这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？

讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。

这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？

在"A Person You Know Who Is Good at Learning Languages"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。

这张题卡还在使用吗？

是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。

IELTS Speaking Part 2

A Person You Know Who Is Good at Learning Languages

最近一次出现于 2026年9–12月当前在用

题卡

Describe a person you know who is good at learning languages.

You should say:

how you know this person
what languages this person speaks
how this person learned to speak these languages
and explain why you think this person is good at learning languages.

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

The answer relies on simple cause-and-effect statements ('he only became confident after joining our studio') and a plain personal comparison at the end, keeping the language clear but unremarkable, as expected at Band 6.5.答案依靠简单的因果陈述句('他是加入我们工作室之后才变得自信起来的')以及结尾一个平实的个人比较,使语言清晰但平平无奇,符合6.5分的预期水平。

The person I want to talk about is my coworker Minh, who works as a project manager at the same studio as me. I've known him for about three years, since we sit quite close to each other in our open-plan office.

Minh speaks Vietnamese, of course, good English, and also Japanese, because our studio works with a few clients from Japan. He can have full work meetings in Japanese without much trouble, which honestly impresses me a lot.

How he learned is mostly through work and apps, not a real classroom. He told me he studied English at school like everyone else, but he only became confident after joining our studio and talking to foreign clients on video calls every week. For Japanese, he started with a phone app in his free time, then practised with our Japanese clients directly, asking them to correct his mistakes during calls.

Why I think he's good at learning languages is because he isn't shy about making mistakes. When he doesn't know a word, he just tries to explain it another way instead of stopping the conversation. He also listens very carefully to how native speakers talk. I studied English for many years at school too, but I still feel nervous speaking to a client directly, so I really admire how naturally he does it.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个人是我的同事Minh,他在我工作的工作室做项目经理。我们认识大概三年了,因为在开放式办公室里我们的座位挨得很近。

Minh当然会说越南语,英语也很好,还会说日语,因为我们工作室有几个日本客户。他可以用日语顺利地开完整场工作会议,这一点真的让我挺佩服的。

他学语言的方式主要是靠工作和手机应用,而不是正规的课堂。他告诉我,他和大家一样在学校学英语,但真正变得自信是在进入我们工作室之后,每周都要在视频会议里和外国客户交流。学日语则是从一个手机应用开始,在空闲时间自学,然后直接跟我们的日本客户练习,请他们在通话中帮忙纠正他的错误。

我觉得他之所以擅长学语言,是因为他完全不怕说错。遇到不会的词,他不会停下对话,而是换一种方式解释。他听别人说话也听得特别仔细,几乎能不费力地模仿母语者的口音。我在学校学了很多年英语,但和客户直接对话时还是会紧张,所以我真的很佩服他那种自然的状态。

222 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

LR“which honestly impresses me a lot” — 'Impresses me a lot' states the reaction using the most common available verb and intensifier, rather than a more specific or idiomatic alternative a higher band might use, and 'honestly' is used here simply as a plain intensifying adverb rather than functioning as the kind of mid-sentence rhythmic device a 7.0 answer might exploit. The admiration is stated once, directly, and the sentence moves on, which keeps the vocabulary plain and clear — exactly the 6.5 lexical target of everyday words doing the communicative job without reaching for range.'Impresses me a lot' 用最常见的动词和加强语气的词来表达这种反应,而不是使用更高分数段可能会用的更具体或更具习语色彩的替代表达,而 'honestly' 在这里只是单纯作为一个平实的加强语气副词使用,而不是像 Band 7.0 答案可能利用的那种句中节奏性手段。这种钦佩之情只被直接表达了一次,句子便继续往下走,这使得词汇保持简单清晰——正是 Band 6.5 词汇目标所要求的:用日常词汇完成交流任务,而不去追求词汇范围的拓展。
GRA“He told me he studied English at school like everyone else, but he only became confident after joining our studio” — Reported speech ('He told me he studied...') is extended with a single 'but' contrast and then a coordinated pair of gerund phrases ('joining... and talking...') marking the cause of his confidence — accurate and reasonably long, but built entirely from coordination rather than varied subordination. A 7.0 answer describing the same shift from classroom English to workplace fluency might instead use a participial or reason clause to tighten the causal link; here the connectors stay basic and safe, fitting the 6.5 grammar target's preference for accuracy over structural ambition.间接引语('He told me he studied...')通过一个单一的 'but' 转折得到扩展,随后是一对并列的动名词短语('joining... and talking...'),用以标示他自信的来源——这句话准确且长度适中,但完全由并列结构搭建而成,而非多样化的从属结构。一个描述同样从课堂英语转向职场流利表达这一转变的 Band 7.0 答案,可能会转而使用分词结构或原因从句来收紧因果联系;而这里的连接词始终保持基础和稳妥,符合 Band 6.5 语法目标准确优先于结构野心的偏好。
FC“I studied English for many years at school too, but I still feel nervous speaking to a client directly” — The closing sentence draws one direct comparison between the speaker's own years of study and continued nervousness against Minh's ease with clients, using 'but' and 'so' to chain contrast into consequence within a single sentence. This comparison is the answer's clearest piece of personal reflection, but it stops at stating the contrast and the resulting admiration rather than exploring why the gap exists, which a 7.0 answer might do by linking it back to Minh's comfort with mistakes mentioned earlier.结尾句在说话者自己多年的学习经历及仍然存在的紧张感,与 Minh 在客户面前的从容之间,做出了一次直接的比较,用 'but' 和 'so' 把对比链接成结果,浓缩在同一句话里。这一比较是全篇答案中最清晰的一处个人反思,但它只停留在陈述这一对比及由此产生的钦佩之情,而没有进一步探究这种差距为何存在——Band 7.0 的答案可能会将其与前文提到的 Minh 能坦然面对错误这一点联系起来,从而做到这一点。

7.0 分

The answer develops the 'why' section with a specific behavioural example (describing unknown words rather than stopping) and a closing reflection on her motivation, giving fuller development than 6.5 while using fewer of the varied structures and idiomatic asides that mark the 7.5 answer.答案在'原因'部分用一个具体的行为例子(遇到不会的词就换种方式描述,而不是卡住)来展开论述,并以对她学习动机的反思收尾,发展程度比6.5分更充分,但使用的多样句式和地道插入语不如7.5分答案丰富。

The person I'd talk about is my cousin Hiền, who works as a tour guide in Hội An, taking visitors around the old town and the nearby islands.

Hiền speaks Vietnamese and English fluently, and over the past few years she's also picked up a good level of French and enough Mandarin to guide small Chinese tour groups without an interpreter, which genuinely surprises me every time I hear her switch between them.

How she learned wasn't through any formal course, as far as I know. She studied basic English at school like the rest of us, but she really improved once she started working with tourists every day and had no choice but to communicate. For French, she told me she picked up phrases from French tourists who visited regularly, then practised by watching French films with subtitles on her days off. Her Mandarin came later, mostly from a phone app combined with real conversations with Chinese visitors, who she says correct her pronunciation without her even asking.

Why I think she's good at learning languages is that she treats every conversation as a small lesson rather than something to get through quickly. She's not afraid of sounding awkward, and if she doesn't know a word, she just describes it in a different way until the tourist understands. She also has a good ear — she can copy a French or Chinese accent almost immediately after hearing it a couple of times, which I've never been able to do myself even after years of studying English at school.

What strikes me most is that her motivation is practical rather than academic: better language skills mean better tips and happier tourists, so she keeps improving without really thinking of it as studying at all.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个人是我表姐阿贤(Hiền),她在会安(Hội An)做导游,带游客参观古镇和附近的岛屿。

阿贤越南语和英语都说得很流利,而且过去几年里她还学会了相当不错的法语,以及足够应付的普通话,能独自带小型中国旅行团,不需要翻译,每次听她在几种语言之间自如切换,我都觉得挺惊讶的。

据我所知,她学语言的方式并不是通过什么正规课程。她跟大家一样在学校学了基础英语,但真正进步是从她开始每天跟游客打交道、不得不用英语交流之后才开始的。至于法语,她说是从常来的法国游客那儿学来一些短语,然后在休息日看带字幕的法国电影练习。普通话是后来学的,主要靠一个手机应用,再加上跟中国游客的实际对话——据她说,那些游客甚至不用她开口请求,就会主动帮她纠正发音。

我觉得她之所以擅长学语言,是因为她把每一次对话都当作一堂小课,而不是要匆匆应付过去的事情。她不怕自己听起来别扭,如果不知道某个词,她就换一种方式描述,直到游客听懂为止。她耳朵也很灵——只要听过几遍,她几乎能立刻模仿出法语或中文的口音,这一点我自己就算在学校学了多年英语也一直做不到。

最让我印象深刻的是,她的动力其实很实际,而不是出于学术追求:语言能力越好,小费就越多,游客也越满意,所以她一直在进步,却几乎从没把这当成是在'学习'。

294 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

LR“she treats every conversation as a small lesson” — "Small lesson" is a natural collocation used metaphorically, an everyday conversation reframed as an informal learning opportunity, which is more specific and flexible than saying she "learns from talking to people." This is the step above plain vocabulary the 7.0 descriptor targets, staying conversational rather than becoming genuinely idiomatic. It also functions as the thesis for the whole explanatory paragraph, which goes on to illustrate exactly how she turns tourist interactions into practice."Small lesson"(小小的一课)是一个用于比喻义的自然搭配,把一次日常对话重新塑造成一次非正式的学习机会,比单纯说她"learns from talking to people"更具体、更灵活。这正是Band 7.0描述所瞄准的、超越普通词汇的一步,同时仍保持口语化,而不是真正意义上的习语。这个短语也充当了整段说明的论点,后文正是围绕她如何把与游客的互动变成练习机会来展开说明的。
GRA“if she doesn't know a word, she just describes it in a different way until the tourist understands” — This combines a conditional clause, "if she doesn't know a word," with a result clause containing its own subordination, "until the tourist understands," handling two levels of structure accurately in one natural-sounding sentence. It's the comfortable, accurate complex grammar the 7.0 descriptor describes, illustrating a specific communication strategy rather than just asserting she's a good communicator. The conditional framing also makes the claim feel like a habitual, observed pattern rather than a one-off event.这句话把一个条件从句"if she doesn't know a word"与一个本身又带有从属结构的结果从句"until the tourist understands"结合在一起,在一个听起来自然的句子里准确处理了两层结构。这正是Band 7.0描述中那种从容、准确的复杂语法,用来说明一种具体的沟通策略,而不只是断言她是一个善于沟通的人。这种条件式的表达方式也让这个说法听起来像是一种可观察到的、习惯性的模式,而不是一次性的事件。
FC“What strikes me most is that her motivation is practical rather than academic” — This closing sentence draws a considered conclusion about why Hiền is successful, practical motivation over academic study, rather than simply restating that she's good with languages, which is the kind of reflective development the 7.0 descriptor rewards. A 6.5 answer would likely just say "she's very good at languages" without this distinction. It also retrospectively reframes all the earlier examples, tourists correcting her pronunciation, films, apps, as evidence for this specific claim about motivation.这句结语得出了一个经过思考的结论,解释Hiền为什么能够成功——是实用的动机,而不是学院式的学习——而不是简单地重复她“外语很好”这一点,这正是Band 7.0描述所看重的反思性发展。Band 6.5的答案很可能只会说"she's very good at languages",而没有这种区分。它也回溯性地重新解读了前文所有的例子——游客纠正她的发音、看电影、用手机应用——把它们都变成支撑这一“动机说”具体论点的证据。

7.5 分

The simile 'listens like a musician' and the closing comparative sentence about teachers with degrees show the flexible, precise language and sentence variety typical of Band 7.5.'像音乐家一样倾听'这个明喻,以及结尾关于那些有学位的老师的比较句,展现出7.5分典型的灵活、精确的语言和多样的句式。

The person I'd talk about is Duy, a Grab driver here in Da Nang who I've ended up riding with dozens of times, because he does the early airport runs and I travel for work more than I'd like. I know him the way you know a regular driver — twenty-minute conversations, once a month, over about three years.

Duy speaks Vietnamese, obviously, plus English well enough to argue about football, Korean that Korean passengers genuinely compliment, and enough Russian to handle the tourists who come to the beach in winter. He's thirty-four and left school at sixteen.

How he learnt is the interesting part, because it wasn't a course. He told me he started with English by writing down every phrase a passenger said that he didn't understand, in a notebook he kept in the door pocket, and then asking the next English-speaking passenger what it meant. Korean came the same way, from the huge number of Korean tourists on his airport route; he'd learn one new sentence a day and test it on the next customer. He watches Korean dramas with the subtitles off now. Russian is newer and rougher, but he's doing the same thing with it.

Why I think he's genuinely good at it, rather than just persistent, is that he has no fear of being wrong. He'll try a sentence, get it wrong, laugh, and try again in the same breath, which is exactly the thing that stops most of us — I studied English for twelve years and still hesitate before speaking to a stranger. He also listens like a musician; he mimics accents without seeming to try. And he's learning for something real: every language means better tips and better conversations, so the motivation never runs out. I've had teachers with degrees who taught me less about learning than that notebook in the door pocket.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个人是Duy，岘港这里的一位Grab司机，我已经跟他坐过好几十次车了，因为他专门跑早班机场路线，而我出差的次数比自己想要的还多。我认识他的方式就像认识一个常坐的司机那样——每月一次，二十分钟的聊天，持续了大概三年。

Duy会说越南语，这是自然的，此外还有足够好的英语可以跟人争论足球，好到连韩国乘客都会由衷称赞的韩语，以及足够应付冬天来海边的俄罗斯游客的俄语。他三十四岁，十六岁就辍学了。

他是怎么学的才是有意思的部分，因为那根本不是靠上课。他告诉我，他学英语是从把每一句乘客说了但他听不懂的话记下来开始的，记在放在车门储物格里的一个本子上，然后问下一个会说英语的乘客那句话是什么意思。韩语也是同样的方法学的，因为他跑的机场路线上有大量韩国游客；他每天学一句新句子，然后拿下一位客人来试。他现在看韩剧都不开字幕了。俄语学得比较新也比较粗糙，但他正在用同样的方法学它。

我之所以觉得他真的很擅长学语言，而不只是单纯执着，是因为他完全不怕出错。他会试着说一句话，说错了，笑一笑，然后在同一口气里再试一次，而这恰恰是让我们大多数人止步不前的地方——我学了十二年英语，跟陌生人开口说话之前还是会犹豫。他听声音的方式也像个音乐家；他模仿口音看起来毫不费力。而且他学语言是为了实实在在的东西：每多一种语言就意味着更好的小费和更有意思的对话，所以他的动力永远不会耗尽。我遇到过一些拿着学位的老师，教给我的关于学习本身的东西，还没有那个车门储物格里的本子教给我的多。

312 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

LR“He also listens like a musician; he mimics accents without seeming to try.” — The simile 'listens like a musician' is a single, well-chosen figurative image rather than a string of them — exactly the restrained 'one figurative or idiomatic touch if it fits the moment' the Band 7.5 descriptor calls for, as opposed to a 6.5 answer that would flatly state 'he listens carefully' or an 8.0 answer stacking several such images together. The semicolon then lets 'he mimics accents without seeming to try' land as a second, closely related observation rather than a new sentence, so the figurative claim is immediately backed up with a concrete detail about Duy's ear for sound. It reads as genuine praise growing out of watching him on rides, not a rehearsed comparison inserted for effect.明喻'listens like a musician'是一个精心挑选的单一比喻意象,而不是一连串堆砌的比喻——这正是7.5分描述语所要求的那种克制的"在合适时机点缀一处比喻或习语",而不是6.5分答案那种平铺直叙的"他听得很认真",也不是8.0分答案那种一口气堆叠好几个类似意象。随后的分号让'he mimics accents without seeming to try'作为一个紧密相关的第二个观察出现,而不是另起一句,于是这个比喻性的说法立刻得到了一个关于阿维(Duy)辨音能力的具体细节支撑。整体读来像是在多次同乘经历中观察出的真心赞美,而不是刻意插入以求效果的排练式比较。
GRA“I've had teachers with degrees who taught me less about learning than that notebook in the door pocket.” — This is an inverted 'less...than' comparative — degreed teachers are set below an object, a notebook — with a relative clause ('who taught me less about learning') embedded inside it, a structure a 6.5 or 7.0 answer would rarely risk because of the accuracy demands of getting both the comparative and the clause to agree. At Band 7.5 the descriptor calls for 'varied complex structures... that are mostly error-free,' and this sentence pulls that off while still sounding like spontaneous speech rather than a scripted line. Comparing degreed teachers against a driver's door-pocket notebook also does real rhetorical work, driving home the essay's argument that motivation beats credentials.这是一个倒装的'less...than'比较结构——把有学位的老师放在一个物件、一本笔记本之下——并在其中嵌入了一个关系从句('who taught me less about learning'),这种结构6.5分或7.0分的答案很少敢用,因为既要让比较结构又要让从句在准确度上都站得住,难度不小。在7.5分这一档,评分标准要求"多样且基本无误的复杂结构",而这句话做到了这一点,同时听起来依然像是脱口而出的自然发言,而不是照本宣科。把有学位的老师和一位司机放在车门储物袋里的笔记本相比较,也确实起到了修辞作用,有力地印证了整篇文章"动力胜过资历"的论点。
FC“He'll try a sentence, get it wrong, laugh, and try again in the same breath, which is exactly the thing that stops most of us” — Rather than finishing the anecdote about Duy trying and failing and then adding a separate sentence like 'This shows he isn't afraid of mistakes,' the speaker folds that judgement straight into the narrative with a relative clause — 'which is exactly the thing that stops most of us.' That fusion of story and evaluation, rather than a bolt-on comment at the end, is the coherence move the Band 7.5 descriptor asks for ('one clear reflective or evaluative point, not just description'); a 6.5 answer would typically narrate the action and stop there. The self-deprecating pivot to 'most of us,' followed by the admission about hesitating after twelve years of study, also widens the point from Duy specifically to a universal truth about language learning.说话者没有先讲完阿维(Duy)尝试又失败的轶事,再补一句"这说明他不怕犯错"这样独立的评论,而是直接用一个关系从句把这种判断融入叙事本身——'which is exactly the thing that stops most of us'。这种把故事和评价融为一体、而非在结尾外挂一句评论的做法,正是7.5分描述语所要求的连贯性("一个清晰的反思性或评价性观点,而不只是描述");6.5分的答案通常只会叙述事件然后就此打住。转向自嘲式的'most of us',紧接着又承认自己学了十二年语言仍会犹豫,这也把论点从阿维个人的例子扩展成了关于语言学习的一个普遍真理。

各考试时段出题记录

Describe a person you know who is good at learning languages.2026年9–12月
Describe a person you know who is good at learning languages2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

1. Do lots of people in your country speak more than one language?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer opens with a flat direct opinion ('Not really') and strings together simple 'so' and 'but' connectors around one plain example each for the young and old generations.6.5分的回答以一个平淡直接的观点("Not really")开篇,并用简单的"so"和"but"连接词,分别为年轻一代和老一辈各举了一个平实的例子。
Not really, if we mean fluent in two languages properly. But it depends how you look at it. Most young people study English at school, so many can have a simple conversation, and that number is growing. Older people are different — my parents learned some French at school, but they never use it now. Also, inside Vietnamese itself, there are big differences. My grandmother speaks the Hue dialect, and people from Hanoi sometimes can't understand her. So it's complicated.
查看中文翻译
严格来说不算,如果指的是真正流利地掌握两种语言的话。但这要看你怎么理解这个问题。大多数年轻人在学校学英语,所以很多人能进行简单的对话,而且这个数字还在增长。老一辈就不一样了——我父母上学时学过一点法语,但现在根本不用了。而且,即便在越南语内部,差异也很大。我奶奶说的是顺化方言,河内人有时候都听不懂她说的话。所以这个问题挺复杂的。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But it depends how you look at it.” — This is a short, self-contained linking sentence using the plainest possible connector 'but' to move between ideas. A 7.0 answer would likely soften this with a spoken hedge like 'honestly' or 'to be fair', while a 7.5 answer would weave the qualification into a single flowing sentence instead of stating it separately.这是一个简短、独立的连接句,使用了最平实的连接词"but"来过渡不同的想法。7.0分的回答可能会用"honestly"或"to be fair"这样的口语化模糊限制语来软化语气,而7.5分的回答则会把这个限定条件编织进一个流畅的长句中,而不是单独陈述。
LR“there are big differences” — 'Big differences' is a generic, everyday word pairing that does the job but shows no range. A 7.5 answer would reach for something more precise and idiomatic, such as 'diversity hiding inside', which conveys the same idea with more texture and less common phrasing."Big differences"是一个通用的日常词组搭配,虽然能表达意思,但没有展现出词汇的广度。7.5分的回答会选用更精准、更地道的表达,比如"diversity hiding inside"(内部隐藏的多样性),用更有质感、更不常见的措辞传达同样的意思。
GRA“so many can have a simple conversation, and that number is growing” — This is a simple compound sentence joined by 'and', which is grammatically safe but repetitive across the answer. A 7.0 or 7.5 response would more likely embed this as a subordinate clause or reduce it to a participial phrase, giving the grammar more variety and flexibility.这是一个用"and"连接的简单并列句,语法上安全稳妥,但在整篇回答中显得重复。7.0分或7.5分的回答更可能将其嵌入为从句,或简化成分词短语,使语法更多样、更灵活。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer adds a spoken hedge ('Honestly') and a reflective aside ('What's interesting is...') around one longer sentence built from a colon and a 'so' clause, going beyond 6.5's flatter opinion-plus-example structure.7.0分的回答加入了一个口语化的模糊限制语("Honestly")和一个反思性的插入语("What's interesting is..."),并围绕一个用冒号和"so"从句构建的长句展开,超越了6.5分版本更平淡的"观点+例子"结构。
Honestly, it depends on what you mean by 'speak.' If we're talking about real fluency, not that many — but if we mean being able to get by, the number is rising fast, mostly because almost everyone under thirty studies English at school now. My parents are a good example of the gap: they learned French decades ago and haven't used a word of it since, so it never really became a language for them. What's interesting is that even within Vietnamese there's a kind of bilingualism, since my grandmother's Hue dialect is different enough that people from Hanoi genuinely struggle to follow her.
查看中文翻译
老实说,这要看你说的"会说"是什么意思。如果指的是真正的流利程度,那不算多——但如果指的是能应付日常交流,这个数字正在快速上升,主要是因为现在几乎每个三十岁以下的人都在学校学英语。我父母就是这种差距的一个很好的例子:他们几十年前学过法语,后来一个字都没用过,所以对他们来说那门语言从来没有真正"活"起来。有意思的是,即便在越南语内部也存在某种"双语现象",因为我奶奶的顺化口音差异之大,河内人真的很难听懂她说话。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Honestly, it depends on what you mean by 'speak.'” — Opening with 'Honestly' signals natural spoken reflection rather than a flat stated fact, which is typical of 7.0 fluency. A 6.5 answer would simply assert 'Not really' without this framing, while a 7.5 answer would likely compress the same idea into a tighter parallel structure.以"Honestly"开篇,传递出一种自然的口语化反思感,而不是平铺直叙地陈述事实,这是7.0分流利程度的典型特征。6.5分的回答只会直接断言"Not really",没有这样的铺垫;而7.5分的回答则可能把同样的想法压缩进一个更紧凑的平行结构中。
LR“haven't used a word of it since” — This is a mild, natural collocation rather than the plainest possible phrasing like 'never use it'. It shows some control of idiomatic expression without reaching for genuinely uncommon vocabulary, which is what would distinguish a 7.5 answer.这是一个温和、自然的词语搭配,而不是像"never use it"那样最平实的表达。它展现出一定的习语表达掌控力,但还没有用到真正不常见的词汇,而这正是7.5分回答的区别所在。
GRA“they learned French decades ago and haven't used a word of it since, so it never really became a language for them” — This single sentence links three ideas with 'and' and 'so', showing more complexity than 6.5's separated short sentences but stopping short of the participial or fronted structures a 7.5 answer would use to compress the same content further.这一个单句用"and"和"so"连接了三个想法,比6.5分版本分开的短句更复杂,但还没有用到7.5分回答会用来进一步压缩内容的分词结构或前置结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with a compact parallel contrast ('Strictly speaking... loosely speaking...'), uses a participial phrase ('having picked up some French') instead of a plain clause, and closes with an idiomatic evaluative flourish weighing 'hardly anyone' against 'almost everyone.'7.5分的回答以一个紧凑的平行对比开篇("Strictly speaking... loosely speaking..."),用分词短语("having picked up some French")替代平铺直叙的从句,并以一个地道的评价性收尾,权衡"hardly anyone"与"almost everyone"之间的差异。
Strictly speaking, not that many — but loosely speaking, more than you'd think. Ask anyone under thirty and they've spent years studying English at school, which has quietly pushed conversational bilingualism up even if true fluency lags behind. My parents illustrate the opposite case nicely: having picked up some French decades ago, they've let it go completely rusty from sheer lack of use. What I find more telling, though, is the diversity hiding inside Vietnamese itself — my grandmother's Hue accent is thick enough to leave Hanoi natives genuinely lost. So depending on how strict your definition is, the honest answer swings between 'hardly anyone' and 'almost everyone.'
查看中文翻译
严格来说,不算多——但宽泛地讲,比你想象的要多。随便问一个三十岁以下的人,他们都在学校学了好几年英语,这悄悄地推高了"能进行日常对话"的双语人数,尽管真正的流利程度还跟不上。我父母恰好是相反的例子:几十年前学过一点法语,但因为完全不用,早就生疏得一塌糊涂了。不过,我觉得更能说明问题的,是越南语内部本身隐藏的多样性——我奶奶的顺化口音浓重到能让河内本地人彻底听懵。所以,答案到底是"几乎没人"还是"几乎人人",要看你的定义有多严格,老实说两者之间都说得过去。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Strictly speaking, not that many — but loosely speaking, more than you'd think.” — This parallel construction delivers a nuanced, two-sided opinion in one fluent breath. A 6.5 answer would state the two sides as separate flat sentences, and even a 7.0 answer would likely need an extra hedge word rather than this tight balanced pairing.这个平行结构在一口气之间流畅地传达出一个细腻的两面性观点。6.5分的回答会把两面分别用平淡的句子陈述出来,甚至7.0分的回答也可能需要额外加一个模糊限制词,而不是这种紧凑平衡的搭配。
LR“conversational bilingualism” — This is a precise, slightly academic collocation that packs a whole idea into two words. A 6.5 answer would spell the same concept out plainly as 'have a simple conversation', showing far less lexical compression and range.这是一个精准、略带学术感的词语搭配,用两个词就浓缩了一整个概念。6.5分的回答会平铺直叙地把同样的概念写成"have a simple conversation",展现出远不如前者的词汇凝练度和广度。
GRA“having picked up some French decades ago, they've let it go completely rusty from sheer lack of use” — The fronted participial phrase 'having picked up some French decades ago' is a flexible, compact grammatical structure. A 7.0 answer would more likely use a colon-plus-clause pattern, and a 6.5 answer would simply write two short linked sentences instead.前置的分词短语"having picked up some French decades ago"是一种灵活紧凑的语法结构。7.0分的回答更可能使用冒号加从句的模式,而6.5分的回答则会干脆写成两个简短的关联句。
2. Is it necessary to speak more than one language to get a good job?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer states a direct position ('It depends on the job') then gives one plain personal example and one contrasting example, linked mainly with 'so' and 'but'.6.5分的回答直接陈述了立场("It depends on the job"),然后给出一个平实的个人例子和一个对比性的例子,主要用"so"和"but"连接。
It depends on the job, not on everyone. In my case, I talk to clients from other countries in English every day, so I really need it for my work. But my cousin is an engineer at a construction company, and he doesn't use any other language at all. Jobs connected to tourism, technology or foreign companies usually need English. Other jobs don't need it so much. So for some jobs it's necessary, and for others it's just extra.
查看中文翻译
这要看工作性质,而不是对每个人都一样。就我而言,我每天都要用英语跟其他国家的客户沟通,所以工作上真的很需要它。但我表哥是一家建筑公司的工程师,他根本不用任何其他语言。跟旅游、科技或外企相关的工作通常都需要英语,其他工作则没那么需要。所以对一些工作来说,这是必需的,而对另一些工作来说,只是加分项。
为什么是这个分数
FC“It depends on the job, not on everyone.” — This is a blunt, direct opening position with no hedging. A 7.0 answer would likely soften it with 'Honestly, it really depends...', and a 7.5 answer would frame it with a more layered opening image, showing more developed spoken fluency.这是一个直白、直接的开篇立场,没有任何缓冲。7.0分的回答可能会用"Honestly, it really depends..."来软化语气,而7.5分的回答则会用更有层次感的开篇意象来构建,展现出更成熟的口语流利度。
LR“Jobs connected to tourism, technology or foreign companies usually need English.” — 'Connected to' and 'usually need' are plain, literal word choices. A 7.5 answer would reach for a more vivid collocation like 'treat English as close to non-negotiable', showing far greater lexical precision."Connected to"和"usually need"都是平实、字面化的词语选择。7.5分的回答会选用更生动的搭配,比如"treat English as close to non-negotiable"(把英语当作几乎不容商量的条件),展现出远超前者的词汇精准度。
GRA“But my cousin is an engineer at a construction company, and he doesn't use any other language at all.” — This is a simple compound sentence joined with 'and'. A 7.0 answer would more likely use a conditional clause, and a 7.5 answer would compress the same contrast into a 'whereas' structure within a single longer sentence.这是一个用"and"连接的简单并列句。7.0分的回答更可能使用条件从句,而7.5分的回答则会把同样的对比压缩进一个更长句子里的"whereas"结构中。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer softens the opinion with 'Honestly' and 'I'd say', and uses one conditional-style clause ('without it I'd be earning a lot less') that 6.5 avoids.7.0分的回答用"Honestly"和"I'd say"软化了观点,并使用了一个6.5分回避的条件式从句("without it I'd be earning a lot less")。
Honestly, it really depends on the sector rather than the job market as a whole. My own work is a clear case — I speak English with overseas clients daily, and without it I'd be earning a lot less doing similar design work locally. My cousin, on the other hand, is a solid engineer who has never needed a second language for his job. I'd say the pattern is that jobs touching foreign money, like tourism, tech or trade, treat English almost as a requirement now, while the rest of the economy still treats it as a bonus rather than a necessity.
查看中文翻译
老实说,这真的要看行业,而不是整个就业市场。我自己的工作就是个明显的例子——我每天都要用英语跟海外客户交流,如果没有这个能力,我在本地做类似的设计工作赚的钱会少很多。而我表哥呢,是个称职的工程师,他的工作从来不需要第二语言。我觉得这里有个规律:凡是跟外资挂钩的工作,比如旅游、科技或贸易,现在几乎都把英语当作必备条件,而经济体的其他部分则仍然把它当作加分项,而非必需品。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I'd say the pattern is that” — This reflective hedge shows the speaker thinking through a generalisation in real time, typical of 7.0 fluency. A 6.5 answer would simply state the pattern as a bare fact, while a 7.5 answer would open it with a more assertive phrase like 'Broadly speaking'.这个反思性的模糊限制语展现出说话者正在实时思考、归纳出一个规律,是7.0分流利度的典型特征。6.5分的回答只会把这个规律当作赤裸裸的事实来陈述,而7.5分的回答则会用更有自信的短语如"Broadly speaking"来开篇。
LR“jobs touching foreign money” — This is a mild, natural collocation that goes slightly beyond the plainest wording. A 6.5 answer would say something flatter like 'jobs connected to tourism, technology', while a 7.5 answer would push further into idiom, such as 'close to non-negotiable'.这是一个温和、自然的词语搭配,比最平实的措辞略进一步。6.5分的回答会说得更平淡,比如"jobs connected to tourism, technology",而7.5分的回答则会更进一步用上习语,比如"close to non-negotiable"。
GRA“without it I'd be earning a lot less doing similar design work locally” — This is a conditional-style structure embedded inside a larger sentence, showing more grammatical range than 6.5's simple coordinated clauses. A 7.5 answer would likely compress this further using a 'whereas' contrast within one sentence.这是一个嵌入在更大句子里的条件式结构,比6.5分简单的并列从句展现出更广的语法范围。7.5分的回答可能会用一个句子内的"whereas"对比结构进一步压缩这一内容。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses a less common verb ('hinges'), a compressed 'whereas' contrast clause, and an idiomatic closing image ('pry open still more specific doors') instead of the plainer statements of the lower bands.7.5分的回答使用了一个不太常见的动词("hinges"),一个压缩的"whereas"对比从句,以及一个地道的收尾意象("pry open still more specific doors"),而不是低分段版本那种更平实的陈述。
It hinges entirely on which corner of the economy you're in. My own career is proof of the trend — I earn what I do because I can talk to overseas clients in English daily, whereas without it I'd be a competent local designer on roughly half the salary. My cousin, meanwhile, thrives as an engineer without a second language in sight. Broadly speaking, sectors that touch foreign money — tourism, tech, trade, multinational firms — now treat English as close to non-negotiable, and a third language can pry open still more specific doors. Elsewhere, it remains a nice-to-have rather than a necessity, though the well-paid slice of the job market is shrinking toward those who speak two languages.
查看中文翻译
这完全取决于你身处经济体的哪个角落。我自己的职业生涯就是这一趋势的证明——我能拿到现在的收入,是因为我每天都能用英语跟海外客户沟通,而如果没有这个能力,我大概只能做个称职的本地设计师,拿差不多一半的薪水。与此同时,我表哥作为工程师却过得风生水起,连第二语言的影子都用不上。总体来说,凡是跟外资挂钩的行业——旅游、科技、贸易、跨国公司——现在几乎把英语当作不容商量的条件,而第三门语言还能撬开更多具体的机会大门。在其他领域,它仍然只是"有更好"而非必需品,不过就业市场里薪水优厚的那一部分,正逐渐向会说两种语言的人收缩。
为什么是这个分数
FC“It hinges entirely on which corner of the economy you're in.” — This opens with a precise, confident image rather than a flat statement. A 6.5 answer would open with the bare 'It depends on the job', showing much less developed idiomatic fluency at the very start of the response.这段以一个精准、自信的意象开篇,而不是平铺直叙的陈述。6.5分的回答会以赤裸裸的"It depends on the job"开篇,在回答一开始就展现出远不如前者成熟的习语流利度。
LR“pry open still more specific doors” — This is a genuinely idiomatic, less-common phrase compared to plainer alternatives. A 6.5 answer would express the same idea with the flat wording 'usually need English', showing a clear gap in lexical range between the two bands.这是一个真正地道、不太常见的短语,相比更平实的替代表达而言。6.5分的回答会用平淡的措辞"usually need English"来表达同样的意思,显示出两个分数段之间明显的词汇范围差距。
GRA“whereas without it I'd be a competent local designer on roughly half the salary” — The 'whereas' clause compresses a contrast and a conditional into one compact structure. A 7.0 answer achieves a similar conditional idea but as a simpler standalone clause, and a 6.5 answer would split it into two separate sentences with 'and' and 'but'."whereas"从句把对比和条件压缩进一个紧凑的结构中。7.0分的回答也表达了类似的条件性想法,但只是一个更简单的独立从句,而6.5分的回答则会把它拆成用"and"和"but"连接的两个独立句子。
3. How important is it for people to know other languages when they travel?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct position ('not really necessary, but it makes travel much better') followed by one plain anecdote told in short 'and'-joined sentences.6.5分的回答给出一个直接的立场("not really necessary, but it makes travel much better"),接着讲述一个平实的轶事,用简短的"and"连接句叙述。
It's not really necessary, but it makes travel much better. Once in Bangkok, I knew only about ten words of Thai, and I used them in a small restaurant. The owner was so happy that she gave me her own dinner instead of the normal tourist menu. You can travel almost anywhere now with English and a translation app, so you don't need the language to survive. But if you know a little, people treat you differently, and you understand more of what's really happening around you.
查看中文翻译
这其实不算必要,但它能让旅行体验好很多。有一次在曼谷,我只会大概十个泰语单词,我在一家小餐馆里用上了。店主特别开心,给了我她自己的晚餐,而不是那份给游客准备的普通菜单。现在几乎哪里都能靠英语和翻译软件走遍天下,所以语言不是生存必需品。但如果你会一点点,人们对你的态度会不一样,你也能更懂周围真正发生的事情。
为什么是这个分数
FC“It's not really necessary, but it makes travel much better.” — This is a direct two-part opinion using the plain connector 'but' with no further hedging. A 7.0 answer would soften the same idea with 'To be fair, it isn't essential anymore', showing a more natural spoken qualifying tone.这是一个用平实连接词"but"表达的直接两段式观点,没有进一步的缓冲。7.0分的回答会用"To be fair, it isn't essential anymore"来软化同样的想法,展现出更自然的口语化限定语气。
LR“so happy that she gave me her own dinner” — This uses modest, everyday vocabulary to describe the moment. A 7.5 answer would choose a more vivid verb, such as 'abandon the tourist menu entirely', giving the same anecdote sharper, more idiomatic detail.这里用了朴素、日常的词汇来描述那一刻。7.5分的回答会选用更生动的动词,比如"abandon the tourist menu entirely",让同一个轶事拥有更犀利、更地道的细节。
GRA“Once in Bangkok, I knew only about ten words of Thai, and I used them in a small restaurant.” — This is a simple chronological sentence joined with 'and'. A 7.5 answer would restructure the same information as a fronted participial phrase like 'Armed with maybe ten words of Thai...', producing more compact, flexible grammar.这是一个用"and"连接的简单时间顺序句。7.5分的回答会把同样的信息重新组织成一个前置分词短语,比如"Armed with maybe ten words of Thai...",从而产生更紧凑、灵活的语法。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer qualifies its opinion with 'To be fair' and 'honestly', and adds a reflective 'even if' clause at the end that 6.5's flatter ending lacks.7.0分的回答用"To be fair"和"honestly"限定了自己的观点,并在结尾加了一个反思性的"even if"从句,这是6.5分更平淡的结尾所没有的。
To be fair, it isn't essential anymore — you can get by almost anywhere with English and a translation app. But honestly, it changes the whole experience. I once had maybe ten words of Thai in a tiny restaurant in Bangkok, and just making the effort got me the owner's own dinner instead of the usual tourist menu. It's less about survival now and more about being treated as a person rather than a walking wallet, which is something no app quite manages. So I'd say it matters a lot for the quality of a trip, even if it's not required to take one.
查看中文翻译
平心而论,现在已经不算必要了——靠英语和翻译软件几乎哪里都能应付过去。但老实说,它能改变整个旅行体验。有一次在曼谷一家小餐馆,我大概只会十个泰语单词,光是这份努力就让我得到了店主自己的晚餐,而不是常见的游客菜单。现在这已经不是生存问题了,更多的是能不能被当作一个"人"而不是一个"会走路的钱包"来对待,这一点是任何软件都做不到的。所以我会说,这对一趟旅行的质量影响很大,即便它不是出行的必要条件。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But honestly, it changes the whole experience.” — This natural spoken connector signals a shift into reflection after conceding the opposite point. A 6.5 answer would use the plainer 'but it makes travel much better' without this extra layer of concession-then-reflection.这个自然的口语连接词标志着在让步了相反观点之后转向反思。6.5分的回答会用更平淡的"but it makes travel much better",没有这层"先让步后反思"的额外结构。
LR“rather than a walking wallet” — This is a mild idiomatic collocation that adds colour beyond literal wording. A 6.5 answer would express the same idea more plainly as 'people treat you differently', lacking this kind of figurative phrase.这是一个温和的习语搭配,为字面表达增添了色彩。6.5分的回答会更平淡地表达同样的意思,比如"people treat you differently",缺少这种比喻性短语。
GRA“even if it's not required to take one” — This is a subordinate concessive clause added onto the main point. A 6.5 answer would instead rely on simple coordinated sentences joined by 'but' and 'so', without this kind of embedded concession.这是附加在主要观点之后的让步从句。6.5分的回答则会依赖用"but"和"so"连接的简单并列句,没有这种嵌入式的让步结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with a fronted participial phrase ('Armed with maybe ten words of Thai...') and uses the less common word 'curated' along with a compact dash-linked closing point, going beyond 7.0's plainer sentence structures.7.5分的回答以一个前置分词短语开篇("Armed with maybe ten words of Thai..."),使用了不太常见的词"curated",并配上一个用破折号连接的紧凑收尾观点,超越了7.0分更平实的句子结构。
Not essential, exactly, but it transforms the trip rather than merely accompanying it. Armed with maybe ten words of Thai in a hole-in-the-wall restaurant in Bangkok, I watched the owner abandon the tourist menu entirely and serve me her own dinner instead — fluency wasn't the point, effort was. These days you can navigate almost anywhere on English and a translation app, so survival was never really the issue. What a little language buys you is subtler: being treated as a person instead of a walking wallet, and glimpsing what's actually going on around you rather than the version curated for outsiders. So it's less about whether you can travel and more about what kind of trip you end up having.
查看中文翻译
说不上是必需品,但它改变的是整趟旅行,而不只是陪衬。在曼谷一家不起眼的小馆子里,我大概只会十个泰语单词,却眼看着店主完全撇开了游客菜单,端上了她自己的晚餐——重点不在于流利,而在于那份努力。如今靠英语和翻译软件几乎能走遍天下,所以生存从来都不是真正的问题。会一点语言带给你的东西更微妙:被当作一个人而不是一只会走路的钱包对待,还能瞥见周围真正发生的事情,而不是专门为外人准备的那个版本。所以问题的关键不在于你能不能旅行,而在于你最终经历的是哪一种旅行。
为什么是这个分数
FC“fluency wasn't the point, effort was” — This compact parallel construction delivers a punchy contrast in very few words. A 6.5 answer would need a full separate sentence to make the same point, such as 'so happy that she gave me her own dinner', showing far less fluent compression.这个紧凑的平行结构用极少的词语传达出有力的对比。6.5分的回答需要一整个独立的句子才能表达同样的观点,比如"so happy that she gave me her own dinner",展现出远不如前者流畅的压缩能力。
LR“the version curated for outsiders” — 'Curated' is a genuinely less-common word choice applied in a fresh way. A 6.5 answer would use the plain phrase 'the normal tourist menu', showing much more limited lexical range."Curated"是一个真正不太常见、被巧妙运用的词语选择。6.5分的回答会用平实的短语"the normal tourist menu",显示出远为有限的词汇范围。
GRA“Armed with maybe ten words of Thai in a hole-in-the-wall restaurant in Bangkok, I watched the owner abandon the tourist menu entirely” — This fronted participial phrase opens the sentence before the main clause, a flexible structure that a 6.5 answer would not attempt, instead writing the plain chronological 'Once in Bangkok, I knew...'这个前置分词短语在主句之前开启了整句话,是一种灵活的结构,6.5分的回答不会尝试这种写法,而是会写出平实的时间顺序句"Once in Bangkok, I knew..."。
4. What are the best ways for adults to learn a new language?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer states its main claim directly ('The best way is to actually use the language') and supports it with two short parallel 'I' sentences joined by 'but', typical of the band's plain connector style.6.5分的回答直接陈述了主要论点("The best way is to actually use the language"),并用两个以"but"连接的平行"I"句支撑,是该分数段典型的平实连接风格。
The best way is to actually use the language for something real, not just study it. I took a Japanese evening class for a year, and now I remember almost nothing. But I worked with a Japanese client for three months, and I still remember every word we used. So having a real purpose helps a lot more than a classroom. Speaking from the start matters too, even if you make mistakes. And doing a little every day works better than studying for hours once a week.
查看中文翻译
最好的方法是真正把语言用在实际的事情上,而不只是学习它。我上过一年的日语夜校课,现在几乎什么都不记得了。但我跟一个日本客户合作了三个月,当时用到的每一个词我现在还记得。所以有一个真实的目的,比坐在教室里有用得多。从一开始就开口说也很重要,哪怕会犯错。而且每天做一点,比一周一次学好几个小时效果更好。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The best way is to actually use the language for something real, not just study it.” — This is a direct, topic-first opening with no hedging device. A 7.0 answer would likely begin with 'Honestly, the biggest thing is...', giving the same claim a more natural spoken frame.这是一个直接、主题先行的开篇,没有任何模糊限制手法。7.0分的回答可能会以"Honestly, the biggest thing is..."开篇,为同样的论点赋予更自然的口语化框架。
LR“having a real purpose helps a lot more than a classroom” — This uses plain, everyday vocabulary to state the point. A 7.5 answer would phrase the same idea more precisely as 'purpose supplies the repetition that lessons never quite manage', showing much richer lexical control.这里用了朴素、日常的词汇来陈述观点。7.5分的回答会更精准地表达同样的想法,比如"purpose supplies the repetition that lessons never quite manage",展现出远为丰富的词汇掌控力。
GRA“I took a Japanese evening class for a year, and now I remember almost nothing.” — This is a simple sentence joined with 'and'. A 7.0 answer would combine the class-versus-client comparison into one longer sentence using 'yet', showing more developed sentence-level complexity.这是一个用"and"连接的简单句。7.0分的回答会用"yet"把"课程对比客户"这一比较合并进一个更长的句子,展现出更成熟的句子层面复杂度。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer links the class-versus-client comparison into one sentence with 'yet', and adds the reflective aside 'I'd say that's because...' that goes beyond 6.5's separate short sentences.7.0分的回答用"yet"把"课程对比客户"这一比较连接进一个句子,并加入了反思性的插入语"I'd say that's because...",超越了6.5分分开的短句。
Honestly, the biggest thing is having a real reason to use it, not just studying it in a classroom. I took a Japanese evening class for a whole year and barely remember anything now, yet three months working with a Japanese client left me still knowing every phrase we actually needed. I'd say that's because purpose creates repetition in a way classes rarely manage. It also helps to start speaking immediately rather than waiting until you feel ready, since adults tend to be far too worried about sounding silly. To be fair, consistency beats intensity too — fifteen minutes a day adds up more than one long class a week.
查看中文翻译
老实说,最重要的是有一个真正的理由去使用这门语言,而不只是在教室里学习它。我上过整整一年的日语夜校课,现在几乎什么都不记得了,但跟一个日本客户合作三个月,却让我至今还记得我们实际用到的每一个短语。我觉得这是因为"目的"能以课堂很少能做到的方式创造重复练习。从一开始就开口说也很有帮助,而不是等到觉得自己"准备好了"才开口,因为成年人往往太担心自己听起来很傻。平心而论,持续性也比强度更重要——每天十五分钟积累起来,比一周上一次长课更有效。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I'd say that's because purpose creates repetition in a way classes rarely manage.” — This reflective hedge shows the speaker reasoning out loud about why something works, typical of 7.0 fluency. A 6.5 answer would simply state the conclusion flatly as 'having a real purpose helps a lot more than a classroom' with no such reasoning marker.这个反思性的模糊限制语展现出说话者正在大声推理某件事为何有效,是7.0分流利度的典型特征。6.5分的回答只会平淡地陈述结论"having a real purpose helps a lot more than a classroom",没有这种推理标记。
LR“far too worried about sounding silly” — This is a natural spoken collocation with mild colour. A 7.5 answer would push further into more vivid phrasing, such as 'swallowing the embarrassment', showing a clearer step up in lexical precision.这是一个带有些许色彩的自然口语搭配。7.5分的回答会更进一步用上更生动的表达,比如"swallowing the embarrassment",展现出词汇精准度上明显的提升。
GRA“I took a Japanese evening class for a whole year and barely remember anything now, yet three months working with a Japanese client left me still knowing every phrase we actually needed” — This single long sentence links both experiences with 'yet', showing more grammatical range than 6.5's two separate short sentences. A 7.5 answer would compress this further using a dash and a fronted evaluative phrase.这一个长句用"yet"把两段经历连接起来,比6.5分两个分开的短句展现出更广的语法范围。7.5分的回答会用破折号和前置的评价性短语进一步压缩这一内容。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with a fronted gerund phrase ('Using it for something real...') as its topic sentence and closes with an idiomatic evaluative touch ('finding a single patient native speaker willing to put up with you'), more compact than 7.0's plainer phrasing.7.5分的回答以一个前置动名词短语作为主题句开篇("Using it for something real..."),并以一个地道的评价性收尾("finding a single patient native speaker willing to put up with you"),比7.0分更平实的表达更紧凑。
Using it for something real, as early and as badly as possible, beats almost any classroom method. A full year of evening Japanese classes left me remembering next to nothing, whereas three months of working alongside a Japanese client somehow lodged every phrase we needed permanently in my head — purpose, it turns out, supplies the repetition that lessons never quite manage. Speaking from day one matters more than grammar tables ever will, and so does swallowing the embarrassment adults are notoriously bad at tolerating. Consistency also beats intensity hands down: fifteen minutes daily will outlast a weekend crash course every time. If I had to pick one shortcut, though, it would be finding a single patient native speaker willing to put up with you.
查看中文翻译
尽早、哪怕说得很糟糕地把语言用在真实的事情上,比几乎任何课堂方法都管用。整整一年的日语夜校课下来,我几乎什么都不记得了,而跟一个日本客户共事三个月,却不知怎的把我们需要的每一个短语都永久刻进了脑子里——事实证明,是"目的"提供了课堂始终难以提供的那种重复练习。从第一天就开口说,比任何语法表格都更重要,能咽下那份尴尬感也同样重要,而成年人在这方面出了名地差。持续性同样以压倒性优势胜过强度:每天十五分钟,永远比一个周末的速成班更持久。不过,如果非要我选一个捷径,那就是找一个耐心的母语者,愿意忍受你。
为什么是这个分数
FC“If I had to pick one shortcut, though, it would be finding a single patient native speaker willing to put up with you.” — This closing sentence adds a fluent evaluative touch, summarising the whole answer with a single memorable recommendation. A 6.5 answer ends flatly instead, with a bare fact like 'doing a little every day works better than studying for hours once a week', showing no such rounding-off.这句结尾增添了一个流畅的评价性色彩,用一个令人印象深刻的建议总结了整个回答。6.5分的回答则以一个赤裸裸的事实平淡收尾,比如"doing a little every day works better than studying for hours once a week",没有这种收束感。
LR“lodged every phrase we needed permanently in my head” — 'Lodged' is a vivid, genuinely less-common verb choice for describing memory. A 6.5 answer would use the plain phrase 'still remember every word we used', showing a much narrower vocabulary range for the same idea."Lodged"是一个生动、真正不常见的动词选择,用来描述记忆。6.5分的回答会用平实的短语"still remember every word we used",展现出远为狭窄的词汇范围。
GRA“Using it for something real, as early and as badly as possible, beats almost any classroom method.” — This sentence is fronted by a gerund phrase functioning as the subject, a flexible structure a 6.5 answer would not use, instead opening plainly with 'The best way is to actually use the language...'这句话以一个作主语的动名词短语开头,是一种灵活的结构,6.5分的回答不会使用,而是会平实地以"The best way is to actually use the language..."开篇。
5. Why do children often find learning languages easier than adults?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer splits its reasoning into two plain parts ('Partly it's the brain, and partly it's their life') and supports each with a short factual sentence joined by 'and' or 'but'.6.5分的回答把论证分成两个平实的部分("Partly it's the brain, and partly it's their life"),并分别用一个由"and"或"but"连接的简短事实性句子加以支撑。
Partly it's the brain, and partly it's their life. My nephew is five, and he can copy the accent of a Korean cartoon character perfectly, but I can't even hear the sounds he's copying. Young children's ears and mouths are just more flexible. But I think the bigger reason is that children aren't embarrassed and aren't busy. They say wrong sentences again and again without worrying, and they hear the language all day. Adults have jobs and families and only a little free time, and they're scared of sounding silly.
查看中文翻译
一部分原因在大脑,另一部分在于他们的生活方式。我侄子五岁,能把一个韩国卡通人物的口音模仿得惟妙惟肖,而我连他在模仿的那些音都听不出来。小孩子的耳朵和嘴巴就是更灵活。但我觉得更重要的原因是,小孩子不觉得尴尬,也不忙。他们会一遍又一遍地说错句子而完全不担心,而且他们整天都能接触到这门语言。成年人有工作、有家庭,只有一点点空闲时间,还很害怕自己听起来很傻。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Partly it's the brain, and partly it's their life.” — This plain, direct two-part opening states the structure of the whole answer immediately. A 7.0 answer would soften the same framing with 'I'd say it's partly biological and partly about how differently children live', adding a reflective hedge.这个平实、直接的两段式开篇立刻点明了整篇回答的结构。7.0分的回答会用"I'd say it's partly biological and partly about how differently children live"软化同样的框架,加入一个反思性的模糊限制语。
LR“children aren't embarrassed and aren't busy” — This uses modest, everyday vocabulary. A 7.5 answer would choose the more precise phrase 'neither self-conscious nor busy', showing a step up in formality and word choice for the same idea.这里用了朴素、日常的词汇。7.5分的回答会选用更精准的短语"neither self-conscious nor busy",在同一想法上展现出更正式、更讲究的用词。
GRA“Adults have jobs and families and only a little free time, and they're scared of sounding silly.” — This sentence simply stacks items with repeated 'and'. A 7.5 answer would compress the same list into a tighter participial clause, such as 'juggling full lives, an hour a week if that, and a genuine horror of sounding stupid'.这句话只是用重复的"and"把几个项目堆叠在一起。7.5分的回答会把同样的列表压缩进一个更紧凑的分词从句,比如"juggling full lives, an hour a week if that, and a genuine horror of sounding stupid"。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer hedges with 'I'd say' and 'to be fair', and uses one conditional sentence ('Give an adult a child's conditions, and I suspect...') that 6.5 doesn't attempt.7.0分的回答用"I'd say"和"to be fair"作模糊限制,并使用了一个条件句("Give an adult a child's conditions, and I suspect..."),这是6.5分没有尝试的。
I'd say it's partly biological and partly about how differently children live. My five-year-old nephew can nail the accent of a Korean cartoon character, and honestly I can't even hear the sounds he's imitating — that window for picking up sounds perfectly does seem to close with age. But to be fair, the bigger factor might just be that children aren't embarrassed and aren't busy: they'll repeat a wrong sentence a hundred times without caring, while adults have full lives, maybe an hour a week, and a real fear of sounding stupid. Give an adult a child's conditions, and I suspect they'd actually learn faster in most ways except accent.
查看中文翻译
我觉得一部分是生理原因,一部分是因为小孩子的生活方式完全不同。我五岁的侄子能把一个韩国卡通人物的口音模仿得惟妙惟肖,老实说我连他在模仿的那些音都听不出来——那扇能完美捕捉发音的"窗口",似乎真的会随着年龄增长而关闭。但平心而论,更重要的因素可能只是小孩子不觉得尴尬,也不忙:他们会把一句错的话重复一百遍也不在乎,而成年人有繁忙的生活,可能一周只有一小时,还真的害怕自己听起来很傻。要是让成年人也处在小孩的那种条件下,我猜他们在除了口音以外的大多数方面,学得其实会更快。
为什么是这个分数
FC“But to be fair, the bigger factor might just be that” — This spoken qualifier weighs two possible explanations against each other in real time. A 6.5 answer states the same idea more flatly as 'But I think the bigger reason is that', without this extra layer of natural hesitation and weighing.这个口语化的限定语在实时权衡两种可能的解释。6.5分的回答会更平淡地陈述同样的想法,比如"But I think the bigger reason is that",没有这层自然的犹豫和权衡。
LR“nail the accent of a Korean cartoon character” — 'Nail the accent' is a mild, natural collocation beyond the plainest wording. A 6.5 answer would say 'copy the accent... perfectly' instead, which is correct but shows less idiomatic range."Nail the accent"是一个温和、自然的搭配,超越了最平实的措辞。6.5分的回答会说"copy the accent... perfectly",虽然正确,但展现出的习语范围较窄。
GRA“Give an adult a child's conditions, and I suspect they'd actually learn faster in most ways except accent.” — This imperative-plus-clause conditional structure is more complex than a simple declarative sentence. A 6.5 answer would not attempt this pattern, sticking instead to straightforward statements joined by 'and' or 'but'.这种"祈使句+从句"的条件结构比简单的陈述句更复杂。6.5分的回答不会尝试这种模式,而是坚持用"and"或"but"连接的直白陈述。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with the precise word pair 'neurological and... circumstantial' and uses a fronted gerund clause ('Watching my five-year-old nephew...') as its sentence subject, more compact than 7.0's plainer structure.7.5分的回答以精准的词语对"neurological and... circumstantial"开篇,并用一个前置的动名词从句("Watching my five-year-old nephew...")作句子主语,比7.0分更平实的结构更紧凑。
It's partly neurological and partly circumstantial. Watching my five-year-old nephew nail the accent of a Korean cartoon character while I can't even hear the sounds he's copying is a pretty stark reminder that young ears and mouths stay flexible in a way that simply closes off later. The bigger factor, though, is probably that children are neither self-conscious nor busy — happily mangling the same sentence a hundred times, marinating in the language all day, with nobody expecting fluency yet. Adults, by contrast, are juggling full lives, an hour a week if that, and a genuine horror of sounding stupid. Hand an adult a child's conditions, and in most respects except accent, they'd likely outlearn the child.
查看中文翻译
这一部分是神经学上的原因,一部分是环境使然。看着我五岁的侄子把一个韩国卡通人物的口音模仿得惟妙惟肖,而我连他在模仿的那些音都听不出来,这清楚地提醒着我,年幼的耳朵和嘴巴保持着一种灵活性,而这种灵活性会随着年龄增长慢慢关闭。不过,更重要的因素大概是小孩子既不自我意识过剩,也不忙碌——他们能开开心心地把同一句话说错一百遍,整天"泡"在这门语言里,而且还没人指望他们能说得流利。相比之下,成年人则忙于处理繁重的生活,一周可能只有一小时,还带着一种对"听起来很蠢"的真切恐惧。要是把小孩的条件给成年人,除了口音之外,他们大多数方面很可能反而会学得比小孩更快。
为什么是这个分数
FC“The bigger factor, though, is probably that” — This qualifier is folded smoothly into the sentence flow rather than standing as its own clause. A 6.5 answer separates the same idea into its own plain sentence, 'But I think the bigger reason is that', showing less integrated fluency.这个限定语被平滑地融入句子的流动中,而不是单独成为一个从句。6.5分的回答把同样的想法拆成一个独立的平实句子"But I think the bigger reason is that",展现出较不流畅的整合能力。
LR“marinating in the language all day” — 'Marinating' is a vivid, genuinely less-common verb applied metaphorically. A 6.5 answer would use the plain literal phrase 'they hear the language all day', showing a much smaller vocabulary range for the same idea."Marinating"是一个生动、真正不常见的动词,被用作隐喻。6.5分的回答会用平实的字面短语"they hear the language all day",展现出远为狭窄的词汇范围。
GRA“Watching my five-year-old nephew nail the accent of a Korean cartoon character while I can't even hear the sounds he's copying is a pretty stark reminder” — This fronted gerund phrase functions as the subject of the whole sentence, a compact and flexible structure. A 6.5 answer would instead write the simple 'My nephew is five, and he can copy...' with the subject stated plainly at the start.这个前置动名词短语充当了整句话的主语,是一种紧凑而灵活的结构。6.5分的回答则会写出简单的"My nephew is five, and he can copy...",在开头就平实地点明主语。
6. Is knowing the vocabulary of another language more useful than knowing the grammar?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer states its position directly ('vocabulary is much more useful') and supports it with one plain example, using simple 'but' and 'so' connectors throughout.6.5分的回答直接陈述了立场("vocabulary is much more useful"),并用一个平实的例子加以支撑,全篇用简单的"but"和"so"连接。
For getting things done, vocabulary is much more useful. My friend Duy speaks Korean using mostly nouns and simple phrases, almost no grammar, but it works fine — his passengers always understand him. You can point at a word and be understood, but you can't do that with only grammar and no words. Grammar becomes important later, when you want to say something more precise or polite. So at the start, vocabulary matters most, and grammar matters more once you already understand the basics.
查看中文翻译
要把事情办成,词汇量要有用得多。我朋友阿维(Duy)说韩语基本上只用名词和简单短语,几乎不懂语法,但照样管用——他的乘客总是能听懂他的意思。你可以指着一个词让别人明白你的意思,但如果只有语法、没有词汇,你根本做不到。语法要到后来才变得重要,那时候你想说得更精确或更有礼貌。所以一开始的时候,词汇最重要,而一旦你已经掌握了基础,语法就变得更重要了。
为什么是这个分数
FC“For getting things done, vocabulary is much more useful.” — This direct plain opening states the position with no hedge word. A 7.0 answer would frame the same claim with 'Honestly, for basic communication, vocabulary wins pretty easily', adding a natural spoken hedge.这个直接平实的开篇陈述了立场,没有任何模糊限制词。7.0分的回答会用"Honestly, for basic communication, vocabulary wins pretty easily"来构建同样的论断,加入了自然的口语化模糊限制语。
LR“it works fine” — This is modest, generic vocabulary that just states the outcome. A 7.5 answer would use the more developed phrase 'it serves him and his passengers just fine', showing slightly richer, more deliberate wording.这是朴素、通用的词汇,只是陈述了结果。7.5分的回答会用更精致的短语"it serves him and his passengers just fine",展现出略微更丰富、更考究的措辞。
GRA“You can point at a word and be understood, but you can't do that with only grammar and no words.” — This is a simple contrastive sentence joined by 'but'. A 7.5 answer would compress the same contrast using 'whereas' or fold it into a longer sentence with a dash, showing more flexible sentence-level grammar.这是一个用"but"连接的简单对比句。7.5分的回答会用"whereas"压缩同样的对比,或者用破折号把它折进一个更长的句子里,展现出更灵活的句子层面语法。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer hedges its claim with 'Honestly' and 'I'd say', and adds a 'though to be fair' qualifying remark about most learners that 6.5's flatter conclusion lacks.7.0分的回答用"Honestly"和"I'd say"来限定自己的论断,并加了一句"though to be fair"来限定关于大多数学习者的说法,这是6.5分更平淡的结论所没有的。
Honestly, for basic communication, vocabulary wins pretty easily. Duy's Korean is mostly nouns and memorised phrases with almost no grammar, and it works perfectly well for him and his passengers — you can point at a word and be understood, whereas a perfect grammar rule with no vocabulary gets you nowhere. I'd say grammar only becomes important later, once being understood isn't enough and you actually want to sound precise or polite. So vocabulary matters first and grammar matters eventually, though to be fair, most learners get that order backwards because grammar is simply easier to teach in a classroom.
查看中文翻译
老实说,就基本沟通而言,词汇量轻松就能胜出。阿维的韩语基本上是名词和背下来的短语,几乎没有语法,但对他和他的乘客来说效果完美——你可以指着一个词让别人明白,而如果只有完美的语法规则却没有词汇,那你什么都做不成。我觉得语法只有到后来才变得重要,那时候光是"被听懂"已经不够,你真的想说得精确或有礼貌了。所以一开始词汇最重要,后来语法才更重要,不过平心而论,大多数学习者都把这个顺序弄反了,因为语法在课堂上就是更容易教。
为什么是这个分数
FC“though to be fair, most learners get that order backwards” — This spoken qualifying remark adds a self-correcting reflection at the end of the answer. A 6.5 answer ends flatly with its conclusion and no such additional qualifying thought, showing less developed coherence-building.这句口语化的限定语在回答结尾加了一段自我修正式的反思。6.5分的回答会以结论平淡收尾,没有这样额外的限定性想法,展现出较不成熟的连贯性构建能力。
LR“memorised phrases with almost no grammar” — This is a slightly more precise phrasing than 6.5's plainer 'simple phrases, almost no grammar', showing marginally more careful word choice while still staying within common vocabulary.这比6.5分更平实的"simple phrases, almost no grammar"措辞略微更精准,展现出稍微更用心的用词选择,同时仍属于常见词汇范围。
GRA“you can point at a word and be understood, whereas a perfect grammar rule with no vocabulary gets you nowhere” — The 'whereas' subordinate clause creates a more sophisticated contrast than 6.5's plain 'but' coordination. This shows a wider range of linking devices typical of the higher band."whereas"从句创造出比6.5分平实的"but"并列结构更精巧的对比。这展现出更宽泛的连接手法,是更高分数段的典型特征。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with the idiomatic 'wins hands down', uses a relative clause fronted with 'whose Korean is little more than...', and closes with the precise phrase 'grammar earns its keep', more compact and vivid than 7.0's plainer wording.7.5分的回答以地道的"wins hands down"开篇,用"whose Korean is little more than..."引导的关系从句,并以精准的短语"grammar earns its keep"收尾,比7.0分更平实的措辞更紧凑、更生动。
For sheer functionality, vocabulary wins hands down. Take Duy, whose Korean is little more than nouns and a handful of memorised phrases with barely any grammar attached, and yet it serves him and his passengers just fine — you can point at a word and be understood, but a flawless grammar rule with zero vocabulary gets you nowhere at all. Grammar only earns its keep later, once being understood stops being enough and you want to sound precise, polite, or genuinely adult. So vocabulary is more useful first and grammar more useful eventually, and most learners, chasing textbook logic, get that order backwards precisely because grammar is easier to teach than words are to memorise.
查看中文翻译
就纯粹的实用性而言,词汇量完胜。就拿阿维来说,他的韩语基本上只是名词加上几个背熟的短语,几乎不带任何语法,可效果对他和他的乘客来说照样管用——你可以指着一个词让人明白,但如果只有零词汇量的完美语法规则,那你哪儿都去不了。语法要到后来才"配得上它的存在",那时候光是被听懂已经不够,你想说得精确、有礼貌,或者真正像个成年人。所以一开始词汇更有用,后来语法才更有用,而大多数学习者追着教科书的逻辑走,恰恰把这个顺序弄反了,原因就在于语法比词汇更容易教,而词汇却更难死记硬背。
为什么是这个分数
FC“For sheer functionality, vocabulary wins hands down.” — This fluent idiomatic opening delivers the position with confidence and colour in one breath. A 6.5 answer states the same idea far more plainly as 'vocabulary is much more useful', with no idiomatic flourish.这个流畅地道的开篇一口气自信而有色彩地传达了立场。6.5分的回答会用远为平实的"vocabulary is much more useful"来陈述同样的想法,没有任何地道的修饰。
LR“Grammar only earns its keep later” — 'Earns its keep' is a genuinely less-common collocation used precisely. A 6.5 answer expresses the same idea with the plain phrase 'Grammar becomes important later', showing a clear gap in lexical sophistication."Earns its keep"是一个真正不常见、被精准运用的搭配。6.5分的回答会用平实的短语"Grammar becomes important later"来表达同样的意思,展现出词汇精巧度上明显的差距。
GRA“Take Duy, whose Korean is little more than nouns and a handful of memorised phrases with barely any grammar attached, and yet it serves him and his passengers just fine” — This relative clause is embedded mid-sentence with a 'yet' contrast, producing a longer, more flexible structure. A 6.5 answer would instead use separate simple sentences to convey the same content, one after another.这个关系从句嵌入句中,带有一个"yet"转折,产生了更长、更灵活的结构。6.5分的回答则会用一个接一个的独立简单句来传达同样的内容。
7. Is it impossible to understand another culture without understanding its language?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct two-part position ('not impossible, but you miss a lot') and supports it with one plain grammatical example, using simple 'but' and 'so' connectors.6.5分的回答给出一个直接的两段式立场("not impossible, but you miss a lot"),并用一个平实的语法例子加以支撑,使用简单的"but"和"so"连接。
It's not impossible, but you miss a lot. In Vietnamese, you can't say 'you' without choosing a word that shows the other person's age and your relationship with them. This one thing explains a lot about how we treat family and older people. You can learn about a culture's food and history without the language, and many foreigners understand Vietnam quite well already. But jokes, politeness, and things people don't say directly — you only get those through the language. So you can understand a culture partly, but not completely, without it.
查看中文翻译
这并非不可能,但你会错过很多东西。在越南语里,你不选一个能体现对方年龄和你们关系的词,就没法说"你"。仅这一点,就能解释很多关于我们如何对待家人和长辈的事情。不需要语言,你也能了解一种文化的饮食和历史,很多外国人其实已经对越南理解得相当不错了。但笑话、礼貌,还有人们不直接说出口的那些东西——你只能通过语言才能懂。所以没有语言,你能理解一种文化的一部分,但不能完全理解。
为什么是这个分数
FC“It's not impossible, but you miss a lot.” — This direct, plain two-clause opinion sets up the whole answer immediately. A 7.0 answer would give the same opinion a more reflective frame with 'Not impossible, I'd say, but there's definitely a layer you never quite reach without it.'这个直接平实的两分句观点立刻为整篇回答定下了基调。7.0分的回答会用"Not impossible, I'd say, but there's definitely a layer you never quite reach without it."为同样的观点赋予更具反思性的框架。
LR“This one thing explains a lot about how we treat family and older people.” — This is plain, generic vocabulary describing the significance of the example. A 7.5 answer would phrase the same point more precisely as 'a single grammatical quirk that reveals more... than any book ever could', showing richer word choice.这是朴素、通用的词汇,用来描述这个例子的重要性。7.5分的回答会更精准地表达同样的观点,比如"a single grammatical quirk that reveals more... than any book ever could",展现出更丰富的用词。
GRA“You can learn about a culture's food and history without the language, and many foreigners understand Vietnam quite well already.” — This is a simple sentence joined with 'and'. A 7.5 answer would embed the same idea into a participial phrase attached to a longer sentence, giving the grammar more compact flexibility.这是一个用"and"连接的简单句。7.5分的回答会把同样的想法嵌入一个附着在更长句子上的分词短语中,使语法更紧凑灵活。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer hedges with 'I'd say' and 'To be fair', and uses one relative clause ('which honestly explains more about... than any book could') that 6.5's simpler sentences avoid.7.0分的回答用"I'd say"和"To be fair"作模糊限制,并用了一个关系从句("which honestly explains more about... than any book could"),这是6.5分更简单的句子所回避的。
Not impossible, I'd say, but there's definitely a layer you never quite reach without it. In Vietnamese, for instance, you can't even say 'you' without picking a word that states the other person's age and your relationship to them, which honestly explains more about how we treat family and seniority than any book could. To be fair, plenty of foreigners here understand Vietnam's food, history and habits perfectly well from outside the language. But the jokes, the politeness, and what people mean when they deliberately don't say something — those live only in the language itself. So culture is understandable in part without it, but the language is the last, and biggest, door.
查看中文翻译
我觉得不是不可能,但确实有一层东西你永远无法在没有语言的情况下触及。比如在越南语里,你甚至不能不选一个能体现对方年龄和你们关系的词就说"你",老实说这一点能解释我们如何对待家庭和长幼有序,比任何一本书都更能说明问题。平心而论,很多在这里的外国人,即使不懂语言,也已经对越南的饮食、历史和习俗理解得相当到位了。但笑话、礼貌,还有人们故意不说出口时想表达的意思——这些只存在于语言本身之中。所以没有语言,文化是可以部分理解的,但语言是最后一道,也是最大的一道门。
为什么是这个分数
FC“To be fair, plenty of foreigners here understand Vietnam's food, history and habits perfectly well from outside the language.” — This natural conceding remark shows the speaker weighing the opposite view before continuing. A 6.5 answer states the same fact more flatly as 'You can learn about a culture's food and history without the language', without this concessive framing.这句自然的让步表达展现出说话者在继续之前权衡了相反的观点。6.5分的回答会更平淡地陈述同样的事实,比如"You can learn about a culture's food and history without the language",没有这种让步性的框架。
LR“the last, and biggest, door” — This is mild figurative phrasing that extends a simple metaphor. A 6.5 answer would state the conclusion plainly as 'you can understand a culture partly, but not completely', with no figurative language at all.这是温和的比喻性表达,延伸了一个简单的隐喻。6.5分的回答会平实地陈述结论,比如"you can understand a culture partly, but not completely",完全没有比喻性语言。
GRA“which honestly explains more about how we treat family and seniority than any book could” — This relative clause contains an embedded comparative structure, showing more grammatical complexity than 6.5's separate simple sentence 'This one thing explains a lot about how we treat family and older people.'这个关系从句包含了一个嵌入的比较结构,比6.5分独立的简单句"This one thing explains a lot about how we treat family and older people."展现出更高的语法复杂度。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer personifies the language ('Vietnamese won't even let you say...') and uses a semicolon to compress two closing clauses into one sentence, more idiomatic and compact than 7.0's separated sentences.7.5分的回答把语言拟人化了("Vietnamese won't even let you say..."),并用分号把两个结尾从句压缩进一个句子,比7.0分分开的句子更地道、更紧凑。
Not impossible, but there's a whole layer you'll never quite reach without it. Vietnamese won't even let you say 'you' without committing to a word that flags the other person's age and your relationship to them — a single grammatical quirk that reveals more about how we handle family and seniority than any book ever could. Plenty of foreigners here get Vietnam's food, history and habits perfectly well from the outside, translation losing surprisingly little along the way. What it can't carry across, though, are the jokes, the politeness, and everything people mean precisely by not saying it — those live nowhere but in the language itself. So a culture stays partly understandable without the words; the language is simply the last door, and it happens to be a big one.
查看中文翻译
不是不可能,但确实有一整层东西,你永远无法在没有语言的情况下触及。越南语甚至不允许你不选定一个能标记对方年龄和你们关系的词就说"你"——这一个语法上的小怪癖,比任何一本书都更能揭示我们如何处理家庭和长幼关系。这里很多外国人,即便不懂语言,也能从外部相当到位地理解越南的饮食、历史和习俗,翻译在这一路上出乎意料地损失不多。然而,翻译无法传递的,是笑话、礼貌,以及人们通过故意不说出口所精确表达的那些意思——这些东西只存在于语言本身之中。所以一种文化在没有语言的情况下仍然可以部分被理解;语言不过是最后一道门,只是恰好是一道很大的门。
为什么是这个分数
FC“What it can't carry across, though, are the jokes, the politeness, and everything people mean precisely by not saying it” — This fronted construction throws emphasis onto what is lost, a more fluent rhetorical move than plain listing. A 6.5 answer would simply list the same items as 'But jokes, politeness, and things people don't say directly', without this emphatic fronting.这个前置结构把重点抛向了"失去了什么",是一种比平铺直叙的列举更流畅的修辞手法。6.5分的回答只会简单地列举同样的条目,比如"But jokes, politeness, and things people don't say directly",没有这种强调性的前置。
LR“a single grammatical quirk that reveals more about how we handle family and seniority” — 'Quirk' is a precise, less-common word choice used with confidence. A 6.5 answer describes the same idea plainly as 'This one thing explains a lot', showing a much narrower vocabulary for the concept."Quirk"是一个精准、不太常见、被自信运用的词语选择。6.5分的回答会平实地描述同样的想法,比如"This one thing explains a lot",展现出对这一概念远为狭窄的词汇量。
GRA“So a culture stays partly understandable without the words; the language is simply the last door, and it happens to be a big one.” — This semicolon-linked compound sentence joins two related closing ideas into one flowing unit. A 6.5 answer would instead write a separate, shorter 'So' sentence on its own, without this kind of compact linkage.这个用分号连接的复合句把两个相关的结尾想法合并成一个流畅的整体。6.5分的回答则会单独写一个更短的"So"句,没有这种紧凑的连接。
8. How might the number of languages a person speaks affect their sense of identity?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct claim ('It can split your identity') and lists two plain contrasting effects for migrants and others, joined by simple 'so' and 'but'-style connectors.6.5分的回答给出了一个直接的论断("It can split your identity"),并列举了移民和其他人身上两种平实的对比性影响,用简单的"so"和类似"but"的连接词连接。
It can split your identity in an interesting way. I'm more direct in English than in Vietnamese — blunter and quicker to disagree — and I've wondered which one is really me. Each language comes with its own manners and memories, so people who speak more than one language can feel like slightly different people in each. For migrants, this can feel confusing, like not fully belonging anywhere. For others, it feels like having more space inside themselves. Either way, language and identity are closely connected.
查看中文翻译
这会以一种有趣的方式"分裂"你的身份认同。我说英语时比说越南语更直接——更直率,更快表示不同意——我也曾想过,到底哪一个才是真正的我。每种语言都自带一套自己的礼节和记忆,所以会说不止一种语言的人,在不同语言里可能会觉得自己像是略有不同的人。对移民来说,这可能会让人感到困惑,像是哪儿都不完全属于。对另一些人来说,这感觉更像是自己内心多了一些空间。不管怎样,语言和身份认同是紧密相连的。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Either way, language and identity are closely connected.” — This plain, flat closing summary simply restates the topic. A 7.0 answer would close with a more reflective image, such as 'extra rooms in the same house', giving the ending more developed coherence.这个平淡、直白的结尾总结只是重述了主题。7.0分的回答会用更具反思性的意象收尾,比如"extra rooms in the same house",让结尾更有连贯性。
LR“like having more space inside themselves” — This is modest, plain phrasing for the idea of expansion. A 7.5 answer would develop the same image more vividly as 'like having extra rooms added onto the same house', showing richer figurative language.这是关于"扩展"这一想法的朴素、平实的表达。7.5分的回答会更生动地发展出同样的意象,比如"like having extra rooms added onto the same house",展现出更丰富的比喻性语言。
GRA“Each language comes with its own manners and memories, so people who speak more than one language can feel like slightly different people in each.” — This is a simple sentence linked with 'so'. A 7.5 answer would use more compressed grammar, such as a dash or semicolon linking two closely related clauses, instead of this single straightforward causal link.这是一个用"so"连接的简单句。7.5分的回答会用更压缩的语法,比如用破折号或分号连接两个密切相关的从句,而不是这种单一直白的因果连接。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer hedges with 'Honestly' and 'I'd say', and adds the reflective closing image of 'extra rooms in the same house' that goes beyond 6.5's plainer ending.7.0分的回答用"Honestly"和"I'd say"作模糊限制,并加入了"extra rooms in the same house"这一反思性的结尾意象,超越了6.5分更平淡的结尾。
Honestly, it can split identity in interesting ways. I'm noticeably more direct in English than in Vietnamese — blunter, quicker to disagree — and I've genuinely wondered which version is the real one. I'd say each language carries its own manners and memories, so people who speak several can end up feeling like slightly different versions of themselves depending on which one they're in. For migrants and their children especially, that can be a source of real tension, a sense of not fully belonging to either side. For others, though, it feels more like an expansion, almost like having extra rooms in the same house.
查看中文翻译
老实说,这会以一些有趣的方式"分裂"身份认同。我说英语时明显比说越南语更直接——更直率,更快表示不同意——我也真心想过,到底哪一个版本才是真正的我。我觉得每种语言都带着自己的礼节和记忆,所以会说几种语言的人,可能会觉得自己在不同语言里是略有不同的版本。对移民和他们的孩子来说尤其如此,这可能会成为一种真实的紧张感的来源,一种不完全属于任何一方的感觉。但对另一些人来说,这感觉更像是一种扩展,几乎像是同一栋房子里多了几个房间。
为什么是这个分数
FC“I'd say each language carries its own manners and memories” — This reflective spoken hedge frames the claim as a considered opinion rather than a bare fact. A 6.5 answer states the same idea flatly as 'Each language comes with its own manners and memories', with no such framing device.这个反思性的口语化模糊限制语把论断构建成了一种经过深思的观点,而不是赤裸裸的事实。6.5分的回答会平淡地陈述同样的想法,比如"Each language comes with its own manners and memories",没有这种构建手法。
LR“a sense of not fully belonging to either side” — This is mildly more precise phrasing than 6.5's plain 'like not fully belonging anywhere', adding the more specific idea of two sides rather than a vague 'anywhere'.这比6.5分平实的"like not fully belonging anywhere"措辞略微更精准,加入了"两边"这一更具体的想法,而不是笼统的"anywhere"。
GRA“depending on which one they're in” — This subordinate clause is added onto the end of the main sentence for extra precision. A 6.5 answer would end the equivalent sentence more simply at 'in each', without this additional dependent clause.这个从句被附加在主句末尾以增加精准度。6.5分的回答会更简单地在"in each"处结束对应的句子,没有这个额外的从句。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer uses the less-common verb 'splinter' and 'curdle' instead of plain words, and closes with a conditional evaluative sentence ('If there's a constant, it's that...') that is more compact and reflective than 6.5's flat closing line.7.5分的回答用了不太常见的动词"splinter"和"curdle",而不是平实的词语,并以一个条件式的评价性句子("If there's a constant, it's that...")收尾,比6.5分平淡的结尾句更紧凑、更具反思性。
It can splinter identity in ways that are genuinely disorienting. I come across noticeably blunter and quicker to disagree in English than in Vietnamese, which has left me wondering more than once which version is actually me. Each language seems to carry its own set of manners and memories baked in, so people who speak several often end up feeling like slightly different versions of themselves depending on which one they're inhabiting. For migrants and their children in particular, that can curdle into real tension — never quite belonging fully to either side. For others it reads more as expansion, like having extra rooms added onto the same house. If there's a constant, it's that losing a language, as many minority communities are, seems to feel like losing part of a self.
查看中文翻译
这有时会以一种真正令人迷失方向的方式"击碎"身份认同。我说英语时明显给人一种更直率、更快表示不同意的印象,而说越南语时则不是这样,这让我不止一次地想,到底哪个版本才是真正的我。每种语言似乎都内置了一整套自己的礼节和记忆,所以会说好几种语言的人,常常会觉得自己在使用不同语言时,像是略有不同的版本。对移民及其子女来说尤其如此,这种感觉可能会"变酸"成真实的紧张感——永远不能完全属于任何一方。对另一些人来说,这更像是一种扩展,就像同一栋房子里加盖了几个房间。如果说有什么是恒定不变的,那就是:正在失去一门语言的人——很多少数族裔社群正是如此——似乎会觉得自己失去了一部分自我。
为什么是这个分数
FC“If there's a constant, it's that losing a language, as many minority communities are, seems to feel like losing part of a self.” — This closing sentence rounds off the whole answer with a fluent, considered generalisation. A 6.5 answer ends with the bare, flat statement 'Either way, language and identity are closely connected', showing far less developed coherence at the close.这句结尾用一个流畅、经过深思的概括总结了整篇回答。6.5分的回答会以赤裸裸、平淡的陈述"Either way, language and identity are closely connected"收尾,展现出结尾处远为不成熟的连贯性。
LR“that can curdle into real tension” — 'Curdle' is a genuinely less-common, vivid verb used metaphorically. A 6.5 answer describes the same idea plainly as 'this can feel confusing', showing a much smaller vocabulary range for the same concept."Curdle"是一个真正不常见、生动的动词,被用作隐喻。6.5分的回答会平实地描述同样的想法,比如"this can feel confusing",展现出对同一概念远为狭窄的词汇范围。
GRA“which has left me wondering more than once which version is actually me” — This relative clause is embedded mid-sentence, adding detail without starting a new sentence. A 6.5 answer would instead use a separate coordinated clause joined by 'and', such as 'and I've wondered which one is really me'.这个关系从句嵌入句中,在不另起一句的情况下增加了细节。6.5分的回答则会用一个由"and"连接的独立并列从句,比如"and I've wondered which one is really me"。
9. Would it be desirable for technology to replace the need for people to learn other languages?
2026年9–12月
查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
6.5 分
The 6.5 answer gives a direct position ('convenient, but... not fully desirable') and supports it with one plain anecdote, using simple 'but' and 'so' connectors throughout.6.5分的回答给出了一个直接的立场("convenient, but... not fully desirable"),并用一个平实的轶事加以支撑,全篇用简单的"but"和"so"连接。
It would be convenient, but I don't think it's fully desirable. I once tried a translation earpiece at a technology fair, and it got every word right but every joke wrong. That shows the real problem. Technology can make basic communication easy, which is great for travel or emergencies. But learning a language also trains your brain and helps you understand a culture's jokes and meaning, which translation can't do. So I'd want technology to remove the difficulty, not remove the reason to learn.
查看中文翻译
这会很方便,但我觉得不能说完全可取。我有一次在科技展上试用了一个翻译耳机,它把每个词都翻对了,却把每个笑话都翻错了。这就说明了真正的问题所在。科技能让基本沟通变得容易,这对旅行或紧急情况来说很棒。但学一门语言还能训练大脑,还能帮你理解一种文化的笑话和言外之意,而这些是翻译做不到的。所以我希望科技能消除的是学习的"难度",而不是消除学习的"理由"。
为什么是这个分数
FC“That shows the real problem.” — This short, plain linking sentence stands alone to connect the anecdote to the argument. A 7.0 answer would fold the same idea into a relative clause, such as 'which sums up the problem pretty well', integrating it more fluently into the previous sentence.这个简短平实的连接句独立存在,把轶事和论点连接起来。7.0分的回答会把同样的想法折进一个关系从句,比如"which sums up the problem pretty well",更流畅地融入前一句话中。
LR“Technology can make basic communication easy” — This is plain, generic vocabulary stating the benefit directly. A 7.5 answer would phrase the same idea more precisely as 'Technology rendering basic communication effortless is undeniably a gain', showing richer, more formal word choice.这是直接陈述好处的朴素、通用词汇。7.5分的回答会更精准地表达同样的想法,比如"Technology rendering basic communication effortless is undeniably a gain",展现出更丰富、更正式的用词。
GRA“it got every word right but every joke wrong” — This is a simple parallel clause joined with 'but'. A 7.5 answer would attach a relative clause to the same idea instead, such as 'which is about as neat a summary of the problem as you could ask for', producing more compact, flexible grammar.这是一个用"but"连接的简单并列从句。7.5分的回答则会给同样的想法附加一个关系从句,比如"which is about as neat a summary of the problem as you could ask for",产生更紧凑、灵活的语法。
7.0 分
The 7.0 answer hedges with 'I'm honestly not so sure' and 'To be fair', and folds the anecdote's point into a relative clause ('which sums up the problem pretty well') rather than 6.5's separate short sentence.7.0分的回答用"I'm honestly not so sure"和"To be fair"作模糊限制,并把轶事的要点折进一个关系从句("which sums up the problem pretty well"),而不是像6.5分那样用独立的短句。
Convenient, definitely — desirable, I'm honestly not so sure. I tried a translation earpiece once at a technology fair, and it got every word right and every joke wrong, which sums up the problem pretty well. To be fair, technology making basic communication effortless is a real gain for travel, trade or emergencies, where nobody should suffer just because two people don't share a language. But learning a language does things translation simply can't — it trains the brain and opens up the parts of a culture that never survive translation. I'd want technology to remove the barrier, not the reason to bother learning in the first place.
查看中文翻译
方便,那是肯定的——但可取不可取,老实说我不太确定。我有一次在科技展上试用了一个翻译耳机,它把每个词都翻对了,却把每个笑话都翻错了,这挺能说明问题的。平心而论,科技让基本沟通变得毫不费力,对旅行、贸易或紧急情况来说是实实在在的好处,毕竟不该让人仅仅因为语言不通就吃苦头。但学一门语言能做到翻译根本做不到的事——它能训练大脑,还能打开一种文化中那些永远无法在翻译中幸存下来的部分。我希望科技能消除的是"障碍",而不是从一开始就消除"费心去学"的理由。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Convenient, definitely — desirable, I'm honestly not so sure.” — This natural spoken hedged opening balances two ideas in one breath with a dash. A 6.5 answer states the same contrast more flatly as 'It would be convenient, but I don't think it's fully desirable', with less natural spoken rhythm.这个自然口语化的、带模糊限制的开篇用一个破折号在一口气之间平衡了两个想法。6.5分的回答会更平淡地陈述同样的对比,比如"It would be convenient, but I don't think it's fully desirable",口语节奏感较弱。
LR“opens up the parts of a culture that never survive translation” — This is mildly more vivid phrasing than the plain equivalent. A 6.5 answer expresses the same idea as 'helps you understand a culture's jokes and meaning', which is correct but noticeably plainer.这比平实的对应表达略微更生动。6.5分的回答会用"helps you understand a culture's jokes and meaning"来表达同样的意思,虽然正确,但明显更平淡。
GRA“it got every word right and every joke wrong, which sums up the problem pretty well” — The relative clause 'which sums up the problem pretty well' is attached directly onto the main clause. A 6.5 answer instead writes this as a separate sentence, 'That shows the real problem', showing less integrated sentence structure.关系从句"which sums up the problem pretty well"直接附加在主句上。6.5分的回答则会把这个想法写成独立的句子"That shows the real problem",展现出较不整合的句子结构。
7.5 分
The 7.5 answer opens with a semicolon-linked contrast ('Convenient, certainly; desirable is another matter entirely'), uses the less-common phrase 'earns its keep', and closes with a compact dash-linked evaluative touch about a world that would be 'smoother, and smaller.'7.5分的回答以一个用分号连接的对比开篇("Convenient, certainly; desirable is another matter entirely"),使用了不太常见的短语"earns its keep",并以一个用破折号连接的紧凑评价性收尾,谈到一个会变得"smoother, and smaller"的世界。
Convenient, certainly; desirable is another matter entirely. A translation earpiece I tried at a technology fair got every word right and every joke wrong, which is about as neat a summary of the problem as you could ask for. Technology rendering basic communication effortless is undeniably a gain in contexts like travel, trade or medical emergencies, where nobody should come to harm simply because two people don't share a language. But learning a language earns its keep in ways no earpiece can replicate — it rewires the brain, builds a kind of mutual respect that only effort produces, and unlocks the untranslatable parts of a culture. I'd want technology to dissolve the barrier, not the reason for learning in the first place — a world where nobody bothers anymore would end up smoother, and smaller.
查看中文翻译
方便,那是当然的;但可取不可取完全是另一回事。我在一次科技展上试用过一个翻译耳机,它把每个词都翻对了,却把每个笑话都翻错了,这几乎是对这个问题最恰如其分的总结了。让基本沟通变得毫不费力,科技带来的这份好处在旅行、贸易或医疗急救等场景中无可否认是实实在在的,毕竟不该有人仅仅因为语言不通就受到伤害。但学一门语言能做到任何耳机都无法复制的事——它能重塑大脑,建立起一种只有靠努力才能产生的相互尊重,还能解锁一种文化中那些无法翻译的部分。我希望科技能消融的是"障碍",而不是从一开始就消融"学习的理由"——一个没人再愿意费心学习的世界,最终只会变得更顺滑,也更狭小。
为什么是这个分数
FC“Convenient, certainly; desirable is another matter entirely.” — This fluent, compact semicolon-linked opening balances the two-sided opinion in a single tight structure. A 6.5 answer opens more plainly with 'It would be convenient, but I don't think it's fully desirable', using a simple 'but' instead of this compressed contrast.这个流畅紧凑、用分号连接的开篇,在一个紧密的结构中平衡了两面性的观点。6.5分的回答会更平实地以"It would be convenient, but I don't think it's fully desirable"开篇,用简单的"but"而不是这种压缩的对比。
LR“learning a language earns its keep in ways no earpiece can replicate” — 'Earns its keep' is a genuinely less-common collocation applied precisely. A 6.5 answer states the same idea plainly as 'learning a language also trains your brain', showing far less lexical sophistication."Earns its keep"是一个真正不常见、被精准运用的搭配。6.5分的回答会平实地陈述同样的想法,比如"learning a language also trains your brain",展现出远为逊色的词汇精巧度。
GRA“a world where nobody bothers anymore would end up smoother, and smaller” — This closing clause uses a compact fronted noun-clause construction as an evaluative touch. A 6.5 answer ends instead with the simple, plain final sentence 'So I'd want technology to remove the difficulty, not remove the reason to learn', without this kind of compressed, reflective closing image.这个结尾从句用了一个紧凑的前置名词从句结构,作为评价性的点睛之笔。6.5分的回答则会以简单平实的结尾句"So I'd want technology to remove the difficulty, not remove the reason to learn"收尾,没有这种压缩的、反思性的结尾意象。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？: 讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？: 在"A Person You Know Who Is Good at Learning Languages"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？: 是的——它是当前考试时段（2026年9–12月）的题卡。