雅思口语 Part 1

Books and Reading

Hobbies & Free Time

最近一次出现于 2026年5–8月

本话题下的题目

按回忆的考试时段分组,最新在前。考官通常从中挑三到四题。

  1. Have you ever watched a film/movie and then read the book?2026年5–8月
  2. How often do you buy books?2026年5–8月
  3. When do you have most time to read?2026年5–8月
  4. Do you read more or less now than when you were younger?2026年5–8月

参考答案:6.5、7.0、7.5 三档

每题的三个版本,分别写到对应分数的真实水平——对比着看分数之间的差别,再换成你自己的细节。

6.5 分

Plain, direct answers such as 'Not very often, maybe two or three times a year' and the basic 'used to' structure for past habits keep the grammar and vocabulary simple and accurate, typical of Band 6.5.像'Not very often, maybe two or three times a year'(不太经常,大概一年两三次)这样朴素直接的回答,以及用来表达过去习惯的基础'used to'结构,让语法和词汇保持简单准确,这是典型的6.5分水平。

Have you ever watched a film/movie and then read the book?
Yes, once. I watched Life of Pi with my sister a few years ago, and I liked it so much that I bought the book afterwards. I read it on my Kindle, and I think the book explained the story even better than the film.
查看中文翻译

有过一次。几年前我和妹妹一起看了《少年派的奇幻漂流》,特别喜欢,后来就买了原著。我是在Kindle上看的,感觉书里把故事讲得比电影还清楚。

为什么是这个分数

  • LRI think the book explained the story even better than the film.The comparison 'even better than the film' is made using the most basic comparative form available, without specifying what 'better' actually means here — clearer plot, more detail, better characters. Leaving the comparison at this general level, rather than naming the specific quality being compared, is typical of the plain vocabulary Band 6.5 expects for a Part 1 answer.'even better than the film' 这一比较采用了最基础的比较级形式,却没有说明 'better' 在这里具体指什么——情节更清晰、细节更丰富,还是人物塑造更出色。把比较停留在这样一个笼统的层面,而不点明具体被比较的是哪种特质,正是6.5分对Part 1答案所期望的那种平实词汇的典型表现。
How often do you buy books?
Not very often, maybe two or three times a year. Last time, I bought a small design book online through Tiki because I needed it for work. Usually, I just read things on my phone instead of buying books.
查看中文翻译

不太频繁,大概一年两三次。上次是在Tiki上买了一本小小的设计书,因为工作上需要用。平时我基本都是用手机看东西,很少专门买书。

为什么是这个分数

  • FCNot very often, maybe two or three times a year.Answering 'Not very often, maybe two or three times a year' gives a short, direct, hedged response to a frequency question without expanding into a full sentence explaining why. This kind of minimal but clear reply is entirely appropriate for a Part 1 question, and it matches the plain, undeveloped register the Band 6.5 fluency descriptor sets as its baseline for short-answer exchanges."Not very often, maybe two or three times a year" 这样的回答,对一个关于频率的问题给出了简短、直接、带有缓冲语气的答复,而没有展开成完整的句子来解释原因。这种简洁但清晰的回答方式对Part 1问题来说完全恰当,也符合6.5分流利度描述为简短问答式交流设定的基线——平实、未展开的语域。
When do you have most time to read?
I usually read most during my lunch break at work. I sit in the office pantry on the 18th floor and read for about twenty minutes before going back to my desk. It's a short but relaxing part of my day.
查看中文翻译

我一般在上班午休的时候读得最多。我会坐在十八楼的茶水间读个二十分钟左右,然后再回去工作。虽然时间不长,但是一天里挺放松的一段时间。

为什么是这个分数

  • GRAIt's a short but relaxing part of my day.This is a single sentence joined by 'but', giving a simple, accurate contrast between the break being short and still being relaxing. A Band 7.0+ answer might expand this into a more developed clause explaining why it's relaxing, but here the plain coordination is correctly used and easy to follow, which is exactly the grammatically basic but accurate style expected at Band 6.5. It rounds off the answer with a brief, clear evaluation.这是用 'but' 连接的单一句子,对假期虽短却依然令人放松这一点作出了简单、准确的对比。7.0分以上的答案可能会将其扩展成一个更充分展开的分句,解释为什么它令人放松,但这里简单的并列结构运用正确、易于理解,恰恰是6.5分所期望的那种语法基础但准确的风格。它以一个简短、清晰的评价为整段回答收尾。
Do you read more or less now than when you were younger?
I read less now, definitely. When I was a teenager, I used to borrow novels from the school library in Hue and finish them in a few days. Now I mostly read short news articles on my phone, and it's rare for me to finish a whole book.
查看中文翻译

现在肯定读得少多了。十几岁的时候,我常从顺化学校图书馆借小说,几天就能看完一本。现在大多只是用手机看看短新闻,很少能完整读完一本书。

为什么是这个分数

  • GRAWhen I was a teenager, I used to borrow novels from the school library in Hue and finish them in a few days.'Used to borrow' is the standard structure for describing a discontinued past habit, and it's introduced with a fronted time clause ('When I was a teenager') that gives the habit a clear timeframe. This is accurate and appropriately used, but it's also one of the first past-habit structures a learner acquires, which places it at the elementary end of what Band 6.5 grammatical range covers rather than anything more varied.'Used to borrow' 是描述一个已经终止的过去习惯的标准结构,并且以一个前置的时间从句('When I was a teenager')引出,为这个习惯提供了明确的时间框架。这样的用法准确且恰当,但这也是学习者最早掌握的过去习惯结构之一,因此它属于6.5分语法范围所涵盖的较为基础的一端,而非更为多样的结构。
7.0 分

The relative clause 'which feels like a nice way to start the day rather than checking my phone straight away' comfortably combines two ideas in one sentence, and casual connectors like 'to be honest' give the answers a natural, unrehearsed spoken quality typical of Band 7.0.定语从句'which feels like a nice way to start the day rather than checking my phone straight away'(感觉这样开启一天比一睁眼就刷手机要好得多)从容地把两个想法结合进一句话里,而像'to be honest'(说实话)这样随意的连接词,让这些回答带有7.0分典型的自然、不做作的口语质感。

Have you ever watched a film/movie and then read the book?
Yes, actually. I watched Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone years ago and really enjoyed it, so I ended up buying the first book not long after. I found the book gave a lot more background about the characters that the film just didn't have time for.
查看中文翻译

有啊,说真的。我很多年前看过《哈利·波特与魔法石》这部电影,特别喜欢,所以没过多久就买了第一本小说。我发现书里对角色的背景交代得比电影丰富太多了,那些是电影根本没时间展开的部分。

为什么是这个分数

  • LRthe film just didn't have time for'Didn't have time for' is used figuratively here about a film's limited runtime and scope, rather than literally about someone's schedule — a flexible extension of an everyday phrase rather than a fixed idiom. A Band 6.5 answer would more likely say something literal like 'the film was too short to explain everything', while this natural, slightly extended use of a common collocation fits the Band 7.0 target of flexible, topic-appropriate vocabulary. It also makes a precise comparative point about what the book offered that the film couldn't.'Didn't have time for' 在这里被用于比喻义,指的是电影有限的时长和篇幅,而不是字面意义上某人的日程安排——这是对一个日常短语的灵活延伸,而不是一个固定的习语。Band 6.5的答案更可能会说一些字面化的话,比如 'the film was too short to explain everything',而这种对常见搭配自然、略带延伸的用法,正符合Band 7.0所追求的灵活、贴合话题的词汇目标。它也精准地提出了一个比较性的观点:这本书提供了电影所无法提供的东西。
How often do you buy books?
I'd say maybe three or four times a year, not that often really. The last one I bought was a cookbook, of all things, because I'd started trying to cook more properly at home. Other than that, I mostly just read things on my phone instead of buying actual books.
查看中文翻译

我觉得大概一年三四次吧,说实话不算多。我最近买的一本居然是本菜谱,因为我开始想在家好好学做饭了。除此之外,我基本上都是在手机上看东西,而不是买实体书。

为什么是这个分数

  • LRnot that often really"Not that often" is a negated frequency phrase softened further by the tacked-on intensifier "really" — a spoken hedging pattern rather than a single textbook frequency adverb like "rarely." This kind of natural downtoning, used instead of a flat number or bare word, is the "few flexible... words" the 7.0 descriptor asks for: plainer than idiomatic phrasing, but more nuanced than the flat frequency answers typical of 6.5, and it sets up the specific detail about the cookbook that follows."Not that often" 是一个否定式的频率短语,又被附加的加强词 "really" 进一步软化——这是一种口语化的缓和表达模式,而不是像 "rarely" 这样单一的教科书式频率副词。这种自然的降调处理,用来代替一个干巴巴的数字或单一词语,正是7.0分描述语所要求的“少量灵活的……词汇”:比习语化的措辞更朴素,却比Band 6.5典型的那种平淡的频率回答更细腻,也为后文关于那本食谱的具体细节作了铺垫。
When do you have most time to read?
Probably on weekend mornings, when I don't have to rush off anywhere. I usually make a coffee and read for about half an hour before I do anything else, which feels like a nice way to start the day rather than checking my phone straight away.
查看中文翻译

大概是周末早上吧,那时候我不用急着赶去哪里。我通常会先泡杯咖啡,读上半个小时的书再做别的事情,感觉这样开启一天比一睁眼就刷手机要好得多。

为什么是这个分数

  • GRAI usually make a coffee and read for about half an hour before I do anything else, which feels like a nice way to start the day rather than checking my phone straight away.The sentence chains a main clause with a non-restrictive relative clause ("which feels like...") and then a comparative "rather than" phrase, all inside one unbroken, accurate sentence — the "comfortable mix of simple and complex sentences" the 7.0 tier calls for. It manages two devices at once without strain, but it isn't layering additional clause types the way a 7.5 answer would (say, an added conditional), which is the ceiling of complexity expected before grammar range needs to widen further.这句话把一个主句与一个非限定性定语从句('which feels like...')以及一个比较性的 'rather than' 短语连接在一起,全部放进一句连贯、准确的话里——正是Band 7.0层级所要求的“简单句与复合句从容混用”。它同时驾驭了两种手法却毫不费力,但还没有像Band 7.5的答案那样叠加更多从句类型(比如再加一个条件句),这正是在语法范围需要进一步拓宽之前所期望达到的复杂度上限。
Do you read more or less now than when you were younger?
Definitely less than before, to be honest. When I was at school I used to read almost every night before bed, but now between work and everything else, I'm lucky if I finish one book a month. I still enjoy it when I actually sit down with one, though.
查看中文翻译

说实话,肯定比以前读得少多了。上学的时候我几乎每晚睡前都会看书,但现在工作和各种事情缠身,一个月能看完一本书就算幸运了。不过每次真正坐下来读的时候,我还是很享受的。

为什么是这个分数

  • FCDefinitely less than before, to be honest."Definitely" as an intensifying opener and the discourse marker "to be honest" work together to frame the answer as a personal, unrehearsed admission rather than a flat statement of fact. This spoken-connector habit is one of the concrete markers the 7.0 descriptor lists ("link ideas with natural spoken connectors"); a 6.5 answer would likely just state "I read less now" without the framing, while a 7.5 answer might add a reflective twist to the comparison itself rather than only softening its delivery.作为加强性开场语的 "Definitely" 与话语标记语 "to be honest" 协同运作,把这个答案框定为一种个人化、未经排练的坦白,而不是一句平淡的事实陈述。这种口语连接词的使用习惯,正是Band 7.0描述语所列出的具体标志之一(“用自然的口语连接词把各个想法连接起来”);Band 6.5的答案很可能只会说 "I read less now" 而不带这种框架,而Band 7.5的答案则可能在比较本身中加入一层反思性的转折,而不只是软化表达方式。
7.5 分

The participial phrase 'usually curled up in a corner of our living room' adds vivid, economical description, and the precise phrase 'a lot more insight into the main character's thoughts' shows the more specific lexical choices typical of Band 7.5.分词短语'usually curled up in a corner of our living room'(通常窝在我们客厅的一个角落里)增添了生动而简洁的描写,而精确的短语'a lot more insight into the main character's thoughts'(对主角内心想法有更深入的洞察)则展现出7.5分典型的更具体的词汇选择。

Have you ever watched a film/movie and then read the book?
Yes, I have. A couple of years ago, I saw The Perks of Being a Wallflower at CGV Lotte Mart with some friends from work. The film really stuck with me, so I picked up the book from a small shop near Han Market the next week. Honestly, the book gave a lot more insight into the main character's thoughts, and I actually enjoyed the story even more in print.
查看中文翻译

是的,我有过这样的经历。几年前,我和几个同事一起在CGV Lotte Mart看了电影《壁花少年》。这部电影给我留下了很深的印象,所以第二周我就在汉市场附近一家小书店买了原著小说。说实话,书里对主角内心想法的刻画丰富得多,我甚至更喜欢文字版的故事。

为什么是这个分数

  • LRthe book gave a lot more insight into the main character's thoughts"Insight into" is a precise, mid-frequency collocation naming a specific cognitive process — understanding a character's interiority — rather than a vague evaluative word like "good" or "interesting" that a 6.5–7.0 answer might default to. Paired with the direct comparison to seeing the film first, it shows the speaker analysing why the book worked rather than just stating that it did, which is the evaluative specificity the 7.5 descriptor means by "several precise or less-common words... used naturally.""Insight into" 是一个精确、中等频率的搭配,点明了一个具体的认知过程——理解一个角色的内心世界,而不是像 "good" 或 "interesting" 这样模糊的评价性词语,而Band 6.5–7.0的答案可能默认会用后者。搭配与先看电影这一经历的直接比较,它展现出说话人在分析这本书为何有效,而不只是陈述它有效,这正是Band 7.5描述语所说的“自然使用多个精准或不太常见的词汇……”所指的那种评价上的具体性。
How often do you buy books?
Actually, I only buy books once every few months. The last time was at a small pop-up book fair near the riverfront in Da Nang. I picked up a design book called "Steal Like an Artist" because a colleague recommended it. Most of the time, I tend to read articles online or borrow from friends instead of buying physical books regularly.
查看中文翻译

其实我大概每隔几个月才会买一次书。上一次是在岘港江边一个小型快闪书展上买的。我买了一本叫《Steal Like an Artist》的设计类书,是一个同事推荐给我的。大多数时候,我更倾向于在网上读文章,或者跟朋友借书,而不是经常买实体书。

为什么是这个分数

  • LRI picked up a design bookThe phrasal verb 'picked up' is a natural, slightly informal way of saying 'bought' or 'got', used here instead of a plain verb like 'bought'. This kind of casual, idiomatic verb choice — used smoothly rather than for show — is characteristic of the natural spoken register and lexical flexibility expected at Band 7.5, where a Band 6.5-7.0 answer would more predictably use 'bought'. It also fits the relaxed, anecdotal tone of describing a casual book fair purchase.短语动词 'picked up' 是一种自然、略带随性的表达方式,意为 'bought' 或 'got',这里没有使用像 'bought' 这样平淡的动词。这种随性、地道的动词选择——运用得自然流畅而非刻意炫技——正是Band 7.5所期望的自然口语语域与词汇灵活性的特征,而Band 6.5-7.0的答案更可能会用更容易预料到的 'bought'。它也契合了描述一次随意的书展购书经历那种轻松、带有轶事色彩的语气。
When do you have most time to read?
I usually have the most time to read late at night, after I wind down from work and finish my run or dinner. For example, just last Wednesday, I stayed up until almost midnight reading a mystery novel on my Kindle while sitting by the window in my apartment. The city gets quiet and it's honestly the best time for me to focus on a book without any distractions.
查看中文翻译

我通常在深夜有最多时间看书,那时工作已经放松下来,跑步或晚饭也结束了。比如上周三,我在Kindle上看一本推理小说,坐在公寓窗边一直看到快半夜。那时候城市变得很安静,说实话这是我最能专心读书、不受打扰的时间。

为什么是这个分数

  • FCThe city gets quiet and it's honestly the best time for me to focus on a book without any distractions.The sentence moves from a plain observation ("the city gets quiet") to an explicit personal judgement ("the best time for me to focus... without any distractions"), which is a reflective move beyond simply naming a preferred reading time. A 7.0 answer might stop at naming late night as the favourite slot; here the speaker explains why in terms of a concrete benefit, which is the "clear reflective or evaluative point" the 7.5 tier specifically requires beyond description.这句话从一个平淡的观察("the city gets quiet")过渡到一个明确的个人判断("the best time for me to focus... without any distractions"),这是超越单纯指出偏好阅读时段的一种反思性举动。Band 7.0的答案可能止步于指出深夜是最喜欢的时段;而这里说话人从一个具体好处的角度解释了原因,这正是Band 7.5层级明确要求的那种超越描述的“清晰的反思或评价性观点”。
Do you read more or less now than when you were younger?
I definitely read less now than I did when I was younger. Back in primary school in Hue, I'd go through a comic book almost every afternoon after finishing my homework, usually curled up in a corner of our living room. These days, I still enjoy reading, but I mostly pick up articles or design blogs on my phone during my commute or lunch break, and I rarely finish a whole novel in one go.
查看中文翻译

我现在肯定比小时候读得少多了。小学时在顺化,我几乎每天下午做完作业后都会读完一本漫画书,通常窝在客厅的一个角落里看。现在,我依然喜欢阅读,但大多是在通勤或午休时用手机看看文章或设计类博客,很少能一口气读完一整本小说。

为什么是这个分数

  • GRAI'd go through a comic book almost every afternoon after finishing my homework, usually curled up in a corner of our living room."Usually curled up in a corner of our living room" is a participial phrase attached loosely to the main clause, adding a visual detail about posture and setting without a second finite verb or conjunction. This is more economical and varied than the coordinated clauses a 6.5–7.0 answer would use for the same image ("and I would curl up..."), and it sits alongside the sentence's other complex piece — the time clause "after finishing my homework" — showing the layered, largely error-free grammar 7.5 expects."Usually curled up in a corner of our living room" 是一个松散地附加在主句上的分词短语,补充了一个关于姿势与场景的视觉细节,却不需要第二个限定动词或连词。这比Band 6.5–7.0的答案会为同一画面所使用的并列分句("and I would curl up...")更为经济、多变,并且与句中另一个复杂成分——时间从句 "after finishing my homework"——并列存在,展现出Band 7.5所期望的那种分层的、基本无误的语法。

常见问题

关于books and Reading的 Part 1 回答应该多长?
两到四句。直接回答,补一个理由或细节,然后停下。Part 1 考察的是自然交流,而不是说了多少——考官大约 20-30 秒后就会进入下一题。
考官会问哪些关于books and Reading的问题?
考生在本话题下回忆了 4 道不同的题目,见上方列表。考试时通常会遇到其中三到四题,从简单的事实问题开始,再转向偏好或看法。
这个 Part 1 话题还在考吗?
它最近一次被回忆出现在 2026年5–8月。Part 1 话题每四个月部分更换,像这样的常见话题往往会在之后的考试时段回归。