The answer explains motivation in short, direct sentences ('he was almost thirty when he decided to change his life'), giving a clear reason without unpacking it further, typical of Band 6.5 simplicity.回答用简短直接的句子解释动机('he was almost thirty when he decided to change his life'),给出一个清楚的理由但没有进一步展开分析,是6.5分那种简单风格的典型表现。
The person I want to talk about is my friend Huy, who used to drive a Grab motorbike near my apartment. Now he works as a tour guide in Hoi An, which is not far from Da Nang.
The difficult thing he did was learn English by himself. He never studied it at school properly, and he was almost thirty when he decided to change his life. Every night after driving all day, he watched English videos on his phone and repeated the sentences out loud. He also talked to foreign tourists whenever he could, just to practise, even when he made mistakes.
This continued for almost two years. He saved a little money and took a short guide training course, then applied for jobs at travel companies in Hoi An. Most of them said no at first because his English was not perfect and he had no experience.
I think he was successful because he never gave up, even after many rejections. He also loved talking to people, which helped him a lot. Finally, one small tour company gave him a chance, and now he leads groups to the Ancient Town every week. He earns more money than before, and he looks much happier too. I really admire his effort.
查看中文翻译
我想说的这个人是我的朋友Huy,他以前在我公寓附近开Grab摩的载客。现在他在离岘港不远的会安当导游。
他做的这件难事,是自学英语。他上学时没怎么好好学过英语,决定改变生活的时候已经快三十岁了。每天载客一整天之后,他晚上都会在手机上看英语视频,大声跟着念句子。只要有机会,他也会找外国游客聊天练习,哪怕说错也不在乎。
这样坚持了差不多两年。他攒了一点钱,报了一个短期导游培训班,然后去会安的旅行社投简历。一开始大多数公司都拒绝了他,因为他的英语还不够好,也没有经验。
我觉得他能成功,是因为他被拒绝了很多次也没有放弃。而且他真的很喜欢和人交流,这一点帮了他很多。最后,一家小旅行社给了他一个机会,现在他每周都带团去古城。他现在赚得比以前多,人看起来也开心多了。我真的很佩服他的努力。
211 词 · 约 2 分钟
为什么是这个分数
- FC“he never gave up, even after many rejections” — The reason for Huy's success is stated as a single plain clause ("he never gave up"), qualified by "even after many rejections" but not developed any further -- a higher band might explore what actually kept him motivated. This bare, undeveloped reason-giving is exactly the level of elaboration Band 6.5 expects, clear and on-topic without additional analysis.阿辉成功的原因被表述为一个简单的分句("he never gave up"),后面用"even after many rejections"加以限定,但并没有进一步展开——更高分的答案可能会去探究究竟是什么真正维持了他的动力。这种简单、未经展开的说理方式,正是6.5分所期望的展开程度,清晰、切题,不需要额外的分析。
- LR“watched English videos on his phone and repeated the sentences out loud” — The routine is described entirely with plain, concrete verbs ("watched," "repeated") and everyday nouns ("videos," "phone," "sentences"), with no attempt at a more specific term like "shadowing," a common language-learning technique this description actually matches. This plainness, favouring accessible words over technical precision, is exactly what the Band 6.5 lexical target asks for.这段日常习惯完全用平实、具体的动词("watched"、"repeated")和日常名词("videos"、"phone"、"sentences")来描述,并没有尝试使用更专业的术语,比如"shadowing"——这其实正是这段描述所对应的一种常见语言学习技巧。这种偏好通俗易懂的词汇、而非追求专业术语精准度的做法,正是6.5分词汇标准所要求的。
- GRA“he was almost thirty when he decided to change his life” — "When" introduces a single basic time clause linking Huy's age to his decision, a straightforward subordination pattern with no further embedding. This is accurate and clear, and representative of the single-subordinate-clause ceiling that defines Band 6.5 grammar, rather than the multi-layered sentences seen in this same collection's 7.0 and 7.5 rows."When"引出一个简单的基础时间状语从句,把阿辉的年龄与他的决定联系起来,是一种直白的从属结构,没有再进一步嵌套。这种表达准确清晰,正好代表了6.5分语法的上限——只用单一的从属从句,而不是同一批例句中7.0和7.5分那种多层叠加的句子。