IELTS Speaking Part 2

A Person You Know Who Does a Job Useful to Society

最近一次出现于 2026年5–8月

题卡

Describe a person you know who does a job which is useful to society

You should say:

  • who this person is
  • what job this person does
  • what skills this person needs to do the job
  • and explain why you think this job is useful to society

范文：6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

同一题目的三个版本，分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看，能清楚看到分数之间到底差在哪里。

6.5 分

The 6.5 answer gives one plain, directly stated reason ('I think the main skill he needs is patience, because...') and stays close to simple coordinated sentences throughout.6.5分的答案给出一个朴素、直接陈述的理由(如'我觉得他最需要的能力是耐心,因为……'),全程基本使用简单的并列句。

The person I want to talk about is a man called Huy, who works as a traffic warden near my office building by the river.

His job is to stand at the crossing outside a primary school every morning and afternoon, and help the children cross the busy road safely. The traffic here can be quite dangerous, with a lot of motorbikes and cars moving fast, especially at rush hour when I'm going to work myself.

I think the main skill he needs is patience, because he does the same job every single day in the sun and rain, and children don't always listen or move quickly. He also needs to be alert all the time, watching the traffic from both directions while making sure no child gets left behind on the road.

I think this job is very useful to society because it keeps children safe on their way to school, which is something parents worry about constantly. Without someone like Huy there, I think there would be accidents. I see him every day when I ride past on my motorbike, and he always waves, even to people who aren't his job to protect. It's a small job that makes a real difference.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个人叫Huy,他在我办公楼附近的江边当交通协管员。

他的工作是每天早晚站在一所小学门口的路口,帮孩子们安全过马路。这里的交通有点危险,摩托车和汽车都开得很快,尤其是我自己上班时经过的高峰时段。

我觉得他最需要的技能是耐心,因为他每天不管晴天下雨都要做同样的事,而孩子们并不总是听话或走得快。他还需要一直保持警觉,同时留意两个方向的车流,确保没有孩子被落在马路上。

我觉得这份工作对社会非常有用,因为它保障了孩子们上学路上的安全,而这正是家长们一直担心的事。如果没有Huy这样的人在那里,我想一定会发生事故。我每天骑车经过时都会看到他,他总是会挥手,哪怕对方并不是他负责保护的人。这是一份很小的工作,却带来了真正的改变。

204 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • FC“I think the main skill he needs is patience, because he does the same job every single day in the sun and rain, and children don't always listen or move quickly.” — The answer gives one direct reason (patience) and supports it with two concrete conditions — working in 'sun and rain' and dealing with children who 'don't always listen or move quickly' — directly answering the cue-card prompt about required skills. This is a clear, single-reason-plus-detail development that matches Band 6.5's expectation of one straightforward point made well, without extending into further reflection.这个回答给出了一个直接理由(耐心),并用两个具体的条件来支撑它——在"sun and rain"(风吹日晒)中工作,以及应对那些“并不总是听话或动作迅速”的孩子——直接回应了题卡所提出的关于所需技能的问题。这是一种清晰的“一个理由加细节”式发展,符合Band 6.5的期望——把一个直白的观点表达清楚,而不进一步延伸为更深层的反思。
  • LR“I think there would be accidents.” — 'I think there would be accidents' states a hypothetical consequence in the plainest possible terms, using the basic modal 'would' without any hedge, qualifier, or more precise description of what kind of accidents or how serious they might be. This kind of unqualified, simple statement is characteristic of Band 6.5's straightforward, unembellished vocabulary.'I think there would be accidents' 用最简单的方式陈述了一个假设性的后果,使用基础的情态动词'would',没有任何模糊限制语、限定词,也没有更精确地说明会是什么样的事故、或严重到什么程度。这种不加修饰的简单陈述正是Band 6.5那种直白、不加修饰的词汇特征。
  • GRA“I see him every day when I ride past on my motorbike, and he always waves, even to people who aren't his job to protect.” — Two ideas are joined with 'and' — seeing Huy every day, and his waving even to strangers — with a concessive tag ('even to people who aren't his job to protect') added onto the end. This is an accurate, basic coordinated structure with one small addition, which is the level of grammatical range Band 6.5 is designed to reflect rather than anything more elaborately subordinated.两个想法用'and'连接在一起——每天见到Huy,以及他甚至会向陌生人挥手打招呼——句末又附加了一个让步性的补充语('even to people who aren't his job to protect')。这是一种准确但基础的并列结构,只加了一个小小的附加成分,这正是Band 6.5所要体现的语法范围水平,而不是任何更复杂的从属结构。
7.0 分

The 7.0 answer backs up its general claim with a short concrete example (covering a stallholder's stand 'without even being asked') and a longer but accurate sentence linking the job to the market's need for trust.7.0分的答案用一个简短具体的例子('根本不用人开口请求'就主动帮忙看摊)来支撑总体论点,并用一个较长但准确的句子把这份工作和市场对信任的需求联系起来。

The person I'd like to talk about is a man everyone calls Chú Sáu, who works as a security guard at Chợ Cồn market, close to where I live in Da Nang.

His main job is fairly simple on paper: he checks the gates in the early morning before the market opens and keeps an eye on things during the day, especially around closing time when people are packing up and it's easy for bags to go missing. But over the years he's ended up doing quite a bit more than that. He knows almost every stallholder by name, and if someone's had a bad day and can't watch their stall for ten minutes, he'll stand there for them without even being asked.

I think the main skill he needs is being observant, since he has to notice small things, like someone acting strangely near a stall, without making a big deal out of it. He also needs a surprising amount of patience, because dealing with hundreds of different people and their problems every day would wear most people out fairly quickly.

I think this job is useful to society because markets like that one depend completely on people trusting the place is safe enough to leave their belongings for a few minutes. Without someone like Chú Sáu quietly watching, I think a lot of small vendors, especially older ones, would feel much less secure running their stalls. It's easy to walk past someone like him without noticing what he actually does, but the market would honestly feel like a different, less friendly place without him.

查看中文翻译

我想说的这个人大家都叫他"六叔",他在离我岘港住处不远的空市场当保安。

他的本职工作说起来挺简单:清晨市场开门前检查各个大门,白天留意周围情况,尤其是收摊时段,那会儿大家都忙着收拾,包很容易丢。但这些年下来,他做的事早就远不止这些了。他几乎认得每一个摊主的名字,要是谁那天不太顺,没办法照看自己的摊位十分钟,他会主动站过去帮忙看着,根本不用人开口请求。

我觉得他最需要的能力是善于观察,因为他得留意那些细微的迹象,比如有人在摊位附近举止反常,却又不动声色、不把事情闹大。他还需要出乎意料的耐心,毕竟每天要应付成百上千形形色色的人和他们的各种问题,换作大多数人恐怕很快就会吃不消。

我认为这份工作对社会是有用的,因为像这样的市场完全依赖于人们相信这个地方足够安全,可以把东西放个几分钟不用担心。要是没有六叔这样默默守着的人,我想很多小摊贩,尤其是上了年纪的那些,做生意时会觉得安全感差很多。人们很容易从他身边走过却没留意到他到底在做什么,但说实话,少了他,这个市场会变成一个完全不同、也没那么让人有归属感的地方。

266 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • LR“wear most people out fairly quickly” — 'Wear most people out' is a phrasal verb collocation describing gradual exhaustion, applied here to the cumulative effect of dealing with 'hundreds of different people' rather than physical tiredness, which shows the phrase being used with some flexibility. This natural, everyday-but-not-basic phrasal verb is the comfortably flexible vocabulary Band 7.0 lexical resource is calibrated around, a step beyond a plainer 'make people tired'.'Wear most people out' 是一个描述渐进式疲惫的短语动词搭配,这里被用来形容应对 'hundreds of different people' 所带来的累积效应,而非单纯的体力疲劳,显示出这个短语的运用带有一定的灵活性。这种自然、日常却又不失分量的短语动词,正是7.0分词汇资源所围绕设定的从容灵活的词汇水平,比更简单的说法 'make people tired' 更进一步。
  • FC“if someone's had a bad day and can't watch their stall for ten minutes, he'll stand there for them without even being asked” — The general claim about Chú Sáu knowing every stallholder is immediately followed by one specific, concrete scenario — covering someone's stall unasked when they're having a bad day — which turns an abstract compliment into something visualisable. Supporting a general observation with exactly one short, vivid example is the reason-plus-example pattern the Band 7.0 descriptor explicitly calls for.关于Chú Sáu认识每一个摊贩这一普遍说法,紧接着立刻给出了一个具体、生动的场景——在别人心情不好时,不用开口就主动帮忙照看摊位——把一句抽象的赞美变成了可以想象的画面。用恰好一个简短、生动的例子来支撑一个普遍观察,正是7.0分描述明确要求的"理由加例子"模式。
  • GRA“I think this job is useful to society because markets like that one depend completely on people trusting the place is safe enough to leave their belongings for a few minutes.” — The sentence links a 'because' clause to an embedded structure of its own — 'people trusting the place is safe enough to leave their belongings' — meaning a clause is nested inside the reason rather than stated as a separate idea. Managing that kind of nested complexity accurately, rather than breaking it into two simpler sentences, is the comfortable range Band 7.0 grammar is calibrated to reward.这句话把一个 'because' 分句与自身的一个嵌套结构联系在一起——'people trusting the place is safe enough to leave their belongings'——也就是说,一个从句被嵌套在理由内部,而不是作为一个独立的想法单独陈述。准确地驾驭这种嵌套式复杂结构,而不是将其拆成两个更简单的句子,正是7.0分语法所要奖励的从容范围。
7.5 分

The 7.5 answer uses a short standalone sentence for emphasis ('He reads the beach.') and closes with a figurative, economical metaphor ('Some jobs hold a city up, and this is one of them.'), both markers of confident Band 7.5 control.7.5分的答案用一个独立的短句来强调('他能读懂整片海滩。'),并以一个形象、精炼的比喻收尾('有些工作默默撑起一座城市,这就是其中之一。'),两者都体现出7.5分自信从容的语言掌控力。

The person I'd talk about is a man called Bảo, who cleans My Khe Beach in Da Nang. I know him only because I run there early, and for about three years now he's been the one other person on the sand at half past four in the morning. We started nodding, then greeting, and now he tells me off if I've missed a few days.

His official job is sanitation — he and a small crew rake the beach, empty the bins, and deal with whatever the sea and the tourists have left overnight. But that's the small part of what he actually does. He reads the beach. He knows the tides by heart, and when the current shifts after a storm he walks down to the lifeguard station before it opens and tells them where the rip currents have moved. I've seen him pull broken glass out of the sand with his fingers, and once a whole fishing net that would have caught a swimmer's leg. On the last Sunday of each month he organises a volunteer cleanup that started with him and four friends and now has a hundred people, half of them students.

The skills sound simple and aren't. Physical stamina, obviously — it's hot, heavy, endless work. But also a kind of local knowledge nobody teaches: how the sea behaves, what's dangerous, which rubbish means a boat has dumped something. And he's a natural organiser without ever calling himself one.

Why it's useful to society is almost embarrassingly obvious, but I'll say it anyway. Da Nang lives on that beach — the tourism, the morning swimmers, the kids who learn to swim there. It's safe and clean at six in the morning because a man most visitors never see has already been there for two hours. Some jobs hold a city up, and this is one of them.

查看中文翻译

我要说的这个人叫保(Bảo),他在岘港的美溪海滩做清洁工作。我认识他,纯粹是因为我经常一大早去那里跑步,大概三年了,他是清晨四点半唯一还在沙滩上的另一个人。我们从点头示意开始,后来变成打招呼,现在要是我有几天没去,他还会说我。

他名义上的工作是环卫——他和一个小团队一起耙沙滩、清空垃圾桶、处理大海和游客一夜之间留下的各种东西。但这只是他实际在做的事情里很小的一部分。他能“读懂”这片海滩。他对潮汐了如指掌,一场风暴过后洋流发生变化时,他会在救生站开门之前就走过去,告诉他们离岸流移到了哪里。我见过他徒手从沙里把碎玻璃捡出来,还有一次是一整张渔网,要是留在那儿可能会缠住游泳者的腿。每个月最后一个周日,他会组织一次志愿清洁活动,一开始只有他和四个朋友,现在已经发展到上百人,其中一半是学生。

这些技能听起来简单,其实一点都不简单。体力当然是一方面——这是又热又累、没完没了的工作。但还有一种没人教过的本地经验:大海会怎么表现,什么东西是危险的,哪种垃圾意味着有船偷偷倾倒了什么。而且他是一个天生的组织者,尽管他自己从来没这么称呼过自己。

这份工作为什么对社会有用,答案几乎明显到有点不好意思说出口,但我还是要说。岘港靠的就是那片海滩——旅游业、清晨的游泳者、在那里学会游泳的孩子们。早上六点它之所以既安全又干净,是因为一个大多数游客从未注意到的人,已经在那里工作了两个小时。有些工作撑起了一整座城市,这就是其中之一。

313 词 · 约 2 分钟

为什么是这个分数

  • FC“He reads the beach.” — This three-word sentence breaks sharply from the longer descriptive sentences around it, creating a deliberate rhythmic pause that functions almost like a topic sentence for the paragraph that follows, explaining exactly what "reading the beach" means in practice. This kind of controlled, punchy short sentence used for emphasis — rather than just varying length randomly — is the confident delivery and coherence control the 7.5 tier rewards; a 7.0 answer would more likely fold this idea into a longer, more conventional sentence like "He also understands the beach really well." The metaphor itself, reading a beach like a text, is also a compact, original way of describing tacit expertise.这个只有三个词的短句与周围那些较长的描述性句子形成鲜明反差,制造出一种刻意的节奏停顿,几乎像是后面那一段的主题句,精准地解释了“reading the beach”在实际中到底意味着什么。这种有控制、有力度的短句用来制造强调——而不是随意变化句长——正是 7.5 档次所奖励的那种自信的表达和连贯性掌控;Band 7.0 的答案更可能把这个想法融进一个更长、更常规的句子里,比如“He also understands the beach really well”。像读一本书那样“阅读”沙滩,这个比喻本身也是对一种只可意会的专业能力的一种精炼而独到的表达。
  • LR“a kind of local knowledge nobody teaches” — This phrase names an abstract concept — tacit, experience-based expertise — precisely and economically, using "nobody teaches" to imply it can only be learned through years of direct experience rather than spelling that idea out in a longer sentence. This kind of precise phrasing for an abstract idea is what the 7.5 tier's Lexical Resource descriptor means by "several precise or less-common words... used naturally"; a 7.0 answer would more likely describe the same idea more plainly, such as "he has learned a lot from experience." It also sits in useful contrast with the more literal "physical stamina" mentioned just before it, distinguishing two different kinds of skill.这个短语精准而经济地道出了一个抽象概念——靠经验积累的隐性专业能力,用“nobody teaches”来暗示这种能力只能靠多年的亲身经历习得,而不是用一整个更长的句子把这层意思说透。这种为抽象概念选用精准措辞的做法,正是 7.5 档次 Lexical Resource 描述中“several precise or less-common words... used naturally”(用得自然的几个精准或不常见的词)所指;Band 7.0 的答案更可能把同样的意思说得更直白,比如“he has learned a lot from experience”。它也与紧接其前、更偏字面意义的“physical stamina”形成有效对照,区分出两种不同的能力。
  • GRA“Some jobs hold a city up, and this is one of them.” — Grammatically this is a simple coordinated sentence, but it carries a figurative metaphor ("hold a city up") as its content, showing that sophistication at 7.5 doesn't always come from complicated syntax — sometimes it comes from choosing the right simple structure to deliver a striking idea economically. This kind of understated but carefully weighted closing sentence is characteristic of the 7.5 tier's expectation of "good rhythm and flexible language"; a 7.0 answer would more likely need a longer, more explicit sentence to make the same point, such as "I think what he does is really important for the city, even though most people don't realise it." The brevity here is itself the sophistication.从语法上看,这是一个简单的并列句,但它承载的内容却是一个比喻(“hold a city up”),说明 7.5 档次的老练并不总是来自复杂的句法——有时恰恰来自选对了一个简单的结构,经济地传达出一个令人印象深刻的想法。这种低调却分量十足的结尾句,正体现了 7.5 档次对“good rhythm and flexible language”(良好的节奏感和灵活的语言)的期待;Band 7.0 的答案更可能需要一个更长、更明说的句子来表达同样的意思,比如“I think what he does is really important for the city, even though most people don't realise it”。这里的简短本身就是老练所在。

各考试时段出题记录

  • Describe a person you know who does a job which is useful to society2026年5–8月

Part 3 追问

这些是考官在该题卡之后提出的讨论题，已编写范文的题目附有参考答案。

  1. 1. How do you think the changing needs of society will affect the jobs people do in the future?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Lists two separate future trends in short sentences joined loosely with 'too' and 'At the same time'.用简短的句子列举两个不同的未来趋势,靠 'too' 和 'At the same time' 松散地连接起来。

    I think care work will be the big one. Families in Vietnam are getting smaller and older, and you can already see private care homes opening around Da Nang where there were none ten years ago — but they can't find trained staff. As people get older, more and more jobs will be about looking after people, both physically and emotionally. Climate change will create jobs too, like flood engineering and coastal protection. At the same time, normal office work is shrinking fast because software can do it. So future jobs look more human, not less.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得照护类工作会是大头。越南的家庭规模在变小,也在老龄化,岘港周围已经能看到私人养老院开起来了,十年前根本没有——但它们招不到受过培训的员工。随着人口老龄化,会有越来越多的工作是照顾人,包括身体上和情感上的照顾。气候变化也会创造出新的工作,比如防洪工程和海岸保护。与此同时,普通的办公室工作正在因为软件的替代而迅速萎缩。所以未来的工作会显得更“人性化”,而不是更少人性化。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“As people get older, more and more jobs will be about looking after people, both physically and emotionally.” — This sentence restates the idea plainly with 'more and more jobs will be about'. The 7.0/7.5 versions use the more precise phrase 'whole categories of work will grow around', which sounds like a more considered generalisation.这句话用 'more and more jobs will be about' 平实地重申了这个想法。7.0/7.5版本用了更精确的短语 'whole categories of work will grow around',听起来更像是经过深思熟虑的概括。
    • LR“normal office work is shrinking fast” — This is a plain, accurate description. The 7.0/7.5 versions add the precise modifier 'routine' before 'office work', which more accurately names the type of work being displaced.这是一个平实、准确的描述。7.0/7.5版本在 'office work' 前加了精确的修饰语 'routine',更准确地指明了正在被取代的那类工作。
    • GRA“Climate change will create jobs too, like flood engineering and coastal protection.” — Examples are introduced with the plain connector 'like'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with a colon followed by a short list, which is a more economical way of presenting the same examples.例子是用平实的连接词 'like' 引出的。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了冒号加简短列表,是呈现同样例子的更简洁方式。
    7.0 分

    Uses 'I'd say' to hedge the claim about ageing populations and a colon to introduce the climate-related job list.用 'I'd say' 来软化关于人口老龄化的论断,并用冒号来引出与气候相关的职业列表。

    I think care will be the big one. Families in Vietnam are getting smaller and older, and you can already see private care homes opening around Da Nang where none existed ten years ago — and they can't find enough trained staff. As populations age, I'd say whole categories of work will grow around looking after people, both physically and emotionally. Climate will create jobs too: flood engineering, coastal protection, energy. Meanwhile, routine office work is shrinking fast because software increasingly does it. So the jobs of the future look more human, not less — the things a machine genuinely can't do.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得照护会是大头。越南的家庭规模在变小,也在老龄化,岘港周围已经能看到私人养老院开起来了,十年前根本没有——而且它们招不到足够多受过培训的员工。随着人口老龄化,我觉得会有整整一类一类的工作围绕照顾人成长起来,包括身体上和情感上的照顾。气候也会创造出新工作:防洪工程、海岸保护、能源。与此同时,常规的办公室工作正在因为软件的日益替代而迅速萎缩。所以未来的工作会显得更“人性化”,而不是更少——都是机器真正做不了的事。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I'd say” — This hedge softens the generalisation about future work, a more natural spoken device than the flat 6.5 statement 'more and more jobs will be about looking after people'. The 7.5 version drops the hedge, stating the same claim with more direct confidence.这个缓和语软化了关于未来工作的概括,是比6.5中平铺直叙的 'more and more jobs will be about looking after people' 更自然的口语手法。7.5版本去掉了这个缓和语,以更直接、更自信的方式陈述同样的论断。
    • LR“routine office work” — This precise compound noun names the type of work at risk exactly. The 6.5 version uses the vaguer 'normal office work', while 7.5 reuses this exact phrase, confirming it fits the higher bands.这个精确的复合名词准确地指出了处于风险中的工作类型。6.5版本用的是更模糊的 'normal office work',而7.5沿用了完全相同的短语,证实它适合更高分段。
    • GRA“Climate will create jobs too: flood engineering, coastal protection, energy.” — This colon-introduced list of noun phrases is more economical than the 'like' clause used at 6.5. It's identical to the structure at 7.5, showing this device is already appropriate from 7.0 upward.这个由冒号引出的名词短语列表比6.5中使用的 'like' 分句更简洁。它和7.5的结构一致,说明这个手法从7.0起就已经合适了。
    7.5 分

    Extends the closing sentence with a further relative clause explaining what 'more human' actually means.在结尾句上又加了一个关系从句,解释 'more human' 到底是什么意思。

    I think care will be the big one. Families in Vietnam are getting smaller and older, and you can already see private care homes opening around Da Nang where none existed ten years ago — and they can't find trained staff. As populations age, whole categories of work will grow up around looking after people, physically and emotionally. Climate will create jobs too: flood engineering, coastal protection, energy. At the same time, routine office work is shrinking fast because software does it instead. So the jobs of the future look more human, not less — the things a machine can't do, which are mostly about caring for and understanding other people.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得照护会是大头。越南的家庭规模在变小,也在老龄化,岘港周围已经能看到私人养老院开起来了,十年前根本没有——而且它们招不到受过培训的员工。随着人口老龄化,整整一类一类的工作会围绕照顾人成长起来,涵盖身体上和情感上的照顾。气候也会创造出新工作:防洪工程、海岸保护、能源。与此同时,常规的办公室工作正在因为软件的替代而迅速萎缩。所以未来的工作会显得更“人性化”,而不是更少——都是机器做不了的事,而这些事大多是关于关心和理解他人。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“which are mostly about caring for and understanding other people” — This relative clause extends the closing sentence with a further explanation, going beyond 7.0's shorter ending 'the things a machine genuinely can't do' by specifying exactly what those things are.这个关系从句在结尾句上又加了一层解释,比7.0中更简短的结尾 'the things a machine genuinely can't do' 更进一步,具体说明了那些事情到底是什么。
    • LR“whole categories of work will grow up around looking after people” — The phrasal verb 'grow up around' is a vivid, organic image for how new job sectors emerge, matching 7.0's near-identical phrase but developed further by the closing relative clause that follows it here.短语动词 'grow up around' 是一个生动、有机的意象,用来形容新兴行业如何出现,与7.0中几乎相同的短语相符,但在这里通过后面接上的结尾关系从句进一步发展了。
    • GRA“the things a machine can't do, which are mostly about caring for and understanding other people” — A relative clause is nested onto an existing dash-led clause, creating a two-layer structure more complex than 7.0's single dash-led clause and much more than 6.5's plain final sentence.一个关系从句被嵌套进了一个已有的破折号引出的分句中,构建出比7.0单一的破折号分句更复杂的双层结构,也远比6.5平实的结尾句复杂得多。

  2. 2. Do people need to continue training throughout their working lives?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Explains the negative alternative with a plain 'If you don't keep learning, you slowly get' structure.用一个平实的 'If you don't keep learning, you slowly get' 结构来解释这种消极的另一种可能。

    Yes, and in my job it's not really optional. Half the tools I use every day didn't exist when I finished university seven years ago, and the way I work now would look strange to the person who left back then. This is true in most jobs to some degree — a nurse learns new rules, a mechanic learns about electric motors, a farmer learns a new app for prices. If you don't keep learning, you slowly get pushed to the edge of your own job. What's changed is that training used to be organised by employers, but now it's mostly up to the person, which isn't really fair to people without time or money.

    查看中文翻译

    是的,在我的工作里这基本上不是可选项。我大学毕业已经七年了,我现在每天用的工具有一半在那时候根本不存在,现在的工作方式对当年刚毕业的那个自己来说都会显得陌生。大多数工作在某种程度上都是这样——护士要学新的规程,修理工要学电动机,农民要学新的报价软件。如果你不持续学习,就会慢慢被挤到自己这份工作的边缘。变化在于,以前培训是由雇主来安排的,但现在基本上要靠个人自己,这对没时间或没钱的人来说其实不太公平。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“If you don't keep learning, you slowly get pushed to the edge of your own job.” — This is a simple conditional sentence with 'if... you get'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the noun phrase 'The alternative... is being slowly pushed', which packages the same idea more economically as a single clause.这是一个用 'if... you get' 构成的简单条件句。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了名词短语 'The alternative... is being slowly pushed',把同样的想法更简洁地打包成一个分句。
    • LR“would look strange to the person who left back then” — This is a workable but slightly informal comparison. The 7.0/7.5 versions upgrade this to the more precise, formal adjective 'unrecognisable', which is a stronger and more natural word choice for the idea of complete change.这是一个可行但略显随意的比较。7.0/7.5版本把它升级成了更精确、更正式的形容词 'unrecognisable',对于“彻底改变”这个概念来说是更有力、更自然的词汇选择。
    • GRA“This is true in most jobs to some degree — a nurse learns new rules, a mechanic learns about electric motors, a farmer learns a new app for prices.” — Three parallel examples are listed after a dash. This same structure appears at 7.0/7.5, but those versions vary the noun in the first example to the more precise 'protocols' instead of the general word 'rules'.破折号后列举了三个并列的例子。同样的结构也出现在7.0/7.5中,但那两个版本把第一个例子里的名词换成了更精确的 'protocols',而不是笼统的 'rules'。
    7.0 分

    Uses 'honestly' to frame the claim about being left behind and closes with a short reflective final sentence.用 'honestly' 来引出关于被落下的论断,并以一句简短的反思结语收尾。

    Yes, and in my field it's simply not optional. Half the tools I use every day didn't exist when I graduated seven years ago, and the way I work now would be almost unrecognisable to the person who left university back then. That's true in most jobs to some degree — a nurse learns new protocols, a mechanic learns electric motors, a farmer learns a new app for prices. The alternative, honestly, is being slowly pushed to the edge of your own profession. What's changed is that training used to be something employers organised, and now it's largely on the individual, which seems unfair to people without the time or money. But the need itself isn't going away.

    查看中文翻译

    是的,在我的领域里这根本不是可选项。我毕业已经七年了,我现在每天用的工具有一半在那时候根本不存在,现在的工作方式对当年刚从大学毕业的那个自己来说几乎认不出来。大多数工作在某种程度上都是这样——护士要学新的操作规程,修理工要学电动机,农民要学新的报价软件。说实话,不这样做的后果,就是慢慢被挤到自己这个行业的边缘。变化在于,以前培训是雇主安排的事,但现在基本上落在个人身上,这对没时间或没钱的人来说似乎不太公平。但这种需求本身并不会消失。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“honestly,” — This hedge is inserted mid-sentence before the consequence, adding a natural spoken register the flatter 6.5 version lacks. The 7.5 version removes this hedge, stating the same idea with slightly more direct confidence.这个缓和语被插入到句中,放在后果之前,增添了一种自然的口语语域,这是6.5中更平铺直叙的版本所缺少的。7.5版本去掉了这个缓和语,以略微更直接、更自信的方式陈述同样的想法。
    • LR“unrecognisable” — This precise adjective is a clear upgrade from the vague 6.5 phrase 'would look strange'. It's reused identically at 7.5, confirming it already fits the higher bands.这个精确的形容词明显是从6.5中模糊的短语 'would look strange' 升级而来的。它在7.5中被原样沿用,证实它已经适合更高分段。
    • GRA“The alternative, honestly, is being slowly pushed to the edge of your own profession.” — The hedge 'honestly' is inserted between the subject and verb, a more flexible placement than a sentence-initial hedge would allow, showing slightly more grammatical control over hedging position than the simpler 6.5 conditional sentence.缓和语 'honestly' 被插入在主语和动词之间,这种位置比放在句首更灵活,展现出比6.5更简单的条件句略高一筹的、对缓和语位置的语法掌控力。
    7.5 分

    Drops the hedge used at 7.0, stating the same reflective observation with slightly more direct confidence.去掉了7.0中使用的缓和语,以略微更直接、更自信的方式陈述同样的反思性观察。

    Yes, and in my field it's simply not optional. Half the tools I use every day didn't exist when I graduated seven years ago, and the way I work now would be unrecognisable to the person who left university back then. That's true in most jobs to some degree — a nurse learns new protocols, a mechanic learns electric motors, a farmer learns a new app for prices. The alternative is being slowly pushed to the edge of your own profession. What's changed is that training used to be something employers organised and now it's largely on the individual, which is unfair to people without the time or money. But the need itself isn't going away.

    查看中文翻译

    是的,在我的领域里这根本不是可选项。我毕业已经七年了,我现在每天用的工具有一半在那时候根本不存在,现在的工作方式对当年刚从大学毕业的那个自己来说会认不出来。大多数工作在某种程度上都是这样——护士要学新的操作规程,修理工要学电动机,农民要学新的报价软件。不这样做的后果,就是慢慢被挤到自己这个行业的边缘。变化在于,以前培训是雇主安排的事,现在基本上落在个人身上,这对没时间或没钱的人来说是不公平的。但这种需求本身并不会消失。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The alternative is being slowly pushed to the edge of your own profession.” — This sentence states the consequence directly and confidently, without the mid-sentence hedge 'honestly' used at 7.0 or the conditional 'If you don't keep learning' structure at 6.5, yet still lands on the same idea.这句话直接、自信地陈述了后果,没有用7.0中句中的缓和语 'honestly',也没有用6.5中的条件句结构 'If you don't keep learning',但最终落脚点还是同一个想法。
    • LR“a nurse learns new protocols” — The precise noun 'protocols' is more accurate and professional than the vague 6.5 phrase 'new rules', matching the identical upgrade already present at 7.0.精确的名词 'protocols' 比6.5中模糊的短语 'new rules' 更准确、更专业,与7.0中已经出现的相同升级一致。
    • GRA“What's changed is that training used to be something employers organised and now it's largely on the individual, which is unfair to people without the time or money.” — This long sentence links a past/present contrast ('used to be... and now') directly to a relative clause of consequence ('which is unfair to...') in one continuous structure, slightly more fluent than 7.0's version of the same sentence, which pauses on the hedge 'honestly' earlier.这个长句把一个过去/现在的对比('used to be... and now')直接连接到一个表示后果的关系从句('which is unfair to...')上,构成一个连续的结构,比7.0中同一句话稍微更流畅,后者早先因缓和语 'honestly' 而有停顿。

  3. 3. Do you think university is a good place to learn about the world of work?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Uses a plain 'But' before the closing evaluation and a comma-joined dash clause to list examples.在结尾评价前用了平实的 'But',并用逗号加破折号的分句来列举例子。

    Honestly, not very well. My first real client meeting was a disaster that nothing in four years at university had prepared me for — the client hated the design, my lecturer wasn't there to grade it, and I had to negotiate instead of just defend my work. University teaches the subject well but barely teaches the world of work — deadlines with money attached, difficult colleagues, who actually decides things. Internships help, and the better courses now include them. But I'd say university is good for learning how to think and not very good for learning how a workplace works.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,准备得不太好。我第一次真正见客户就是一场灾难,大学四年根本没让我为此做好准备——客户不喜欢那个设计,而我的老师也不在场给我打分,我得去谈判,而不是像以前那样只是“答辩”自己的作品。大学把学科本身教得很好,但几乎没教“职场”这回事——那种和钱挂钩的截止日期、难相处的同事、真正说了算的到底是谁。实习是有帮助的,现在比较好的课程都会把实习包含进去。但我觉得,大学适合学怎么思考,不太适合学职场是怎么运作的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“University teaches the subject well but barely teaches the world of work” — The contrast here is built with the simple repeated verb 'teaches', which is clear but slightly repetitive. The 7.0/7.5 versions restructure this with a colon and an implied ellipsis ('and the world of work barely at all'), avoiding the repeated verb.这里的对比是靠重复动词 'teaches' 搭建起来的,清楚但略显重复。7.0/7.5版本用冒号和隐含的省略('and the world of work barely at all')重新组织了这句话,避免了动词的重复。
    • LR“had to negotiate instead of just defend my work” — This phrase is functional but adds the extra words 'just' and 'my work' to make the contrast clear. The 7.0/7.5 versions compress this to the leaner 'negotiate rather than simply defend' / 'negotiate rather than defend', which reads more naturally at speed.这个短语有其功能性,但加了额外的词 'just' 和 'my work' 来让对比更清楚。7.0/7.5版本把它压缩成了更精简的 'negotiate rather than simply defend' / 'negotiate rather than defend',读起来语速更自然。
    • GRA“But I'd say university is good for learning how to think and not very good for learning how a workplace works.” — This sentence repeats the phrase 'good for learning' twice, which is clear but a little repetitive. The 7.0/7.5 versions vary the second half to 'a poor place to learn how a workplace behaves', avoiding the repetition while keeping the parallel structure.这句话把 'good for learning' 这个短语重复了两次,清楚但有点重复。7.0/7.5版本把后半句变换成了 'a poor place to learn how a workplace behaves',避免了重复,同时保留了并列结构。
    7.0 分

    Uses ellipsis after a colon to avoid repeating the verb 'teaches' a second time.在冒号后用了省略手法,避免第二次重复动词 'teaches'。

    Honestly, not very. My first real client meeting was a disaster that nothing in four years at university had prepared me for — the client hated the design, my lecturer wasn't there to grade it, and I had to negotiate rather than simply defend the work. University teaches the subject well and the world of work barely at all: deadlines with money attached, difficult colleagues, the politics of who decides. Internships help, and the better courses now build them in. But I'd say university is a good place to learn how to think and a fairly poor place to learn how a workplace actually behaves.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,不太好。我第一次真正见客户就是一场灾难,大学四年根本没让我为此做好准备——客户不喜欢那个设计,而我的老师也不在场给我打分,我得去谈判,而不是简单地“答辩”我的作品。大学把学科本身教得很好,但对职场这回事几乎没教:那种和钱挂钩的截止日期、难相处的同事、谁说了算这种政治关系。实习是有帮助的,现在比较好的课程都会把实习纳入其中。但我觉得,大学是个学怎么思考的好地方,却是个学职场到底怎么运作的相当差的地方。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“University teaches the subject well and the world of work barely at all:” — This sentence drops the repeated verb after 'and', relying on ellipsis, which is more economical than the 6.5 version's repeated verb 'teaches'. The 7.5 answer keeps this identical structure, showing it's already suited to the top band.这句话在 'and' 后省去了重复的动词,依靠省略手法,比6.5版本中重复动词 'teaches' 更简洁。7.5的回答保留了完全相同的结构,说明它已经适合最高分段。
    • LR“negotiate rather than simply defend the work” — This is a leaner, more natural phrasing than the 6.5 version's 'negotiate instead of just defend my work'. The 7.5 answer trims it even further to 'negotiate rather than defend', dropping the object entirely for maximum economy.这是一种比6.5版本中的 'negotiate instead of just defend my work' 更精简、更自然的措辞。7.5的回答把它进一步精简成了 'negotiate rather than defend',干脆去掉了宾语,追求最大程度的简洁。
    • GRA“a good place to learn how to think and a fairly poor place to learn how a workplace actually behaves” — This parallel structure repeats 'a... place to learn how' twice with contrasting adjectives, a more controlled repetition-for-effect than the plain 6.5 version's similarly patterned but less polished sentence.这个并列结构用对比的形容词把 'a... place to learn how' 重复了两次,是一种更有掌控力的、为了效果而重复的手法,比6.5版本中模式相似但打磨不足的句子更胜一筹。
    7.5 分

    Trims the negotiate/defend contrast to its leanest form and adds a further closing sentence about the first year on the job.把 'negotiate/defend' 的对比精简到了极致,并加了一句关于入职第一年的收尾句。

    Honestly, not very. My first real client meeting was a disaster that nothing in four years at university had prepared me for — the client hated the design, my lecturer wasn't there to grade it, and I had to negotiate rather than defend. University teaches the subject well and the world of work barely at all: deadlines with money attached, difficult colleagues, the politics of who decides. Internships help, and the better courses now build them in. But I'd say university is a good place to learn how to think and a poor place to learn how a workplace behaves. Most people learn that in their first bewildering year on the job.

    查看中文翻译

    说实话,不太好。我第一次真正见客户就是一场灾难,大学四年根本没让我为此做好准备——客户不喜欢那个设计,而我的老师也不在场给我打分,我得去谈判,而不是“答辩”。大学把学科本身教得很好,但对职场这回事几乎没教:那种和钱挂钩的截止日期、难相处的同事、谁说了算这种政治关系。实习是有帮助的,现在比较好的课程都会把实习纳入其中。但我觉得,大学是个学怎么思考的好地方,却是个学职场到底怎么运作的差地方。大多数人是在自己入职后那令人困惑的第一年里才学到这些的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I had to negotiate rather than defend” — This is the leanest version of the three bands' phrasing, dropping the object 'the work' entirely that both 6.5 and 7.0 include, trusting the reader to follow the implied contrast.这是三个分段中最精简的版本,彻底去掉了6.5和7.0都保留的宾语 'the work',相信读者能跟上这种隐含的对比。
    • LR“their first bewildering year on the job” — The adjective 'bewildering' adds a vivid, precise sense of confusion that neither lower band attempts; this phrase appears only in the final sentence unique to this band.形容词 'bewildering' 增添了一种生动、精确的困惑感,两个较低分段都没有尝试过;这个短语只出现在这个分段独有的结尾句中。
    • GRA“Most people learn that in their first bewildering year on the job.” — This additional closing sentence extends the answer beyond where 6.5 and 7.0 stop, adding a further generalising observation that rounds off the comparison rather than ending abruptly on the workplace/place-to-think contrast.这句额外的结尾把回答延伸到了6.5和7.0停下的地方之外,加上了一个进一步概括性的观察,把整个比较收拢起来,而不是在”职场/思考之地“的对比上戛然而止。

  4. 4. Which types of jobs do you think are not paid enough?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Explains city workers' pay with the simple comparative structure 'which is paid like it's unskilled, when...'.用简单的比较结构 'which is paid like it's unskilled, when...' 来解释城市工作者的薪水问题。

    The caring jobs, without question. A nurse friend of mine works twelve-hour shifts with very sick children and earns less than a junior designer at my studio, which doesn't make sense by any measure of usefulness. Teachers, especially in primary schools, are in a similar position. Then there's the work that keeps cities running — cleaning, security guards, delivery riders — which is paid like it's unskilled, when the city would actually stop within days without it. Farmers too. The pattern is clear: jobs where the value is obvious but the customer is the public instead of a company get paid badly.

    查看中文翻译

    毫无疑问是照护类工作。我有个当护士的朋友,值十二小时的班,照顾病得很重的孩子,挣得却比我工作室里的初级设计师还少,无论用什么标准来衡量“有用”,这都说不通。老师,尤其是小学老师,处境也差不多。还有那些让城市正常运转的工作——清洁工、保安、外卖骑手——薪水按“没技术含量”的标准来算,可要是没有这些人,城市几天之内就得停摆。农民也是一样。规律很明显:那些价值明明摆在那里,但顾客是公众而不是某家公司的工作,往往薪水都很低。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“which is paid like it's unskilled, when the city would actually stop within days without it” — The comparison uses the informal 'like' and the plain verb 'stop'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'like' with the more formal 'as if' and 'stop' with the stronger, more precise verb 'collapse', both clear upgrades.这个比较用了口语化的 'like' 和平实的动词 'stop'。7.0/7.5版本把 'like' 换成了更正式的 'as if',把 'stop' 换成了更有力、更精确的动词 'collapse',两者都是明显的升级。
    • LR“which doesn't make sense by any measure of usefulness” — This is a workable but slightly flat evaluation. The 7.0 version softens it slightly to 'makes little sense', while 7.5 intensifies it to the more emphatic 'makes no sense', showing a wider range of evaluative precision across bands.这是一个可行但略显平淡的评价。7.0版本把它软化成了 'makes little sense',而7.5则把它加强成了更有力的 'makes no sense',展现出各分段之间评价性措辞更广的精确度区间。
    • GRA“Then there's the work that keeps cities running — cleaning, security guards, delivery riders — which is paid like it's unskilled, when the city would actually stop within days without it.” — This sentence lists examples after a dash and then adds a 'when' clause. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace the general noun 'cleaning' with the more precise, technical term 'sanitation', a small but real lexical upgrade within the same structure.这句话在破折号后列举了例子,然后加了一个 'when' 分句。7.0/7.5版本把笼统的名词 'cleaning' 换成了更精确的专业术语 'sanitation',在同样的结构里做出了虽小但真实的词汇升级。
    7.0 分

    Upgrades 'stop' to 'collapse' and adds the causal final clause 'because nobody profits from paying them well'.把 'stop' 升级成了 'collapse',并加了一个表示因果的结尾分句 'because nobody profits from paying them well'。

    The caring jobs, without question. A nurse friend of mine works twelve-hour shifts with seriously ill children and earns less than a junior designer at my studio, which makes little sense by any measure of usefulness. Teachers, especially in primary schools, are in much the same position. Then there's the work that keeps cities running — sanitation, security guards, delivery riders — which gets paid as if it were unskilled, when the city would genuinely collapse within days without it. Farmers, too. The pattern is fairly clear: jobs where the value is obvious but the customer is the public rather than a company tend to get paid badly, because nobody profits from paying them well.

    查看中文翻译

    毫无疑问是照护类工作。我有个当护士的朋友,值十二小时的班,照顾病得很重的孩子,挣得却比我工作室里的初级设计师还少,无论用什么标准来衡量“有用”,这都说不太通。老师,尤其是小学老师,处境也差不多。还有那些让城市正常运转的工作——环卫、保安、外卖骑手——薪水按“没技术含量”来算,可要是没有这些人,城市真的几天之内就会瘫痪。农民也是一样。规律相当明显:那些价值明明摆在那里,但顾客是公众而不是某家公司的工作,往往薪水都很低,因为没有人能从“给他们涨工资”这件事里获利。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The pattern is fairly clear:” — The hedge 'fairly' softens the generalisation slightly, a natural spoken qualifier absent from the flatter 6.5 statement 'The pattern is clear'. The 7.5 version drops 'fairly' for a more confident, unhedged claim.缓和语 'fairly' 稍微软化了这个概括,是6.5中更平铺直叙的陈述 'The pattern is clear' 所没有的自然口语限定词。7.5版本去掉了 'fairly',使论断更自信、不加保留。
    • LR“the city would genuinely collapse within days without it” — The intensifier 'genuinely' plus the stronger verb 'collapse' makes this claim more forceful than the plain 6.5 phrase 'the city would actually stop'. The 7.5 version keeps 'collapse' but drops 'genuinely', relying on word order for emphasis instead.加强语气的 'genuinely' 加上更有力的动词 'collapse',让这个论断比6.5中平实的短语 'the city would actually stop' 更有力。7.5版本保留了 'collapse',但去掉了 'genuinely',转而靠语序来强调。
    • GRA“jobs where the value is obvious but the customer is the public rather than a company tend to get paid badly, because nobody profits from paying them well” — This sentence adds an explicit causal clause ('because nobody profits...') that the 6.5 version lacks entirely, giving a fuller explanation for the pattern rather than just stating it.这句话加了一个明确的因果分句('because nobody profits...'),这是6.5版本完全没有的,为这个规律给出了更充分的解释,而不只是陈述它。
    7.5 分

    Reorders the final city-collapse clause and drops the hedge 'fairly' for a more confident final generalisation.调整了最后关于“城市瘫痪”分句的语序,并去掉了缓和语 'fairly',让最后的概括更自信。

    The caring ones, without question. A nurse friend of mine works twelve-hour shifts with seriously ill children and earns less than a junior designer at my studio, which makes no sense by any measure of usefulness. Teachers, especially in primary schools, are in the same position. Then there's the work that keeps cities running — sanitation, security guards, delivery riders — which is paid as if it were unskilled when the city would collapse without it within days. Farmers, too. The pattern is clear: jobs where the value is obvious but the customer is the public rather than a company get paid badly, because nobody profits from paying them well.

    查看中文翻译

    毫无疑问是照护类工作。我有个当护士的朋友,值十二小时的班,照顾病得很重的孩子,挣得却比我工作室里的初级设计师还少,无论用什么标准来衡量“有用”,这都说不通。老师,尤其是小学老师,处境也是一样。还有那些让城市正常运转的工作——环卫、保安、外卖骑手——薪水按“没技术含量”来算,可要是没有这些人,城市几天之内就会瘫痪。农民也是一样。规律很明显:那些价值明明摆在那里,但顾客是公众而不是某家公司的工作,往往薪水都很低,因为没有人能从“给他们涨工资”这件事里获利。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“The pattern is clear: jobs where the value is obvious but the customer is the public rather than a company get paid badly, because nobody profits from paying them well.” — This closing sentence states the generalisation and its cause in one unhedged, confident flow, without the softening 'fairly' used at 7.0 or the shorter, causeless version at 6.5.这句结尾以一种不加保留、自信的连贯方式陈述了这个概括及其原因,没有用7.0中软化用的 'fairly',也没有像6.5那样更短、不带原因的版本。
    • LR“would collapse without it within days” — The word order here places 'without it' before the time phrase, a slightly more compact and natural-sounding arrangement than 7.0's 'would genuinely collapse within days without it', which needs the extra adverb 'genuinely' to carry similar force.这里的语序把 'without it' 放在了时间短语之前,是一种比7.0中 'would genuinely collapse within days without it' 略微更紧凑、听起来更自然的安排,后者需要额外的副词 'genuinely' 才能达到类似的力度。
    • GRA“which is paid as if it were unskilled when the city would collapse without it within days” — The subjunctive 'as if it were' (rather than 'as if it is') is a more formally correct and controlled structure than the informal 'like it's unskilled' used at 6.5, and matches the register upgrade already present at 7.0.虚拟语气 'as if it were'(而不是 'as if it is')是一种比6.5中口语化的 'like it's unskilled' 在语法上更正确、更有掌控力的结构,与7.0中已有的语域升级相符。

  5. 5. What kinds of jobs are very well paid in your country?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Closes with a plain causal statement rather than naming the two abstract underlying factors directly.以一句平实的因果陈述收尾,而不是直接点出背后两个抽象的因素。

    Anything close to foreign money or investment. A university friend of mine at an international bank in Ho Chi Minh City earns in one month roughly what my father earned in a whole year teaching, and she isn't unusual. Senior people in finance, real estate developers, executives at foreign-invested companies and some doctors in private hospitals are at the top. Technology is rising fast too — a good software engineer can now earn more than most professionals. Pilots and some civil-service jobs with, let's say, unofficial income are also well known. What links most of them is that they sit where a lot of money passes through.

    查看中文翻译

    但凡和外资、投资沾边的工作。我有个大学同学在胡志明市一家国际银行工作,一个月挣的钱差不多相当于我父亲教书一整年的收入,而她并不算特别的例子。金融业的高层、房地产开发商、外资企业的高管,还有一些私立医院的医生,都处于顶端。科技行业也在快速上升——一个优秀的软件工程师现在能比大多数专业人士挣得都多。飞行员和一些“你懂的”有灰色收入的公务员岗位也很出名。这些行业大多数的共同点在于,它们都处在大量资金流经的位置上。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“What links most of them is that they sit where a lot of money passes through.” — The closing generalisation is expressed as a single simple clause introduced by 'that'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with two named abstract nouns before a colon, 'scarcity and leverage', which frames the same idea more analytically.结尾的概括是用一个以 'that' 引出的简单分句表达的。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了冒号前两个明确点出的抽象名词 'scarcity and leverage',把同样的想法框定得更具分析性。
    • LR“Technology is rising fast too” — This is a plain, functional way of describing a trend. The 7.0/7.5 versions use the more dynamic, idiomatic verb 'climbing', which paints a slightly more vivid image of rapid upward movement.这是一种平实、实用的方式来描述一种趋势。7.0/7.5版本用了更有动感、更地道的动词 'climbing',描绘出一幅关于快速上升运动的略微更生动的画面。
    • GRA“a good software engineer can now earn more than most professionals” — This is a straightforward comparative sentence. The 7.0 version compresses the same idea into a single verb, 'out-earn', which is a more economical, single-word way of expressing the comparison.这是一个直接的比较句。7.0版本把同样的想法压缩成了一个单独的动词 'out-earn',是一种更简洁、用单个词表达比较关系的方式。
    7.0 分

    Names the two abstract causes explicitly, 'scarcity and leverage', before explaining them with a colon.在用冒号解释之前,明确点出了两个抽象的原因,'scarcity and leverage'。

    Anything close to foreign money or capital, I'd say. A university friend of mine at an international bank in Ho Chi Minh City earns in a month roughly what my father earned in a year teaching, and she's not particularly unusual. Senior people in finance, real estate developers, executives at foreign-invested companies and some doctors in private hospitals sit at the top. Technology is climbing fast — a good software engineer can now out-earn most professionals. Pilots and certain civil-service positions with, let's say, informal income are also well known. What links most of them, honestly, is scarcity and leverage: they sit where large amounts of money pass through, and they take a slice.

    查看中文翻译

    我觉得,但凡和外资或资本沾边的工作都算。我有个大学同学在胡志明市一家国际银行工作,一个月挣的钱差不多相当于我父亲教书一年的收入,而她也不算特别罕见的例子。金融业的高层、房地产开发商、外资企业的高管,还有一些私立医院的医生,都处于顶端。科技行业也在快速攀升——一个优秀的软件工程师现在能比大多数专业人士挣得都多。飞行员和一些“你懂的”有非正式收入的公务员岗位也很出名。说实话,这些行业大多数的共同点在于稀缺性和杠杆效应:它们都处在大量资金流经的位置上,然后从中分一杯羹。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“honestly,” — This hedge is inserted mid-sentence just before the key generalisation, softening the claim in a natural spoken way the flatter 6.5 conclusion lacks. The 7.5 version removes this hedge for a more direct, confident final claim.这个缓和语被插入在句中,紧接在关键概括之前,以一种自然的口语方式软化了论断,这是6.5中更平铺直叙的结论所缺少的。7.5版本去掉了这个缓和语,让最后的论断更直接、更自信。
    • LR“scarcity and leverage” — This pair of precise abstract nouns names the underlying economic logic directly, a clear upgrade from the plain descriptive clause used at 6.5. The 7.5 answer reuses this exact pair, confirming it's already right for the top band.这一对精确的抽象名词直接点出了背后的经济逻辑,明显是从6.5中平实的描述性分句升级而来的。7.5的回答沿用了完全相同的这一对词,证实它已经适合最高分段。
    • GRA“a good software engineer can now out-earn most professionals” — The single compound verb 'out-earn' replaces the fuller comparative structure used at 6.5 ('can now earn more than'), a more economical piece of grammar that packs comparison directly into the verb.单一的复合动词 'out-earn' 取代了6.5中使用的更完整的比较结构('can now earn more than'),是一种更简洁的语法,直接把比较关系打包进了动词本身。
    7.5 分

    Drops the hedge used at 7.0, presenting the same abstract analysis with direct confidence.去掉了7.0中使用的缓和语,用直接、自信的方式呈现同样的抽象分析。

    Anything close to foreign money or capital. A university friend of mine at an international bank in Ho Chi Minh City earns in a month roughly what my father earned in a year teaching, and she's not unusual. Senior people in finance, real estate developers, executives at foreign-invested companies and some doctors in private hospitals are at the top. Technology is climbing fast — a good software engineer can now earn more than most professionals. Pilots and certain civil-service positions with, let's say, informal income are also well known. What links most of them is scarcity and leverage: they sit where large amounts of money pass through, and they take a slice.

    查看中文翻译

    但凡和外资或资本沾边的工作都算。我有个大学同学在胡志明市一家国际银行工作,一个月挣的钱差不多相当于我父亲教书一年的收入,而她也不算特别的例子。金融业的高层、房地产开发商、外资企业的高管,还有一些私立医院的医生,都处于顶端。科技行业也在快速攀升——一个优秀的软件工程师现在能比大多数专业人士挣得都多。飞行员和一些“你懂的”有非正式收入的公务员岗位也很出名。这些行业大多数的共同点在于稀缺性和杠杆效应:它们都处在大量资金流经的位置上,然后从中分一杯羹。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“What links most of them is scarcity and leverage: they sit where large amounts of money pass through, and they take a slice.” — This sentence states the analytical claim and its explanation directly, without the mid-sentence hedge 'honestly' used at 7.0, giving the conclusion more unhedged authority while keeping the same content.这句话直接陈述了这个分析性论断及其解释,没有用7.0中句中的缓和语 'honestly',让结论显得更不加保留、更有权威感,同时内容保持不变。
    • LR“they take a slice” — This is a vivid, idiomatic closing image for profiting from a flow of money, shared with 7.0 but landing with more weight here since it isn't preceded by a softening hedge.这是一个生动、地道的收尾意象,用来形容从资金流动中获利,和7.0共用同一个说法,但因为前面没有软化语气的缓和语,在这里显得更有分量。
    • GRA“a good software engineer can now earn more than most professionals” — This reverts to the fuller comparative structure rather than 7.0's compressed verb 'out-earn', which is arguably a deliberate, slightly more formal choice suited to the analytical tone of the rest of this band's answer.这里回到了更完整的比较结构,而不是7.0中压缩过的动词 'out-earn',可以说这是一个刻意的、略微更正式的选择,契合这个分段回答其余部分的分析性语气。

  6. 6. How have working conditions changed over the years?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Ends the answer on the father/phone contrast without drawing an explicit final generalisation about the trade-off.回答以”父亲/手机“的对比收尾,没有对这种此消彼长的取舍做出明确的最终概括。

    Hugely different, in my family within just one generation. My father worked six days a week for most of his life, often without a written contract, and paid holiday only came along when he was already in his forties. I work five days, two of them from home, with health insurance and a contract a lawyer could actually read. Safety has improved a lot in factories and construction, though not everywhere. What's got worse, I think, is the boundary between work and life — my father's work ended when he left the building, but mine follows me home on my phone.

    查看中文翻译

    差别巨大,就在我家,仅仅一代人之间。我父亲大半辈子都是一周工作六天,常常连书面合同都没有,带薪假期这种东西一直到他四十多岁才有。我一周工作五天,其中两天在家办公,有医疗保险,合同也是律师能真正看懂的那种。工厂和建筑工地的安全条件改善了很多,虽然不是每个地方都这样。要说变差的地方,我觉得是工作和生活之间的界限——我父亲一走出那栋楼,工作就结束了,而我的工作会通过手机一路跟着我回家。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“What's got worse, I think, is the boundary between work and life” — The hedge 'I think' plus the spelled-out phrase 'between work and life' is clear but slightly wordy. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'I think' with 'I'd argue' and drop the explanatory phrase, letting the colon and example carry the meaning instead.缓和语 'I think' 加上完整拼出的短语 'between work and life' 清楚但略显啰嗦。7.0/7.5版本把 'I think' 换成了 'I'd argue',并去掉了这个解释性短语,改由冒号和例子来承担意思。
    • LR“Hugely different” — This is a plain, general opening adverb-adjective pair. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace it with the single, stronger adverb 'Enormously', which is more economical and slightly more formal in register.这是一对平实、笼统的开头副词-形容词组合。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了单个更有力的副词 'Enormously',更简洁,语域也略显正式。
    • GRA“my father's work ended when he left the building, but mine follows me home on my phone” — This final contrast is joined with the simple coordinator 'but'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace 'but' with 'and', relying on the parallel structure itself to signal contrast, plus they add a further summarising sentence afterwards that this version lacks.这个最后的对比用了简单的并列连词 'but' 来连接。7.0/7.5版本把 'but' 换成了 'and',靠并列结构本身来传达对比意味,而且它们后面还加了一句这个版本没有的总结性句子。
    7.0 分

    Adds an explicit summarising sentence at the end: 'So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse'.在结尾加了一句明确的总结句:'So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse'。

    Enormously, in my family within one generation. My father worked six days a week for most of his life, often without a written contract, and the idea of paid holiday arrived when he was already in his forties. I work five days, two of them from home, with health insurance and a contract a lawyer could genuinely read. Safety has improved hugely in factories and construction, though not everywhere. What's got worse, I'd argue, is the boundary: my father's work ended the moment he left the building, and mine follows me home on a phone. So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse.

    查看中文翻译

    差别巨大,就在我家,仅仅一代人之间。我父亲大半辈子都是一周工作六天,常常连书面合同都没有,带薪假期这种概念一直到他四十多岁才出现。我一周工作五天,其中两天在家办公,有医疗保险,合同也是律师真正能读懂的那种。工厂和建筑工地的安全条件有了巨大改善,虽然不是每个地方都这样。要说变差的地方,我认为是那条界限:我父亲一走出那栋楼,工作就立刻结束了,而我的工作会通过手机一路跟着我回家。所以说,身体层面的条件好了很多,但心理层面反而有些变差了。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“I'd argue,” — This hedge is more confident and analytical than the plainer 6.5 hedge 'I think', signalling a considered judgement rather than a simple opinion. The 7.5 version keeps this exact hedge, showing it already suits the higher bands.这个缓和语比6.5中更平实的缓和语 'I think' 更自信、更具分析性,传达出一种经过深思熟虑的判断,而不只是简单的意见。7.5版本保留了完全相同的缓和语,说明它已经适合更高分段。
    • LR“a contract a lawyer could genuinely read” — The intensifier 'genuinely' sharpens the contrast with the father's undocumented work more than the plain 6.5 phrase 'a contract a lawyer could actually read', with 'genuinely' carrying slightly more formal weight than 'actually'.加强语气的 'genuinely' 比6.5中平实的短语 'a contract a lawyer could actually read' 更能凸显出与父亲那份没有合同文件的工作之间的对比,'genuinely' 比 'actually' 带有略微更正式的分量。
    • GRA“So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse.” — This additional closing sentence draws an explicit generalisation from the examples given, a structural move the 6.5 answer doesn't make, instead ending on the example itself without stating the broader conclusion.这句额外的结尾从前面举的例子中得出了一个明确的概括,这是6.5的回答没有做的结构性处理,后者只是停在例子本身,没有陈述更广泛的结论。
    7.5 分

    Extends the closing generalisation with a further clause naming what the 'new fights' are actually about.在结尾的概括上又加了一个分句,点明“新的争取重点”到底是关于什么。

    Enormously, in my family within one generation. My father worked six days a week for most of his life, often without a written contract, and the idea of paid holiday arrived when he was already in his forties. I work five days, two of them from home, with health insurance and a contract that a lawyer could read. Safety has improved hugely in factories and construction, though not everywhere. What's got worse, I'd argue, is the boundary: my father's work ended when he left the building, and mine follows me home on a phone. So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse, and the new fights are about time rather than safety.

    查看中文翻译

    差别巨大,就在我家,仅仅一代人之间。我父亲大半辈子都是一周工作六天,常常连书面合同都没有,带薪假期这种概念一直到他四十多岁才出现。我一周工作五天,其中两天在家办公,有医疗保险,合同也是律师真正能读懂的那种。工厂和建筑工地的安全条件有了巨大改善,虽然不是每个地方都这样。要说变差的地方,我认为是那条界限:我父亲一走出那栋楼,工作就结束了,而我的工作会通过手机一路跟着我回家。所以说,身体层面的条件好了很多,但心理层面反而有些变差了,而现在人们争取的重点,已经从“安全“变成了”时间”。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“and the new fights are about time rather than safety” — This final clause extends the closing generalisation beyond where 7.0 stops, adding a further precise claim about the nature of modern workplace conflict that neither lower band includes.这个结尾分句把最后的概括延伸到了7.0停下的地方之外,加上了一个关于现代职场冲突本质的更精确的论断,这是两个较低分段都没有的内容。
    • LR“a contract that a lawyer could read” — The relative pronoun 'that' is used here in a slightly more formal, complete relative clause than 7.0's reduced version 'a contract a lawyer could genuinely read', showing a marginal grammatical formality upgrade even without a new intensifier.这里的关系代词 'that' 用在了一个比7.0中的缩减版本 'a contract a lawyer could genuinely read' 略微更正式、更完整的关系从句里,即使没有新的加强语气词,也展现出微小的语法正式度升级。
    • GRA“So conditions are physically far better and mentally somewhat worse, and the new fights are about time rather than safety.” — This sentence adds a second coordinated clause after the one used at 7.0, extending the same summarising sentence with a further specific claim rather than stopping at the general observation.这句话在7.0使用的分句之后又加了一个并列分句,在同一句总结句上又延伸出一个更具体的论断,而不是止步于笼统的观察。

  7. 7. What could secondary or high schools do to better prepare students for work?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Lists the missing workplace skills with a plain 'like' clause rather than a colon-introduced list.用一个平实的 'like' 分句来列举缺失的职场技能,而不是用冒号引出的列表。

    Put students into real workplaces, even for a short time. The single most useful thing my school did was send us to a workplace for a week — I spent mine in a print shop — and that one week taught me more about deadlines, customers and being useful than a whole year of careers lessons. Schools could also teach the things every job needs and no subject covers, like writing an email, presenting an idea, and working with someone lazy. Bringing in ordinary workers to talk honestly would help too, since students usually only hear from the successful ones. And letting students fail safely at something real prepares them better than any exam.

    查看中文翻译

    让学生真正进入职场,哪怕只是短时间也好。我们学校做过最有用的一件事,就是把我们送到一个工作场所待一周——我当时去的是一家印刷店——那一周教给我的关于截止日期、客户和“如何有用”的东西,比一整年的职业规划课都多。学校也可以教一些每份工作都需要、但没有哪门课教过的东西,比如怎么写邮件、怎么陈述一个想法,还有怎么和一个懒惰的同事一起共事。请一些普通劳动者来坦诚地聊聊也会有帮助,因为学生们平时听到的往往只是那些“成功人士”的故事。而让学生在真实的事情上安全地经历失败,比任何考试都更能让他们做好准备。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Schools could also teach the things every job needs and no subject covers, like writing an email, presenting an idea, and working with someone lazy.” — The examples are introduced with the informal connector 'like'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with a colon, a more formal and economical way of presenting a list that follows a general claim.这些例子是用口语化的连接词 'like' 引出的。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了冒号,是一种更正式、更简洁的方式,来呈现跟在一个概括性论断后面的列表。
    • LR“Bringing in ordinary workers to talk honestly would help too” — This is a workable but slightly blunt phrase. The 7.0/7.5 versions expand it to 'people with ordinary jobs' / 'people who do ordinary jobs', which reads as a more natural, less compressed description.这是一个可行但略显生硬的短语。7.0/7.5版本把它扩展成了 'people with ordinary jobs' / 'people who do ordinary jobs',读起来是一种更自然、压缩程度更低的描述。
    • GRA“that one week taught me more about deadlines, customers and being useful than a whole year of careers lessons” — This comparative sentence is complete but relatively plain. The 7.0 version extends it with the added phrase 'than a whole year of careers lessons ever did', using 'ever did' for emphasis, a slightly more idiomatic comparative structure.这个比较句是完整的,但相对平实。7.0版本用加上的短语 'than a whole year of careers lessons ever did' 进行了扩展,用 'ever did' 来加强语气,是一种略微更地道的比较结构。
    7.0 分

    Uses a colon to introduce the list of missing skills and adds emphatic 'ever did' to the closing comparison.用冒号引出缺失技能的列表,并在结尾的比较句中加上强调性的 'ever did'。

    Put students into real workplaces, even briefly. The single most useful thing my school did was send us to a workplace for a week — I spent mine in a print shop — and that one week taught me more about deadlines, customers and being useful than a whole year of careers lessons ever did. Beyond that, schools could teach the things every job needs and no subject covers: writing an email, presenting an idea, working in a group that includes someone lazy. Bringing in people with ordinary jobs to talk honestly would help too, since students usually only hear from the successful. And letting students fail at something with real consequences, safely, prepares them far better than any exam.

    查看中文翻译

    让学生真正进入职场,哪怕只是短暂的时间。我们学校做过最有用的一件事,就是把我们送到一个工作场所待一周——我当时去的是一家印刷店——那一周教给我的关于截止日期、客户和“如何有用”的东西,比一整年的职业规划课加起来都多。除此之外,学校还可以教一些每份工作都需要、但没有哪门课教过的东西:怎么写邮件、怎么陈述一个想法、怎么在一个有懒惰成员的团队里共事。请一些从事普通工作的人来坦诚地聊聊也会有帮助,因为学生们平时往往只听得到成功人士的故事。而让学生在有真实后果的事情上安全地经历失败,比任何考试都能更好地让他们做好准备。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Beyond that,” — This connector signals a shift to a new category of suggestion more formally than the plain 6.5 connector 'also', giving the answer a clearer sense of structure between its two main points.这个连接词比6.5中平实的连接词 'also' 更正式地标示出转向了一个新类别的建议,让回答在两大要点之间的结构感更清晰。
    • LR“people with ordinary jobs to talk honestly” — This phrase is a more natural expansion of the compressed 6.5 phrase 'ordinary workers', giving the noun phrase a fuller, more idiomatic shape. The 7.5 answer varies this again slightly to 'people who do ordinary jobs', showing continued refinement at the top band.这个短语是对6.5中压缩短语 'ordinary workers' 更自然的扩展,让这个名词短语呈现出更完整、更地道的形态。7.5的回答又稍微变换了一下,变成了 'people who do ordinary jobs',展现出在最高分段的持续打磨。
    • GRA“than a whole year of careers lessons ever did” — The addition of 'ever did' after the comparative intensifies the claim through a kind of echo structure, a more sophisticated device than the plain comparison at 6.5, which stops at 'than a whole year of careers lessons'.在比较结构后加上 'ever did',通过一种呼应式的结构加强了论断的语气,比6.5中平实的比较——停在 'than a whole year of careers lessons' 就结束——更精妙。
    7.5 分

    Extends the colon-introduced list with a fourth item, 'handling money', going further than 7.0's three-item list.在冒号引出的列表里加了第四项,'handling money',比7.0中三项的列表更进一步。

    Put students in real workplaces, even briefly. The single most useful thing my school did was send us to a workplace for a week — I spent mine in a print shop — and that one week taught me more about deadlines, customers and being useful than a year of careers lessons. Beyond that, schools could teach the things every job needs and no subject covers: writing an email, presenting an idea, working in a group that includes someone lazy, handling money. Bringing in people who do ordinary jobs to talk honestly would help, since students only ever hear from the successful. And letting students fail at something with real consequences, safely, prepares them better than any exam.

    查看中文翻译

    让学生真正进入职场,哪怕只是短暂的时间。我们学校做过最有用的一件事,就是把我们送到一个工作场所待一周——我当时去的是一家印刷店——那一周教给我的关于截止日期、客户和“如何有用”的东西,比一年的职业规划课还要多。除此之外,学校还可以教一些每份工作都需要、但没有哪门课教过的东西:怎么写邮件、怎么陈述一个想法、怎么在一个有懒惰成员的团队里共事、怎么理财。请一些从事普通工作的人来坦诚地聊聊会很有帮助,因为学生们向来只听得到成功人士的故事。而让学生在有真实后果的事情上安全地经历失败,比任何考试都更能让他们做好准备。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“writing an email, presenting an idea, working in a group that includes someone lazy, handling money” — This four-item list extends one step beyond 7.0's three-item version of the same list, adding 'handling money' as a further concrete, practical skill.这个四项的列表在7.0同一列表的三项基础上又延伸了一步,加上了 'handling money' 这一项具体、实用的技能。
    • LR“people who do ordinary jobs to talk honestly” — This is a slightly more natural, idiomatic phrasing than 7.0's 'people with ordinary jobs', using the verb 'do' to describe the relationship between a person and their job more directly.这是一种比7.0中的 'people with ordinary jobs' 略微更自然、更地道的措辞,用动词 'do' 更直接地描述了一个人和自己工作之间的关系。
    • GRA“that one week taught me more about deadlines, customers and being useful than a year of careers lessons” — This drops the intensifying 'ever did' used at 7.0, relying instead on the plain comparative alone, which suggests a slightly more restrained, controlled register appropriate to the calmer tone of this band's closing paragraph.这里去掉了7.0中用来强调的 'ever did',转而只用平实的比较结构,展现出一种略微更克制、更有掌控力的语域,契合这个分段结尾段落更平静的语气。

  8. 8. Why do some jobs have a higher status now than they did in the past?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Uses the noun phrase 'being seen' rather than the more precise noun 'visibility' in the opening summary.在开头的总结里用了名词短语 'being seen',而不是更精确的名词 'visibility'。

    Money and being seen, mostly. When I was small, cooking for a living was a job people just fell into; now every second young person in Da Nang wants to be a chef, because chefs are on television and their restaurants are on social media. Software developers went through the same change once people saw how much they earned. Some jobs became higher status because they became rare and skilled — a good plumber is now hard to find and gets paid well. Society's values also changed: jobs connected to health, sustainability or creativity now get a respect they didn't use to have.

    查看中文翻译

    主要是钱,还有被看见的机会。我小时候,靠做饭为生是一种人们随便干干的工作;现在岘港每两个年轻人里就有一个想当厨师,因为厨师能上电视,他们的餐厅也会出现在社交媒体上。软件开发人员也经历过同样的转变,一旦人们看到他们挣多少钱。有些工作地位变高,是因为它们变得稀缺、需要技术了——一个好的水管工现在很难找,而且工资很高。社会的价值观也变了:和健康、可持续发展或创意相关的工作,现在获得了它们以前从没有过的尊重。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Money and being seen, mostly.” — The opening summary uses the verb phrase 'being seen', which is functional but less precise than a single abstract noun. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with 'visibility', a tighter and more formal noun that matches the register of the rest of the answer.开头的总结用了动词短语 'being seen',有功能性,但不如一个单独的抽象名词精确。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了 'visibility',是一个更紧凑、更正式的名词,和回答其余部分的语域相匹配。
    • LR“gets paid well” — This is a plain, general verb phrase. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace it with the more precise, slightly formal phrase 'paid accordingly', which more directly links the pay to the scarcity just described.这是一个平实、笼统的动词短语。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了更精确、略微更正式的短语 'paid accordingly',更直接地把薪水和前面提到的稀缺性联系了起来。
    • GRA“Society's values also changed: jobs connected to health, sustainability or creativity now get a respect they didn't use to have.” — This sentence uses the plain verb phrase 'didn't use to have'. The 7.0/7.5 versions replace this with the fuller, more explicit clause 'didn't have when the priority was simply a stable government salary', adding a precise historical contrast within the same sentence.这句话用了平实的动词短语 'didn't use to have'。7.0/7.5版本把它换成了更完整、更明确的分句 'didn't have when the priority was simply a stable government salary',在同一句话里加上了一个精确的历史对比。
    7.0 分

    Adds a precise historical contrast at the end of the values sentence, naming what the old priority actually was.在关于价值观的句子结尾加了一个精确的历史对比,点明了以前的首要目标到底是什么。

    Money and visibility, mostly. When I was small, cooking for a living was a job people simply fell into; now every second young person in Da Nang wants to be a chef, because chefs are on television and their restaurants are all over social media. Software developers went through the same shift once it became clear how much they earned. Some jobs gained status because they became rare and skilled — a good plumber is now genuinely hard to find and paid accordingly. And society's values shifted: jobs connected to health, sustainability or creativity now carry a respect they didn't have when the priority was simply a stable government salary.

    查看中文翻译

    主要是钱,还有能见度。我小时候,靠做饭为生是一种人们随随便便就落进去的工作;现在岘港每两个年轻人里就有一个想当厨师,因为厨师能上电视,他们的餐厅也遍布社交媒体。软件开发人员也经历过同样的转变,一旦人们清楚地看到他们挣多少钱。有些工作地位提高了,是因为它们变得稀缺、需要技术——一个好的水管工现在确实很难找,工资也相应地水涨船高。社会的价值观也发生了转变:和健康、可持续发展或创意相关的工作,现在承载着一种尊重,而在以前,当人们的首要目标只是一份稳定的公务员薪水时,这种尊重是不存在的。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“And society's values shifted:” — The connector 'And' plus the more formal verb 'shifted' (replacing 6.5's 'also changed') signals the final point slightly more smoothly, setting up the colon-led explanation that follows.连接词 'And' 加上更正式的动词 'shifted'(取代了6.5的 'also changed')更顺畅地引出了最后这一点,为后面冒号引出的解释做好了铺垫。
    • LR“visibility” — This single abstract noun is a more precise, economical upgrade from the 6.5 verb phrase 'being seen'. It's reused identically at 7.5, confirming it already fits the higher bands.这个单一的抽象名词是从6.5中的动词短语 'being seen' 升级而来的,更精确、更简洁。它在7.5中被原样沿用,证实它已经适合更高分段。
    • GRA“they didn't have when the priority was simply a stable government salary” — This clause adds a specific historical contrast that the 6.5 version lacks entirely, explaining exactly what values used to prioritise instead of just asserting that they've changed.这个分句加上了一个具体的历史对比,这是6.5版本完全没有的,它准确解释了以前的价值观优先考虑的是什么,而不只是断言价值观已经变了。
    7.5 分

    Adds a final aphoristic sentence, 'Status follows the money and the cameras, in that order', summarising the whole answer.加上一句格言式的结语,'Status follows the money and the cameras, in that order',总结整段回答。

    Money and visibility, mostly. When I was small, cooking for a living was a job people fell into; now every second young person in Da Nang wants to be a chef, because chefs are on television and their restaurants are on social media. Software developers went through the same shift once it became clear how much they earned. Some jobs gained status because they became rare and skilled — a good plumber is now hard to find and paid accordingly. And society's values shifted: jobs connected to health, sustainability or creativity carry a respect they didn't have when the priority was simply a stable government salary. Status follows the money and the cameras, in that order.

    查看中文翻译

    主要是钱,还有能见度。我小时候,靠做饭为生是一种人们随随便便就落进去的工作;现在岘港每两个年轻人里就有一个想当厨师,因为厨师能上电视,他们的餐厅也在社交媒体上有一席之地。软件开发人员也经历过同样的转变,一旦人们清楚地看到他们挣多少钱。有些工作地位提高了,是因为它们变得稀缺、需要技术——一个好的水管工现在很难找,工资也相应地水涨船高。社会的价值观也发生了转变:和健康、可持续发展或创意相关的工作,如今承载着一种尊重,而在以前,当人们的首要目标只是一份稳定的公务员薪水时,这种尊重是不存在的。地位追随的,依次是金钱,然后是镜头。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“Status follows the money and the cameras, in that order.” — This closing aphorism condenses the entire answer into one memorable, structured sentence, a device neither the 6.5 nor the 7.0 answer includes, giving the response a stronger sense of a deliberate rhetorical close.这句结尾的格言把整段回答浓缩成了一句令人印象深刻、结构分明的话,这是6.5和7.0的回答都没有的手法,让整个回答显得有一个更明显、刻意为之的修辞性收尾。
    • LR“the cameras” — This metonymic use of 'cameras' to represent media visibility is more vivid and economical than the abstract noun 'visibility' used earlier in the same answer, showing a wider stylistic range within one response.用 'cameras' 来转喻媒体曝光度,比同一段回答前面用过的抽象名词 'visibility' 更生动、更简洁,展现出在一段回答内更宽的文体范围。
    • GRA“Status follows the money and the cameras, in that order.” — The phrase 'in that order' functions as a compact appositive modifying the whole preceding clause, a more sophisticated closing device than the plain final sentences used at 6.5 and 7.0, which end on the values point without this extra layer of commentary.短语 'in that order' 作为一个紧凑的同位语修饰前面整个分句,是一种比6.5和7.0中平实的结尾句更精妙的收尾手法,后两者都是在价值观这一点上结束,没有这层额外的点评。

  9. 9. Do you agree or disagree that young people should not earn as much as older people?

    2026年5–8月
    查看这道题的6.5 / 7.0 / 7.5三档对比
    6.5 分

    Introduces the counter-argument with a plain colon after a short lead-in sentence, 'There is one reasonable version of the argument:'.在一句简短的引导句 'There is one reasonable version of the argument:' 后,用一个平实的冒号引出反面论证。

    I disagree, as a general rule. At my studio, a former receptionist who taught herself to code now earns more than a colleague fifteen years older, because she's better at the job, and nobody serious thinks that's wrong. Pay should follow value and responsibility, not age. There is one reasonable version of the argument: older workers usually have more experience, more dependents and more to lose, and experience is often worth paying for. But that's a reason to pay experience, not birthdays. Systems that pay purely by seniority tend to push out ambitious young people and keep unmotivated older ones.

    查看中文翻译

    总的来说我不同意。在我的工作室里,一个自学编程的前台现在挣得比一个大她十五岁的同事还多,因为她工作能力更强,没有哪个正经人会觉得这有什么不对。工资应该跟着价值和责任走,而不是跟着年龄走。这个观点也有一个说得通的版本:年纪大的员工通常经验更丰富、要养的人更多、能输掉的东西也更多,而经验往往是值得花钱买的。但这是一个应该为“经验”付钱的理由,而不是为“生日”付钱的理由。那种纯粹按资历付薪的体系,往往会把有野心的年轻人挤走,却留下没什么干劲的老员工。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“There is one reasonable version of the argument:” — This lead-in uses the number word 'one' before 'reasonable version', which is functional but slightly clunky. The 7.0/7.5 versions drop 'one' and instead add the concessive tag 'though' at 7.0, a more natural way to flag a genuine counterpoint.这个引导句在 'reasonable version' 前用了数词 'one',有功能性,但略显笨拙。7.0/7.5版本去掉了 'one',7.0还加了一个让步性的附加语 'though',是一种更自然的方式来标示一个真正的反面观点。
    • LR“a colleague fifteen years older” — This is a plain, workable comparative phrase. The 7.5 version upgrades it to the more idiomatic 'fifteen years her senior', a more natural collocation for describing an age gap between two specific people.这是一个平实、可行的比较短语。7.5版本把它升级成了更地道的 'fifteen years her senior',是描述两个具体的人之间年龄差时更自然的搭配。
    • GRA“Systems that pay purely by seniority tend to push out ambitious young people and keep unmotivated older ones.” — This closing sentence ends without a further consequence clause. The 7.0/7.5 versions extend the same sentence with 'and I've seen that hollow out a company/companies', adding a personal, evidence-based consequence.这句结尾没有再加上一个表示后果的分句就结束了。7.0/7.5版本在同一句话上又加了 'and I've seen that hollow out a company/companies',加上了一个个人的、有实例支撑的后果。
    7.0 分

    Adds the concessive tag 'though' and extends the closing sentence with a personal consequence clause.加上了让步性的附加语 'though',并在结尾句上加了一个个人化的后果分句。

    I disagree, as a general rule. At my studio a former receptionist who taught herself to code now earns more than a colleague fifteen years older, simply because she's better at the job, and nobody serious thinks that's wrong. Pay should follow value and responsibility, not age. There is a reasonable version of the argument, though: older workers usually have more experience, more dependents and more to lose, and experience genuinely is often worth paying for. But that's a reason to pay for experience, not for birthdays. Systems that pay purely by seniority tend to push out ambitious young people and keep unmotivated older ones, and I've seen that hollow out a company.

    查看中文翻译

    总的来说我不同意。在我的工作室里,一个自学编程的前台现在挣得比一个大她十五岁的同事还多,单纯是因为她工作能力更强,没有哪个正经人会觉得这有什么不对。工资应该跟着价值和责任走,而不是跟着年龄走。不过,这个观点确实有一个说得通的版本:年纪大的员工通常经验更丰富、要养的人更多、能输掉的东西也更多,而经验的确往往是值得花钱买的。但这是一个应该为“经验”付钱的理由,而不是为“生日”付钱的理由。那种纯粹按资历付薪的体系,往往会把有野心的年轻人挤走,却留下没什么干劲的老员工,而我亲眼见过这种做法把一家公司掏空。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“though:” — This concessive tag, placed right before the colon, signals a genuine shift toward the counter-argument more naturally than the 6.5 version's plain 'one reasonable version of the argument'. The 7.5 version achieves a similar effect without the tag, relying on tone alone.这个让步性的附加语紧接在冒号前面,比6.5版本中平实的 'one reasonable version of the argument' 更自然地标示出真正转向了反面论证。7.5版本没有用这个附加语也达到了类似的效果,只靠语气本身。
    • LR“experience genuinely is often worth paying for” — The intensifier 'genuinely' strengthens this concession more than the plain 6.5 phrase 'experience is often worth paying for', making the acknowledgement of the counter-argument feel more considered.加强语气的 'genuinely' 比6.5中平实的短语 'experience is often worth paying for' 更能强化这个让步,让对反面论证的承认显得更经过深思熟虑。
    • GRA“and I've seen that hollow out a company” — This added clause extends the final sentence with a first-hand consequence, a structural move the 6.5 version doesn't make, stopping instead at the general claim about seniority systems.这个加上去的分句给最后一句加上了一个亲身经历的后果,这是6.5版本没有做的结构性处理,后者只停在了关于资历体系的笼统论断上。
    7.5 分

    Drops the tag 'though' used at 7.0 for a more direct concession, and pluralises the closing consequence to 'companies'.去掉了7.0中用的附加语 'though',让步显得更直接,并把结尾的后果改成了复数 'companies'。

    I disagree, as a general rule. At my studio a former receptionist who taught herself to code now earns more than a colleague fifteen years her senior, because she's better at the job, and nobody serious thinks that's wrong. Pay should follow value and responsibility, not age. There is a reasonable version of the argument: older workers usually have more experience, more dependents and more to lose, and experience often is worth paying for. But that's a reason to pay experience, not birthdays. Systems that pay purely by seniority tend to push out ambitious young people and keep unmotivated older ones, and I've seen that hollow out companies.

    查看中文翻译

    总的来说我不同意。在我的工作室里,一个自学编程的前台现在挣得比一个大她十五岁的同事还多,因为她工作能力更强,没有哪个正经人会觉得这有什么不对。工资应该跟着价值和责任走,而不是跟着年龄走。这个观点确实有一个说得通的版本:年纪大的员工通常经验更丰富、要养的人更多、能输掉的东西也更多,而经验往往是值得花钱买的。但这是一个应该为“经验”付钱的理由,而不是为“生日”付钱的理由。那种纯粹按资历付薪的体系,往往会把有野心的年轻人挤走,却留下没什么干劲的老员工,而我亲眼见过这种做法把不止一家公司掏空。

    为什么是这个分数

    • FC“There is a reasonable version of the argument:” — This states the concession directly and economically, without the numeral 'one' used at 6.5 or the concessive tag 'though' used at 7.0, relying on the colon alone to signal the shift.这句话直接、简洁地陈述了让步,没有用6.5中的数词 'one',也没有用7.0中让步性的附加语 'though',只靠冒号本身来标示转折。
    • LR“fifteen years her senior” — This idiomatic collocation for describing an age gap between two people is more natural and precise than the plain 6.5 phrase 'fifteen years older', and is not used at 7.0 either.这个用来描述两人年龄差的地道搭配比6.5中平实的短语 'fifteen years older' 更自然、更精确,7.0也没有用过这个说法。
    • GRA“and I've seen that hollow out companies” — The plural 'companies' generalises the closing consequence beyond a single instance, a subtly more sweeping claim than 7.0's singular 'hollow out a company', suggesting a broader pattern rather than one specific case.复数形式 'companies' 把结尾的后果概括到了不止一个个案之外,是一个比7.0中单数的 'hollow out a company' 更微妙、更具概括性的论断,暗示的是一种更广泛的模式,而不是一个具体案例。

常见问题

这道 Part 2 题应该讲多长？
讲 1 到 2 分钟。考官会在 2 分钟时打断你，因此目标约 220-300 词，覆盖题卡上的每一点，并以你的感受收尾。
这张题卡之后会问哪些 Part 3 问题？
在"A Person You Know Who Does a Job Useful to Society"之后，考官提出过 9 个讨论题，见上方列表。问题会从你的个人经历转向同一主题的普遍观点。
这张题卡还在使用吗？
考生最近一次报告它出现在 2026年5–8月。题卡每四个月轮换一次，许多话题会在之后的季度以略有不同的措辞回归。