Reading 2026-02 Test 12 — IELTS Academic Reading Practice Test with Answers

基于考生回忆投稿及材料收集整理 — 非官方 IELTS 资料。

Reading Passage 1: The Cane Toad in Australia

A The cane toad was introduced into Australia in 1935 to control sugar cane pests in Queensland. One hundred and one cane toads arrived at Edmonton in June in 1935. Breeding occurred almost immediately. The cane toad is tough and adaptable, as well as being poisonous throughout its life cycle, and has few predators in Australia.

B Cane toads are large heavily-built amphibians with dry, warty skin. They have a bony head and over their eyes are bony ridges that meet above the nose. They sit upright and move in short rapid hops. Their hind feet have leathery webbing between the toes and their front feet are unwebbed. Adult cane toads have large swellings - the parotoid glands - on each shoulder behind the eardrum. Cane toads may be grey, yellowish, olive-brown or reddish-brown, and their bellies are pale with dark mottling. Average-sized adults are ten to fifteen centimetres long. The largest female measured in Queensland was twenty-four centimetres long and weighed one point three kilograms. Male cane toads are smaller and wartier than females. During the breeding season males develop dark lumps (nuptial pads) on their first two fingers; these help them cling to a female while mating. Their mating call is a long loud purring trill. Cane toad spawn is exclusive in Australia. It is laid in long strings of transparent jelly enclosing double rows of black eggs. The spawn tangles in dense dark masses around water plants, and hangs in ropy strands if picked up.

C The natural range of cane toads extends from the southern United States to tropical South America. In 2002, cane toads occurred throughout the eastern and northern half of Queensland and have extended their range to the river catchments surrounding Kakadu National Park in the Northern Territory. In New South Wales, they occur as far south as Yamba and Port Macquarie.

D Cane toads tolerate a broad range of environmental and climatic conditions and appear to be able to adjust and survive in almost any environment system, including sea water for short periods of time. This to a large extent explains their success in their spreading in Australia. Cane toads are found in environments ranging from sand dunes and coastal heath to the margins of rainforest and mangroves. They are most abundant in open clearings in urban areas, and in grassland and woodland.

E Cane toads eat almost anything they can swallow, including pet food, carrion and household scraps, but most of their food consists of living insects. Beetles, honey bees, ants, winged termites, crickets and bugs are eaten in abundance. Marine snails, smaller toads and native frogs, small snakes, and small mammals are occasionally eaten by cane toads. The tadpoles of cane toads eat algae and other aquatic plants which they rasp off with five rows of tiny peg-like teeth. They also filter organic matter from the water. Large tadpoles sometimes eat cane toad eggs.

F Cane toads were introduced to Australia to eat French's Cane Beetle and the Greyback Cane Beetle. The whitegrub larvae of these beetles eat the roots of sugar cane and kill or stunt the plants. The Australian Bureau of Sugar Experimental Stations imported about a hundred toads from Hawaii to the Meringa Experimental Station near Cairns. The toads bred quickly and more than three thousand were released in the sugar cane plantations of north Queensland in July 1935. At that time, some naturalists and scientists warned of the dangers of liberating cane toads in Australia. Their protests resulted in a brief moratorium on the release of toads, but releases resumed in 1936. The protestors were right. Firstly, cane toads compete for the resources of native animals, like food, which affects native populations. Secondly, cane toads don't have as many established predators as native animals and so their population grows quickly. Finally, some native animals who would normally feed on frogs try to eat toads and get poisoned.

G All stages of the cane toad's life-cycle are poisonous. No humans have died in Australia from cane toad poison, but overseas, people have died after eating toads and even soup made from boiled toad eggs. Cane toads are also poisonous to pets. In Hawaii, up to fifty dogs a year have died after having cane toads in their mouths. Signs of dogs being poisoned through ingestion include profuse salivation, twitching, vomiting, shallow breathing, and collapse of the hind limbs. Death may occur by cardiac arrest within fifteen minutes. A cane toad responds to threat by turning side-on so its parotoid glands are directed towards the attacker. The poison usually oozes out of the glands, but toads can squirt a fine spray for a short distance if they want. The poison is absorbed through mucous membranes such as eyes, mouth and nose, and in humans may cause intense pain, temporary blindness and inflammation.

1
Paragraph B
- i. Diet
- ii. Habitat
- iii. Pollution Effects
- iv. Danger
- v. Arrival In Australia
- vi. Food for Snakes
- vii. Identification
- viii. Captivity
- ix. Distribution
- x. Environmental Impacts
2
Paragraph C
3
Paragraph D
4
Paragraph E
5
Paragraph F
6
Paragraph G
7
Male cane toads grow protuberances during mating periods. Which paragraph?
8
The cane toad's unique way of laying eggs in Australia. Which paragraph?
9
Opposition to the introduction of cane toads in Australia. Which paragraph?
10
The danger of eating cane toad eggs. Which paragraph?
11
When suspended, the eggs of the cane toad resemble _______.
- flowers. flowers
- hearing. hearing
- hair. hair
- walking. walking
- leaves. leaves
- roots. roots
- smelling. smelling
- tadpoles. tadpoles
- stalks. stalks
- rope. rope
- seeds. seeds
- sleeping. sleeping
12
Cane toads were introduced into Australia in order to stop beetle young eating sugar cane _______.
13
The text says that dogs affected by cane toad poisoning may have problems with _______.

Reading Passage 2: Coastal Archaeology of Britain

The recognition of the wealth and diversity of England’s coastal archaeology has been one of the most important developments of recent years. Some elements of this enormous resource have long been known. The so-called ‘submerged forests’ off the coasts of England, sometimes with clear evidence of human activity, had attracted the interest of antiquarians since at least the eighteenth century, but serious and systematic attention has been given to the archaeological potential of the coast only since the early 1980s.

It is possible to trace a variety of causes for this concentration of effort and interest. In the 1980s and 1990s, scientific researches into climate change and its environmental impact spilled over into a much broader public debate as awareness of these issues grew; the prospect of rising sea levels over the next century, and their impact on our current coastal environments, have been a particular focus for concern. At the same time archaeologists were beginning to recognise that the destruction caused by natural processes of coastal erosion and by human activity was having an increasing impact on the archaeological resource of the coast.

The dominant process affecting the physical form of England in the post-glacial period has been the rise in the altitude of sea level relative to the land, as the glaciers melted and the landmass readjusted. The encroachment of the sea, the loss of huge areas of land now under the North Sea and the English Channel, and especially the loss of the land bridge between England and France which finally made Britain an island, must have been immensely significant factors in the lives of our prehistoric ancestors. Yet the way in which prehistoric communities adjusted to these environmental changes has seldom been a major theme in discussions of the period. One factor contributing to this has been that, although the rise in relative sea level is comparatively well documented, we know little about the constant reconfiguration of the coastline. This was affected by many processes, mostly quite localised, which have not yet been adequately researched. The detailed reconstruction of coastline histories and the changing environments available for human use will be an important theme for future research.

So great has been the rise in sea level and the consequent regression of the coast that much of the archaeological evidence now exposed in the coastal zone, whether being eroded or exposed as a buried land surface, is derived from what was originally terrestrial occupation. Its current location in the coastal zone is the product of later unrelated processes, and it can tell us little about past adaptation to the sea. Estimates of its significance will need to be made in the context of other related evidence from dry land sites. Nevertheless, its physical environment means that preservation is often excellent, for example in the case of the Neolithic structure excavated at the Stumble in Essex.

In some cases these buried land surfaces do contain evidence for human exploitation of what was a coastal environment, and elsewhere along the modern coast there is similar evidence. Where the evidence does relate to past human exploitation of the resources and the opportunities offered by the sea and the coast, it is both diverse and as yet little understood. We are not yet in a position to make even preliminary estimates of answers to such fundamental questions as the extent to which the sea and the coast affected human life in the past, what percentage of the population at any time lived within reach of the sea, or whether human settlements in coastal environments showed a distinct character from those inland.

The most striking evidence for use of the sea is in the form of boats, yet we still have much to learn about their production and use. Most of the known wrecks around our coast are not unexpectedly of post-medieval date, and offer an unparalleled opportunity for research which has as yet been little used. The prehistoric sewn-plank boats such as those from the Humber estuary and Dover all seem to belong to the second millennium BC; after this there is a gap in the record of a millennium, which cannot yet be explained, before boats reappeared, but built using a very different technology. Boatbuilding must have been an extremely important activity around much of our coast, yet we know almost nothing about it. Boats were some of the most complex artefacts produced by premodern societies, and further researches on their production and use make an important contribution to our understanding of past attitudes to technology and technological change.

Boats needed landing places, yet here again our knowledge is very patchy. In many cases the natural shores and beaches would have sufficed, leaving little or no archaeological trace, but especially in later periods, many ports and harbours, as well as smaller facilities such as quays, wharves, and jetties, were built. Despite a growth of interest in the waterfront archaeology of some of our more important Roman and medieval towns, very little attention has been paid to the multitude of smaller landing places. Redevelopment of harbour sites and other development and natural pressures along the coast are subjecting these important locations to unprecedented threats, yet few surveys of such sites have been undertaken.

One of the most important revelations of recent researches has been the extent of industrial activities along the coast. Fishing and salt production are among the better documented activities, but even here our knowledge is patchy. Many forms of fishing will leave little archaeological trace, and one of the surprises of recent surveys has been the extent of past investment in facilities for procuring fish and shellfish. Elaborate wooden fish weirs, often of considerable extent and responsive to aerial photography in shallow water, have been identified in areas such as Essex and the Severn estuary. The production of salt, especially in the late Iron Age and early Roman periods, has been recognised for some time, especially in the Thames estuary and around the Solent and Poole Harbour, but the reasons for the decline of that industry and the nature of later coastal salt working are much less well understood. Other industries were also located along the coast, either because the raw materials outcropped there or for ease of working and transport: mineral resources such as sand, gravel, stone, coal, ironstone, and alum were all exploited. These industries are poorly documented, but their remains are sometimes extensive and striking.

Some appreciation of the variety and importance of the archaeological remains preserved in the coastal zone, albeit only in preliminary form, can thus be gained from recent work, but the complexity of the problem of managing that resource is also being realised. The problem arises not only from the scale and variety of the archaeological remains, but also from two other sources: the very varied natural and human threats to the resource, and the complex web of organisations with authority over, or interests in, the coastal zone. Human threats include the redevelopment of historic towns and old dockland areas, and the increased importance of the coast for the leisure and tourism industries, resulting in pressure for the increased provision of facilities such as marinas. The larger size of ferries has also caused an increase in the damage caused by their wash to fragile deposits in the intertidal zone. The most significant natural threat is the predicted rise in sea level over the next century, especially in the south and east of England. Its impact on archaeology is not easy to predict, and though it is likely to be highly localised, it will be at a scale much larger than that of most archaeological sites. Thus protecting one site may simply result in transposing the threat to a point further along the coast. The management of the archaeological remains will have to be considered in a much longer time scale and a much wider geographical scale than is common in the case of dry land sites, and this will pose a serious challenge for archaeologists.

14
What has caused public interest in coastal archaeology in recent years?
- A. The rapid development of England’s coastal archaeology
- B. The rising awareness of climate change
- C. The discovery of an underwater forest
- D. The systematic research conducted on coastal archaeological findings
15
What does the passage say about the evidence of boats?
- A. There’s enough knowledge of the boatbuilding technology of the prehistoric people.
- B. Many of the boats discovered were found in harbours.
- C. The use of boats had not been recorded for a thousand years.
- D. Boats were first used for fishing.
16
What can be discovered from the air?
- A. Salt mines
- B. Roman towns
- C. Harbours
- D. Fisheries
17
England lost much of its land after the Ice Age due to the rising sea level.
18
The coastline of England has changed periodically.
19
Coastal archaeological evidence may be well-protected by sea water.
20
The design of boats used by pre-modern people was very simple.
21
Similar boats were also discovered in many other European countries.
22
There are few documents relating to mineral exploitation.
23
Large passenger boats are causing increasing damage to the seashore.
24
Which THREE of the following statements are mentioned in the passage?
- A. How coastal archaeology was originally discovered.
- B. It is difficult to understand how many people lived close to the sea.
- C. How much the prehistoric communities understand the climate change.
- D. Our knowledge of boat evidence is limited.
- E. Some fishing grounds were converted to ports.
- F. Human development threatens the archaeological remains.
- G. Coastal archaeology will become more important in the future.

Reading Passage 3: When people are ‘deaf’ to music

Music has long been considered a uniquely human concept. In fact, most psychologists agree that music is a universal human instinct. Like any ability, however, there is great variation in people’s musical competence. For every brilliant pianist in the world, there are several people we refer to as ‘tone deaf’. It is not simply that people with tone deafness (or ‘amusia’) are unable to sing in tune, they are also unable to discriminate between tones or recognize familiar melodies. Such a ‘disorder’ can occur after some sort of brain damage, but recently research has been undertaken in an attempt to discover the cause of congenital amusia (when people are born with the condition), which is not associated with any brain damage, hearing problems, or lack of exposure to music.

According to the research of Dr. Isabelle Peretz of the University of Montreal, amusia is more complicated than the inability to distinguish pitches. An amusic (a person who has the condition of amusia) can distinguish between two pitches that are far apart, but cannot tell the difference between intervals smaller than a half step on the Western diatonic scale, while most people can easily distinguish differences smaller than that. When listening to melodies which have had a single note altered so that it is out of key with the rest of the melody, they do not notice a problem. As would be expected, amusics perform significantly worse at singing and tapping a rhythm along with a melody than do non-amusics. The most fascinating aspect of amusia is how specific to music it is. Because of music’s close ties to language, it might be expected that a musical impairment may be caused by a language impairment. Studies suggest, however, that language and music ability are independent of one another. People with brain damage in areas critical to language are often still able to sing, despite being unable to communicate through speech. Moreover, while amusics show deficiencies in their recognition of pitch differences in melodies, they show no such deficiencies in tonal languages. Amusics who speak tonal languages, such as Chinese, do not report having any difficulty discriminating between words that differ only in their intonation. The linguistic cues inherent in speech make discrimination of meaning much easier for amusics. Amusics are also successful most of the time at detecting the mood of a melody, can identify a speaker based on his or her voice and can discriminate and identify environmental sounds.

Recent work has been focused on locating the part of the brain that is responsible for amusia. The temporal lobes of the brain, the location of the primary auditory cortex, have been considered. It has long been believed that the temporal lobes, especially the right temporal lobe, are most active when engaged in musical activity, so any musical disability should logically stem from here as well. Because it has been shown that there is no hearing deficit in amusia, researchers moved on to the temporal neocortex, which is where more sophisticated processing of musical cues was thought to take place. New studies, however, have suggested that the deficits in amusics are located outside the auditory cortex. Brain scans of amusics do not show any reaction at all to differences smaller than a half step. When changes in tones are large, their brains overreact, showing twice as much activity on the right side of the brain as a normal brain hearing the same thing. These differences do not occur in the auditory cortex, indicating again that the deficits of amusia lie not in hearing impairment, but in higher processing of melodies.

So what does this all mean? Looking only at the research of Peretz in the field of neuropsychology of music, it would appear that amusia is some sort of disorder. As a student of neurobiology, however, I am skeptical. Certainly the studies by Peretz that have found significant differences between the brains of so-called amusics and normal brains are legitimate. The more important question now becomes one of normality. Every trait from skin color to intelligence to mood exists on a continuum—there is a great deal of variation from one extreme to the other. Just because we recognize that basic musical ability is something that the vast majority of people have, this doesn’t mean that the lack of it is abnormal. What makes an amusic worse off than a musical prodigy? Musical ability is culturally valued, and may have been a factor in survival at one point in human history, but it does not seem likely that it is being selected for on an evolutionary scale any longer. Darwin believed that music was adaptive as a way of finding a mate, but who needs to be able to sing to find a partner in an age when it is possible to express your emotions through a song on your iPod? While the idea of amusia is interesting, it seems to be just one end of the continuum of innate musical ability. Comparing this ‘disorder’ to learning disorders like a specific language impairment seems to be going too far. Before amusia can be declared a disability, further research must be done to determine whether lack of musical ability is actually detrimental in any way. If no disadvantages can be found of having amusia, then it is no more a disability than having poor fashion sense or bad handwriting.

25
27 What does the writer tell us about people with tone deafness (amusia) in the first paragraph?
- A. They usually have hearing problems
- B. Some can play a musical instrument very well
- C. Some may be able to sing well-known melodies
- D. They have several inabilities in regard to music
26
28 What is the writer doing in the second paragraph?
- A. outlining some of the factors that cause amusia
- B. summarising some findings about people with amusia
- C. suggesting that people with amusia are disadvantaged
- D. comparing the singing ability of amusics with their sense
27
29 What does the writer say about the relationship between language ability and musical ability?
- A. People who are unable to speak can sometimes sing
- B. People with amusia usually have language problems too
- C. Speakers of tonal languages like Chinese rarely have amusia
- D. People with amusia have difficulty recognizing people by their voices
28
30 In the third paragraph, the writer notes that most amusics are able to
- A. learn how to sing in tune
- B. identify a song by its tune
- C. distinguish a sad tone from a happy tune
- D. recognise when a singer is not singing in tune
29
31 What is the writer doing in the fourth paragraph?
- A. claiming that amusics have problems in the auditory cortex
- B. outlining progress in understanding the brains of amusics
- C. proving that amusia is located in the temporal lobes
- D. explaining why studies of hearing are difficult
30
32 Peretz’s research suggesting that amusia is a disorder is convincing.
31
33 People with musical ability are happier than those without this ability.
32
34 It is inappropriate to consider amusia as a real disorder.
33
35 People with amusia often have bad handwriting.
34
36 The reason why some people are born with amusia is
- A. an inability to hear when spoken language rises and falls.
- B. considered to be desirable.
- C. an inability to follow the beat of music.
- D. not a problem.
- E. not yet well understood.
- F. a result of injury to the mother.
- G. more marked than with other people.
- H. associated with intelligence.
35
37 One of the difficulties amusics experience is
36
38 For amusics, discrimination of meaning in speech is
37
39 Certain reactions in the brain of an amusic are
38
40 In most cultures, musical ability is

答题卡

边做边填 — 即时本地判分，所有错题自动记录到错题本，并附带对应讲解。

数据保存在本设备 — 无需账号。如需同步进度，请在进度页登录。

显示答案

1. vii
Paragraph B is about how to identify cane toads, mentioning features like size, color, and the protuberances males grow during mating. This matches option vii (Identification).
2. ix
Paragraph C discusses where cane toads are found, mentioning their spread and locations in Australia, which fits option ix (Distribution).
3. ii
Paragraph D describes the types of places cane toads live, such as swamps and gardens, so option ii (Habitat) is correct.
4. i
Paragraph E talks about what cane toads eat, including insects and small animals, so option i (Diet) is the answer.
5. x
Paragraph F explains the environmental impact of cane toads, like their effect on native species, matching option x (Environmental Impacts).
6. iv
Paragraph G warns about the danger of eating cane toad eggs, which can be poisonous, so option iv (Danger) is correct.
7. B
Paragraph B mentions that male cane toads grow protuberances during mating, so this is the correct paragraph.
8. B
Paragraph B describes the cane toad's unique way of laying eggs in Australia, so this is the right paragraph.
9. F
Paragraph F talks about people who opposed bringing cane toads to Australia, so this is the correct paragraph.
10. G
Paragraph G explains that eating cane toad eggs is dangerous because they are poisonous, so this is the right paragraph.
11. rope
The passage says that when suspended, cane toad eggs look like 'rope,' so 'rope' is the correct answer. 'Hair' is tempting but the passage does not mention it.
12. roots
The passage states that cane toads were introduced to stop beetle young from eating sugar cane roots, so 'roots' is correct.
13. walking
The passage says that dogs poisoned by cane toads may have trouble walking, so 'walking' is the answer.
14. B
The passage says public interest in coastal archaeology has grown because of rising awareness of climate change, so B is correct. A is tempting but the passage focuses on climate change.
15. C
The passage says there was no record of boats for a thousand years, so C is correct. A is wrong because knowledge is limited, not enough.
16. D
The passage says fisheries can be discovered from the air, so D is correct. The other options are not mentioned as being found this way.
17. TRUE
The passage says England lost land after the Ice Age because the sea level rose, so this statement is TRUE.
18. FALSE
The passage says the coastline has changed constantly, not just periodically, so this statement is FALSE.
19. TRUE
The passage explains that sea water can protect archaeological evidence, so this statement is TRUE.
20. FALSE
The passage says the design of pre-modern boats was not simple, so this statement is FALSE.
21. NOT GIVEN
The passage does not say if similar boats were found in other European countries, so the answer is NOT GIVEN.
22. TRUE
The passage says there are few documents about mineral exploitation, so this statement is TRUE.
23. TRUE
The passage says large passenger boats are causing more damage to the seashore, so this statement is TRUE.
24. B / D / F
B is mentioned as it is hard to know how many people lived near the sea; D is mentioned as knowledge of boat evidence is limited; F is mentioned as human development threatens remains. The other options are not clearly stated.
25. D
The passage says people with amusia have several inabilities with music, so D is correct. B and C are tempting but not supported.
26. B
The second paragraph summarizes findings about people with amusia, so B is correct.
27. A
The passage says people who cannot speak can sometimes sing, so A is correct. C is tempting but not stated.
28. C
The passage notes most amusics can tell a sad tune from a happy one, so C is correct.
29. B
The fourth paragraph outlines progress in understanding the brains of amusics, so B is correct.
30. NO
The passage says Peretz’s research is not convincing, so the answer is NO.
31. NOT GIVEN
The passage does not compare happiness of people with or without musical ability, so the answer is NOT GIVEN.
32. YES
The passage says it is inappropriate to call amusia a real disorder, so the answer is YES.
33. NOT GIVEN
The passage does not mention handwriting of people with amusia, so the answer is NOT GIVEN.
34. E
The passage says the reason some people are born with amusia is not yet well understood, so E is correct.
35. C
The passage says one difficulty for amusics is following the beat of music, so C is correct.
36. D
The passage says for amusics, discrimination of meaning in speech is not a problem, so D is correct.
37. G
The passage says certain reactions in the brain of an amusic are more marked than with other people, so G is correct.
38. B
The passage says in most cultures, musical ability is considered to be desirable, so B is correct.

想要完整的限时体验？试试免费的完整模拟考试——真实考生回忆的考题，真实机考界面。

开始模拟考试 →