住脚。
   • LR“a similar kind of acceleration right now” — This is a clear, workable phrase. The 7.5 answer's 'the same kind of acceleration' is nearly identical, showing this particular phrase has already reached a stable form by 7.0, with further polish coming from elsewhere in the sentence.这是一个清晰、可用的短语。7.5分范文的“the same kind of acceleration”几乎一模一样,说明这个特定的短语到7.0分时就已经形成了稳定的形式,进一步的打磨来自句子中的其他地方。
   • GRA“But the tools I use for design have changed more in the last two years than in the previous ten, mostly because of AI, and biology and energy seem to be entering a similar kind of acceleration right now.” — This sentence links a comparative clause to a further coordinated clause with 'and', a well-developed structure. The 7.5 answer achieves an almost identical structure, dropping only 'mostly' and 'right now', showing this pattern is already close to settled by 7.0.这个句子用“and”把一个比较从句和另一个并列从句连接起来,是一个成熟的结构。7.5分范文实现了几乎一模一样的结构,只是去掉了“mostly”和“right now”,说明这种模式到7.0分时就已经基本定型了。

   7.5 分

   The closing image, 'while the real changes move somewhere less visible', trims the 7.0 version's extra words 'are happening somewhere far' into a tighter, more economical final phrase.结尾意象“while the real changes move somewhere less visible”,把7.0版本中多余的“are happening somewhere far”修剪成一个更紧凑、更经济的最终短语。

   I think it's half right, depending on where you look. Phones have barely changed in five years — my current one is essentially the one before it — and that kind of visible consumer innovation does seem to be slowing as the easy improvements run out. But the tools I use for design have changed more in the last two years than in the previous ten, because of AI, and biology and energy seem to be entering the same kind of acceleration. So innovation may slow in the products we hold and speed up in the systems behind them. The view feels like something people say when their gadgets stop surprising them, while the real changes move somewhere less visible.

   查看中文翻译

   我认为这个观点说对了一半,这取决于你看的是哪个方面。手机在过去五年里几乎没什么变化——我现在用的这部,基本上就是上一部——而这种面向消费者的、看得见的创新,似乎确实随着容易实现的改进逐渐耗尽而慢了下来。但我用于设计的工具,在过去两年里的变化,比之前十年还要大,原因就是AI,而生物学和能源领域似乎也正在进入同样的加速阶段。所以,创新可能会在我们手中的产品上放慢脚步,同时在这些产品背后的系统里加快速度。这种观点感觉就像是人们在自己的小玩意儿不再让他们感到惊喜时才会说出的话,而真正的变革正在某个不那么显眼的地方悄然发生。

   为什么是这个分数

   • FC“The view feels like something people say when their gadgets stop surprising them” — Dropping the hedge 'Honestly,' and the word 'own' used at 7.0, this sentence states the same sharp observation with more confidence and economy, trusting the claim to land without softening.去掉了7.0分使用的缓和语“Honestly,”和“own”这个词,这个句子用更自信、更经济的方式陈述了同样犀利的观察,不加软化,相信这个论断能够自己站住脚。
   • LR“the real changes move somewhere less visible” — This trimmed closing phrase, using the simple verb 'move' instead of the fuller 'are happening... far less visible' at 7.0, is a more economical, almost aphoristic final image.这个经过修剪的结尾短语,使用简单的动词“move”来代替7.0分更完整的“are happening... far less visible”,是一个更经济、近乎格言式的最终意象。
   • GRA“innovation may slow in the products we hold and speed up in the systems behind them” — This sentence balances two parallel verb phrases, 'slow in... and speed up in', without a relative clause or repeated subject, a tighter and more rhythmically deliberate structure than the looser equivalent sentence at 6.5.这个句子平衡了两个并列的动词短语,“slow in... and speed up in”,没有使用关系从句或重复主语,比6.5分中更松散的对应句子结构更紧凑、节奏感也更用心。